Essential Questions. Why does the complexity of text used in - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 60
About This Presentation
Title:

Essential Questions. Why does the complexity of text used in

Description:

Essential Questions. Why does the complexity of text used in instruction matter? How can thinking through the complexity of text we use help us prepare students? – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:36
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 61
Provided by: flbsiOrgp6
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Essential Questions. Why does the complexity of text used in


1
Increasing Text Complexity
  • Through Reading, Writing, and Fluency Development

2
Essential Questions
  • Why does the complexity of text used in
    instruction matter?
  • How can thinking through the complexity of text
    we use help us prepare students?
  • How can we support students when they encounter
    complex text?
  • How can we provide additional support for
    students to become independent in comprehending
    complex grade level text?

3
Reading is....
  • Reading is an active and complex process that
    involves
  • Understanding written text
  • Developing and interpreting meaning and
  • Using meaning as appropriate to type of text,
    purpose, and situation (NAEP Framework, 2008)
  • Reading is the single most important educational
    skill students will learn. As students move up in
    grade levels text demand significantly increases.

4
not all reading is created equal
  • Many students are engaged in shallow reading,
    skimming text for answers, focusing only on
    details and failing to make inferences in order
    to integrate different parts of the text. Years
    of reading in this superficial way will cause a
    students reading ability to deteriorate.
  • For many students the decline of text demands in
    the courses that they take has both an immediate
    and long term impact on student achievement.

5
NAEP Results - 2011
  • At grade 4, the percentages of students
    performing at or above Basic, at or above
    Proficient, or at Advanced did not change
    significantly from 2009 to 2011 but were higher
    in 2011 than in 1992 .
  • At grade 8, the percentage of students performing
    at or above the Proficient level in 2011 was
    higher than in 2009 and 1992 (figure C). The
    percentage of students at Advanced in 2011 (3.4)
    was higher than in 2009 (2.8). The percentage of
    students at or above Basic did not change
    significantly from 2009 to 2011 but was higher in
    2011 than in 1992.
  • For Florida Scores were not significantly
    different from 2009 for either 4th or 8th grades.

6
Reading Between the Lines ACT Findings
  • Question type and level (main idea, word
    meanings, details) is NOT the chief
    differentiator between students scoring above and
    below the benchmark.
  • The degree of text complexity in the passages
    acted as the sorters within ACT. The findings
    held true for both males and females, all racial
    groups, and was steady regardless of family
    income level.
  • What students could read, in terms of its
    complexity--rather than what they could do with
    what they readis greatest predictor of success.

ACT, 2006
7
RESULTs
  • A huge gap exists between reading demands at the
    end of high school and college, equal to 350L
    (Lexile) or the Lexile difference between 4th
    grade and 8th grade NAEP texts!
  • 20 of college freshman require remedial reading
    courses (NCES, 2004b).
  • Only 30 of students enrolled in any remedial
    reading course went on to receive a degree or
    certificate (NCES, 2004).
  • Over 75 of surveyed students who dropped out
    indicated that difficulty with reading was a
    major contributing factor (Lyon, 2002).

8
The Crisis of Complexity
  • The complexity of texts which students are
    expected to handle during K-12 has eroded
  • Complexity of high school textbooks has declined
    in all subject areas over several decades.
  • Average length of sentences in K-8 textbooks has
    declined from 20 to 14 words.
  • Vocabulary demands have declined (e.g., 8th grade
    textbooks demands are equivalent to former 5th
    grade texts 12th grade anthologies are
    equivalent to former 7th grade).

9
The Crisis of Complexity, Continued
  • Complexity of college and careers texts have
    remained steady or increased
  • Lexile scores of college textbooks have not
    decreased in any block of time since 1962 and in
    fact have increased (Stenner, Koons, and Swartz
    in press).
  • Vocabulary difficulty of newspapers has remained
    stable (Hayes, Wolfer, Wolfe, 1996).
  • Word difficulty of scientific journals and
    magazines 19301990 has increased since 1930
    (Milewski, Johnson, Glazer Kubota, 2005)

10
Turn and talk
  • What is the impact of this research on our work
    today?

11
Text Complexity
  • Included within the Standards is an enhanced
    focus on text complexity. Specifically, within
    reading standard 10
  • Anchor Standard
  • R.CCR.10 Read and comprehend complex literary and
    informational texts independently and
    proficiently.
  • Example Grade-level Standard (6th grade)
  • RI.6.10 By the end of the year, read and
    comprehend literary nonfiction in the grades 6-8
    text complexity band proficiently, with
    scaffolding as needed at the high end of the
    range.

12
Just as it is impossible to build muscles
without weight resistance, its impossible to
build robust reading skills without reading
challenging text. The Challenge of Challenging
Text Shanahan, Fisher, Frey
13
Looking at text through new lenses
  • Chocolate Fever Tangerine
  • Lexile 680 Lexile 680
  • What factors might be used then to differentiate
    these texts?

14
Thinking about text complexity.
  • Chocolate Fever Tangerine
  • Listen as I read an excerpt of each, think about
  • What about this text is supportive for the
  • reader? What about this text is challenging for
  • the reader?

15
Determining Text Complexity
  • Gone are the days when text was judged as
  • difficult solely on the basis of sentence
    length and
  • syllable count. We know that many factors
    affect text complexity. With this increased
    understanding, teachers do not have to rely on
    intuition to figure out what their students can
    handle. Instead, teachers can select texts
    worthy of instruction and align their
    instructional efforts to ensure that all their
    students read complex, interesting, and important
    texts.

  • Shanahan, Fisher, and Frey, 2012

16
What Factors Make Text Complex?
  • Vocabulary
  • Domain-Specific and Academic Terms
  • Sentence Structure
  • Simple v. Complex Short v. Long Density
    Embedding Language Punctuation
  • Coherence
  • Connections
  • Organization
  • Straightforward v. Varied
  • Background Information
  • Developmental, Experiential, and Cognitive

Shanahan, Fisher, Frey, 2012
17
Vocabulary
Powerful Predictors of Complexity
Syntax
Liben, D. and Liben, M., 2012.
18
Stretch Break
Take 2-3 minutes to stretch and say hello to your
table mates.
19
Text Complexity
  • Text complexity is defined by

Qualitative measures levels of meaning,
structure, language conventionality and clarity,
and knowledge demands often best measured by an
attentive human reader
Quantitative measures readability and other
scores of text complexity often best measured by
computer software.
Reader and Task considerations background
knowledge of reader, motivation, interests, and
complexity generated by tasks assigned often best
made by educators employing their professional
judgment.
20
Determining Complexity - Digging Deeper
  • Using available resources to determine the text
  • complexity of materials

21
Determining Text Complexity
  • A Four Step Process
  • Determine the quantitative measures of the text.

Quantitative
Qualitative
  • Analyze the qualitative measures of the text.

Reader and Task
  • Reflect upon the reader and task considerations.
  • Recommend placement in the appropriate text
    complexity band.

22
Step 1 Quantitative Measures
The Quantitative Measures Ranges for Text
Complexity This document outlines the suggested
ranges for each of the text complexity bands
using
  • Lexile Text Measures

---or---
  • ATOS Book Levels (Accelerated Reader)

23
Step 2 Qualitative Measures
  • Measures such as
  • Text structure and organization
  • Language Demands and Conventions
  • Knowledge Demands
  • Levels of Meaning/Purpose
  • Content analysis
  • Visual supports

24
Step 2 Qualitative Measures cont
  • A tool to qualitatively measure texts
  • Qualitative Features of Text Complexity

25
Step 2 Qualitative Measures
  • A companion tool to this is
  • Qualitative Dimensions of Text Complexity Chart
  • The rubric for literary text and the rubric for
    informational text allow educators to evaluate
    the important elements of text that are often
    missed by computer software that tends to focus
    on more easily measured factors.

26
Step 3 Reader and Task
  • Considerations such as
  • Motivation
  • Knowledge and experience
  • Purpose for reading
  • Proficiency of language
  • Complexity of task assigned regarding text
  • Complexity of questions asked regarding text

27
Step 4 Recommend placement in the appropriate
text complexity band
28
TEXT COMPLEXITY AND THE GROWTH OF COMPREHENSION
  • Whatever they are reading, students must also
    show a steadily growing ability to discern more
    from and make fuller use of text, including
    making an increasing number of connections among
    ideas and between texts, considering a wider
    range of textual evidence, and becoming more
    sensitive to inconsistencies, ambiguities, and
    poor reasoning in texts. (CCSS Page 8)

29
Instructing with Complex Text
Knowledge of text complexity can help teachers
design three important components of literacy
instruction building skills, establishing
purpose, and fostering motivation.
Building Fluency
Reading
Writing
Vocabulary Syntax
Multiple Interactions Motivation / Purpose
Text Dependent Questions Other Responsive Writing
30
Teacher Role in Fostering Independent Reading
with Grade Level Text
As independent reading ability increases..teacher
scaffolding decreases.
Scaffolding
Independence
31

Scaffolding for Independence
Scaffolds enable all students to experience the
complexity of the text, rather than avoid it. 
  • Scaffolding should support students in
    negotiating the text, but not exempt them from
    doing the hard work of grappling with text.
  • Many students will need careful
    instructionincluding effective scaffoldingto
    enable them to read at the appropriate level of
    text complexity.
  • Scaffolding is support and is not an alternate,
    simpler source of information that diminishes the
    need for students to read the text itself
    carefully.

32
Instructing with Complex Text Through Close
Reading
Over time, as students read with purpose, they
develop background knowledge and a deeper
understanding of the organizational structures
authors use to convey information. This
understanding gives students access to
increasingly complex texts.
33
Instructing with Complex TextClose Reading
HOW ?
Opportunity for Struggle
  • Not the entire text
  • Doesnt have to be the beginning
  • Opportunity to discuss a question following the
    reading (Read, Think, Discuss)

Student has task
  • Teacher models then students re-read
  • Building Background Knowledge
  • Analyze the text
  • Promote Interaction

Responsive Writing
Seek evidence within text
  • Text dependent questions

34
Unlocking Text Through Close Reading
35
Break 10 minutes
36
Observing Close Reading
Coleman Expert Think Aloud on Close Reading
Close Reading in Action with Students
37
Instructing with Complex TextPlanning for Close
Reading
  • Reflective questions
  • What supports do my students need before they
    begin reading a passage?
  • What strategies will assist them to read the text
    with purpose and clarity?
  • How can I encourage re-reading to facilitate
    deeper meaning?
  • What kinds of collaborative activities will help
    deepen their understandings?
  • How can I help students who need more
    scaffolding?
  • Without my assistance what will students take
    away from this reading?

38
Lets Practice
  • Words We Live By Your Annotated Guide to the
    Constitution. From The Preamble We the
    People

39
The Text Monk, Linda R. Words We Live By Your
Annotated Guide to the Constitution
  • The first three words of the Constitution are the
    most important. They clearly state that the
    peoplenot the king, not the legislature, not the
    courtsare the true rulers in American
    government. This principle is known as popular
    sovereignty. But who are We the People? This
    question troubled the nation for centuries. As
    Lucy
  • Stone, one of Americas first advocates for
    womens rights, asked in 1853, We the People?
    Which We the People? The women were not
    included. Neither were white males who did not
    own property, American Indians, or African
    Americansslave or free. Justice Thurgood
    Marshall, the first African American on the
    Supreme Court, described the limitation
  • for a sense of the evolving nature of the
    constitution, we need look no
  • further than the first three words of the
    documents preamble we the
  • people. when the founding fathers used this
    phrase in 1787, they did not
  • have in mind the majority of Americas citizens .
    . . the men who gathered
  • in Philadelphia in 1787 could not... have
    imagined, nor would they have
  • accepted, that the document they were drafting
    would one day be
  • construed by a Supreme Court to which had been
    appointed a woman
  • and the descendant of an African slave.
  • Through the Amendment process, more and more
    Americans were eventually included in the
    Constitutions definition of We the People.
    After the Civil War, the Thirteenth Amendment
    ended slavery, the Fourteenth Amendment gave
    African Americans citizenship, and the Fifteenth
    Amendment gave black men the vote. In 1920, the
    Nineteenth Amendment gave women the right to vote
    nationwide, and in 1971, the Twenty-sixth
    Amendment extended suffrage to eighteen-year-olds.

40
Writing in Response to Reading
  • Implications
  • Common Core puts greater emphasis on the use of
    evidence in writing
  • Writing will need to be more closely integrated
    with reading comprehension instruction
  • The amount of writing about what students read
    will need to increase
  • Greater emphasis on synthesis of information and
    critical essays than in the past

41
Instructing with Complex TextResponsive Writing

Direct Note Taking
Student Generated Questions
Writing
Reflective Analysis
Text Dependent Questions
42
Instructing with Complex TextResponsive Writing
Text Dependent Questions
  • The Common Core State Standards for reading
    strongly focus on students gathering evidence,
    knowledge, and insight from what they read.
    Indeed, eighty to ninety percent of the Reading
    Standards in each grade require text dependent
    analysis accordingly, aligned curriculum
    materials should have a similar percentage of
    text dependent questions.

How can we ASK text dependent questions if we
dont know how to WRITE them?
43
Turn and Talk
  • What has been most helpful for you so far?
  • What additional questions do you still have?
  • At your table, write your questions on sticky
    notes. (Facilitators will collect)

44
How to Craft Text Dependent Questions
  • A text dependent question specifically asks a
    question that can only be answered by referring
    explicitly back to the text being read.
  • It does not rely on any particular background
    information extraneous to the text nor depend on
    students having other experiences or knowledge.
  • A Guide to Creating Text Dependent Questions,
    JRF

45
Closed Sorting ActivityText Dependent Question
Cards
  • Use the selection from the Words We Live By
  • Sort question cards into two piles TEXT
    DEPENDENT and NON-TEXT DEPENDENT QUESTIONS.
  • Share out

46
Text Dependent Text Dependent Text
Dependent
NON-Text Dependent
Text Dependent Text Dependent
NON-Text Dependent NON-Text Dependent
NON-Text Dependent
47
CRAFTING TEXT DEPENDENT QUESTIONS
YOUR TURN !
  • SELECT A TEXT FROM THE EXEMPLAR SET AND WORK IN
    TEAMS TO CREATE TEXT DEPENDENT QUESTIONS TO
    ACCOMPANY THAT TEXT

Tuskegee Airmen
Depression in Teens could be diagnosed with blood
test
Because of Winn Dixie
48
Instructing with Complex TextBuilding Fluency
  • True fluency is not merely lining up one sentence
    after another and reading them aloud quickly
    it's also maintaining understanding across a
    text.
  • Shanahan, T, Fisher, D., and Frey, N., 2012

49
Instructing with Complex TextBuilding Fluency
Vocabulary
Building Fluency
Syntax
Oral Reading
50
Instructing with Complex TextRole of Vocabulary
in Fluency Building
Building Fluency
Vocabulary
What role does it play in fluency building?
Why should we consider vocabulary when
instructing with complex texts?
51
Instructing with Complex TextRole of Syntax in
Fluency Building
Building Fluency
Syntax
Pronoun references
Punctuation and Clauses
Sentence Structure
52
Syntax Detective Activity
http//www.flhsmv.gov/handbooks/EnglishDriverHandb
ook.pdf
53
  • No Two Texts Are Alike
  • Considering Vocabulary and Syntax
  • Which Text Is More Complex?

https//www.lexile.com/analyzer/
54
Text Dependent Questions That Support Fluency
Development
  • Using the same text exemplar which was used to
    write text dependent questions earlier, circle
    sample text dependent questions that support
    students to notice vocabulary or syntax.
  • Discuss with a partner the things you notice
    about these questions and how you think they
    would support fluency development.

55
Instructing with Complex TextBuilding Fluency
through Oral Reading
Building Fluency
Oral Reading
  • Re-reading is an important tool for enhancing
    comprehension.
  • Meaningful repetition cements learning.
  • Learning is enhanced through group interaction.
  • Performance motivates students.
  • Comprehension is RECIPROCAL to oral
    interpretation.
  • Meaningful use of rhythm aids memory of key
    concepts.

Repeated Reading
Radio Reading
Echo Reading
56
Instructing with Complex TextBuilding Fluency
Increase Your Pedagogy
57
Reflection
58
References
  • ACT . (2006) . Reading between the lines What
    the ACT reveals about college readiness in
    reading. American College Testing. Available
    on-line http//www.act.org/research/policymakers/
    pdf/reading_report.pdf
  • Common Core State Standards .(2010). Common core
    state standards for English language arts and
    literacy in history/social sciences, science, and
    technical subjects Appendix A Research
    supporting key elements of the standards and
    glossary of key terms. Retrieved January 10,
    2012, from www.corestandards.org/assets/Appendix_
    A.pdf
  • Fisher, D ., Frey, N. (2012, January). Text
    complexity and close reading. Engaging the
    adolescent learner.
  • Graham, S., Hebert, M. ( 2010). Writing to Read,
    Evidence of how writing can improve reading.
    Carnegie Corporation of New York.
  • Hayes, D.P., Wolfer, L.T., Wolfe, M.F. (1996).
    Sourcebook simplification and its relation to the
    decline in SAT Verbal scores. Educational
    Leadership, volume 69, 58-62.

59
References cont
  • Liben, D. Aspects of text complexity project why
    complex text matters.
  • Liben, D. and Liben, M. (March 7, 2012). Text
    complexity research project and educational
    implications, draft.
  • Livingston, A., and Wirt, J. (2004). The
    Condition of Education 2004 in Brief (NCES
    2004076). U.S. Department of Education, National
    Center for Education Statistics. Washington, DC
    U.S. Government Printing Office.
  • Lyon, G. R. (2002). Testimonies to Congress
    19972002. Covington, LA Center for Development
    Learning.
  • Milewski, G.B., Johnsen, D., Glazer, N., Kubota,
    M. (2005). A Survey to Evaluate the Alignment of
    the New SAT Writing and Critical Reading Sections
    to Curricula and Instructional Practices. College
    Board.
  • National Assessment Governing Board. (2008).
    Reading framework for the 2009 National
    Assessment of Educational Progress . National
    Assessment of Educational Progress. Washington,
    DC. US Department of Education.

60
References cont
  • National Center for Education Statistics (2011).
    The Nations Report Card Reading 2011. (NCES
    2012457). Institute of Education Sciences, U.S.
    Department of Education, Washington, D.C.
  • Opitz M. Rasinski T.(1998) Good-Bye Round
    Robin 25 effective oral reading strategies.
    Portsmouth, NH Heinemann. 
  • Rasinski, T. Ph.D.. Making Oral Reading an
    Authentic and Effective Part of Your Intermediate
    Grade Curriculum Making Oral Reading an
    Authentic and Effective Part of Your Middle and
    Secondary Grade Curriculum.
  • Shanahan, T, Fisher, D., and Frey, N. (2012,
    March). The challenge of challenging text.
  • Stenner, A.J., Koons, H., and Swartz, C.W (in
    press) Text complexity and developing expertise
    in Reading. Chapel Hill, NC MetaMetrics, Inc.
  • Varlas, L. (April, 2012). Its complicated,
    Common Core State Standards focus on text
    complexity. Educational Update, volume 54,
    number 4.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com