Title: Update on APPA Activities at the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission FERC Sue Kelly VP, Policy Anal
1Update on APPA Activities at the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission (FERC)Sue Kelly VP,
Policy Analysis and General CounselAmerican
Public Power Association2008 NEPPA Annual
ConferenceBretton Woods, NHAugust 11, 2008
2Twilight of the Kelliher Commission?
- We are certainly close to the end of the Bush
Administrationsprint to the finish - Chairman Kelliher could well leave FERC in 2009,
especially if Ds win - There is much speculation regarding prospects for
Commissioners/Chair in the next Administration
(be it R or D) - Like most such Inside-the-Beltway gossip, it is
largely speculation
3Legacy of the Kelliher Commission
- FERC had many responsibilities under the Energy
Policy Act of 2005 (EPAct05) many rulemakings
and studies on market manipulation, long-term
transmission rights, reliability, demand
response, mergers, books and records authority - APPA did not agree with all of FERCs calls, but
FERC met every deadline under EPAct05 in
workman-like fashion
4FERC Implementation of Mandatory Reliability
Regime
- Initial mandatory reliability standards called
for under EPAct05 now approved by FERC, but there
is on-going standards-related activities at the
North American Electric Reliability Council
(NERC) and FERC - Spotlight is now on compliance activities
violations, penalties and registration disputes - First round of penalties has issued more on the
way so far our members have not been levied
monetary fines, but that is bound to change
5Cybersecurity-The Next Reliability Frontier
- FERC has approved, subject to further NERC
review, a set of Critical Infrastructure
Protection (CIP) standards - There is strong concern that there is a gap in
NERC/governmental authorities to deal with
imminent cyber-related threats to the bulk power
system - Legislative drafts are circulating in Congress to
address this gap
6Implementation of EPAct05 Transmission Siting
Authorities
- APPA is supporting DOEs National Interest
Electric Transmission Corridors (NIETC)
designations in 9th Circuit Appeals Court
(CA)precondition for use of FERCs backstop
authority - APPA is supporting FERCs backstop transmission
siting regulations in 4th Cir. Appeals Court (VA)
against challenges by states, landowner groups
7Implementation of New Merger and Affiliate
Transaction Authorities
- APPA/NRECA urged FERC to exercise its new EPAct05
merger review and books and records authorities
to protect consumers from cross-subsidization,
market power - We had some marginal impact on the new
regulations, but FERC clearly leery of
recreating PUHCA Public Utility Holding Co.
Act of 35 - Government Accountability Office strongly
criticized FERCs effort in March 08 Report
called for improved vigilance
8Prohibition on Energy Market ManipulationFPA 222
- FERC now has authority to pursue manipulative or
deceptive devices or contrivances - FERC pursuing Brian Hunter/Amaranth for
attempting to manipulate natural gas futures
market, due to adverse impact on physical markets
(which FERC regulates) - APPA has supported FERC in jurisdictional spat
with Commodities Futures Exchange Commission
9FERC in Clean-up Mode
- The Kelliher Commission also undertook a number
of important rulemaking initiatives not required
under EPAct 2005 it is now in the process of
completing them - Open Access Transmission Tariff (OATT) reform
- Market-based Rate Policy
- Standards of Conduct
- Review of RTO Organized Wholesale Markets
10Need to Reform Open Access Transmission Tariffs
(OATTs)
- FERC had found more than once during the RTOs or
Bust era that Order No. 888 OATT still permitted
undue discrimination in provision of transmission
service - Once it became clear not all regions would have
RTOs, FERC had to deal with loopholes in
individual Transmission Provider (TP) Order No.
888 OATTs
11Order No. 890 (RM05-25)
- After Notice of Inquiry, Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking (NOPR), many rounds of comments, FERC
issued Order No. 890 - Required regional transmission planning process
with substantial stakeholder input (applies to
RTOs) - More specificity in calculating Available
Transfer Capability (NERC standard-setting
proceeding) - TPs must offer Conditional Firm/redispatch
service - Move to tiered energy imbalance penalties
12Order No. 890, con.
- Revised rollover/right of first refusal
provisions terms lengthened but no additional
flexibility on changing receipt points (APPA had
argued for such flexibility) - Lifted price cap on resales of long-term (one
year or more) firm point-to-point (PTP)
transmission service (even for resales by
affiliates of the TP) - Modified standards for credits for customer-owned
transmission facilities, but retained the
difficult-to-meet integration standard - No generic implementation of FERC-Lite
13Order Nos. 890-A and 890-B
- APPA sought rehearing on three issues
- Lack of flexibility on receipt points for
rollovers - Lifting of cap on firm long-term PTP resales
- Retention of the integration standard
- Now at the end of the rehearing road only
substantial change was that FERC limited sales of
long-term firm PTP service at above price cap to
period ending 10/1/10 - Have to decide on appeal this month
14Market-Based Rates (RM04-7)
- Docket ongoing since 2004, as FERC has wrestled
with standards and tests for granting
market-based rate (MBR) authority - What tests to use for generation market power?
- What power supply products to test for?
- What is the relevant market area?
- What mitigation to apply to those who fail?
- What if seller flunks in home control area but
not in surrounding control areas?
15Order No. 697
- FERC issued Order No. 697 in 06/07
- Sellers seeking MBR authority must pass two
screens (uncommitted market share and
uncommitted pivotal supplier) or submit full
delivered price test - Post-July 9, 1996 generators must pass tests too
- RTO region is default market, but geographic
submarkets are recognized outside RTOs, the
default market is the control area - FERC will not test separately for long-term
power supply products new entry will
discipline market
16Order No. 697-A
- APPA/TAPS sought rehearing on long-term power
supply issue, citing barriers to new generation
entry - Order No. 697-A issued in 04/08 denied rehearing
on long-term power supply issue - APPA has sought review of these orders in 9th
Circuit (CA) will contest FERCs ruling on
long-term power supply/lack of barriers to entry
17Standards of Conduct NOPR (RM07-1)
- FERC set out new standards of conduct (SOC) for
transmission functions and merchant
functions/affiliates of both electric
transmission providers (TPs) and natural gas
pipelines in Order No. 2004 - Natural gas interests went to court and won a
remand FERC had gone too far in regulating
relations with energy affiliates without
sufficient evidence
18SOC NOPRSeeing Double
- FERC issued SOC NOPR in 01/07, narrowing prior
rules but maintaining same general approach got
an earful from industry on lack of clear
standards, arbitrary enforcement - FERC went back to the drawing board, issuing a
revised NOPR in 03/08 - FERC is now proposing a functional approach
employees of marketing and transmission functions
must function independently (but not entire
affiliates)
19APPA Comments on Second SOC NOPR
- APPA comments supported new approach
employee-based approach works better for APPA
members that comply with the SOC - APPA did express concerns that proposed
regulations would allow preferential
communications in two areas - Transmission planning (citing to Order No. 890
transmission planning process) - Upcoming availability of firm PTP (citing to
Order 890 lifting of firm PTP price caps)
20APPAs Electric Market Reform Initiative (EMRI)
- Intended to first assess and then address the
failures of restructured wholesale electricity
markets - First phase Investigate the operations of the
wholesale markets and the claims of market
supporters - Second phase Grassroots campaign to obtain
support from Congress for FERC to implement
needed reforms
21FERCs Rulemaking on RTO Organized Markets
- FERC in 2007 opened investigation into
centralized wholesale markets run by Regional
Transmission Organizations (RTOs) in Docket Nos.
AD07-7-000 and RM07-19-000 - FERC held series of technical conferences in the
winter and spring of 2007 - APPA and its members participated actively in the
conferences and filed comments, including all of
the EMRI Studies then completed
22FERCs Advance NOPR
- FERC issued Advance Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking (ANOPR) in 06/07 - Opined that consumers are benefiting from RTO
markets, and that much of the concern can be
traced to the effects of higher natural gas
prices - Proposed only limited changes in four areas
- Demand Response/Scarcity pricing
- Long-term Contracting
- Market Monitoring
- RTO responsiveness to stakeholders
23APPAs ANOPR Comments
- 09/07 Comments presented EMRI research results
with sworn affidavits from Ken Rose (re limited
impact of higher natural gas prices on RTO
wholesale prices) and Ed Bodmer (showing high
profits of PJM sellers) - APPA asked FERC to broaden its proposed
investigation to look at the justness and
reasonableness of wholesale power prices in
RTO-run centralized marketsthe core issue
24The 41 Party Motion
- In 12/07, APPA joined with 40 other load/consumer
side interests asking FERC to expand its
rulemaking to examine the justness and
reasonableness of the rates charged in RTO-run
centralized markets - APPA was joined by AARP, NASUCA, CFA, ELCON,
Public Citizen, PJM Industrials, many others
(AARP, et al.)
25 Full NOPR on RTO Organized Electric Markets
- FERC issued full NOPR in 02/08
- FERC denied APPAs and AARP, et al.s requests to
broaden scope of proceeding - Commenters offered no solutions (but see
American Forest Paper Association and Portland
Cement Association proposals) - RTOs were instructed to consider the issues
commenters had raised in stakeholder proceedings
26RTO Markets NOPR, con.
- NOPR would still require RTOs to implement
proposed provisions limited to - Demand response (by far the most sweeping of the
proposals would allow scarcity pricing if
operating reserve shortage arises) - Long-term power supply contracting
- Market-monitoring
- RTO responsiveness to stakeholders
27APPAs NOPR Comments
- Filed extensive NOPR comments in 04/08 we expect
a Final Rule this fall - APPA argued, among other things, that
- FPA 206 does not require complainants to provide
solutions to have FERC initiate an
investigation - Requiring the RTOs to consider claims regarding
the justness and reasonableness of their own
rates constitutes an unlawful delegation of
functions by FERC
28APPAs NOPR Comments, con.
- Regarding the four designated topics
- Opposed use of scarcity pricing to incent
demand response more likely as proposed to
enrich generators and incent shortages - Opposed aggregators of retail customers (ARCs)
dealing directly with end users behind public
power systems unless the system enacted a
regulatory policy prohibiting this practice
should flip presumption - Pointed out FERC cant do much to support
long-term contracting without tackling RTO market
structures
29APPA NOPR Comments, con.
- Suggested that the PJM market monitoring
settlement set best practices on RTO market
monitoring issues - Suggested ways RTOs could improve governance and
management to be more responsive to end use
consumers (stakeholder advisory committees,
hybrid boards, cost-benefit analyses, mission
statements, management compensation)
30- The Campaign for Fair Electric Rates is a
grassroots advocacy effort focused on educating
consumers and businesses as well as Members of
Congress and other policymakers, on the failure
of the wholesale electricity markets operated by
regional transmission organizations (RTOs) to
adequately protect consumers. Participants are
encouraged to contact their Senators and
Representatives asking that Congress urge FERC to
reexamine the changes made to the wholesale
electricity markets over the last few years and
take all necessary steps to protect consumers
against unjust and unreasonable rates.
31- The Campaign for Fair Electric Rates believes
that reform to RTO-run markets should adhere to
the following criteria - 1. A market structure that produces just and
reasonable prices, is fair to all market
participants, and where the benefits of factors
such as fuel diversity and operational
efficiencies are shared equitably between
consumers and suppliers. - 2. Improved and more timely transparency and
accountability to consumers - 3. A consumer-focused system that assures
reliability and capacity growth to meet our
future needs
32- The following are among the organizations
supporting the Campaign - American Public Power Association
- Blue Ridge Power Agency
- Citizens Utility Board
- Electricity Consumers Resource Council (ELCON)
- Industrial Energy Users Ohio
- Maryland PIRG
- Municipal Electric Utilities of Wisconsin
- NEPOOL Industrial Customer Coalition
- Northeast Public Power Association
- Ohio Hospital Association
- Ohio Partners for Affordable Energy
- Portland Cement Association
- Power in the Public Interest
- Public Citizen
- Consumer Federation of America
33- The Campaign has launched a website
www.fairelectricrates.net - Individuals can visit the website, learn more
about wholesale market problems and how they are
impacting their utility bills, share their
stories on how high electricity prices are
impacting their families and communities, and
learn how to communicate their concerns locally
and to their Members of Congress
34Other APPA RTO-related Advocacy Activities at
FERC--RPM
- PJMs Reliability Pricing Model (RPM) In
response to cries of pain from members in PJM,
APPA (via EMRI) commissioned an RPM study by Jim
Wilson of LEGC - His study formed basis of affidavit supporting a
customer complaint against PJM regarding outcome
of first four transitional RPM auctions (26.2
billion in customer obligations!) - APPA has intervened in support of the customers
complaint
35Other RTO Advocacy Activities at FERC-Market
Manipulation
- APPA has supported PJM complaint against the
Tower Companies (hedge fund hanky-panky creates
80 million revenue deficiency on counterflow
FTRs) - Challenging FERC settlement with Edison Mission
re bidding behavior in PJM market (high offer
strategy) is it OK to withhold generation so
long as you dont lie about it!?
36Other Advocacy Activities at FERC-Market
Manipulation II
- Seeking broader FERC investigation into Lake
Erie loop flow situation in NY ISO circuitous
transmission service nominations by certain
unnamed parties inflated uplift charges and
LMPs, at expense of NY consumers - Who did it, why and how much have others had to
pay?
37Our Mission
- Electric rates are going up due to increased
costs of fuel, construction costs, costs of
complying with environmental and carbon
regulations - We need to ensure that cost increases to
consumers are justified, and not the result of
market power/manipulation, lack of oversight, bad
market design, faith-based regulation - We need to support new infrastructure, not just
ration scarce resources
38