Center for Professional Advancement Generic Drug Approvals Course - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 24
About This Presentation
Title:

Center for Professional Advancement Generic Drug Approvals Course

Description:

Center for Professional Advancement Generic Drug Approvals Course Bioequivalence & Bioavailability Michael A. Swit, Esq. Vice President Definitions Statutory ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:19
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: fdacounse
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Center for Professional Advancement Generic Drug Approvals Course


1
Center for Professional AdvancementGeneric Drug
Approvals Course
  • Bioequivalence Bioavailability
  • Michael A. Swit, Esq.
  • Vice President

2
(No Transcript)
3
Definitions
  • Statutory
  • Bioavailability Means The Rate And Extent To
    Which The Active Ingredient Or Therapeutic
    Ingredient Is Absorbed And Becomes Available To
    The Site Of Drug Action. 505(j)(7)(A)
  • A Generic Drug Will Be Considered To Be
    Bioequivalent To A Listed Drug If
  • The Rate And Extent Of Absorption Of The Generic
    Does Not Show A Significant Difference From The
    Rate And Extent Of Absorption Of The Listed Drug.
     505(j)(7)(B)(i).
  • The Extent Of Absorption Of Drug Does Not Show
    Significant Difference From The Extent Of
    Absorption Of The Listed Drug If The Difference
    In Rate Is Intentional. 505(j)(7)(B)(ii).

4
Definitions
  • Regulatory
  • Bioavailability means the rate and extent to
    which the active drug ingredient or therapeutic
    moiety is absorbed from a drug product and
    becomes available at the site of drug action. 21
    C.F.R. 320.1(a).
  • Bioequivalence means pharmaceutical equivalents
    whose rate and extent of absorption do not show a
    significant difference when administered at the
    same molar dose of the therapeutic moiety under
    similar experimental conditions. 21 C.F.R.
     320.1(e).

5
Definitions
  • Regulatory
  • Pharmaceutical Equivalents means drug products
    that contain identical amounts of the identical
    active drug ingredient, i.e., the same salt or
    ester of the same therapeutic moiety, in
    identical dosage forms, but not necessarily
    containing the same inactive ingredients, and
    that meet the identical compendial or other
    applicable standard of identity, strength,
    qaulity, and purity, including potency and, where
    applicable, content uniformity, disintegration
    times and/or dissolution rates. 21 C.F.R.
    320.1(c).

6
Bioequivalence
  • Procedures For Determining Bioavailability Or
    Bioequivalence. 21 C.F.R.  320.21-.63.
  • Considerations For Bioequivalence.
  • Statutory/Regulatory.
  • Proof that drug is not only pharmaceutically
    equivalent (same active ingredient in same
    strength and dosage form), but also
    bioequivalent.
  • Systemic bioequivalence testing is based on
    assumption that therapeutic effect of A drug is A
    function of the concentration of the active
    ingredient in the systemic circulation of A
    person and is thus related to its
    bioavailability.
  • Clinical bioequivalence is based on clinical data
    from the reference listed drug (RLD) and
    generic that demonstrate the generic has the same
    safety and effectiveness as the RLD. Often, a
    placebo is required to assure that both drugs are
    superior to the placebo.

7
Requirements For Submission Of Bioequivalence
Study Data. 21 C.F.R. 320.21.
  • Evidence Demonstrating Bioequivalence To Listed
    Drug.
  • Or Information Establishing That A Waiver Is
    Appropriate

8
Criteria For Waiver Of In Vivo Bioequivalence21
C.F.R. 320.22
  • Drug Products Whose Bioequivalence Is Self
    Evident.
  • Parenterals, ophthalmics, and otics with the same
    concentration of active and inactive ingredients
    as the listed drug. (Qualitative and
    quantitative QQ)
  • Oral or topical solutions with the same
    concentration of active ingredient and dosage
    form as the listed drug, and any difference in
    inactive ingredients will not significantly
    affect the drug's absorption.
  • DESI Drugs Without Known Or Potential
    Bioequivalence Problems.
  • Drug Products Whose Bioequivalence Can Be
    Established Through In Vitro Evidence.
  • For Good Cause, If Waiver Is Compatible With
    Protection Of Public Health.

9
Types Of Evidence To Establish Bioequivalence
21 C.F.R. 320.24.
  • In Vivo Testing Of Blood Or Related Biological
    Fluid.
  • In Vivo Testing Of Urinary Excretion.
  • In Vivo Testing To Measure Pharmacological
    Effect.
  • Well-Controlled Clinical Trials.
  • In Vitro Testing That Ensures In Vivo
    Bioavailability

10
Components Of Bioequivalence Study
  • Protocol
  • Clinical Report
  • Analytical Report
  • Pharmacokinetic and Statistical Report
  • Statistical Tables, Listings and Graphs

11
Guidelines For Single Dose In Vivo
Bioavailability Study (Blood Level). 21 C.F.R.
320.26.
  • Investigational New Drug (IND) application not
    required.
  • Protocol Example
  • At least 24 healthy human volunteers (male and
    female).
  • Age 18 - 45
  • Weight 10 - 15 for frame size
  • No concomitant medications allowed
  • Single dose comparison.
  • Fasting state of volunteers.
  • 10 hours
  • No water/fluids 1 hour dosing
  • Two-way crossover.
  • In first leg, half receive the test (generic)
    product and half the listed drug.
  • Adequate wash-out period (at least three times
    the half life of elimination of active ingredient
    or metabolite)

12
Key Measures During BE Study
  • Samples must be collected with sufficient
    frequency to permit estimate of peak
    concentration (CMax), area under the
    concentration time curve (AUC), and time to peak
    (TMax).
  • CMax the observed peak drug concentration
    obtained directly for the experimental data
    without interpolation.
  • TMax the observed time to reach peak drug
    concentration obtained directly from the
    experimental data without interpolation.
  • AUC(0-t) area under the concentration versus
    time curve from time 0 to time of last
    quantifiable concentration, calculated by the
    trapezodial rule.
  • CMax is a surrogate to indicate rate of
    absorption.
  • AUC defines extent of absorption

13
Other Key Aspects of BE Studies
  • Treatment of systemic blood sample centrifuge,
    measure volume, ph, color, temperature control
  • In Vitro Dissolution testing using water and acid
    solutions (simulated gastric fluid) to determine
    that potency of generic is within 5 of RLD.
  • Validation of assay method.
  • Pharmacokinetic parameters. (See Exhibits A and
    B.)

14
Exhibit A Pharmacokinetics from Generic Drug
Subject 1
Tmax 6 hours Cmax 47 ug/m/
Conc. (ug/ml)
4
8
12
12
0
4
8
0
Time (hr)
15
Exhibit B Pharmacokinetic Data from Generic and
RLD


0
Conc. (ug/ml)


Conc. (ug/ml)








10
12
0
0
2
4
6
8
2
6
10
16
Multiple Dose In Vivo Biostudy Guidelines For
Multiple Dose In Vivo Bioavailability Study
(Blood Level)21 C.F.R. 320.27.
  • Purpose is to determine steady-state levels of
    the active drug ingredient or therapeutic moiety
    in the body.
  • Sufficient blood or urine samples necessary to
    establish maximum and minimum blood
    concentrations on 2 or more consecutive days.

17
Clinical Bioequivalence Study
  • Submission of protocol for review or reliance on
    guidance
  • Dosage Forms -- At present time, clinical trials
    in patients is about only methodology available
    to establish bioequivalence where dosage form
    makes systemic blood level studies not possible
    or unreliable.
  • Oral drugs that are not systemically absorbed.
    (e.g., Sucralfate)
  • Most topically administered drugs
  • Intrauterine
  • Surgical antibacterial scrubs

18
Clinical Bioequivalence Study
  • Must show RLD and generic are superior to placebo
  • Must show RLD and generic are equivalent as to
    clinical effect.
  • Example Draft 1990 Guidance For Performance Of
    A Bioequivalence Study For Topical Antifungal
    Products requires
  • Placebo normally generic without active
    ingredient
  • RLD usually from single lot of RLD manufacturer
  • Generic drug
  • Clinical study that is probably identical to or
    very similar to study used by RLD to obtain
    approval
  • IND required
  • Measurements
  • Mycological
  • Clinical
  • Therapeutic (combination of mycological and
    clinical)

19
Statistical Evaluation Required For Any
Bioequivalence Tests
  • Average Bioequivalence Method
  • Systemic Blood Level Studies
  • 90 Confidence Interval Using The Two One-Sided
    T-Test. CMax And AUC 80 - 125.
  • July 1992 Guidance Statistical Procedures For
    Bioequivalence Studies Using A Standard
    Two-Treatment Crossover Design
  • Clinical Study
  • Statistical model will be determined by FDA
    usually in guidance
  • Statistical analysis to demonstrate RLD and
    generic are bioequivalent

20
Collateral Issues for BE Studies
  • Guidance On Food-Effect Bioavailability And Fed
    Bioequivalence Studies (Dec. 2002) (see
    www.fda.gov/cder/guidance/5194fnl.pdf)
  • Retention Of Bioequivalence Samples. 21 C.F.R.
    320.63.
  • OGD does not distinguish between systemic blood
    level studies and clinical studies so retention
    samples must be held by clinical investigator or
    third party and not sponsor.
  • See 21 C.F.R.  320.38 and 320.63,
  • www.fda.gov/cder/ogd/retention_samples.htm.
  • See also August 2002 Draft Guidance for Industry,
    Handling and Retention of BA and BE Testing
    Samples www.fda.gov/cder/guidance/4843dft.pdf.

21
BE Guidances
  • FDA has available approximately 70 guidances for
    bioequivalence tests, including
  • Design of study.
  • Number of subjects to use.
  • Identification of reference product.
  • Duration of study.
  • Collection times.
  • Suggested methods for assay.
  • Dissolution testing methodology and
    specifications

22
Factors That Can Impact BE Study
  • Physicochemical Properties of Drug.
  • Physiological Factors.
  • Biopharmaceutical Factors.
  • Formulation Factors.
  • Pharmaceutical Factors.
  • Analytical Control.
  • Statistical Analysis and Acceptance Criteria.

23
Settled Bioequivalence Study Parameters Are
Binding On FDA
  • Provision added by Food And Drug Administration
    Modernization Act Of 1997 (FDAMA)
  • Applicant to provide written request to FDA for
    determination of acceptable biostudy
  • Purpose is to reach agreement on the design and
    size of bioavailability and bioequivalence
    studies needed for approval
  • Agreements regarding study parameters reached
    between FDA and the applicant are binding
  • Cannot be directly or indirectly changed by field
    or compliance personnel
  • Cannot be changed after testing begins, with two
    exceptions
  • When applicant agrees to changes in writing
  • When director of reviewing division determines
    that A substantial scientific issue essential to
    determining the safety or effectiveness of the
    drug has been identified

24
Challenging BE Issues
  • Racemic Drugs, Metabolites
  • Gender and Age (Including Pediatrics).
  • Long Shelf-Life Drugs.
  • Locally Acting Drug Products.
  • Estrogenic Drugs
  • Narrow Therapeutic Index Drugs
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com