Mining the Future: Chinese Investment in South American Extractive Industries - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 15
About This Presentation
Title:

Mining the Future: Chinese Investment in South American Extractive Industries

Description:

Mining the Future: Chinese Investment in South American Extractive Industries Dr. Cynthia A. Sanborn Universidad del Pac fico Lima, Peru Context . – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:47
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: wilsoncen2
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Mining the Future: Chinese Investment in South American Extractive Industries


1
Mining the Future Chinese Investment in South
American Extractive Industries
  • Dr. Cynthia A. Sanborn
  • Universidad del PacĂ­fico
  • Lima, Peru

2
Context .
  • Global demand and competition all MNCs and SOEs
    seeking LA commodities.
  • Renewed development concerns. Can we diversify,
    escape resource curse?
  • Rethinking role of State, public institutions
  • Democracy, diversity of actors issues
  • Rights, environment, revenue distribution
  • Higher global standards for industry, CSR

3
Questions
  • In this context.
  • What are the development implications of expanded
    investment by Chinese SOE?
  • Do Chinese firms and government -- behave
    differently than others in this region?
  • Do governments behave differently with them?
  • What can we learn from recent cases?
  • What more do we need to know?

4
General Comments
  • Chinese interest primarily oil minerals, but
    also relative social stability, local capacity
    (vs. Africa)
  • Actively recruited by governments, partners
  • Primarily SOE, but also firm diversity
  • What do Chinese offer?
  • Broad government-government agreements
  • Accomodationist position vis governments, local
    elites, changing rules (Gonzalez V.)
  • More money on the table, access to finance
  • Access to China market
  • Increasing Chinese government concern about
    firms behavior, at home and overseas

5
However
  • Goverment directives hard to implement afar on
    the ground.
  • When host governments not strong
  • When firms not national champion, central
    government linked
  • Limited experience with community relations,
    multi-stakeholders
  • Tend to assume governments will resolve social
    problems
  • Limited vocation for dialogue, media
  • Lack of transparency. Part culture, part
    distance and language
  • Do not participate in EITI, local counterparts
  • Delisting acquisitions (Toronto, London)
  • Few effective channels for communication
  • Limited local staff with main office authority
  • Shareholder contacts, activism unlikely

6
Perucase
7
Peru
  • Minerals 62 of exports
  • 25 tax revenues, 20 FDI
  • 6 GDP, 20-50 regions
  • 26 Chinese world mineral MA
  • 34 MA in Peru from China
  • First projects 1992-93
  • Second wave 2007
  • 8 major firms
  • China 2 trade partner
  • FTA with China 2009

8
Peru context
  • Since early 1990s, governments promote foreign
    investment with favorable tax, legal measures.
  • Since 2006, renewed courting of China - FTA
    framework
  • Relatively weak State capacity/will to regulate
    firms
  • Challenges property rights (private, community),
    water rights, environmental impacts, labor,
    indigenous even Church.
  • Increasing socio-environmental conflict.
    Communities vs firms, with State on sidelines.
  • Chinese investing in conflictive situations

9
Major mineral investments
  • 1992, Shougang buys government-owned property
  • 2007-2010, Chinese acquire private juniors
  • Zijin Consortium, Rio Blanco copper, 186m
  • Chinalco, Toromocho copper, 792m
  • Minmetals/Jiangxi, Galeno copper/gold, 432m
  • Nanjinzhao, Pampa de Pongo iron, 100m
  • China Sci Tech, Mina Justa copper, 240m
  • Total announced mining investment in next five
    years 6.8 billion
  • Also oil since 1993, CNPC - today 40 of total
    oil production in Peru. Amazon and coast.

10
Case 1 Shougang Corporation
  • Fourth largest steel company in China, 90 year
    history
  • 1992 buys Hierro Peru (Marcona) for US 188
    million (311 bid)
  • First privatization for Peru mining sector
  • Largest foreign investment for China in LA
  • Labor conflicts 350 Chinese staff, fire locals,
    resist union
  • Local government conflict over water, electricity
  • Environmental impact outdated facilities, fines
    for non-compliance
  • Initial investment commitment not honored, govt
    assumes 266 debt
  • Three anti-corruption investigations since 2002,
    shelved due to perceived threat to expansion,
    other Chinese investments
  • What learning here?

11
Case 2 Zijin Consortium
  • Copper project on Northern border with Ecuador,
    UK junior firm
  • Inherited troubles non-mining area, fragile
    environment, land rights disputed, strong
    opposition from local communities, violence
  • Three Chinese investors (Zijin, Tongling, Xiamen
    CD) - mixed
  • 2007 Only bidder, recruited by
    diplomats-turned-directors
  • Chinese CEO, little change in community
    relations, conflicts persist
  • 2008 President Garcia visits China, meets CEOs,
    promises help
  • Project declared National Priority, protesters
    charged as terrorists
  • Fined in Peru for safey violations, EIA
  • not approved, expanded concessions
  • 2009 more violence, project stand-off

12
Case 3 Chinalco
  • Large new copper project in Junin, Canadian
    junior
  • Requires relocation of entire town (5,000)
  • 2007 bought by Chinalco, national champion SOE
  • Non-Chinese (expat) CEO, former head of
    world-class Antamina copper mine
  • Staff 99 non-Chinese, local experience
  • Extensive investment in environmental programs,
    cleanup old Acid Water Treatment Plant
  • Greater engagement with local community,
    authorities, social investment residents
    approve move.

13
Most likely to succeed?
14
Conclusions
  • Chinese investment a major opportunity for
    commodity producers, but development impacts
    mixed
  • National level ability to harvest these
    resources for sustainable development, depends
    more on will and capacity of national
    policymakers - and vigilance of civil societies.
  • Chinese more positive force, when local states
    are (Chile, Brazil)
  • High potential for conflict when not the case
    (Peru)
  • Local level reducing negative impacts still
    relies heavily on voluntary action of firms
  • Chinese less experienced with stakeholders,
    unions, media
  • Lack of transparency, accountability
  • How fast can they learn?
  • Latin Americans also need to learn more about
    China, its firmst and government institutions
    urgently.

15
Fin
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com