Potential for using Clinoptilolite Zeolites for Ammonia-N Transfer and Retention in Integrated Aquaculture Systems - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Potential for using Clinoptilolite Zeolites for Ammonia-N Transfer and Retention in Integrated Aquaculture Systems

Description:

Research Objectives Assess the potential of crushed clinoptilolite zeolite to: transfer ammonia-N from animal manures to ponds, ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:180
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 30
Provided by: NC60
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Potential for using Clinoptilolite Zeolites for Ammonia-N Transfer and Retention in Integrated Aquaculture Systems


1
Aquaculture 2004 Honolulu, HI 4 March
2004
Potential for using Clinoptilolite Zeolites for
Ammonia-N Transfer and Retention in Integrated
Aquaculture Systems by
Christopher F. Knud-Hansen, SolarBee/Pump
Systems, Inc., Colorado, USA Yuan Derun,
Asian Institute of Technology, Pathumthani,
Thailand Yang Yi, Asian Institute of
Technology, Pathumthani, Thailand
Ted R. Batterson, Michigan State University,
Michigan, USA
2
(No Transcript)
3
(No Transcript)
4
(No Transcript)
5
(No Transcript)
6
(No Transcript)
7
(No Transcript)
8
Research Objectives
  • Assess the potential of crushed clinoptilolite
    zeolite to
  • transfer ammonia-N from animal manures to ponds,
  • moderate ammonia-N concentrations in fertilized
    ponds, and
  • remove ammonia-N from discharged pond water.

9
Experiments
  • 1. Bucket experiments (using clinoptilolite in
    mesh bags)
  • a) ammonia absorption agitation versus
    non-agitation
  • b) algal growth versus ammonia-N conc. in
    clinoptilolite
  • 2. Tank experiments (using bags soaked in swine
    manure)
  • Nile tilapia growth versus of bags
  • moderate ammonia-N concentrations (not soaked)
  • absorb ammonia-N from discharged pond water

10
1 kg bag of crushed (2-4 mm) clinoptilolite
zeolite
11
Swine manure
.. and flush
Chicken manure
12
Figure 1.
Total ammonia-N (TAN) absorption by
clinoptilolite versus time of immersion in
chicken or swine manure with without agitation
13
Figure 2.
Log total ammonia-N (TAN) absorption by
clinoptilolite versus log time of immersion in
swine manure without agitation
14
Figure 3.
Initial total ammonia-N (TAN) concentration in
clinoptilolite versus algal growth
15
Bucket Experiment Results
  1. Clinoptilolite absorbed
    1.91 g N (from NH4Cl) per kg
    clinoptilolite 0.43 g N (from swine
    or chicken manure) per kg
  2. Ammonia absorption was logarithmic, with most
    absorption occurring within first 2 days.
  3. Agitation improved ammonia absorption from
    chicken manure, but no effect with swine manure.
  4. Algae are able to use N adsorbed to
    clinoptilolite.

16
(No Transcript)
17
(No Transcript)
18
(No Transcript)
19
(No Transcript)
20
(No Transcript)
21
One week later .
22
Tank Experiment Tilapia Growth
Treatment
Daily Wt. Gain of CZ bags Manure TSP1
Urea2 (g d-1 fish-1 se) 2 Y
Y 0.62 0.11 3
Y Y 0.83 0.09 4 Y
Y 0.97 0.37 2 Y Y 0.62
0.09 3 Y Y 0.51 0.09 4
Y Y 0.62 0.12 0 Y Y 0.47
0.08 1 10 kg P ha-1 wk -1 2 30 kg N
ha-1 wk-1
23
Figure 4. (tank study)
Number of manure-soaked bags of
clinoptilolite/tank versus mean fish weight
24
Figure 5 (tank study)
Number of manure-soaked bags of
clinoptilolite/tank versus mean DO at dawn
25
Tank Experiment Total
Ammonia Nitrogen (TAN)
Treatment
TAN of CZ bags Manure TSP1
Urea2 (mg L-1 se) 2 Y
Y 0.01 0.01 3 Y
Y 0.31 0.08 4 Y
Y 0.37 0.12 2 Y Y 1.34
0.20 3 Y Y 1.41 0.19 4
Y Y 1.19 0.19 0 Y Y 1.40
0.16 1 10 kg P ha-1 wk -1 2 30 kg N
ha-1 wk-1
26
Tank Experiment Results
  1. Tilapia NFY increased (P lt 0.05) with increasing
    number of clinoptilolite bags soaked in swine
    manure.
  2. Tilapia survival higher (96.7) in tanks with
    bags with manure versus in tanks with bags
    without manure (83.7).
  3. DO decreased (P lt 0.001) with increasing number
    of clinoptilolite bags soaked in swine manure.
  4. Clinoptilolite bags were not able moderate
    ammonia concentrations in tanks.
  5. Clinoptilolite bags were not able to effectively
    remove ammonia from discharged pond water.

27
Economic Analysis
Material Costs clinoptilolite 0.13/k
g mesh bag 0.11/bag 1 kg of useable
Nitrogen Costs clinoptilolite 325.00
urea 0.32 Therefore, it would take 1000
reuses of clinoptilolite bags to equal cost of
urea-N
28
Conclusions
  1. 0.4 g manure-N was absorbed per kg clinoptilolite
    (less than the 1.9 g/kg theoretical maximum).
  2. Tilapia raised on manure-enhanced clinoptilolite
    had higher growth rates and survival than
    controls.
  3. Clinoptilolite additions were not able to
    moderate ammonia-N concentrations in ponds
    without manure.
  4. Economics do not (yet) encourage incorporating
    clinoptilolite into integrated aquaculture.

29
Many thanks to.
  • Pond Dynamics/Aquaculture CRSP

    Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA
  • Dept. of Aquaculture Aquatic Resource
    Management School of Environment, Research
    Development Asian Institute of
    Technology, Pathumthani, Thailand
  • Dept. of Fisheries Wildlife
    Michigan State
    University, East Lansing, MI, USA
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com