Title: EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND MONETARY UNION
1EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND MONETARY UNION
2OVERVIEW
- Economic Integration
- One of the most powerful dynamics of this era in
world politics - Nations are increasingly driven to unite their
economies for greater efficiency and growth - Integrated markets do NOT necessarily mean
integrated states
3EUROPEAN UNION
- Began life in 1957 as the European Economic
Community (EEC) often called the Common Market - 1980s - economic element in group's name was
eliminated European Community (EC) created - 1993 name changed to the European Union (EU)
- Fundamental question Is economics more important
than politics? - Does the individualistic motives of the market
matter more than the unifying social values of
the nation-state?
420th Century in Europe
- Most violent century in history
- 2 common enemies
- External threat of the USSR during the Cold War
- Internal threat of a return to divisions and
conflicts that created war and instability in
Europe in the past - Europe has been able to achieve political
cooperation and even unify by using economics as
a political tool
521st Century
- Regionalism is a distinctive feature of IPE in
the 21st century - IPE is pulled in 2 directions
- On the one hand security concerns make the state
as important now as it has ever been. - At the same time, the forces of economic
globalization are blurring the distinction
between home and abroad. From an economic
standpoint the world is defined by markets and
they are global.
6Regionalism
- Refers to the process by which groups of
nation-states, usually in the same geographic
region, agree to cooperate and share
responsibility to achieve common goals. - Regional groups are clubs formed by
nation-states to accomplish objectives that
require coordinated or collective action - The goals may be narrow and specific (ex.
Ecotourism) or very broad and ambigous (like the
EU) - Regionalism takes many forms in IPE
- Regional environmental agreements, regional
economic development programs, regional
scientific and health regimes, and regional
security arrangements - Regionalism is not a new thing but what is new is
its strength as an organizing force due to the
incrasing importance of economic integration and
the rise of regional trade blocs
7ECONOMIC INTEGRATION
- The process by which a group of nation states
agree to ignore their national boundaries for at
least some economic purposes, creating a larger
and more tightly connected system of markets - Several degrees of economic integration
- Free Trade Area (FTA)
- Customs Union
- Economic Union
8Free Trade Area
- Involves a relatively minimal degree of
integration - Nations in FTA agree to eliminate tariff barriers
to trade for goods and services they produce
themselves - However, each nation still retains the right to
set its own tariff barriers with respect to
products from outside the FTA - In essence, some goods are still subject to
differential trade barriers while some goods are
tariff-fee (for ex. Goods from other countries)
this leads to complications
9North American Free Trade Area (NAFTA)
- Example of an FTA
- Goods from the USA, Canada and Mexico will be
traded freely within NAFTA borders - Goods from other countries will be subject to
differential trade barriers of these three
countries - (ex. Chile has negotiated three separate
bilateral trade agreements with each of the NAFTA
members separately)
10NAFTA
- Trade bloc in North America created by the U.S.A,
Canada and Mexico - Came into effect January 1, 1994
- Between 1993 2004 trade among NAFTA members
increased 129.3
11Customs Union (example Turkey - EU)
- A group of nations agree both to tariff free
trade within their collective borders and to a
common set of external trade barriers - If NAFTA were to evolve into a customs union, the
USA, Canada and Mexico would need to agree to a
unified set of tariff barriers that would apply
to products from other countries - The Treaty of Rome, which created the EEC, was
based upon the idea of a customs union - The movement to a customs union is an important
step in terms of economic and political
integration
12Customs Union (cont.)
- Nations involved give up some degree of
sovereignty or national political economy since
they can no longer set their own trade barriers
without consulting their economic partners - Nations gain a far greater degree of economic
integration - Products flow more easily within a customs union
without need for border inspections or customs
fees because of the unified trade structure
(however, member nations still retain right to
impose some non-tariff barriers such as health
and safety standards
13Turkey EU Customs Union
- Came into effect on 31 December 1995
- Does not cover essential economic areas like
agriculture (bilateral trade concessions still
apply) and services - Turkey applied for full EU membership in 1987
- Helsinki Summit (December 1999) Turkey given
candidate country status - October 3, 2005 European Council began
accession negotiations with Turkey
14Turkish Exports
15Turkey in World Trade in Regional Perspective in
1993, 1996 and 2004
16Turkeys Foreign Trade By Sectors
17Turkeys Foreign Trade by Country Groups
18Direction and Dynamics of Turkeys Trade in 1985,
1995 and 2001-2004 (in millions of dollars and
percent)
19Change in shares in EU external imports in
1992-2004
20Economic Union (example EU)
- The final stage of economic and political
integration - Non-tariff barriers are eliminated along with
tariff barriers creating an even more fully
integrated market - Member nations also agree to four freedoms of
movement - Goods
- Services
- People
- Capital
21Economic Union (cont.)
- Four freedoms represent significant limitations
on national sovereignty but have significant
effects on economic activity - Free Movement of Goods
- Goes beyond the elimination of tariff barriers
- Requires a variety of governmental health, safety
and other standards and regulations to be
harmonized so that a product that can be sold
somewhere in the economic union can be sold
everywhere in it - Free Movement of Services
- The service sector includes many industries such
as banking and finance traditionally subject to
heavy regulation that varies considerably among
nations
22Economic Union (cont.)
- Free Movement of People
- Requires a unified immigration policy since a
person free to enter and work in one member of
the economic union would be able to live and work
anywhere in the area - Free Movement of Capital
- Individual nations give up their ability to
regulate investment inflows and outflows - Many nations have traditionally imposed capital
controls to encourage domestic investment,
promote financial stability or reduce foreign
exchange variations - These controls are not eliminated in an economic
union but must be harmonized so that national
regulations are similar enough to not become a
barrier to economic activity
23Economic Union (cont.)
- If we consider the different state in an
alliance, then the US is the most successful
economic union in the world - Economic integration is appealing because it is a
way for nations to achieve greater efficieny in
their use of scarce resources and higher rates of
economic growth - Leads to both static efficiency gains and dynamic
efficiency gains
24Static Efficieny Gains
- With completely free trade within the area, each
member nation is able to specialize in producing
the goods and services in which it is most
efficient - Protective barriers that preserve inefficient
industries and promote redundancy are eliminated - The creation of a large, integrated market
promotes efficiency in certain industries where
large scale production or long production runs
are possible. These gains from economies of
scale make products cheaper and more competitive
25Dynamic Efficiency Gains
- Promotion of economic growth
- A larger and more competitive market is likely to
be more innovative - As internal trade barriers are removed,
previously protected firms are forced to compete
with one another and this makes them more
efficient - If economic integration is successful, economic
growth rates tend to increase, which raises
living standards
26Trade Diversion Effect
- Regional Trade Blocs became important and
controversial in the 1990s because of the trade
diversion effect of a FTA, customs union or
economic union - By dropping internal barriers members create more
trade between and among member nations - Some of this is newly created trade but some of
it is trade that is lost from another non-member
partner - Ex. With NAFTA, Mexican trade to the USA
increased while other developing nations trade
decreased
27Trade Diversion
- Trade diversion is a two-fold problem
- It is an economic problem because it means that
economic integration is not as efficient as it
may seem. Trade blocs may be economically
beneficial for the nations that form them but
they create inefficiency and economic loss for
other countries that suffer the loss. - It is also a political problem since as more and
more countries enter into regional economic
groups non members find themselves locked out and
vulnerable. They have a strong motivation to
gain membership in an existing bloc to get trade
creation effects or to form their own bloc with
other countries in the same boat. - The threat of trade diversion and of being left
out has led to an expansion in size and number of
trade blocs
28Sovereignty at Risk The Politics of Integration
- There are many political implications that should
be considered when looking at an economic union - Trade-offs between economic benefits and
political costs - Cooperation in economic sphere cooperation in
political sphere - Example an economic union requires that a nation
negotiate a new immigration policy, safety
standards, methods of financial regulation and
adopt a harmonized system of investment controls - Political choices no longer influenced mainly by
domestic voters and groups now the wishes of
groups in other member states must also be
considered
29Politics of Integration (cont.)
- Fundamental problem loss of sovereignty that
occurs when nations form regional trade blocs - At some point each member state risks being
forced to ignore national interests as a
consequence of maintaing its international
obligations - This tension between national interest and
international obligations poses a severe dilemma
for states which tend to value security and
autonomy - Another school of thought that does not believe
that economic integration weakens political power
states that integration weakens the hold of
national interest groups on political decisions
specific interest groups are less likely to
benefit and resulting policies will reflect the
public interest
30Politics of Integration (cont.)
- Another argument states that individual nations
may actually gain political power, especially in
relations with other nations, by being members of
a powerful economic alliance. - Example Belgium a more powerful political
presence as a leading nation of the EU than if it
were simply a small but autonomous European
nation - Basically, it is argued that smaller countries
are far more powerful as members of a larger
group than tney would be as separate,
unaffiliated individual nations
31European Economic Community (cont.)
- Movement toward a united Europe was founded upon
two important ideas - It is possible for nations to live in a state of
perpetual peace (attributed to Immanuel Kant)
under a federal system of governance, where each
yields some sovereignty and sacrifies some
national interests in return for like actions by
others. However, it was difficult to transform
an environment of nearly perpetual war (Europe
from 1914-1945) into one where Kant's vision of
perpetual peace would take hold - Economic cooperation and the gains therefrom
would strengthen the cooperative ties that bind
European nations together (attributed to David
Ricardo)
32European Economic Community (cont.)
- More than perpetual internal peace was desired.
Postwar Western leaders sought to create strong,
democratic, capitalist nations to a firm wall of
resistance to the spread of communism - Marshall Plan (1948)
- The first formal postwar step toward building an
integrated European economy - President Harry S. Truman's Secretary of State,
General George Marshall called upon the nations
of Europe to form a continentwide economic market
like the USA - Marshall Plan aid was designed to hasten economic
recovery by providing a resource base on which to
build a European community
33How different states viewed European integration
- USA saw European integration as a strong
anticommunist ally - Many Europeans supported it as a solution to
the German problem the need to embed German
political and economic power in supranational
insitutions - Germany wanted to be reintegrated into the
international community after the disaster of
Nazism - Great Britain Winston Churchill saw the United
States of Europe as a balance to US influence in
the postwar era - France President Charles de Gaulle imagined a
Europe of States in which the structure of
regionalism would enhance the sovereignty and
status of all its members
34European Economic Community (cont.)
- An integrated Europe also needed European
leadership - Jean Monnet, a French political economist,
provided the intellectual guidance - He proposed an alliance along functional economic
lines a zone of free trade uniting the heavy
industry regions that spanned the French-German
border - This plan for the European Coal and Steel
Community (ECSC) was implemented by Robert
Schuman, a French statesman, in 1950 - ECSC was a critical test for Europe and provided
a model for futher integration in Western Europe
35European Economic Community (cont.)
- 1957 Treaty of Rome
- Created the European Economic Community (EEC, or
the Common Market) a customs union that brought
together the markets of Italy, France, Belgium,
Luxembourg, the Netherlands and West Germany - This union of the six was a great success
because these nations were natural trading
partners - Great Britain participated in the negotiations
but decided against it for fear of losing
political and economic autonomy and preferential
trading relations with the Commonwealth nations
and the USA
36European Economic Community (cont.)
- European Free Trade Area
- Great Britain did not want to be isolated from
the rest of Europe and organized a weaker
alliance of trading nations called the European
Free Trade Area (EFTA) - EFTA brought together Denmark, Sweden, Austria,
Switzerland, Portugal and the United Kingdom - An FTA, being more restricted than a customs
union, could never offer these nations the
benefit of a common market - Geographic separation, deep cultural divisions,
huge economic gaps between rich and poor members
contributed to limit trade and growth - EFTA members soon sought EEC membership
37European Economic Community (cont.)
- Trade among EEC members was never entirely free
non-tariff barriers to trade abounded and
sometimes nations would simply refuse to accept
imports of any items from another member, in
violation of the Treaty of Rome because of
domestic political or economic concerns - It was also necessary to create an elaborate
system of agricultural subsidies across the EEC
to defuse political opposition from powerful farm
groups - The Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) provided for
a complex pattern of payments to farmers in all
EEC nations
38European Economic Community (cont.)
- Although a far cry from free trade and
laissez-faire, CAP was the price of achieving
greater liberalism and cooperation in other
spheres of economic life. - The CAP eventually led to a budget crisis in the
1980s - The EEC changed its name to the European
Community (EC) in 1967 signaling intention to
move beyond purely economic issues
39Common Agricultural Policy
- One of the most controversial and divisive
elements of economic and political integration in
Europe - An EU-wide system of agricultural subsidies,
financed through value-added-taxes imposed by EU
member nations - Largest item of expenditure of the EU and has
been a point of contention both within the EU and
in its relations with other nations - Perfect example of the use of economic means to
achieve political ends
40Common Agricultural Policy
41Common Agricultural Policy (cont.)
- When the EEC was being formed, farm interests
were a major political obstacle - Farmers feared a more comopetitive market would
make them suffer to sell their own goods - Since farm groups could have potentially blocked
the European integration the CAP was created - CAP created a unified system of farm subsidies
that insulated farmers from many aspects of
competitive market forces - CAP can be thought of as a system that collected
some of the economic gains of European
integration in the form of taxes that were then
paid to farmers in exchange for their political
support
42Common Agricultural Policy (cont.)
- Provides Europe's farmers with high prices
through a system of price supports the EU
purchases excess farm produce to keep prices from
falling and farm incomes from declining a
system that benefits farmers at the expense of
the tax-paying public - Over the years the CAP's guarantees have
encouraged European farmers to over-produce - CAP is now a source of deep political disagreement
43Common Agricultural Policy (cont.)
- Problems of CAP
- As the EU expanded, the cost of maintaining
agricultural subsidies has grown. Rising costs
have pitted nations that are net recipients of
CAP funds against nations that are net payers of
the taxes that fund the program - The future of the EU's expansion into Central and
Eastern Europe have created additional pressures.
The countries that believe they unfairly pay the
bills are worried that the bills will get larger.
At the smae time, current EU members are fearful
that more subsidies to new EU members will come
at the expense of payments to their own farmers - EU is under pressure from the US and other
countries to reduce agricultural subsidies
generally as part of the WTO's process of trade
liberalization - - Plans are in the works to reduce agricultural
subsidies
44Common Agricultural Policy
45The European Community, 1973-1993
- The second stage of development of the EU lasted
from 1973-1993 - Great Britain, Ireland and Denmark entered the EC
in 1973 - Greece entered in 1981, followed by Spain and
Portugal in 1986 - EC membership for these three countries was in
part a reward for the triumph of democratic
institutions over authoritarian governments.
Free trade and closer economic ties were intended
to solidify democracy and protect it from
communist influence
46The European Community (cont.)
- The entry of poorer nations of Ireland, Greece,
Spain and Portugal magnified a variety of
tensions within the EC - Lower living standards limited the extent of
their trade with richer member states - Lower wage structures threatened some jobs in EC
industries - The entry of four largely agricultural nations to
the EC institutions, like the CAP, put severe
fiscal strains on the other nations
47The European Community (cont.)
- These economic and political stresses caused a
split in the EC. - Jacques Delors, the new president of the European
Commission tried to find a way to reunite the EC
and he produced a proposal for the creation of a
single market by 1992 the Single Market Act - Although it seemed as if the EC was already a
single market, it was still far from its goal - The goals were the four freedoms
- Free movement of goods
- Free movement of servies
- Free movment of capital
- Free movement of people
48The European Community (cont.)
- National sovereignty and economic growth were
often in conflict - For example Germany wanted its stringent
environmental laws applied to the EC but Portugal
and Greece objected because it was too costly - The four freedoms required sacrifice of some
domestic freedoms, such as the right to
self-determination of environmental and safety
standards - Not all of the goals of the Single Market were
achieved by 1/1/1993, the basic thrust of the
program succeeded, however, Europe did not
immediately experience economic growth
491995-2003
- 1995
- Accession of Austria, Finland and Sweden to the
EU - Schengen Agreement (abolishing border controls)
implemented by Germany, France, Benelux states,
Spain and Portugal - 1997 - European Council agrees on the Treaty of
Amsterdam strengthening EU institutions - 1999 The Euro goes into effect in 11 of the 15
EU member states - 2000 European Council agrees on the Treaty of
Nice - 2002 Euro coins and banknotes enter circulation
and replace national currencies - 2003 The Draft of a Constitution for Europe
presented
50EU-27
51EU-27
- 2004
- 10 new states (Czech Republic, Slovakia,
Slovenia, Hungary, Poland, Cyprus, Malta,
Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia) joined the Union - The European Council signs the treaty
establishing a Constitution for Europe - 2005 The treaty for establishing a constitution
is rejected in referanda in France and the
Netherlands - 2007
- Bulgaria and Romania join
- Today
- Croatia, Turkey and Macedonia await future
membership
52(No Transcript)
53Political Institutions of the EU
- The Treaty of Rome did more than commit six
nations to economic integration it also began
the process of developing a set of political
institutions to make policy, settle disputes and
provide leadership for Europe - The most important political institutions in the
EU today are - The European Commission (and its President)
- The Council of Ministers
- The European Council
- The European Parliament
- The European Court of Justice
54Political Institutions of the EU (cont.)
- Each of these institutions plays a specific role
in setting the delicate balance between the
national interests of member nations and the
collective interest of the EU
55President of the European Commission
- Head of the state of the EU
- Leads the European Commission
- Represents EU to other nations
- Jose Manuel Barroso, the former Prime Minister of
Portugal, began his term in 2004, taking over
from Romano Prodi, the former Prime Minister of
Italy
56European Commission
- The executive branch of the EU serving much the
same function as the cabinet in the USA or UK - Proposes legislation to the Council of Ministers
- Administers EU programs
- Represents the EU in economic relations with
other countries or international organizations - Each commissioner has a special portfolio of
responsibilities, such as competition or
agriculture
57Council of Ministers
- Main lawmaking body of the EU
- Composed of a single representative from each
member nation - The Council can accept or reject legislation
proposed by the European Commission, but it
cannot draft legislation itself - Intended to provide a balancing forum for more
narrow national interests - The voting rules of the EU allow a minority of
member states to block action in the European
Commission when they believe their national
interests are threatened
58European Council
- Meetings of the EU heads of states and
governments are called the European Council - Meetings are held at least once every six months
by the country holding the Presidency of the
Council of Ministers
59European Parliament
- The only body of the EU whose members are
directly elected by the citizens of its member
states - European Parliament committees review legislation
proposed by the European Commission and may
propose amendments to the legislation before
submitting it to the Council of Ministers - May veto a proposal after it reaches the Council
of Ministers if it does not agree with the
Council's position - Has 736 members as of 2009
60European Parliament (cont.)
- Organized along political party lines, not
according to national citizenship - For example socialists from all EU nations act
together, as do conservatives and other groups - Provides a forum for debate and discussion from
the perspective of political ideology, not
national interest (Council of Ministers) or
European interest (European Commission) - Not a legislative body but can have important
influence over EU policies
61European Parliament
62European Parliament
- National apportionment of MEP seats (2009)
Germany99 France72 Italy78 United
Kingdom72 Spain50 Poland50 Romania33 Netherlands25
Belgium22 CzechRepublic22 Greece22 Hungary22 Port
ugal22 Sweden18 Austria17 Bulgaria17 Finland13 Den
mark13 Slovakia13 Ireland12 Lithuania12 Latvia8 Sl
ovenia7 Cyprus6 Estonia6 Luxembourg6 Malta5 - Total 736
63European Court of Justice
- Supreme Court of EU law
- Composed of 15 judges who are appointed to
six-year terms - Deals with disputes between member governments
and EU institutions and among EU institutions and
with appeals against EC rulings or decisions - Made up of one representative from each of the EU
member nations
64European Central Bank
- EU's central bank
- Created after the decision to adopt the euro
- Executive board, appointed for eight-year terms,
and a governing board which includes the
executive board and the heads of all EU member
nation central banks - Currently responsible for the monetary policy of
the 16 member states of the Eurozone - (Austria, Belgium, Cyprus, Finland, France,
Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg,
Malta, Netherlands, Portugal, Slovakia, Slovenia
and Spain)
65The 1990's
- The collapse of communism eliminated the threat
of Soviet domination but not the need for
peaceful cooperation - The questions for Europe now are
- Is Europe just a geographical unit that lies
north of Africa and west of Asia? - Will it be united by money (its common currency,
the euro) alone? - Or will it become more Europa a people with a
common will?
66Post-Cold War Issues Confronting the EU
- The EU was confronted with at least several
issues at the end of the Cold War - The Ever-Wider Union
- How to accommodate the new demands for membership
in the EU without hopelessly alienating current
EU members - How to deal with rising membership applications
at the end of the Cold War - 12 countries filed formal membership
applications - Cyprus, the Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary,
Poland and Slovenia were given top priority
joined in 2004 - Bulgaria, Latvia, Lithuania, Romania and Slovakia
were given second priority joined in 2004 (with
the exception of Romania and Bulgaria which
joined in 2007) - Croatia awaits membership and Macedonia has
received candidate status - Turkey's application continues to be snubbed
- New members were and will continue to be poorer
than current members causing tension between
member states - Like it or not, the EU opened its gates to these
countries to ensure democracy persists
67Post-Cold War Issues Confronting the EU (cont.)
- The Challenge of the Regions
- What to do about demands for greater regional
autonomy within the EU - As nation-states secede power within the EU,
regions have begun to assume more importance - Sometimes the regional focus is rooted in
culture, for ex. Catalan region in Spain - In other places the issue is money and the
perceived need to be free of the shackles of
national government, for ex. Bavaria in Germany
and Northern Italy - The EU needs to find a way to address the desires
of richer regions while trying to accommodate
newer members
68Post-Cold War Issues Confronting EU (cont.)
- The Security Issue
- How to deal effectively with security issues
other than the Soviet threat - EU is surrounded by conflicts (the Balkans,
Middle East, North Africa) and threats
(terrorists, environmental dangers, organized
crime, illegal immigration) - Europe needs a common defense policy, however, a
collective policy would require a good deal more
political unity than the EU has ever demonstrated
in the past
69Post-Cold War IssuesConfronting the EU (cont.)
- The German Problem
- How to make sure that Germany remains committed
to a united Europe without dominating it - The German problem was one of the original
problems that the EC was meant to address - Germany today, a decade and one half after
unification of its Eastern and Western sections,
finds itself bound by the EU to the rest of
Europe but faced with very serious economic,
social and political problems at home, both in
the poorer Eastern provinces and in the rising
tensions between East and West - Germany has so many domestic problems that it
would be natural for it to put domestic issues
above those of European unity - RISING NATIONALISM a new problem??
70Post-Cold War IssuesConfronting the EU (cont.)
- The Political Challenge of the Euro
- Once the Euro was launched in 2002 the member
nations faced a transformed political environment - Their ability to influence domestic economic
conditions was much reduced and interest rates
were now set by the ECB and not the policymakers
of these states this left national leaders in
an awkward position. - One states economic problems also become
problems of other member states (ex. Greek
financial crisis)
71Post-Cold War IssuesConfronting the EU (cont.)
- The Constitutional Challenge
- In its movement towards an ever closer union
the EU is aiming at political union and an EU
constitution this raises issues of national
sovereignty. - The draft of the Constitution was rejected in
referanda in France and the Netherlands in 2005
72Monetary Union
- Discussed in Maastricht in 1991
- France proposed a single currency
- In theory, a monetary union was supposed to
address the four issues mentioned previously - A single currency would make European markets
more efficient and Europe's economies more
dynamic - It would provide economic gains to offset the
costs of enlargement and boost the prospects of
the regions the German problem would be soved
because Germany would be chained to the rest of
Europe with money
73Monetary Union (cont.)
- Finally, political cooperation would be
accomplished through an indirect mechanism with
a single currency EU nations would need to
cooperate more on political issues - Germany did not have much interest in a common
currency. It saw more to lose than to gain
because of its strong deutschemark however
Germany wanted a political union
74Monetary Union (cont.)
- A deal was struck Germany would gets its
political union and France would get its monetary
union (before Maastricht) - However, at the end of Maastricht, the monetary
union had been adopted and the political union
was not - The criteria for nations to be part of the single
currency - Low government debt
- Low inflation rates
- Low interest rates
- Greece initially failed to qualify on economic
grounds and the UK and Sweden opted to remain
outside the euro zone
75Political Economy of the Euro
- The euro is still a political issue
- The name euro was chosen because it means nothing
in any European language (ECU European Currency
Unit was considered but was rejected because
France once had such a coin in medieval times) - Images on any euro currency look like what
appears to be classic Europe but none of them are
authentic because putting any real European scene
could lead to disagreements - The euro symbol means nothing
76Political Economy of the Euro
- Three levels of political issues that surround
the euro - The monetary union has created a reason for
nations to unify in the absence of a common
security threat. Being left out of the euro might
mean being doomed to peripheral status. - Qualifying for membership in the monetary union
has forced European nations to make very
difficult political decisions like cutting
government spending, increasing taxes and
becoming more laissez-faire. - The single currency changes the domestic
political environment member nations will not
longer be able to spend their way out of a
recession or print money to pay for unemployment
because fiscal autonomy is surrendered.