USA Regionals: What is KSBE Up To - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 73
About This Presentation
Title:

USA Regionals: What is KSBE Up To

Description:

They were born the year Harvard Law Review Editor Barack Obama announced he ... In 2000, the total spending to educate students with disabilities in the US was ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:108
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 74
Provided by: man155
Category:
Tags: ksbe | usa | born | in | not | regionals | us

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: USA Regionals: What is KSBE Up To


1
USA Regionals What is KSBE Up To?
  • Dr. Alexa Posny
  • August/September 2008

2
(No Transcript)
3
My fathers favorite bedtime story is Measures
of Academic Progress and Systematic Change.
4
Number Tested ACT
5
Five Year Trend Composite
6
Five Year Trend Subjects
7
Part I Academic Achievement
Part III
Part II
8
Part I Academic Achievement
Part III
Part I
9
An increase of 0.1
  • 147 more students who are college-ready
  • 36 more students who enroll in college
  • 46 more students who persist into second year
  • 25 fewer students taking remedial reading 39
    fewer students taking remedial math
  • 39 more students who persist through four years
    of college
  • 42 more students who complete a degree in five
    years of less

10
Kansas and Title I
  • 94.5 of Title I schools made AYP
  • 94 of Title I districts made AYP
  • 4 schools came off the list
  • USD 457 Bernadine Sitts Intermediate Center
  • USD 457 Charles O Stones Intermediate Center
  • USD 475 Junction Middle School
  • USD 500 Douglass Elementary

11
(No Transcript)
12
(No Transcript)
13
KS Assessment Highlights Reading
14
KS Assessment Highlights Math
15
The class of 2011, born in 1993
  • What Berlin wall?
  • They never rolled down a car window.
  • They never saw Johnny Carson live on TV.
  • Theyre always texting 1 n other.
  • Tiananmen Square is a 2008 Olympics venue, not
    the scene of a massacre.
  • Al Gore has always been running for president or
    thinking about it.
  • They were born the year Harvard Law Review Editor
    Barack Obama announced he might run for office
    some day.

16
(No Transcript)
17
KSBE 5 Steps to the Future
  • Ensure that all students meet or exceed high
    academic standards
  • --Multi-Tier System of Supports
  • --Standards for 21st Century Schools
  • --Integrating Accountability
  • Redesigning the delivery system to meet our
    students changing needs
  • Career Academies
  • Individualized Career Plans
  • Providing an effective educator in every
    classroom
  • Teaching in Kansas Commission
  • Ensuring a visionary and effective leader in
    every school
  • Kansas Educational Leadership Commission
  • Improving communication with all constituent
    groups and policy partners
  • Kansas P20 Education Council

18
(No Transcript)
19
Redesigning High Schools
  • Integrating Academics and Career and Technical
    Education

20
Why Finish High School
  • Dropping out of high school is not a sudden act,
    but a gradual process of disengagement (The
    Silent Epidemic Perspectives of High School
    Dropouts)
  • When students have the option to enroll in
    career/technical programs, more of them stay in
    school (2003 National Assessment of Vocational
    Education Report)
  • Contextual learning and integrated academics in
    technical courses are powerful tools for engaging
    students in high school studies. (Lost in
    Transition SREB)

21
Why Finish High School
  • The average annual earnings of workers 18 and
    older with
  • No diploma 20,873
  • Solely a high school diploma 31,071
  • A bachelors degree 56,788
  • An advanced degree 82,320

22
Ready for College and Ready for Work Same or
Different?
  • Whether planning to enter college or workforce
    training, students need to be educated to a
    comparable level of readiness in reading and
    mathematics
  • Educating some students to a lesser standard than
    others narrows their options to jobs that no
    longer pay well enough to support a family of
    four
  • Found concordance with the ACT College Readiness
    benchmarks with WorkKeys Level 5

23
Aligning Postsecondary Expectations and High
School Practice The Gap Defined
  • What postsecondary instructors expect entering
    college students to know is far more targeted and
    specific than what high school teachers view as
    important.
  • Remedial-course teachers ratings of mathematics
    and reading skills tend to align more closely
    with those of postsecondary instructors than with
    those of high school teachers.

24
Aligning Postsecondary Expectations and High
School Practice The Gap Defined
  • While most high school teachers across subject
    areas believe that meeting their states
    standards prepares students for college-level
    work, most postsecondary instructors disagree.
  • High school teachers believe that todays high
    school graduates are less well prepared for
    postsecondary education and work than graduates
    in previous years, while postsecondary
    instructors perceive no difference.

25
Aligning Postsecondary Expectations and High
School Practice The Gap Defined
  • There are specific differences between high
    school instruction and postsecondary expectations
    in every major curriculum area.

26
Design 21
27
Board Policy Initiatives
  • Improve access to Career and Technical Education
    (CTE) dual enrollment qualified admissions
    promote partnerships
  • Implement integration of academics and CTE
    standards integrated standards based on 16
    career clusters gold standard assessments
  • Require career planning and awareness
    personalized/individualized career plans of study
    (ICPS)
  • Promote multiple strategies data reporting
    across and through secondary and postsecondary
    programs
  • Support funding at federal/state/local level
    additional funding based on output
    (results-based) versus input

28
Teaching in Kansas
  • Regulations, Initiatives and Survey Results

29
KS 2008 Data Says
  • 40 of our teachers leave the field after seven
    years
  • 36 of our teachers can retire within 5 years
  • 50 of reported personnel are over 45
    36 are over 50
  • 12 fewer students have gone into teaching over
    the past six years
  • In 2007, there were 55 teacher biology licenses
    in 2008 there were 82
  • In 2007, there were 33 chemistry licenses in
    2008 there were 35
  • In 2007, there were 24 physics licenses in 2008
    there were 28

30
KS Teacher Vacancies
  • In June 2008, there were 846 teacher vacancies
    across the state
  • In August 2008, there are 375 teacher vacancies
    that remain
  • Estimated
  • In June 2007, there were 1144 teacher vacancies
    across the state
  • In August 2007, there were 476 teacher vacancies
    that remained

31
Why Do Teachers Leave?
  • Isolation from colleagues
  • Assignments outside their area of training
  • Lack of appreciation or respect
  • Feeling discouraged
  • Feeling frustrated
  • Feeling left out of the decision-making
  • Poor school management
  • Lack of classroom resources specifically
  • Too many regulations
  • Lack of mentoring or induction programs
  • Class size
  • Not enough support from administration
  • Undisciplined, poorly motivated students
  • Uninvolved parents
  • Unreasonable expectations
  • Lack of resources

32
Licensure Regulation Changes August 10, 2007
  • Removed GPA (2.5) for conditional teaching
    license
  • Offered a restricted school specialist license
  • Recognized experienced Out-of-State (OoS) school
    counselors without teaching background
  • Expanded provisional license options
  • Offered a one-year nonrenewable without existing
    offer of employment
  • Offered three additional options for added
    endorsements
  • Scienceadditional science with content test
  • 15 content credits plus test for middle level
  • Secondary with 50 of program plus test
  • Expanded innovative/experimental programs for
    IHEs

33
Licensure Regulation Changes July 18, 2008
  • Changed conditional to initial license
  • Created new licenses
  • Transitional license
  • Interim alternative license
  • Enhanced access to professional license as the
    initial Kansas license for veteran OoS educators
  • Offered reinstatement based on OoS experience
  • Added endorsements
  • OoS license with endorsements by meeting
    specified coursework
  • Passing the content assessment
  • Reduced renewal requirements for standard
    substitute to 50 professional development points
  • Reinstated masters plus experience renewal
    option
  • Emergency substitute renewed for two years
  • Removed prohibition on compensation paid to
    student teachers
  • Edited the issuance of restricted license for one
    school year reissued with successful progress
    report

34
(No Transcript)
35
KPA Transitional Performance Assessment
  • Each conditionally licensed teacher must complete
    a year-long, district-administered induction and
    mentoring program to pass the teaching
    performance assessment as a prerequisite to
    receiving a professional teaching license.
  • During this transitional period, school districts
    are expected to provide and supervise the
    year-long induction mentoring program.
  • Districts will not be required to submit a
    program plan for approval for this transitional
    licensure requirement.
  • Over the course of the next year, the State Board
    will consider permanent changes to the teaching
    performance assessment as originally outlined in
    the regulations.

36
Transitional Performance Assessment Performance
Assessment
  • Teacher Performance Assessments will occur at the
    preservice level
  • There will be no prescribed teacher performance
    assessment
  • A model is being developed by the IHEs
  • The model will be voluntary
  • The model covers the waterfront
  • The model will change over time the model will
    change teacher preparation programs over time

37
(No Transcript)
38
  • Findings
  • Perceptions of the presence of teaching
    conditions in Kansas appear to have improved
    since 2006
  • Teaching conditions have an impact on teacher
    employment plans.
  • Teachers and administrators view working
    conditions differently.
  • Teachers perceptions of teaching and learning
    conditions do not significantly vary by school
    level and years of experience.

39
Select Survey Questions
40
School Leadership is Key to Teacher RetentionQ
Which aspect of your work environment MOST
affects your willingness to keep teaching in your
school?
41
School Leadership Trends
  • Almost 2/3rds (61) of teachers believe that the
    school leadership in their building is effective.
  • A little more than 2/3rds (67) believe they work
    in supportive environments.
  • 64 believe they can raise issues and concerns.
  • 68 consistently get support when needed.
  • 69 agree that school leadership communicates
    clear expectations.

42
Working Conditions Influence Teacher Employment
Decisions

43
Remain in Teaching in Their School
  • 89 or nine out of ten teachers want to remain in
    their current school
  • 6 indicate that they want to continue teaching,
    but in a different school or district
  • Only 5 want to leave classroom teaching
    altogether

44
Select Survey Questions
45
Teachers Need Time to Plan and Collaborate
  • Less than half (46) of educators believe the
    non-instructional time (time without student
    contact that could be used for planning,
    meetings, etc.) that teachers receive is
    sufficient.
  • Only 53 percent agree that teachers have time
    available to collaborate with colleagues.
  • Only one-quarter (28) of Kansas educators report
    receiving, on average, an hour per day of
    non-instructional time.
  • Only 40 believe efforts are made to minimize the
    amount of routine paperwork required of teachers.

46
Professional Development
47
(No Transcript)
48
Teaching in KS Commission
  • What is the Teaching in KS Commission?
  • A commission formed to focus on the teacher
    shortage including the preparation, recruitment,
    and retention of teachers

49
Teacher Summit
  • 5 Common Concerns
  • Working Conditions
  • Training Programs
  • Salary and Benefits
  • Image and Promotion
  • Regulations and Requirements
  • Task Force Directives

50
Educator Recruitment and Retention Summit
  • Working conditions teacher planning time,
    career-ladders
  • Teacher preparation consistency across
    programs compensate student teachers
  • Salary and benefits salaries on a continuum
  • Image and promotion statewide marketing
    campaign grow your own
  • Regulations/requirements/data change transfer
    credit rule set funding one year ahead

51
Structured for ContinuousOpportunities
52
Leadership for Learning
  • Kansas Educational Leadership Commission

53
Leadership Matters
  • Leadership is the keystone element in school and
    district success as defined in terms of student
    achievement at the school level, it is
    imperative
  • In difficult times, leadership matters even more
  • In periods of significant organizational
    transition, leadership is the major controllable
    factor in explaining organizational performance
  • Instructionally focused and change-oriented
    leadership are especially effective frames for
    education
  • Team leadership seems to offer promise for
    enhancing organizational performance

54
KS Educational Leadership Commission
  • What recommendations did the KS Educational
    Leadership Commission make?
  • Add a 14th standard to the professional education
    standards focusing on teacher leadership
  • Establish state policy that directs districts to
    develop opportunities for teachers to engage in
    collaborative work and create centers to helps
    educators become teacher leaders
  • Establish a comprehensive review process to
    direct the overhaul of programs that prepare
    school leaders
  • Develop and implement a statewide framework for
    the evaluation of school administrators
  • Develop and fund 12 district-based initiatives to
    help school leaders find additional time and more
    effectively use existing time to engage in
    instructional-based leadership work

55
KS Educational Leadership Commission
  • What work groups will assist in this work?
  • Teacher Leadership Regulation/Licensure (TLRL)
  • Teacher Leadership Blueprint/Curriculum (TLBC)
  • Higher Education Preparation Review and Induction
    Redesign (HEPR/IR)
  • Administrative Evaluation (AE)
  • Kansas Education Leadership Initiative (KELI)

56
Kansas P20 Education Council
57
P-20 Council Who?
  • Janet Waugh, Region 1 State Board member
  • Bill Wagnon, Chair, State Board of Education
  • Two Board of Regents members
  • Barry Downing, CEO of Northrock, Inc., Wichita,
    as a member at-large
  • Terry Dunn, CEO of JE Dunn Construction, Kansas
    City, as a member at-large
  • David Kerr, Secretary of the Kansas Department of
    Commerce
  • Pam Robinson, representing the Kansas Association
    of School Boards
  • Gail Kuehl, Owner/Operator of Kuehl Operations,
    Hays, as a member at-large
  • Jan Long, representing the Kansas Parent Teacher
    Association
  • Melissa Ness, representing the Kansas Childrens
    Cabinet
  • Doug Penner, representing the Kansas Association
    of Independent Colleges
  • Linda Robinson, President of USD 497 School
    Board, Lawrence, as a member at-large
  • Dr. Brenda Dietrich, Superintendent, United
    School Administrators of Kansas
  • Blake West, representing the Kansas Teachers
    Association

58
P-20 Council How?
  • Develop a shared vision that reflects the needs
    of the educational system
  • Develop a shared plan for reaching the states
    vision with benchmarks for success
  • Establish policy coherence among KSDE, KBOR,
    school districts, IHEs, businesses, foundations
  • Coordinate programs
  • Align resources in the use of federal, state,
    district and private funds
  • Evaluate and continuously refine the plan
  • Report progress to constituents

59
Kansas Sample
  • Vision
  • Charting a path to success for every child and
    youth in Kansas.
  • Mission
  • To create a collaborative, seamless system of
    education in partnership with business and
    industry that ensures students are prepared for
    success from pre-school to graduate school and/or
    to work in the 21st century.

60
Kansas Sample
  • Goals Develop a shared plan that--
  • Aligns high academic standards for Pre-K-12
    students with postsecondary education and with
    business and industry standards.
  • Builds a statewide network for increased
    collaboration, information sharing and
    cooperation across all levels of education and
    business and industry.

61
Kansas Sample
  • Strategies
  • Alignment
  • Engage higher education faculty, Pre-K-12
    teachers and business and industry
    representatives in aligning academic and work
    force standards.
  • Develop a longitudinal database that allows the
    sharing and use of student achievement data from
    preschool through postsecondary.
  • Agree upon measures of student achievement that
    are useful within and across all educational
    levels and with business and industry.

62
Kansas Sample
  • Strategies
  • Collaborative Network
  • Clarify, focus and align existing policies,
    priorities and programs.
  • Communicate consistently across all educational
    levels and business and industry to ensure
    coordinated action.
  • Align, leverage or redirect resources across the
    systems and with business and industry.

63
Kansas Sample
  • Guiding Principles
  • The Council believes in the need to be respectful
    of different points of view and diverse opinions.
  • The Council believes that it must stand ready to
    initiate courageous conversations about difficult
    topics.
  • The Council believes that regardless of race,
    socioeconomic status, disability, or language
    background, all students can be successful.
  • The Council believes that in order to succeed,
    all programs that affect student achievement must
    be considered.

64
(No Transcript)
65
(No Transcript)
66
Special Education Funding Task Force
An effective educational system mustestablish
placement-neutral funding formulas and
cost-effective strategies for meeting the needs
of children with disabilities (P.L. 105-17,
Sec. 651 (a)(6)(I)
67
Federal Funding
  • In 2000, the total spending to educate students
    with disabilities in the US was 78.3 billion
  • Per pupil average spending was 12,639
  • This is 90 percent more than general education
    alone
  • The federal portion of the funding covers
    approximately 12-18 of the total cost
  • 10.5 billion was provided by the federal
    government as a formula grant to states (Part B)

68
State Funding
  • Comparable resources for comparable students
  • Timely to plan for services
  • Cost-effective yet allow for unique conditions
  • Accountable for outcomes
  • Reasonable in terms of reporting
  • Linked to general education

69
State Funding Formulas
  • Pupil weights Aid allocated on a per student
    basis
  • Flat grant Fixed funding amount per student
  • Census-based Count of all students of which a
    percentage is assumed to represent special
    education students
  • Resource-based Allocation of specific education
    resources such as teachers or classroom units
  • Percentage reimbursement Expenditures for the
    services provided
  • Variable block grant Base year allocations,
    expenditures, and/or enrollment

70
Spending
  • Average cost for a school-aged student served in
    a program outside the public school is 26,440
  • Average cost for a school-aged student served
    within a public school is 5,709
  • Central office administration cost amounts to
    662 per pupil
  • Total spending on eligibility determination
    activities is 6.7 billion, or 1,086 per pupil

71
Spending
  • 72 on school-aged programs, public and private
  • 9 on preschool programs, public and private
  • 2 on summer school, homebound
  • 7 on transportation
  • 10 on administration

72
Students are volunteers, whether we want them to
be or not. Their attendance can be commanded, but
their attention must be earned. Their compliance
can be insisted on, but their commitment is under
their own control. Phillip Schlechty
Administrators who care know that
73
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com