Bridge Therapy: Peri-operative Anticoagulation

1 / 24
About This Presentation
Title:

Bridge Therapy: Peri-operative Anticoagulation

Description:

Bridge Therapy: Peri-operative Anticoagulation Management Amjad AlMahameed, MD, MPH Division of Cardiology Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Boston – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:52
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: card8

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Bridge Therapy: Peri-operative Anticoagulation


1
Bridge Therapy Peri-operative Anticoagulation
Management Amjad AlMahameed, MD,
MPH Division of Cardiology Beth Israel Deaconess
Medical Center Boston
2
RATIONALE FOR BRIDGING
Cross Coverage to Therapeutic INR
Requiring AC but have not achieved Therapeutic
INR
Already Rxed w chronic AC and now documented
drop in INR
Peri-procedural
3
BENEFITS Supporting Need for Bridge Therapy
  • high daily risk estimate for thrombosis when
    patients remain unprotected for several days
    peri-procedure
  • Subtherapeutic INR offers little or no protection
  • Possible rebound hypercoaguable state, especially
    when warfarin reinitiated leading to thrombosis
  • Bleeding complications can be controlled while
    CVA or PE may have lasting effect
  • New drugs and new data offer increased ease of
    therapy

4
SAFE SURGERY Choosing the Best Approach
Must Answer three basic questions
  • 1- What is the risk of bleeding with AC based
    upon the type of procedure and patients history?
  • 2- What is the risk of thrombosis if AC reduced
    or stopped?
  • 3- Which is the best bridging strategy (bridging
    medication, timing, outpatient vs. inpatient)

5
SAFE SURGERYWhat is the Risk of pei-operative
Thrombosis?
DEFICIENCIES IN CURRENT EVIDENCE
  • From descriptive studies and clinical experience
  • Does not account for
  • - the added risk of thrombosis during surgery
  • - the rebound theory
  • - the heterogeneity in patients
    characteristics
  • - the post-operative clinical course

6
SAFE SURGERY What is the Optimal Upper INR
Level?
  • Type of Surgery
  • Patients Characteristics
  • Integrity of the hemostasis/coagulation system
  • Technical/intraoperative factor

7
Current Standard in Bridge Therapy

Prospective Randomized Controlled Trials
Expert Opinion/Consensus
8
Prospective Randomized Trials (Bridge Therapy)
None available, but some in progress and others
in the planning phase
9
Expert Opinion on Bridge Therapy
  • British Society of Hematology
  • American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP)
  • Kearon and Hirsh article NEJM, May, 1997
  • Pregnancy and Prosthetic Valve Clinical Consensus
    (PPCR)
  • Douketis article

10
British Society of Haematology
3 2 1.3 1
Therapeutic INR range
INR
Normal INR Range 1-1.3
Procedure
Procedure
Pre-Op Day 3 2
1
UFH when INR lt 2
Stop Warfarin /- Vit K
11
American College of Chest Physicians
3 2 1.3 1
Therapeutic INR range
INR
Normal INR Range 1-1.3
Procedure
Procedure
Pre-Op Day 5 4
3 1

Low or full dose UFH or LMWH when INR lt
2
Stop Warfarin /- Vit K
12
Kearom and Hirsh RecommendationsNEJM, May, 1997
Indication Before After
VTE 1 month IV UFH IV UFH
Month 2-3 No Heparin IV Heparin
Recurrent No Heparin SC
Heparin Arterial 1 month IV Heparin
IV Heparin Mechanical Valve No Heparin
SC Heparin A Fib No Heparin No Heparin
13
Limitations of Kearon and Hirsh Recommendations
  • Discounts rebound phenomena
  • Estimate 100-fold ? in VTE risk but no ? in ATE
    risk versus Wahls review (5 of 493 patients had
    ATE , 4 died)
  • Low estimate ATE risk off warfarin (4.5 / year A
    fib, 8 /year mechanical valve)
  • Estimate heparin bleeding risk of 3 per 2 days
  • Recommends SC vitamin K, does not utilize LMWH
  • Does not focus on patients characteristics (type
    of valve, risk factors for ATE in A Fib)
  • SC (or no) heparin in A fib and mechanical
    valves??!!

14
Douketis Article Thrombosis Research, 108 (2003)
3-13
  • Better risk stratification of
  • - risk of post-procedural bleed
  • - risk of peri procedure thrombotic
  • complications
  • Advocates normal or near normal INR at the time
    of surgery (earlier withdrawal of warfarin)
  • Includes practical algorithms that guide
    perioperative management of AC

15
Bleeding Risk Classification and Postoperative AC
Post-op AC
Type of Procedure
Bleeding Risk
Low-dose LMWH POD 1-2 Warfarin evening POD
1-2 Full dose LMWH POD 2-3 h
NSG, Prostate/bladder, OHS, major vascular,
renal Bx, polypectomy, major CA surgery
High Risk
Low-dose LMWH warfarin evening of OR day Full
dose LMWH POD 1-2
Major abd, thoracic, and orthopedic PPM
insertion
Moderate Risk
Catarct, cutaneous, laparascopic choly/hernia
repai, cardiac cath
Low-dose LMWH warfarin evening of OR day Full
dose LMWH POD 1
Low Risk
J.D. Douketis, Thrombosis Research 108 (2003)
3-13
16
Perioperative AC Rx in Patients With Mechanical
Valves
Thromboembolism Risk Category
Patient Characteristics
Suggested Management
Bridging strongly recommended
Stroke or TIA lt 1 mo Any MV Caged-ball or single
leaflet tilting disc AV
High
Star-Edwards Bjork-Shiley Medtronic-Hall Omnicarbo
n
A Fib, CVA, TIA, emboli, LV dysfxn, gt75 y/o, HTN,
DM
Moderate
Bridging should be considered
Bileaflet tilting disc AV and gt 2 stroke RF
St. Jude Carbomedics
Low
Bileaflet tilting disc AV and lt 2 stroke RF
Bridging is optional
J.D. Douketis, Thrombosis Research 108 (2003)
3-13
17
Perioperative AC Rx in Patients With Chronic A
Fib
Thromboembolism Risk Category
Patient Characteristics
Suggested Management
Bridging strongly recommended
Stroke or TIA lt 1 mo Any MV Rheumatic MV Disease
High
A Fib, CVA, TIA, emboli, LV dysfxn, gt75 y/o, HTN,
DM
Moderate
Bridging should be considered
Chronic A Fib and gt 2 stroke RF
Low
Chronic A Fib and lt 2 stroke RF
Bridging is optional
J.D. Douketis, Thrombosis Research 108 (2003)
3-13
18
Regardless of thromboembolism risk category,
patients characteristics take precedent!
  • A Fib
  • CVA
  • TIA
  • arterial emboli
  • LV dysfxn
  • gt75 y/o
  • HTN
  • DM

Bridging strongly recommended
J.D. Douketis, Thrombosis Research 108 (2003)
3-13
19
Perioperative AC Rx in Patients With VTE
VTE Recurrence Risk
Patient Characteristics
Suggested Management
Bridging strongly recommended
Recent VTE (lt 3 wks) Active CA APL Ab or
LA Major comorbid disease
High
Bridging should be considered
VTE lt 6 months VTE with previous AC
interruption
Moderate
Low
None of the above
Bridging is optional
J.D. Douketis, Thrombosis Research 108 (2003)
3-13
20
Emergency Surgery in the Anticoagulated Patient
  • D/C all anticoagulants
  • If INR gt2.5 plasma or factor concentrate (/-
    Vit k)
  • Prepare PRBC, platelet, and FFP
  • Consider PRBC transfusion to augment hematocrit
    especially in pts with cardiac disease
  • Watch for volume overload, dilutional
    thrombocytopenia and coagulaopathy

21
Available Anticoagulants
  • UFH Discovered 1916, clinical use 1935
  • Vitamin K antagonists discovered 1940, clinical
    use 1960s, clinical trials 1990s
  • LMWHs Discovered 1976, clinical trials started
    in 1980s and ongoing
  • Parenteral DTIs Lepirudin (recombinant Hirudin)
    and Argatroban approved for Rx of HIT/HIT-T
    (3/1998 and 6/2000). Bivalirudin (modified
    Hirudin), for patients with ACS undergoing PCI

22
New Anticoagulants
  • Oral Small-Molecule DTIs Ximelagatran. No FDA
    approval
  • Pentasaccharide Fondaparinux (anti Xa activity),
    FDA approval for VTE prophylaxis in orthopaedic
    surgery 12/2001. Idraparinux Being evaluated for
    chronic treatment of VTE

23
Choosing the Best Bridging Medication
  • Depends on patient characteristics
  • - Recent bleed
  • - Renal function
  • - Actual body weight
  • - Pre-op INR
  • - Baseline coagulation tests
  • - History of Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia
  • Available data, clinical experience, and Douketis
    advocate bridging with LMWH if possible

24
BRIDGING STRATEGY
Prophylactic Dose LMWH
Start full Dose LMWH
Resume full dose LMWH
Hold Coumadin
Coumadin
Resume Coumadin
Surgery
Day -7 -5 -3 -1
1 2 3 5
v INR v CBC
v INR
v INR
Days post-op
Days pre-op
J.D. Douketis, Thrombosis Research 108 (2003)
3-13
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)