Status, conformity, and obedience - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

Status, conformity, and obedience

Description:

What happens to people who do not comply to norms? ... Supermodels. Sports stars. Aristocrats. The Chicken dilemma: A model of status? ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:83
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: mvv
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Status, conformity, and obedience


1
Status, conformity, and obedience
  • Session 4, SP603/844

2
Questions
  • Why do most groups have status hierarchies?
  • What is the link between self-esteem and social
    status?
  • Why do groups have social norms in place and why
    do most people conform to them?
  • What happens to people who do not comply to
    norms?

3
  • Acknowledged expertise attracts, though perhaps
    only temporarily, what we may term a following of
    dependent persons. These persons will be welcomed
    as a principal source of prestige as a capital
    benefit of the hunters expertise. Nor is this
    expertise necessarily reduced or dissipated
    through having to share it with other persons
    attached to him (Paine, 1973)

4
Definitions
  • Status ones standing in a group
  • Dominance status achieved through an ability to
    threat and punish
  • Prestige status achieved through an ability to
    help (in valued domains) Henrich Gil-White
    (2001)
  • Power controlling someones outcomes

5
Evolution of status psychology
  • Status is a primary and universal human motive
    (Hogan Hogan, 1991)
  • In any group, individuals compete for status,
    because
  • Status is associated with reproductive resources
  • particularly for males high status males make
    more attractive mates and coalition partners
    women prefer high status men (Buss, 1999)
  • Everyone aspires to high status and wants to
    avoid low status (see DeBottons book in which he
    describes a phenomenon called status anxiety
    (keeping up with the Jones)
  • In humans, status is granted largely to
    individuals who benefit others/the group through
    their actions prestige
  • Prestige is based on ability to help and it
    differs from dominance (ability to hurt) see
    Henrich Gil-White, 2001 Pinker, 1994
  • See Heinrich Gil-Whites paper on how prestige
    is awarded to individuals (infocopying as
    mechanism)
  • Status is a costly signal some handicaps may
    give you status and a good reputation (Van Vugt,
    Roberts, Hardy, 2006 Zahavi Zahavi, 1977)
    cf. competitive altruism

6
Evolution of prestige
  • Prestige processes emerge from social learning
  • Social learning (cultural transmission) saves
    costs of individual learning
  • Natural selection favours learning and
    identifying from models that possess
    better-than-average information
  • Selection favours strategies to provide benefits
    to models (via deference) to induce preferred
    models to gain greater access and cooperation

7
Exercise
  • Use this prestige model to explain why the
    folllowing people are prestigious, and how we
    defer to them
  • Scientists
  • Musicians
  • Supermodels
  • Sports stars
  • Aristocrats

8
The Chicken dilemma A model of status?
The lower left and upper right cells are
equilibria
9
The lower left and upper right cells are
equilibria
10
Social Psychology of Status
  • Hogan Hogan (1991) Although status
    considerations are ubiquitous and consequential,
    psychologists have tended to avoid this topic
  • Yet, in any group, there are differences in
    status and influence between members noticeable
    over time
  • Expectation states theory (Berger, 1972) assumes
    that status depends upon ones specific (e.g.,
    athletic ability), and diffuse task
    characteristics (e.g., sex, age) i.e.,
    abilities that could help group
  • Social exchange theory (Homans, 1961) assumes
    that status results from a reciprocal
    relationship between individual and group
    individual gives something to group, and, in
    return, gets status
  • Quite consistent with evolutionary prestige model

11
Correlations with status (Anderson et al., 2001)
  • zero-order
  • Extraversion .47
  • Agreeableness .12
  • Neuroticism -.31
  • Conscientiousness .23
  • Openness -.05
  • Physical attractiveness .39

12
  • What do you think are the professions with the
    highest status in British society today?
  • Could you give an evolutionary account of this?

13
A Theory of Dominance (Cummins, 1996)
  • Natural selection favours strategies that cause
    one to rise in dominance, and strategies to
    subvert the access of dominant individuals to
    resources (via deception, coalition formation)
  • Humans have evolved strategies for reasoning
    about social norms involving dominance
    hierarchies (obligations, prohibitions,
    permissions) cf. obedience norms
  • How did humans move away from dominance to status
    hierarchies this is a VERY important issue????
    Look at young children and one can see the change
    from dominance to status
  • There is not a clear theory as yet to explain
    this transition (Buss, 1999)

14
Ultimate Bargaining game
  • You have 10 (allocator)
  • Any amount of this 10 you can share with another
    person (recipient)
  • The recipient can either accept or reject this
    offer
  • If s/he rejects the offer, nobody gets anything!
  • Lets play!

15
(No Transcript)
16
(No Transcript)
17
Social Psychology of Norms
  • Consensual standards that regulate group members
    behaviours
  • Why do we need social norms?
  • Increases conformity
  • Reduces uncertainty
  • Why do groups need conformist and loyal people?
  • What is in it for the conforming individuals?
    They are good social learners (Simon, 1990)
    altruism as byproduct of docility
  • Types of social norms?
  • Descriptive norms (what most do) is this a norm?
  • Prescriptive norms (what people ought to do)
  • Cialdinis litter research
  • Think of norms in traffic situations distinguish
    between descriptive and prescriptive norms

18
The effect of prescriptive and descriptive norms
on littering (Reno, Cialdini, Kallgren, 1993)
19
Evolution of social norms
  • Norms as individual and/or group-level
    adaptations
  • Individuals in groups with norms have better
    survival and reproductive chances than in groups
    without norms is that so, please give example
  • Norms for fairness exist (who gets what?) but are
    they functional? see research on the Ultimate
    Bargaining Game (Fehr Fischbacher, 2003)
    offers range between 40/60 and 50/50
  • Why do people reject low offers???
  • Norms of reciprocity (Ill scratch your back,
    youll ride mine)
  • Norms of morality (what one ought do) see Krebs
    Janicki, 2002
  • Decency norms
  • Obedience norms
  • Solidarity norms
  • Find an example of each of these norms and
    explain why we have them

20
Evolution of social norms
  • Research presented by Dr. Rick OGorman
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com