The IDP crisis today and the protracted IDP situations in Africa - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

The IDP crisis today and the protracted IDP situations in Africa

Description:

Other situations include Cote d'Ivoire (700,000), Somalia (400,000) and Chad (150,000) ... frozen (Uganda, Chad, Cote d'Ivoire) or active (Democratic Republic ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:126
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: Dia138
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The IDP crisis today and the protracted IDP situations in Africa


1
The IDP crisis today and the protracted IDP
situations in Africa
  • Mahnirban Calcutta Research Group, India
  • 5 December 2007
  • Khassim Diagne, Senior Policy Advisor, UNHCR
    Geneva

2
Background
  • Current estimates by IDMC place the number of
    conflict related IDPs at 24.5 million in 2006.
    The bulk of it in Africa.
  • Countries with the highest number Sudan (5m),
    Uganda (1.7m) and DRC (1.1m). Other situations
    include Cote dIvoire (700,000), Somalia
    (400,000) and Chad (150,000)
  • West Africa. A new terminology is arising called
    climate change displacement. While majority of
    displacement is due to conflicts, increasingly
    displacement is due to natural disasters as
    recently seen with the floods in Uganda, Somalia
    and parts of

3
Who is an IDP?
  • IDPs are persons or groups of persons who have
    been forced or obliged to flee or to leave their
    homes or places of habitual residence, in
    particular as a result of or in order to avoid
    the effects of armed conflict, situations of
    generalized violence, violations of human rights
    or natural or human-made disasters, and who have
    not crossed an internationally recognized border
    (Guiding Principles on Internal Displacement)

4
An attempted definition of a protracted IDP
situation
  • New field of research
  • Using the refugee analogy, 25,000 IDPs or more
    who have been in exile for five or more years.
    NRC estimates that the average length of the
    conflicts that caused displacement and prevented
    return stood at 14 years in 2004.
  • However, caution about using an arbitrary figure
    such as 25,000, or even a particular timeframe.
    Instead the focus should be the absence or
    failure of solutions as such.
  • At Brookings Bern/UNHCR seminar in June 2007,
    protracted IDP situations are those in which
  • The process for finding durable solutions is
    stalled, and/or
  • IDPs are marginalized as a consequence of
    violations or a lack of protection of human
    rights, including economic, social and cultural
    rights.

5
Causes of protracted displacements in Africa
  • Starting point is that protracted displacement in
    Africa occur on the territories of fragile or
    collapsed states
  • Overwhelming majority of displacement situations
    in Africa are the result of civil wars,
    inter-communal violence or government repression.
    Some of these conflicts are either frozen
    (Uganda, Chad, Cote dIvoire) or active
    (Democratic Republic of the Congo, Sudan). In
    2000, an intra-state conflict, war between
    Eritrea and Ethiopia, however, resulted in
    massive displacement.
  • Intense ethnic and communal violence (Burundi,
    DRC, Liberia, Sierra Leone, Sudan, Chad), high
    levels of organized violence and destruction

6
Features
  • In general displaced do not settle in camps, but
    rather locate in or nearer host communities or
    in urban areas making them harder to access.
  • Mostly populated by a large proportion of people
    with special needs such as children, women and
    the elderly
  • Live in great deprivation and danger, SGBV
  • Protracted IDP situations rarely seen as
    humanitarian emergencies

7
Features
  • Vested economic interest by various parties in
    the continuation of the armed conflict
  • Lack of international interest
  • State reluctant to open their borders. Policy of
    containment. Safe zones particularly where
    peacekeeping operations exist. Asylum fatigue
  • Residual caseloads
  • Political hostages and vested economic interests
  • Inadequate national responses

8
Visible consequences
  • Destabilizing effects on regional security
  • Material deprivation
  • Idleness, despair and low self worth,
  • Social tension and violence
  • Dependency syndrome, passive recipients of
    assistance
  • Perception of burden, resentment and hostility
  • Discrimination based on being an IDP
  • Lack of adequate housing
  • Lack of protection of property left behind

9
Consequences
  • Lack of (access to) work/livelihoods
  • Lack of documentation
  • No or limited access to health and education
  • Sometimes lack of food/food security
  • Difficulties accessing pension rights and
    asserting tenancy rights
  • Discrimination related to the fact of their
    displacement
  • Limitations on their free choice of durable
    solutions

10
What could be some of the solutions preliminary
remarks
  • Invariably, the policy options for dealing with
    protracted IDP situations revolve around the
    three solutions under section V of the GP.
    Ultimately political commitment is key to
    resolving the conflicts that are at the root
    causes of most protracted IDP situations. To
    quote former Assistant High Commissioner, Kamel
    Morjane, for every protracted situation, there
    is a political origin. Camps and idle
    populations do not simply appear as a natural
    consequence of forced displacement they are
    established in response to political realities
    and constraints. Solutions, then, must
    ultimately be sought in the political arena.

11
Solutions preliminary remarks
  • While presented separately, comprehensive plans
    of actions for IDPs, involving a mix of the three
    solutions, have a clear conceptual logic. They
    require as former High Commissioner Ogata said a
    convergence of interests covering humanitarian,
    political, and security action by states,
    international and regional powers

12
Solution 1 Return to communities of origin
  • Return to communities of origin may include the
    identification of particular sub-groups sharing
    certain characteristics (political affiliation,
    ethnic, religious, language and/or cultural
    background) and/or originating from a specific
    part of the country of origin where conditions
    may be more conducive for return

13
Solution 2 Integration in host communities
  • Integration in host communities given the
    considerable time that IDPs have spent in the
    area of displacement, local integration may be
    the only viable option. Economic self-reliance
    will be key. However, comprehensive package
    providing concrete benefits for the host
    communities must be developed. Role of
    development actors will be crucial. Ensure that,
    from the outset, assistance programs for IDPs
    have a limited emergency relief and care and
    maintenance phase. Early recovery, self reliance
    built in the operations from the start

14
Solution 3 Relocation to another part of the
country
  • Relocation and reintegration elsewhere in the
    country
  • Community based programs also necessary to ensure
    brassage between the two groups

15
Other solutions
  • Prevention and mitigation of displacement. Are
    there steps which can be taken early in
    displacement from becoming a protracted
    situation. See Guiding Principle, no 21 (para 3)
  • Education, peace education programs,
  • Regional initiatives such as the AU Convention on
    IDPs preceded by a Heads of State Summit on
    Forced displacement in Africa. International
    Conference on the Great Lakes region and Regional
    IDP Protocol
  • RSG Framework for Durable Solutions offers
    guidance to policy makers

16
Role of national actors
  • Primary responsibility for IDPs rests with
    national authorities since IDPs remain under the
    jurisdiction of their national governments. See
    in particular Principle 6 and Principle 28
  • Need for expanded attention to capacity building
    for national/local authorities
  • Negotiation with non state entities
  • Legislation
  • Public policy
  • Improving accountability
  • Advocacy efforts with a special focus on women
    and children

17
Role of international community
  • Lead agency concept
  • Collaborative approach (lack of predictability,
    accountability, partnership)
  • Cluster approach to improve humanitarian response
  • RSG for the HR of IDPs and the Guiding Principles
    in 1998.
  • Need to inscribe IDP issues in the agenda of the
    Peacebuilding Commission and other development
    initiatives

18
Inputs by the IDPs
  • Focus on vulnerabilities of both IDPs and host
    communities
  • IDPs and peace processes (research being carried
    out on the subject by the Brookings Bern Project
    on Internal Displacement) Track one and two
    Diplomacy and People to People Diplomacy.

19
Research questions
  • Dedicated research on the subject in comparison
    with refugee programs i.e. what are the
    similarities, the differences.
  • Case studies from Africa and Asia regions and
    what they tell notably on coping mechanisms
    issues
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com