Back to Basics Selection Tools for Beef Cattle Improvement - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Back to Basics Selection Tools for Beef Cattle Improvement

Description:

Pregnancy check results. Calving data. Birth weight (within 24 hr of birth; scales) Calf sex ... Age in Days Calculator. Age in Days Calculator. How are your ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:162
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 48
Provided by: nationalan
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Back to Basics Selection Tools for Beef Cattle Improvement


1
(No Transcript)
2
Back to BasicsSelection Tools for Beef Cattle
Improvement
AMERICAN ANGUS ASSOCIATION
  • Sally L. Northcutt
  • Genetic Research Director
  • American Angus Association

3
The evolution of livestock measurement
AVERAGE DAILY GAIN
4
Beef Improvement Records
9,112 herds
329,167 weaning wts
15 million pedigrees
14 million measures
Fiscal 2005
5
The Performance Life of an Angus Calf
  • Breeding records
  • Cow disposal information
  • Pregnancy check results
  • Calving data

6
The Performance Life of an Angus Calf
  • Birth weight (within 24 hr of birth scales)
  • Calf sex
  • Calving score (1 to 5)
  • 1 unassisted 4 C-section
  • 2 some assistance 5 Abnormal presentation
  • 3 mechanical
  • Birth type (single, twin)
  • Weaning weight, creep or no creep (120-280)
  • Mature cow size data ( 45 days of weaning wt)
  • Cow body condition score (1 to 9)
  • Cow weight height

7
The Performance Life of an Angus Calf
  • Yearling weight, hip height (320-440 days of age)
  • Scrotal circumference (320-440)
  • Temperament (320-440 1 to 6 scale)
  • Ultrasound data (bulls 320-440 heifers 320-460)
  • Carcass progeny data

8
Age in Days Calculator
9
Age in Days Calculator
10
How are your weight and measures used?
  • AHIR summary reports
  • Adjusted measures
  • Ratios
  • EPDs
  • Adjusted measures are used, not the Ratios.
  • Contemporary group definition by the breeder is
    critical.

11
Contemporary Groups
A group of cattle of the same breed, of the same
sex, born in the same season, at the same
location, managed alike from birth to the time of
measurement.
  • Proper contemporary grouping eliminates
    environmental effects.
  • Differences expressed between cattle are then
    genetic.

12
ALL CONTEMPORARY GROUPS ARE NOT EQUAL
13
What Splits Calves into Contemporary Groups?
  • Management codes (creep vs. noncreep)
  • Group codes
  • Weaning weigh dates more than three days apart
  • Location codes
  • Registered vs. commercial dams
  • Natural vs. embryo transfer (ET) calves,
    registered Angus vs. other recipients

14
What Splits Calves into Contemporary Groups?
  • Submitting data on calves from the same
    contemporary group on different days.

Process Date Lot ID Bulls 10/21/04 1 2 07/23/04
1 1 06/14/04 3 3 05/17/04 1 4 05/13/04 4 2
04/21/04 1 1 04/19/04 3 1 10/13/03 4 7
Process Date Lot ID Bulls 10/13/03 4 21
Weigh date and management codes were the same.
15
American Angus Association 2006
...Decision Making Tools...
16
How are EPDs Calculated?
17
EPDs
Pedigree
Progeny
Individual
18
Traits That We Measure
Heritability Estimates
  • Reproduction (low) lt .20
  • Growth (moderate) .20 - .40
  • Carcass (high) gt .40

19
Expected Progeny Difference
  • EPD is the expected difference in future progeny
    performance of one individual relative to another
    individual(s).
  • EPDs can be used to compare all cattle within a
    breed.

20
HOW DO WE USE EPDs?PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
What is the current level of herd
performance? What direction (if any) does the
herd need to move?
21
Producer Questions
Birth weight EPD - Example
BULL A BULL B
BW EPD, lb 0 6
  • The Expected Difference in the Progeny of Bull A
    and Bull B is 6 lb.

But what will my calves weigh?
EPDs Do Not Predict Actual Performance
22
Where do these EPDs come from?
6 pounds
Expected Difference In EPDs For Two Bulls
23
Expected Progeny Difference (Bull A vs. B)
Breed EPD, lb Averagea Bull A Bull B Diff
BW EPD 2.3 5 0 5 WW EPD 40 45 30 15 YW
EPD 74 75 55 20 MILK 20 17 27 -10
a Non-parent Angus Bulls
24
Capturing Value Through Genetics
  • Calving Ease
  • Cow Size/Milk
  • Growth/Efficiency
  • Carcass Merit

Very rarely is an effective breeding program
based solely on a single trait.
25
Heifer Calving Ease
  • Use as a tool in choosing sires mated to
    first-calf heifers.
  • Increase the chance of easier calving.
  • Higher EPDs are more favorable.

26
Producer Resources Breed Averages
www.angus.org
27
Producer Resources Percentile Rank
28
Producer Resources Possible Change
29
National Cattle Evaluation (NCE)
New Data Submitted
AAA DATABASE
  • Interim EPDs ( I 25)
  • Uses Animal Record, or
  • Pedigree estimate

30
Missing EPDs
Calf EPDs
  • Calf has no individual wt
  • The Dam has Interim EPDs
  • Cannot take Interims from Interims

The calf needed a weight or measure submitted
from a proper contemporary group
31
...Decision Making Tools...
Solutions for Commercial Bull Buyers
  • Bridges for the Information Gap
  • Selection Tools, Commercial Programs, Data
    Management

32
Outputs create Revenue
Inputs generate Expense
33
What are Indexes?
INDEX -- A combination and weighting of multiple
traits and their relative economic impact into
one value that can be used to rank animals.
  • Challenging to Develop
  • Simplistic to Use
  • Directional Change in Multiple Traits

34
AMERICAN ANGUS ASSOCIATION
Value Indexes
Weaned Calf W
Postweaning F G B
QG, YG
Cow Energy EN
35
Weaned Calf Index (W)
36
Cow Energy Value (EN)
Energy Savings
37
Using W and EN Consider Feed Resources
38
(No Transcript)
39
Key Components
Feedlot Value (F)
  • WW and YW EPDs and their relationship
  • Projected ADG
  • Value
  • Costs
  • Feed Consumption and Cost Differences

40
(No Transcript)
41
Carcass Evaluation
? Initiated 1974
? 83,331 progeny records
? 6,330 sires
Fall 2006
42
Ultrasound Evaluation
? Initiated 1998
? 630,794 Records
Fall 2006 NCE
? 53,950 Sires
? 1,074,546 EPDs
Fall 2006
43
Key Components
Grid Value (G)
  • End Product
  • Carcass EPDs
  • Ultrasound EPDs
  • Quality Grade
  • Yield Grade

American Angus Association 2005
44
Feedlot Value (F)
Grid Value (G)
Beef Value (B)
per head difference
American Angus Association 2005
45
EPD/Pedigree Lookup Details
46
Values
Wean W Feedlot F Grid G Quality QG Yield
YG Beef B
EN
SM
American Angus Association 2005
47
Back to BasicsSelection Tools for Beef Cattle
Improvement
AMERICAN ANGUS ASSOCIATION
  • Sally L. Northcutt
  • Genetic Research Director
  • American Angus Association
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com