PHIL 2 Philosophy: Ethics in Contemporary Society - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 39
About This Presentation
Title:

PHIL 2 Philosophy: Ethics in Contemporary Society

Description:

PHIL 2 Philosophy: Ethics in Contemporary Society Week 1 Topic Outlines – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:164
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 40
Provided by: JudyJe2
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: PHIL 2 Philosophy: Ethics in Contemporary Society


1
PHIL 2Philosophy Ethics in Contemporary Society
  • Week 1
  • Topic Outlines

2
Course Overview
  • This course examines the nature of philosophy and
    ethics relationship to it, including the issue
    of morality. Several ethical theories are applied
    to individual ethical problems and contemporary
    social issues, such as health care applications.
    Other moral issues, such as abortion, euthanasia,
    discrimination and animal rights, are addressed.

3
Course Objectives
  • At the completion of this course, you will be
    able to
  • Explain the relationship between philosophy,
    ethics, and morality.
  • Classify the characteristics, history,
    application, and importance of morality.

4
Course Objectives (continued)
  • Describe several theories of morality and ethics
    (for example, ethical egoism, utilitarianism,
    divine command theory, Kants duty ethics, Rosss
    prima facie duties, and virtue ethics). Explain
    consequential theories of morality.

5
Course Objectives (continued)
  • Differentiate between absolutism versus
    relativism, as well as freedom versus
    determinism.
  • Explain reward and punishment in relationship to
    justice.
  • Define (or outline) the system of humanitarian
    ethics.

6
Course Objectives (continued)
  • Analyze case studies to determine moral or
    immoral implications of actions and behaviors.
  • Synthesize the major ethical theories and the
    process by which they apply to current moral
    problems within our society.

7
Course Text
  • Thiroux, Jacques P.
  • Ethics Theory and Practice, 8th ed.
  • Pearson-Prentice Hall, 2004.
  • ISBN 0-13-183002-3

8
Course Topics by Week
  • Week 1
  • Course Expectations
  • Components and History of Morality Chap. 1
  • Consequential Theories of Morality Chap. 2
  • Theories of Morality and Virtue Ethics Chap. 3

9
Course Topics by Week
  • Week 2
  • Absolutism versus Relativism Chap. 4
  • An Analysis of Freedom versus Determinism Chap.
    5
  • Reward and Punishment Chap. 6
  • Act of Setting Up a Moral System Chap. 7

10
Course Topics by Week
  • Week 3
  • Moral Implications of Taking Human Life Chap. 8
  • Moral Implications of Allowing Someone to Die
    Chap. 9
  • Moral Implications of Abortion Chap. 10
  • Applying Humanitarian Ethics

11
Course Topics by Week
  • Week 4
  • Moral Implications of Lying, Cheating, Breaking
    Promises, and Stealing Chap. 11
  • Morality, Marriage, and Human Sexuality Chap.
    12

12
Course Topics by Week
  • Week 5
  • Bioethics and the Ethical Issues in Medicine
    Chap. 13
  • Business and Media Ethics Business and Media
    Ethics Chap. 14

13
Course Topics by Week
  • Week 6
  • Environmental Ethics Chap. 15
  • Key Concepts and Major Ethical Theories
    Appendixes

14
Topic 1 Course Expectations
  • Philosophy, ethics, and morality
  • Relationships among philosophy, ethics, and
    morality

15
Philosophy, Ethics, and Morality
  • Philosophy is concerned with
  • Epistemology (study of knowledge)
  • Metaphysics (study of nature of reality)
  • Ethics (study of morality)
  • Ethics What is right or wrong in human behavior
    and conduct
  • Morality Human conduct and values

16
Relationships among Philosophy, Ethics, and
Morality
  • Ethics is a sub-area of philosophy.
  • Ethical and moral are often used
    interchangeably.
  • Ethics pertains to the individual character of a
    person.
  • Morality deals with relationships among people.

17
Topic 2 Components and History of Morality
  • Approaches to the study of morality
  • Why human beings should be moral
  • Morality and the law morality and religion

18
Approaches to the Studyof Morality
  • Values as totally objective from external
    source
  • Supernatural theory
  • Natural law theory
  • World and objects in it have value without the
    presence of valuing humans
  • Values as totally subjective from within human
    beings

19
Approaches to the Studyof Morality (continued)
  • Values as both subjective and objective
  • Includes three variables
  • Thing of value, or thing valued
  • Conscious being who values
  • Context or situation in which valuing takes place

20
Why Human Beings Should Be Moral
  • Religion or the supernatural
  • Enlightened self-interest
  • Tradition and law
  • Common human needs

21
Morality and the Law Morality and Religion
  • Law provides guides to human behavior and
    protection from harm.
  • What is moral is not necessarily legal.
  • What is legal is not necessarily moral.
  • Law is the public codification of morality.

22
Morality and the Law Morality and Religion
(continued)
  • Religion has served as a most powerful sanction
    for getting people to behave morally.
  • Morality is not based solely on religion.
  • Difficulty of proving supernatural existence
  • Nonreligious people can be moral
  • Difficulty of providing a rational foundation
  • Which religion?

23
Topic 3 Consequential Theories of Morality
  • Consequentialist and nonconsequentialist views of
    morality
  • Three types of ethical egoism
  • Two types of utilitarianism

24
Consequentialist and Nonconsequentialist Views of
Morality
  • Consequentialist ethical theories based on or
    concerned with consequences also called
    teleological theories
  • Nonconsequentialist ethical theories not based
    on or concerned with consequences also called
    deontological theories

25
Three Types of Ethical Egoism
  • Ethical egoism people should act in their own
    self-interest
  • Three types
  • Individual everyone should act in my
    self-interest
  • Personal I ought to act in my self interest
  • Universal everyone should act in his or her
    self-interest

26
Two Types of Utilitarianism
  • Utilitarianism people should act in the best
    interest of all concerned
  • Two types
  • Act one should perform that act that brings
    about the greatest good for everyone affected
  • Rule one should follow the rule that will bring
    about the greatest number of good consequences
    for all involved

27
Topic 4 Theories of Morality and Virtue Ethics
  • Nonconsequentialist and Virtue Ethics theories of
    morality and consequentialist theories
  • Nonconsequentialism and the divine command
    theory, Kants duty ethics, Rosss prima facie
    duties, and virtue ethics
  • Aristotles Nichomachean Ethics and John Rawls
    theory of justice

28
Nonconsequentialist Virtue Ethics theories of
morality vs. Consequentialist theories
  • Nonconsequentialist theories consequences do
    not and should not enter into judgment of
    morality
  • Two types
  • Act there are no rules
  • Rule following the rules is what is moral

29
Nonconsequentialist Virtue Ethics theories of
morality vs. Consequentialist theories
  • Virtue Ethics development of a moral or
    virtuous character by doing what a good person
    would do
  • Virtue Ethics are not concerned with consequences
    or rules.

30
Divine Command theory, Kants Duty Ethics, Rosss
Prima Facie duties, Virtue Ethics
  • Divine Command theory morality is based on
    commands and prohibitions communicated by a
    supernatural being or beings.
  • To be moral, humans must follow these commands
    without concern for consequences, self-interest,
    or anything else.

31
Divine Command theory, Kants Duty Ethics, Rosss
Prima Facie duties, Virtue Ethics (continued)
  • Kants Duty Ethics
  • Good will human ability to act in accordance
    with rules, laws, or principles regardless of
    interests or consequences
  • Establishing morality by reasoning alone
    absolute moral truths exist that are consistent
    and universal
  • Categorical Imperative a rule is immoral if it
    cannot apply to all humans

32
Divine Command theory, Kants Duty Ethics, Rosss
Prima Facie duties, Virtue Ethics (continued)
  • Kants Duty Ethics (continued)
  • Practical Imperative no human being should be
    used merely as a means to someones end
  • Duty rather than inclination people must act
    out of a sense of duty

33
Divine Command theory, Kants Duty Ethics, Rosss
Prima Facie duties, Virtue Ethics (continued)
  • Rosss Prima Facie duties all humans must obey
    in a general way before any other considerations
  • Fidelity telling the truth, keeping promises
  • Reparation making amends
  • Gratitude recognizing what others have done for
    us

34
Divine Command theory, Kants Duty Ethics, Rosss
Prima Facie duties, Virtue Ethics (continued)
  • Rosss Prima Facie duties (continued)
  • Justice seeing that people get what they
    deserve
  • Beneficence helping to improve the condition of
    others
  • Self-improvement improving our own virtue,
    intelligence and happiness
  • Nonmaleficence not injuring others, preventing
    injury to others

35
Divine Command theory, Kants Duty Ethics, Rosss
Prima Facie duties, Virtue Ethics (continued)
  • Virtue Ethics based on Aristotles Nichomachean
    Ethics
  • Goal is the development of a good or virtuous
    human being an action is not right or good in
    itself.

36
Aristotles Nichomachean Ethics and John Rawls
Theory of Justice
  • Aristotles Nichomachean Ethics human beings
    have natural ethical tendencies in human beings
    to follow them with a general attitude of
    consistent harmony and proportion constitutes an
    ethical life.
  • Virtue is the mean between two extremes (vices).

37
Aristotles Nichomachean Ethics and John Rawls
Theory of Justice
  • John Rawls Theory of Justice rights are given
    to humans by a just society in which no one has
    an unfair advantage over others.
  • Principles that shape society are agreed upon
    without regard to our place in that society.

38
Aristotles Nichomachean Ethics and John Rawls
Theory of Justice
  • Rawls two basic principles
  • Equality principle each person has equal rights
    to maximum liberty compatible with the same
    amount of liberty for everyone else.
  • Difference principle inequality is permissible
    to the extent that it is to everyones advantage.

39
Week 1
  • Thiroux, Jacques P.
  • Ethics Theory and Practice, 8th ed.
  • Chapters 1-3
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com