Memory Errors and Memory Gaps - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 53
About This Presentation
Title:

Memory Errors and Memory Gaps

Description:

Nancy woke up feeling sick again and wondered if she really was pregnant. ... During Woodstock reunion? During last major earthquake in California? ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:122
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 54
Provided by: johnw61
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Memory Errors and Memory Gaps


1
Memory Errors and Memory Gaps
2
List of words
  • Put your pencils down. Listen to the following
    list, and try to remember as many words as you
    can.

3
(No Transcript)
4
Example Instructions
  • When you score your results, do nothing to your
    correct answers, but carefully mark those answers
    which are wrong.

5
Memory Task (a)
  • Nancy arrived at the cocktail party. She looked
    around the room to see who was there. She went
    to talk with her professor. She felt she had to
    talk to him but was a little nervous about just
    what to say. A group of people started to play
    charades. Nancy went over and had some
    refreshments. After a while she decided shed
    had enough and left the party.

6
Memory Task (b)
  • Identical but added
  • Nancy woke up feeling sick again and wondered if
    she really was pregnant. How would she tell the
    professor she was seeing?
  • Propositional memory recalled
  • The professor had gotten Nancy pregnant.

7
Example Memory Task
8
Memory Task
  • Meaningful context helped understanding, promoted
    recall
  • Meaningful context also resulted in 3 times as
    many intrusion errors

9
Memory Tasks
  • Where were you
  • September 11?
  • During OJs low speed chase?
  • When they tore down the Berlin Wall?
  • Name 5 people in your 1st grade class
  • Were they also in your classes from 2-5 and
    beyond?
  • What is the first thing you can remember?

10
List of words read earlier
  • Were the following on the list?
  • 1. pie
  • 2. pencil
  • 3. sweet
  • 4. horn

11
List of words read earlier
  • Were the following on the list?
  • 1. pie Y
  • 2. pencil N
  • 3. sweet N
  • 4. horn N
  • Did you think sweet was on the list? Why?

12
Roediger McDermott
  • People commonly remembered
  • - sweet on list about foods
  • - sleep on list about beds, naps, etc.
  • gt These are the roots of the lists

13
Professors office
  • List the items that you saw in the professors
    office shown earlier

14
Professors office
  • Brewer Treyens
  • 29/30 correctly remembered desk and chair
  • 8/30 remembered bulletin board
  • 9/30 remembered books on shelves -- not there!

15
(No Transcript)
16
Which sentence did I give you?
  • 1. When you score your results, do nothing to
    correct your answers, but carefully mark those
    answers which are wrong.
  • 2. When you score your results, do nothing to
    correct your answers, but mark carefully those
    answers which are wrong.
  • 3. When you score your results, do nothing to
    your correct answers, but carefully mark those
    answers which are wrong.
  • 4. When you score your results, do nothing to
    your correct answers, but mark carefully those
    answers which are wrong.

17
Wanner (1968)
  • Better at specifics when warned. Memory for
    contents uniformly high
  • We extract meaning, not exact wording

18
Memory for Visual Information
  • Mandler Richey (1977)
  • Detail relating to meaning recalled better than
    unrelated detail (e.g., blackboard vs. dress
    style)
  • Gersbacher (1985)
  • After 10 minutes subjects couldnt tell the
    difference between original and mirror reversed
    picture
  • Detail is forgotten rapidly, semantic information
    remains

19
Propositional Representations
  • Abstract away all surface characteristics
  • Reduce meaning to primitive unit of meaning
  • E.g., the dog chased the cat -gt Chased (dog, cat)

20
Memory Accuracy and Confidence
  • Often little relation between confidence of
    memory and accuracy
  • Confidence hinges on familiarity (or the
    availability principle)
  • Things which are consistent with your
    expectations are more likely to be falsely
    recalled.

21
Summary so far
  • Often bring memory in line with our other
    knowledge and beliefs
  • Memory errors
  • can be large (things that arent there)
  • often undetectable

22
Sources of Memory Errors
  • General Knowledge
  • Sally put the vase on the table and it broke.
    What broke?
  • Inferences guide perceptions
  • Schematic Knowledge
  • Offices have books, tables, chairs
  • Results in source confusion, memory
    reconstruction
  • Schemas and Attention
  • Only remember unusual details (pig in restaurant,
    not menus)

23
Autobiographical Memory
24
Autobiographical Memory
  • Includes memories of sense of self
  • How does this affect recall?
  • Contains emotionally charged memories
  • How will emotion affect recall?

25
Self Reference Effect
  • you best remember
  • things you said
  • adjectives that apply to you
  • names of places youve visited
  • Why?
  • attention
  • reconstruction using self-schema

26
Biases in Episodic Memory
  • Self perception affect
  • Am I stable / Have I changed a lot?
  • Recall of past events modified to fit self
    perception
  • Biased Retrieval
  • recall memories consistent with desired traits

27
Emotional Memories
  • Clearest, most vivid memories
  • Trigger amygdala, consolidation of memory
  • Emotion may also focus attention (e.g., weapon
    focus in crime)

28
Flashbulb Memory
  • Extraordinary clarity of event
  • remember as though it was yesterday
  • where they where
  • what they were doing
  • whom they were with
  • Often large scale errors in recall, despite
    confidence of recall. Best if event important to
    them.

29
Traumatic Memory
  • War-time atrocities, sexual assault
  • How accurate is recall (e.g., during trial)?
  • Will painful memories fade?

30
Traumatic Memory
  • Some events remembered for many years (even
    enhanced), others fade.
  • Emotion impacting consolidation?
  • Repressed memory / memory recovery?
  • no good evidence of repression
  • need considerable assistance of therapist
    (convinced problems linked to childhood abuse)

31
Childhood Amnesia
  • Name your Kindergarten, 1st Grade teachers.
  • What is the first thing you can remember?
  • Earliest memories usually around 3.5 years

32
Child Hood Amnesia
33
Source of Childhood Amnesia?
  • Freud repression (anxiety ridden memory
    forgotten)
  • Children spend little time consolidating memories
    -- reviewing them, summarizing them

34
Long, Long Term Remembering
  • Where were you
  • During OJ verdict?
  • During Woodstock reunion?
  • During last major earthquake in California?

35
Very little forgetting in long term
36
Memory for Cognitive Psychology
  • Conway, Cohen Stanhope (1991)
  • lt3 years Some forgetting of names, specific
    concepts
  • gt3 years very little subsequent forgetting

37
Permastore
  • Lasting memories result of
  • strong initial learning
  • further use of memory (e.g., algebra calculus)
  • rehearsal
  • (5 sec exposure increases recall 60)

38
Advantages of Forgetting
  • Makes memories retrievable (not too much
    interference)
  • Reduces memory to useful facts (details on board
    vs. clothing on instructor)
  • Reveals general relations between events
    (abstract thoughts)

39
Summary
  • Memory for details fade quickly
  • General Knowledge, Schemas, and Attention affect
    retention
  • General knowledge held for very long time (e.g.,
    50 years), begins around 4 years of age
  • Forgetting may help to focus memory on relevant
    details

40
Source Memory
  • Hypothesis 1 Loftus claims that LTM is
    malleable. You can have synthetic memories of
    things that never happened.
  • Against usual claim LTM is permanent

41
Source Memory
  • Study 1
  • New information can be added to an old memory.
  • - Subjects saw a 3 min. film of an automobile
    accident (3 mins).
  • - Then all Ss filled out a questionnaire on
    what they had seen. The questionnaire had about
    30 items. One question was critical.

42
Source Memory
  • Control Group How fast was the white car going?
  • Experimental How fast was the white car going
    when it passed the barn?
  • (There was no barn in the movie.)

43
Source Memory
  • 20 mins later they answered more questions
  • Was there a barn in the movie?
  • Control Group 3 Yes
  • (Had heard How fast was the white car going?)
  • Experimental Group 17 Yes
  • (Had heard How fast was the white car going when
    it passed the barn?)

44
Source Memory
  • Study 2
  • Does the timing of the misleading information
    matter?
  • Experiment (Same with barn)
  • event------------------------------------test
  • misleading
  • info.

45
Source Memory
  • 1. Without any misleading info.,
  • - performance with 20 min retention interval
    90. - After 1 week, 50.
  • 2. Misleading info. - more effective after long
    interval,
  • - just before test.

46
Two hypotheses
  •  Original information must be weak to be
    overwritten.
  •  Old information is not overwritten, but new
    information is more retrievable.

47
Source Memory
  • Study 3 Can new information actually change
    information?
  • - Subjects were shown a series of 30 slides
    showing a red Datsun coming to an intersection,
    turning right, and hitting a pedestrian.
  • - Group 1 a Stop sign at intersection
  • - Group 2 a Yield sign at intersection

48
Source Memory
  • 20 item questionnaire-
  • 17 Did another car pass the red Datsun while
    it was at the Yield/Stop sign?

49
Source Memory
  • - 20 min intervening activity
  • - 2 alternative SLIDE RECOGNITION test.
  • Selected correct slide when the misleading info
    was
  • Consistent 71 selected correct
  • Inconsistent 41 selected correct.

50
Source Memory
  • Study 4. You do not have to actually present
    misleading information.
  • 1. Show film of accident.
  • 2. Questionnaire contained item
  • How fast were the two cars going when
    they______(into) each other?
  • smashed (40.8), collided (39.3), bumped (38.1)
  • hit (34.0), contacted (31.8)

51
Source Memory
  • Study 5a. Memories can 'BLEND' together
  • Slides of a green car driving past an accident
    and not stopping.
  • Questionnaire 10 "Did the blue car that drove
    past the accident have a ski rack?
  • Test Pick out the color from a color wheel
    from purple to yellow.

52
Source Memory
  • Study 5b. How can you keep people from being
    mislead?
  • Same as above but recalled event immediately
    after viewing slides and before misleading info.
  • --gt Much less of an effect.
  • Why?
  • 1. Green memory gets stronger, but still some
    blending
  • 2. Commitment to green lets one reject blue info.

53
Source Memory
  • Hypothesis 1 Loftus claims that LTM is
    malleable. You can have synthetic memories of
    things that never happened.
  • Alternative Hypothesis Both real and misleading
    information is stored. The original memory is
    not changed, but sometimes the misleading
    information is retrieved.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com