Steps needed to improve the accountability and effectiveness of Californias Alcohol and Drug Treatme - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 17
About This Presentation
Title:

Steps needed to improve the accountability and effectiveness of Californias Alcohol and Drug Treatme

Description:

... and effectiveness of California's Alcohol and Drug Treatment System: ... enter treatment in California's system do reduce their drug/alcohol use, reduce ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:53
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: etes9
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Steps needed to improve the accountability and effectiveness of Californias Alcohol and Drug Treatme


1
Steps needed to improve the accountability and
effectiveness of Californias Alcohol and Drug
Treatment System California Outcome
Measurement System for Treatment
(CalOMS)Increased implementation of
science-supported interventionsImproved
educational/professional standards for
Californias AOD workforce
  • Richard Rawson, Ph.D., Professor
  • UCLA Integrated Substance Abuse Programs
  • David Geffen School of Medicine
  • www.uclaisap.org

2
Californias AOD Publicly Funded Treatment
System Facts and Figures
  • Every year 200,000 individuals over the age of
    18 are admitted for treatment into Californias
    publicly funded treatment system.
  • The California system is made up of a
    heterogeneous collection of 1200-1500 treatment
    programs.
  • The annual budget for this treatment is
    approximately 500,000,000.

3
Californias AOD Publicly Funded Treatment
System What does it deliver?
  • Treatment programs are diverse and highly
    variable in the setting as well as the type,
    amount and quality (??) of services provided.
  • Settings include
  • Hospital-based medically supervised
    detoxification services
  • Residential services, in which therapies
    (counseling and medications) are integrated into
    the 24 hour facility operations.
  • Residential services, which consist of minimal
    services other than sober housing
  • Outpatient psychosocial care (eg. counseling)
    without medications
  • Outpatient care with medication focus (eg.
    Narcotic Replacement Therapy).
  • Most widely used

4
Californias AOD Publicly Funded Treatment
System What does it deliver?
  • Services include
  • Assessment Services (with and without a
    standardized methodology)
  • Medications (eg methadone, buprenorphine).
  • Individual and Group counseling of an undefined
    nature.
  • Behavioral and psychosocial therapies with
    scientific support (eg. Cognitive Behavioral
    Therapy, Contingency Management, 12 Step
    Facilitation Therapy, Motivational Interviewing,
    Matrix Model).
  • Specialty services (eg Womens focused therapies,
    employment counseling, medical and psychiatric
    services
  • Case management, referral services,
    transportation, educational services, child care
    services.
  • Most widely used

5
Californias AOD Publicly Funded Treatment
System Does Treatment Work?
  • Yes Without Question
  • Data from the California Admission and Discharge
    Data System (CADDS) documented over the past
    decade that, in general, individuals who enter
    treatment in Californias system do reduce their
    drug/alcohol use, reduce crime and make
    improvements in their lives.
  • Specific studies of selected samples of
    individuals treated in the California Treatment
    system make very substantial improvements and the
    treatment saves taxpayer money (eg Caldata,
    CalTopps, SACPA Evaluation).

6
Californias AOD Publicly Funded Treatment
System Unanswered Questions
  • Which treatment settings work best for which
    patients?
  • How much treatment is enough?
  • How much of the treatment used is based on sound
    scientific evidence?
  • Do some California counties deliver better care
    than others?
  • Is treatment accessible to individuals who need
    it?
  • Is California investment in AOD treatment
    producing maximal benefits?
  • Is treatment in California improving or becoming
    less effective?
  • Do we use effective treatment practices for
    different types of AOD disorders (eg heroin,
    methamphetamine, alcohol, etc)?
  • Do we use effective treatment practices for
    different types of clients (women, different
    ethnic groups, homeless people, people with AIDs,
    etc)?
  • Do some treatment programs in California work
    better than others?
  • CorollaryAre some programs better investments
    than others?

7
Californias AOD Publicly Funded Treatment
System An Unpleasant Reality
  • Currently, if an addicted individual or their
    family member desire to identify a specific
    treatment program in California that provides the
    most effective and appropriate care for their (or
    their loved ones) specific AOD problem, there is
    no objective means for them to be directed to a
    program or programs which are best suited to meet
    their needs.
  • Individuals are referred to treatment based upon
    rumor, unsupported marketing material, personal
    experience, geographic proximity, etc.
  • There are no publicly available data on the
    treatment outcomes for a specific program (as
    there are for hospitals) or on the
    quality/credentials of the people delivering care
    within a specific program (as there are for
    schools, colleges, universities) or on the array
    of services provided by the program (as there are
    for hotels) or on the satisfaction of the client
    customers (as there are for restaurants).
  • There is no Consumers Guide to the California
    AOD treatment system

8
California Outcome Measurement System for
Treatment (CalOMS)
  • A major advancement in developing the capability
    to answer the questions posed above is the
    implementation of the California Outcomes
    Monitoring System for Treatment (CalOMS).
  • CalOMS is a data collection system developed by
    the Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs (ADP)
    and implemented in Jan 2006.
  • With CalOMS, a standardized set of information is
    collected on every adult admitted into
    Californias publicly funded AOD treatment system
    at the time they are admitted to treatment,
    transferred to a different level of treatment, at
    365 days after admission (for those remaining in
    treatment for one year) and at discharge from
    treatment.

9
California Outcome Measurement System for
Treatment (CalOMS) What does it measure?
  • CalOMs data includes information on
  • drug and alcohol use,
  • employment and educational activities,
  • medical conditions,
  • psychiatric symptoms,
  • family functioning,
  • criminal activity and involvement with the
    criminal justice system.
  • CalOMs also captures the length of time
    individuals remain in treatment, the proportion
    who complete episodes of care and the proportion
    who successfully transfer to other levels of
    care.

10
California Outcome Measurement System for
Treatment (CalOMS) How will it improve
treatment system accountability?
  • CalOMS will produce data that will allow
    California ADP and County Administrators to
    assess the functioning of specific treatment
    programs.
  • Impact of treatment on client functioning from
    admission to discharge can be objectively
    measured (eg. reduction in drug use days) (ie.
    program outcomes).
  • Degree to which the clients in a particular
    program meet specific benchmarks (eg retention in
    treatment) (ie. program performance).
  • Because the information collected on all clients,
    in all programs, in all counties is the same,
    programs can be evaluated with the same yard
    stick.

11
California Outcome Measurement System for
Treatment (CalOMS) How will it improve
treatment accountability?
  • CalOMs allows California to meet federal
    requirements for participation in the National
    Outcomes Monitoring System (NOMS).
  • By linking CalOMS data to other California data
    systems, the fiscal benefits produced by
    treatment from reductions in other taxpayer
    domains (eg. crime, incarceration, welfare costs,
    etc).
  • As CalOMs evolves and collects more information
    on the exact therapies/medications used and the
    amount of these services delivered, a better
    understanding on the best match of client with
    treatment type and amount can be obtained.

12
California Outcome Measurement System for
Treatment (CalOMS) How will it improve
treatment accountability?
  • It will allow ADP and County Administrators to
    identify programs that are performing the best
    and whose clients have the best outcomes.
  • This will allow for Counties to implement
    performance-based contracting (if desired).
  • It will allow ADP and Counties to target
    technical assistance to poorly performing
    programs and reward exceptional programs.
  • In extreme situations where programs continue to
    perform below established standards, it will
    provide information needed to discontinue funding
    for subpar programs

13
California Outcome Measurement System for
Treatment (CalOMS) Recommendations
  • The systematic measurement of California
    treatment programs has begun with the
    implementation of CalOMS. The potential value of
    this system to improve Californias AOD treatment
    system is great. However, to fulfill its
    promise, there will need to be
  • Ongoing evaluation, improvement and systematic
    application of the CalOMS information.
  • Input and involvement from California and
    national treatment experts to ADP to ensure
    appropriate and optimal applications.
  • Expanded efforts to link CalOMS data with other
    data sets to measure full impact of AOD treatment
  • Addition of youth treatment programs to CalOMS
    data system.
  • Increase linkage between CalOMS findings and
    training, service improvement and workforce
    development efforts.

14
Other AOD System Improvement Issues Increased
Application of Science-supported Interventions
  • Maximize the application of and training for
    treatment methods with clear scientific support.
  • Engagement and Retention strategies (NIATx).
  • Trauma-informed treatments
  • Empirically supported treatments for stimulant
    dependence (methamphetamine and cocaine).
  • Increase application of opiate addiction
    medications (methadone and buprenorphine) and
    medications for alcohol dependence treatment.
  • Implement methadone and buprenorphine for opiate
    addiction within and following incarceration in
    prisons and jails.

15
Other AOD System Improvement Issues Increased
Application of Science-supported Interventions
  • To ensure continued improvement of the AOS
    system, create an ongoing AOD system improvement
    committee to ensure the proper integration of
    data, identification of most appropriate
    treatment methods and training to ensure the
    development of most effective treatment
    approaches.
  • Involve leading clinical researchers, clinical
    leaders, educators, treatment providers, county
    administrators and other stakeholders (eg.
    criminal justice).

16
Other AOD System Improvement Issues Improved
Educational/Professional Standards for
Californias AOD Workforce
  • Educational requirements and certification
    standards for service delivery personnel in the
    California treatment system should be sufficient
    to ensure application of treatments with best
    clinical effectiveness.
  • Ensure that the California Substance Abuse
    Counselor Certification program curricula promote
    skill development and competence with science
    supported interventions.
  • Use the aforementioned AOD system improvement
    committee to provide input and guidance for
    certification and educational system improvements

17
Thank yourrawson_at_mednet.ucla.eduwww.uclaisap.or
g
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com