Floodplain Management SESSION 7 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 47
About This Presentation
Title:

Floodplain Management SESSION 7

Description:

Floodplain Management SESSION 7 Stream Systems on Dynamic Earth Floodplain Management Principles & Practice Prepared By Donald R. Reichmuth, PhD. Management Framework ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:96
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 48
Provided by: trainingF3
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Floodplain Management SESSION 7


1
Floodplain ManagementSESSION 7
  • Stream Systems on Dynamic Earth
  • Floodplain Management
  • Principles Practice
  • Prepared By
  • Donald R. Reichmuth, PhD.

2
Management Framework
  • Objectives
  • 1 Stream sediment cycle in terms of source,
    transport and deposition.
  • 2 Difference between the engineering and geologic
    approaches in developing analytical tools for
    stream management.
  • 3 Channel blockages and overall stream stability.
  • 4 Behavior and stabilization methods used in
    drainages showing vertical instability.
  • 5 Problems associated with horizontal stream
    channel migration.
  • 6 Management practices to determine how to insure
    low impact development.
  • 7 Present floodplain as a product of the
    geological floodplain -- case study exercises
  • 8 Module 2 examination.

3
Elements Of Channel Formation
4
Analytical Methods
  • Engineering Approach
  • Initiated By Irrigation Designers
  • Mathematical Approximations
  • Equations Have Limited Utility
  • Geologic Approach
  • Initiated By Field Explorers
  • Descriptive Physical Principals
  • Universal Concepts Developed

5
Energy EquationsNoteExtra Friction Loss For
Expanding Sections
6
(No Transcript)
7
Stream Problem Types
  • Channel Blockage
  • In-channel Obstructions
  • Geologic Accidents
  • Impoundments
  • Vertical Change
  • Headcutting
  • Channel Aggradation
  • Horizontal Change
  • Meander Loop Migration
  • Bank Erosion
  • Channel Cutoffs

8
Channel Blockages
  • Blockages can vary in size
  • from a single downed tree
  • to total channel filling.

9
Effects Of In-stream Obstructions
10
(No Transcript)
11
Debris Flow ExampleAmero, Colombia -- 1985
12
Regional Uplift Erosion PatternsNote Colorado
River Maintained Original Grade
13
Cross Section ViewNote Grand Canyon Formed At
TopOf Structural Warping
14
FromCanyons of the ColoradoByJ. W.
Powell1895
15
ErosionPatternsNoteStream GradientMaintained
During Tectonic Uplift
16
Effects Of Dams
17
Colorado River HydrographBelow Lake Powell
18
Clean Water ReleasesFrom Lake Powell -- Nov. 2004
19
Typical Fish Passage ProblemNoteThe Extreme
Turbulence At The Base Of The Structure
20
Typical Concrete/ Steel Design
  • Yakima River -- Town Diversion
  • U.S. Bureau of Reclamation Design
  • Age ---------------------- About 15 Yrs.
  • Drop Height ---------- About 6 Feet
  • Fish Ladder ---------- 4 Cells (5 Drops)
  • Repair Costs --------- 200,000 Est.
  • (130,000 Spent)
  • Other Problems ----- Apron Undercut

21
Irrigation Diversion DamTypical Concrete
Structure With Fish Ladder
22
(No Transcript)
23
Improved Safety
24
Fish Passage Proof
25
Vertical Change
  • The sediment availability causes most channel
    filling and degradation. Many regions are
    experiencing downcutting as earlier glacial
    deposits are mobilized.

26
Headcuts Cause should we do anything?
27
Headcut-Caused FailureOpen Arch Culvert --- Bed
Scoured To Bedrock
28
(No Transcript)
29
Vertical Grade StabilizationExcess Energy
Removed With Drops
30
Rock Drop Characteristics
  • Stable
  • Fish Friendly
  • Overhead Cover
  • Low Velocity Eddy
  • Macro-Invertebrates
  • Safe For Boaters
  • ---------------------------------------------
  • Unstable
  • Poor Habitat
  • Standing Wave Unsafe

31
(No Transcript)
32
Rock Drop ExampleLow Flow Concentrated At
Mid-Channel
33
(No Transcript)
34
Horizontal Change
  • Horizontal channel migration
  • is most common in regions
  • that have low stream gradients
  • and have reached an equilibrium grade.

35
(No Transcript)
36
(No Transcript)
37
Meander Loop CutoffLoss Of Energy
DissipationMust Be ReplacedFor Stable
Conditions To Exist
38
Bank ErosionCaused By Uncontrolled Upstream
Sediment Source
39
Cumulative Impacts
  • Low Impact Development can only occur when long
    range goals are adopted that minimize cumulative
    impacts.

40
Quick FlushPoor Management Technique Shifts
Problems To OthersEncourages Unsound
Development
41
Floodplain UtilizationGood Management
TechniqueHelps Protect Downstream
ReachesIncreases Base FlowEncourages
Sustainable Development
42
(No Transcript)
43
Cumulative ImpactsOn Roaring Fork River
Floodplain
44
Roaring Fork River1985 Aerial View Before
Highway Construction
45
Roaring Fork RiverAerial View Of Bottleneck Area
46
Roaring ForkRiverGround PhotoShowingFailing
Gabion BasketWall
47
Slide Presentation Prepared ByGeomax, P.C.Dr.
Donald R. Reichmuth, President1023 W. 30th
Ave.Spokane, WA 99203-1324Phone FAX
509-838-6390E-mail geomax_at_comcast.net
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com