Comparision between Taylor and Fayol’s principles - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Comparision between Taylor and Fayol’s principles

Description:

Comparision between Taylor and Fayol s principles Taylor s Scientific Management Sceintific management is concerned with knowing exactly what you want men to do ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:72
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: force9Fil
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Comparision between Taylor and Fayol’s principles


1
Comparision between Taylor and Fayols principles
2
Taylors Scientific Management
  • Sceintific management is concerned with knowing
    exactly what you want men to do and then see in
    that they do it in the best and cheapest way.

3
Elements and Tools of Scientific management
  • Separation of planning and doing
  • Functional formanship
  • Job analysis
  • Standardisation
  • Financial incentives
  • Scientific selection and training
  • Economy
  • Mental revolution

4
Principles of Scientific management
  • Replacing Rule of thumb with Science
  • Harmony in group action
  • Cooperation
  • Maximum output
  • Development of worker

5
Fayols Administrative Management
  • Fayol looked at the problems of managing an
    organisation from top management point of view.

6
0rganisation can be divided into six groups
  • Technical
  • Commercial
  • Financial
  • Security
  • Accounting
  • Managerial emphasised more on this

7
Approach of Studying Management
  • Managerial qualities and training
  • General principle of management
  • Elements of management

8
Manegerial Qualities and Training
  • Physical
  • Mental
  • Moral
  • Educational
  • Technical
  • Experience

9
General principles of management
  • Division of work
  • Authority and responsibility
  • Discipline
  • Unity of command
  • Unity of direction
  • Subordination of individual to General Interest
  • Remuneration of personnel
  • Centralisation
  • Scalar chain
  • Order
  • Equity
  • Stability of tenure
  • Initiative
  • Esprit de corps(team work)

10
Elements of Management
  • Planning
  • Organising
  • Commanding
  • Coordinating
  • Controlling

11
Comparision
Similarity
  • Both conributed in the evolution of management
    thought
  • Both emphasised on proper utilisation of human
    resourse
  • Stressed on the technical and professional
    aspects
  • Responsible for managerial revolution
  • Both were a successful manager in life so gave a
    very practical solution
  • Both were unable read to the human psychology to
    some extent
  • Both emphasised on maximum output
  • Both emphasised on division of work
  • Both emphasised on competent management

12
Difference
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com