FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES OF PUBLIC FINANCE - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES OF PUBLIC FINANCE

Description:

INTRODUCTION FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES OF PUBLIC FINANCE How are Governments Different from other Enterprises? How are Governments Different from other Enterprises? – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:503
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 61
Provided by: AGSM
Learn more at: https://willamette.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES OF PUBLIC FINANCE


1
INTRODUCTION
  • FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES OF PUBLIC FINANCE

2
How are Governments Different from other
Enterprises?
What are the powers enumerated in the US
Constitution?
Can the US government exercise those powers
anywhere Else?
3
How are Governments Different from other
Enterprises?
  • Powers? To spend? No to borrow? No to tax? Yes
    to prohibit or compel? Yes. To create money? No,
    not really. Wage war? Make treaties with other
    sovereign states?
  • Jurisdiction, geographic (in the US overlapping,
    unitary states, not so much).

4
Taxes are Coercive
  • Nobody likes paying taxes
  • Nobody much likes doing things they are forced to
    do
  • Americans pay a lot of taxes (although less than
    in most other economically developed countries)

5
IF TAXES ARE SO BAD, WHY HAVE A PUBLIC SECTOR IN
AN OPEN AND FREE SOCIETY?
6
IN SOME CASES THE BENEFITS OF COLLECTIVE ACTION
(requiring spending) OFFSET THE HARMS DONE BY
TAXES
7
Market Failure
  • Markets equilibrate
  • DEMAND (measured in terms of willingness and
    ability to PAY)
  • and
  • SUPPLY (measured in terms of willingness and
    ability to SELL)
  • But markets can be unstable. People do not like
    instability.

8
Markets and the Functions of Government
  • MARKET PRECONDITIONS
  • System of law
  • Protection of life and property
  • Definition of property
  • Enforcement of contracts
  • Disclosure requirements
  • Regulation of competition natural monopolies
  • Sound medium of exchange
  • MARKET STABILIZATION
  • Macroeconomic
  • Income redistribution
  • Microeconomic
  • Public goods
  • Toll goods
  • Commons goods
  • Private goods?
  • Merit goods?

9
Markets and the Functions of Government
  • MARKET STABILIZATION
  • Macroeconomic Stabilization
  • Income Stabilization
  • Supply Stabilization
  • MUSGRAVES LAYER CAKE

10
Politics (given the American liberal consensus)
  • Left cradle to grave security, aim to eliminate
    all the avoidable insecurities of life
  • Right watch out for waste, moral hazard, and
    adverse selection

11
Macroeconomic Stabilization
  • Addressed to systemic risk (hazard)
  • Automatic stabilizers
  • Monetary policy
  • Fiscal policy
  • Business bailouts

12
Why Obama Is President of the US and Not McCain
13
Income Stabilization
  • Idiosyncratic (personal) risk
  • Social security
  • Medicare/medicaid
  • Earned income tax credit
  • Unemployment insurance
  • Food support (stamps)
  • TANF

14
Supply Stabilization
  • Idiosyncratic (supplier) risk
  • Private suppliers could fail, often when most
    needed
  • Pure public goods, toll goods, positive
    externalities would be undersupplied (negative
    ones oversupplied)
  • How about merit goods?

15
What is a Public Good?
Private Goods
Toll Goods
Common Goods
Public Goods
16
Toll Goods I Not a Natural Monopoly
17
Toll Goods II Natural Monopoly
18
More Realistic example of a toll good
19
What about merit goods?
  • What is a merit good?
  • If publicly supported (supplied or subsidized),
    less personal idiosyncratic risk
  • Examples?

20
Private Good
Q 60 - 2.5P
21
Public Good II
P 75 - 4Q
22
Public Good III
23
What Is a FAIR Tax/Price?
  • IF THE LIGHTHOUSE
  • COST 12000?
  • Equal share?
  • Equal net benefit?
  • Equal ratio of MC to MB
  • IF THE LIGHTHOUSE COST 12000 A B EACH HAD A
    BENEFIT LEVEL OF 2000 AND Cs BENFIT WAS 2750?

24
  • Government Spending
  • and Taxation

25
Government Spending
  • It is important to distinguish between (a)
    government purchases of goods services and (b)
    transfer payments.
  • Government purchases Goods supplied through the
    public sector. Examples government spending on
    police and fire protection, medical services,
    administration, highways and jet planes.
  • Transfer payments Income transfers from
    taxpayers to recipients who do not provide
    current goods and services in exchange for these
    payments.

26
Government Spending
  • Approximately three-fifths of government
    expenditures are undertaken at the federal level.
  • In 2000, 85 of federal expenditures went for
    just four items
  • income transfers
  • health care
  • national defense
  • net interest on the national debt

27
Government Spending
  • Education accounts for almost 30 of state and
    local spending. Other major spending categories
    at the state and local level include public
    welfare (income transfers), health care and
    highways.

28
What Governments Buy
The major categories of government spending at
both the federal and state and local levels are
displayed above.
29
Taxes and other Sources of Funds
  • Governments are financed by taxes, user charges,
    and borrowing. Borrowing implies higher future
    taxes.
  • The major sources of federal revenue are the
    personal income tax (accounts for almost 50 of
    federal revenue) and the payroll tax (accounts
    for about a third of the total).
  • Major revenue sources at the state and local
    level are sales and excise taxes, personal income
    taxes, user charges, and grants from the federal
    government.

30
Sources of Revenue
The revenue sources of both the federal and state
and local governments are displayed above.
31
  • Growth of Government

32
Growth of Government
  • During the first 125 years of U.S. history,
    federal expenditures per person were small and
    they grew at a relatively slow rate.
  • In contrast, federal spending soared throughout
    most of the 20th century. In 1990, real federal
    spending per person was nearly 60 times the level
    of 1916.
  • During the 1990s per capita real federal spending
    was relatively constant. In fact, it declined
    slightly during the decade.

33
Real Federal Expenditures Per Capita 1792-2000
Real federal spending per person(in 2000 U.S.
dollars)
7,000
6,000
5,000
4,000
3,000
2,000
1,000
0
1800
1850
1900
1950
2000
Real federal spending per person (measured in
2000 dollars) grew slowly during the first 125
years of U.S. history, but it soared throughout
most of the 20th century.
34
  • The Changing Composition
  • of Federal Spending

35
Changing Nature of Government
  • During the last 4 decades, the composition of
    federal spending has shifted away from national
    defense and toward spending on income transfers
    and health care.
  • In 2000, national defense accounted for only
    16.2 of the federal budget, down from 52.2 in
    1960.
  • In contrast, spending on income transfers and
    health care rose from 21.5 of the federal budget
    in 1960 to 56.6 in 2000.

36
The Changing Composition of Federal Spending
1960
1970
1980
1990
2000
1960
1970
1980
1990
2000
During the last four decades, federal spending
has shifted sharply away from national defense
and toward income transfers and health care.
37
  • The Payment and
  • Burden of Taxation

38
The Payment and Burden of Taxation
  • In 2000, total government revenues summed to
    37.9 (and federal revenue to 25.6) of national
    income. Both figures were at their highest level
    since World War II.
  • A dollar of taxation cost the private economy
    much more than a dollar because
  • It is costly to administer, enforce, and comply
    with tax legislation.
  • Taxes distort incentives and eliminate productive
    exchanges (and cause people to undertake some
    counterproductive activities).
  • Economists refer to this as the dead weight
    loss of taxation.

39
The Payment and Burden of Taxation
  • Payment of the personal income tax is skewed
    towards upper-income individuals.
  • Even though the highest marginal tax rates are
    now lower than in 1980, the share of taxes
    collected from high income taxpayers has
    increased.
  • The 1 of tax-filers with the highest incomes
    paid 36.2 of the federal personal income taxes
    in 1999, up from 19.1 in 1980.
  • 66.5 of the personal income tax was collected
    from the top 10 of earners in 1999, compared to
    49.3 in 1980.

40
The Payment and Burden of Taxation
  • Overall, the U.S. tax system is generally
    progressive the percentage of income taken from
    high earners is greater than for those with less
    income.
  • More so in some states than others.
  • US has one of the worlds most progressive tax
    systems not so spending.

41
Government Revenue As a Share of National Income
Government revenue as a share of National
Income(as a share of national income)
40
30
20
10
1950
1960
1970
1980
1990
2000
1946
  • In 2000, government revenue as a share of
    national income rose to the highest level since
    World War II.

42
Share of Federal Personal Income Taxes Paid By
Various Income Groups
Share of total federalpersonal income tax paid
Income group
1980
1990
1999
Top 1
19.1
25.1
36.2
Top 5
36.8
43.6
55.5
Top 10
49.3
55.4
66.5
Next 40
43.7
38.8
29.5
Bottom 50
7.0
5.8
4.0
43
Total Federal Taxes as a Share of Income
Federal taxes as a share of income ()
Lowest
Second
Third
Fourth
Highest
Family income groups (quintiles)
Here we show the payment of federal taxes as a
share of income for each income quintile. Note
the overall federal tax structure is progressive.
44
  • Size of the U.S. Government Compared to other
    Countries

45
Size of Government U.S. Versus Other Countries
  • The U.S. size of government is smaller than that
    of Japan and major Western European countries,
    but larger than for a number of high-growth Asian
    economies.

46
Size of Government An International Comparison
Government expenditures as a share of GDP, 2000
Sweden
52.7
France
51.4
Greece
50.9
Denmark
50.2
Austria
47.6
Belgium
47.0
Japan
45.3
Italy
44.4
Germany
42.9
Netherlands
41.5
Canada
40.9
New Zealand
40.2
United Kingdom
39.2
Australia
32.7
Ireland
30.0
United States
29.4
Singapore
25.9
South Korea
23.8
Hong Kong
21.3
Thailand
18.3
47
  • Deficits, Surpluses,
  • and the National Debt

48
Deficits, Surpluses, and the National Debt
  • National debt Outstanding loans that have been
    made to the U.S. Treasury.
  • A budget deficit increases the size of the
    national debt by the amount of the deficit.
    Conversely, a budget surplus allows the federal
    government to pay off bondholders and so reduce
    the size of the national debt.
  • The national debt represents the cumulative
    effect of all the prior budget deficits and
    surpluses.

49
Budget Deficits the National Debt
Federal deficitas a share of GDP
2
0
- 2
- 4
1950
1960
1970
1980
1990
2000
Gross net federal debtas a share of GDP
80
60
40
20
1950
1960
1970
1980
1990
2001
  • Through most of the 1950s 1960s, federal
    budget deficits were small as a of GDP
    occasionally there was a surplus.
  • During this period, the national debt declined
    as a of GDP.

50
Budget Deficits the National Debt
Federal deficitas a share of GDP
2
0
- 2
- 4
1950
1960
1970
1980
1990
2000
Gross net federal debtas a share of GDP
80
60
40
20
1950
1960
1970
1980
1990
2001
  • During 1974-1995, budget deficits were quite
    large, causing the national debt to increase
    as a of GDP.
  • During the last few years of the 20th century,
    the national debt fell as a share of the economy.

51
  • Who Owns
  • the National Debt?

52
Who Owns the National Debt
Source The Treasury Bulletin, September 2001
and http//www.federalreserve.gov..
53
  • Concerns About
  • the National Debt

54
How Does Debt Financing Influence Future
Generations?
  • For domestically held debt (58.5 of total
    privately held debt), the future generations that
    pay the tax liability accompanying the debt will
    also receive the interest income.
  • The opportunity cost of resources used by the
    government is incurred during the current period
    regardless of how the government activity is
    financed.

55
  • Debt Financing
  • in Other Countries

56
Government Debt of Industrial Countries
Net public debtas a share of GDP, 2000
Net interest on government debt, 2000
Australia
1.5
United Kingdom
2.2
United States
2.6
Germany
2.8
France
2.9
Spain
3.1
Japan
1.3
Canada
3.5
Italy
6.3
Belgium
6.6
Source OECD Economic Outlook, June 2001.
  • Several countries have government debt to GDP
    ratios greater than the United States.

57
  • How Does Social Security Influence the National
    Debt?

58
Social Security, Budget Deficits, and the
National Debt
  • Social Security revenues and expenditures are
    generally included in budget deficit
    calculations.
  • Because the Social Security system is now running
    a surplus, inclusion of these figures reduces the
    size of the reported deficit.

59
  • Demographics and
  • Debt Financing

60
Favorable Budgetary Factors During the 1990s
  • The following favorable factors shifted the
    federal budget from deficit to surplus during the
    1990s
  • Rapid economic growth
  • Reductions in defense expenditures in the
    aftermath of the Cold War
  • Favorable demographics-- the baby boomers were
    in their prime earning years and the number
    of people moving into the retirement phase of
    life grew slowly.

61
Budget Prospects
  • Budget deficits reemerged in the last decade and
    could get worse
  • Spending on defense and domestic security grew
    rapidly as the result of terrorist threats.
  • The Great Recession
  • Spending on Social Security Medicare will grew
    rapidly , and will grow even faster once the baby
    boomers begin retiring after 2010.

62
EndClass 1
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com