New Zealand Perspective on Rotavirus Disease - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 37
About This Presentation
Title:

New Zealand Perspective on Rotavirus Disease

Description:

NH&MRC, WHO, HRC* Lottery Grants Board. CHRF, WMRF, NZCFA. ESR. GlaxoSmithKline ... Viral Sexually Transmitted Infection Education Foundation. Australian CF ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:143
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 38
Provided by: keithgr8
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: New Zealand Perspective on Rotavirus Disease


1
New Zealand Perspective on Rotavirus Disease
  • Keith Grimwood
  • Wellington School of Medicine
  • Health Sciences

2
Duality of interest
  • Consultancies, Advisory, Data Monitoring Boards
  • MoH, NIH NIAID, HRC
  • Viral Sexually Transmitted Infection Education
    Foundation
  • Australian CF Association
  • CF Association of NZ
  • GlaxoSmithKline
  • Merck Sharp Dohme
  • Wyeth Pharmaceuticals
  • Funded grants
  • NHMRC, WHO, HRC
  • Lottery Grants Board
  • CHRF, WMRF, NZCFA
  • ESR
  • GlaxoSmithKline
  • Merck Sharp Dohme

rotavirus-related
3
NZ Perspective
  • Global disease burden
  • Case for immunisation
  • NZ disease burden
  • Serotype distribution
  • Economic analysis
  • Surveillance/Questions

4
Global estimates of RV disease burden
  • More than 600,000 children under 5yrs of age die
    annually
  • Rotaviruses account for
  • 8 (2.522) of all cases of diarrhoea in the
    community
  • 28 of clinic visits
  • 39 of hospitalisations

Vaccine 1999 17 2207 Emerg Infect Dis 2006 12
304
5
Estimated global prevalence of RV disease
Event
Risk of Particular Event
1 205
610,000 deaths
1 50
2.4 million hospitalisations
1 5
24 million clinic visits
1 1
114 million domiciliary episodes
Emerg Infect Dis 2006 12 304
Lancet 2006 368 323
6
Case for immunisation
  • More than 90 of children by 3-years of age have
    had gt 1 RV infection
  • independent of
  • nationality or ethnicity
  • hygiene level, sanitation, access to clean water
  • Vaccines are seen as the only public health
    measure capable of controlling RV disease
  • safety
  • efficacy
  • disease burden
  • RV serotypes
  • anticipated health benefits
  • economic analyses

7
Gastro disease burden in NZ
  • 2500 NZ children lt 3yrs of age are hospitalised
    annually with gastroenteritis
  • 3rd behind asthma and respiratory infections
  • RV was 1st reported in NZ infants in 1975
  • Dunedin 2/3 infants
  • Dunedin 2/4 children
  • Palmerston North 2/5 children

NZMJ 197581494 197582176
197683 22
8
RV disease burden in NZ
  • Small hospital-based studies
  • Auckland
  • 60 children (lt 6yrs) between June and July, 1977
  • 43/60 (72) had RV in their stools
  • Palmerston North
  • 39 children (3-38 mths) between June and Sept,
    1978
  • 26/39 (67) were RVve

J Infection 19791339 NZMJ 19799077
9
RV disease burden in NZ
  • Dunedin-based study
  • 497 children, between June 1977 and Sept 1980
  • 252 from Dunedin, 245 from other NZ centres
  • RVs were detected in 45 of stool samples by EIA
  • in some months up to 75 were ve for RV
  • 98 were lt 5years of age

NZMJ 19829567
10
RV disease burden in NZ
  • Retrospective multicentre study
  • Starship, Middlemore, Waikato and CHCH
  • linked hospital admission and laboratory data
  • children aged lt 5 yrs with acute diarrhoea for
    1994-96
  • RVs accounted for 46.5 to 88.3 of the total
    ves
  • Estimated that 35 of admissions were RV-related
  • Mean (SD) LOS was 1.5 (2.35) days
  • Between 1984-1993 there were 18 diarrhoea-related
    deaths

PIDJ 199918614
11
RV disease burden in NZ
  • Prospective hospital-based multicentre study
  • Starship, Middlemore, Waikato, Wellington/Kenepuru
    , Hutt, CHCH and Dunedin
  • children aged lt 3 yrs with acute diarrhoea (May
    1998 to April 2000)
  • Overall, 1138/2019 (56) provided stools for
    testing
  • centre range 38-88
  • Stools were more often collected from
  • infants lt 12mths of age
  • non-Pacific ethnicity
  • residing in less deprived neighbourhoods
  • staying more than 48 hrs in hospital
  • during the winter/spring mths
  • centres outside Auckland

JPCH 200642 198-205
12
RV disease burden in NZ
  • RVs were detected in 43 of samples
  • Mean (SD) LOS was 1.9 (1.9) days
  • RV detection varied by age and season (not SES or
    ethnicity)
  • peak detection rates 2nd yr of life
  • winter/spring predominance
  • 83 of cases
  • monthly peaks in July to September
  • 57-71
  • Dehydration for RV vs non-RV cases 51 vs 37

JPCH 200642 198-205
13
Age distribution of children lt 3yrs with acute
diarrhoea
  • Ages
  • 0-5 15
  • 6-11 32
  • 12-17 23
  • 18-23 14
  • 24-29 9
  • 30-35 6

JPCH 200642 198-205
14
Standardised age and ethniciy estimates for
annual RV hospitalisation in NZ children under
age 3yrs, 1998-2000
per 100,000 age-adjusted children
JPCH 200642 198-205
15
Annual incidence of hospitalisation for RV
gastroenteritis in children under 5yrs of age
from selected industrialised countries
Emerg Infect Dis 2003 9 565 PIDJ 2006 25
S7 J Paediatr Child Health 2006 42 198
16
RV disease burden in NZ
  • Most recent study of RV-associated
    hospitalisation might have
    under-estimated the true burden of disease
  • systematic under-sampling of older children with
    short LOS
  • sensitivity of EIA method is only 90
  • miscoding of hospitalisations was not taken into
    account
  • Visits to the ED or GPs were not included
  • No attempt was made to estimate nosocomial RV
    infections

Arch Virol 1995 140 1225
17
National estimates of RV disease burden
  • Assumptions
  • ELISA-based methods under-estimate RV infection
    by 10
  • for each hospitalisation, 8 children visit
    their doctor
  • for each physician visit, 4 are treated at home

Arch Virol 1995 140 1225 Acta Paediatr
Suppl 1999 426 24 PIDJ 1987 6 1270 Arch
Pediatr Adolesc Med 2004 154 586
BMJ 1999 318 1046
18
Estimated annual RV disease burden in NZ
Event
Risk of Particular Event
1 58,000
? 1 death
1 40
1,400 hospitalisations
1 5
11,200 GP visits
44,800 domiciliary episodes
1 1.3
19
(No Transcript)
20
Goals for a rotavirus vaccine
  • Aim to duplicate the degree of protection
    following natural infection
  • prevent moderate to severe disease
  • decrease numbers of children
  • admitted to hospital
  • seen in Emergency Departments
  • presenting to the family doctor
  • Rotarix (P8 G1) and RotaTeq (P8, G1-G4)
  • 85-98 efficacy against severe RV disease

NEJM 2006 354 11 2006 354 23
21
Efficacy of licensed RV vaccines

Efficacy from 3 pooled studies of 67, 95 CI
15,87
NEJM 2006 354 11 2006 354 23
22
Global distribution of human group A rotavirus
P-G types (1989-2004)
Rev Med Virol 2005 15 29
23
Distribution of NZ and Australian RV G-serotypes
JCM 2003 41 3649 Unpublished NZ data
24
NZ RV G serotypes 1998-99
Unpublished NZ data from JPCH 200642 198-205
25
Distribution of RV G serotypes in New Zealand
1998-1999, 2005-2006
Unpublished NZ data from JPCH 200642
198-205 Current RV serotype survey
preliminary data
26
NZ RV G serotypes 2005-6 in children lt 5yrs
Starship Waikato
Wellington Hutt MedLab Wellington
CHCH Hospital MedLab South
Current RV serotype survey preliminary data
27
(No Transcript)
28
Health economics key NZ issues
  • Primary burden of rotavirus disease is morbidity
    in children
  • Rotavirus also has an economic impact on
  • households
  • healthcare systems
  • society
  • Questions asked by policy makers and payers
  • is rotavirus an important problem?
  • can we do something about it?

Hosp Pharm 1997 32 1480 Emerg Infect Dis
2003 9 565 Pediatrics 1999 103
556 Health Policy 1997 42 39 Ped Infect
Dis J 1993 12 897 BMJ 1983 287 575 and
1999 318 1046
29
Economic analysis
  • Burden of Disease
  • what is the cost of rotavirus disease to the
    healthcare system and nation?
  • Cost Effectiveness
  • compare change in healthcare costs to a change in
    some intermediate health outcome measure
  • is vaccination a good health investment?
  • Cost Benefit
  • compare monetary costs to monetary benefits
  • is vaccination a good economic investment?

30
Economic analysis Australian data
  • Annual cost of rotavirus disease in Australia is
    AUD 26 m (1999)
  • societal and health care costs
  • the cost effectiveness ratios are sensitive to
    the unit price of the vaccine
  • New Zealand in 2005 AUD 6.2
  • population differences
  • 2.5 annual inflation
  • Need economic data for the New
  • Zealand environment


ANZ J Pub Health 1999 23 611

Expert Rev Pharmacoeconomics Outcomes Res 2005
5 593
31
Surveillance
  • RV gastroenteritis surveillance
  • not notifiable
  • stool collection for RV testing is not routine
  • need to develop surveillance systems to monitor
    effectiveness of a RV immunisation programme
  • disease burden
  • circulating RV serotypes
  • emergence of new strains with loss of vaccine
    efficacy
  • reassortment of vaccine strains with WT viruses
  • adverse events AIS 1 in 4,000 by chance alone
    in 1st 6m
  • Centre for Adverse Reactions Monitoring (CARM)
  • NZPSU
  • NZHIS database, linked with NIR

ADC 2005 90 1077
32
Some remaining questions
  • Ongoing trials
  • Asia and Africa
  • efficacy in these settings
  • protection against P4G2
  • immunogenecity in preterm infants
  • transmission studies in twins
  • safety in HIV infected infants
  • long term efficacy 2-3 yrs
  • Latin America, Europe and Asia
  • ? Role in reducing nosocomial RV diarrhoea
    patients, families, staff, students

33
RV vaccines do we need them in NZ?
  • Yes, but can we afford them?
  • overseas economic analyses demonstrate
  • that an immunisation programme will
  • not initially be cost saving
  • direct health vs societal costs
  • costs being sensitive to vaccine price
  • competition from other new vaccines
  • post licensure surveillance
  • safety relating to IS
  • efficacy, including strain surveillance

34
Acknowledgements
  • Auckland
  • D Lennon, R. Pinnock, R. Nicholson
  • Waikato
  • D Graham
  • Wellington/Hutt
  • K Grimwood, A Farrell, P Leadbitter
  • N Beamish, I Gosling
  • CHCH/Dunedin
  • G. Abbott, D Teele, M Dennis-Meates
  • B Taylor, R Ikram
  • Malaghan Institute
  • J Kirman, C Cohet, N Redshaw
  • S Hook, K Romeril, C Wood
  • ESR
  • S Huang

35
(No Transcript)
36
Geographical and temporal clustering of G9 in
NZ in 1999
37
Deciding NZ immunisation policy
Case made to Ministers for funding for
new/revised programme
Advises the Ministry of Health
Immunisation Technical Working Group (an
independent expert advisory panel)
Economic analysis
Epidemiology and disease burden Post-licensure
effectiveness and safety
Licensure
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com