Advanced Pragmatics of Communication Introduction - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 28
About This Presentation
Title:

Advanced Pragmatics of Communication Introduction

Description:

ITRI Information Technology Research Institute, Faculty of Science and Engineering ... (Pinter's The Dumb Waiter) GUS: How many times have you read that paper? ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:192
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 29
Provided by: itriBri
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Advanced Pragmatics of Communication Introduction


1
(Advanced) Pragmatics of Communication
Introduction
  • Paul Piwek
  • ITRI Information Technology Research Institute,
    Faculty of Science and Engineering

2
Practical Issues LCM13/CBM14(Advanced)
Pragmatics of Communication
  • Attendance list
  • Introductions
  • Paul Piwek (ITRI)
  • Kees van Deemter (ITRI)
  • Irmi Karl (CMIS)
  • David Horner (CMIS)
  • Preparation Pack

3
Plan for introduction
  • What is Pragmatics?
  • Syntax - Semantics - Pragmatics
  • Varieties of Meaning and Context
  • Some remarks on History the Field (Books,
    Journals, etc.)
  • Plan for remainder of today, Tuesday and Wednesday

4
What is Pragmatics?
  • Charles Morris (1938). The science of signs
    (semiotics)
  • Syntax relation of signs to each other
  • Semantics signs and things to which they apply
  • Pragmatics signs and interpreters

5
Syntax
  • Syntax. Distinguish grammatical from
    non-grammatical sentences.
  • Generative Grammar (Chomsky) Have a finite set
    of rules which produce only the grammatical
    sentences of language, e.g., English
  • John yesterday house bought. NO
  • John bought a house yesterday YES
  • Colorless green ideas sleep furiously YES
  • ... (till infinity John, Mary, Peter and Sally
    went to the movies.)

6
Semantics
  • Truth-conditional semantics. (Richard Montague).
    Semantics assigns meanings to grammatical
    sentences.
  • (Semantics) Meaning Truth-conditions
    Proposition (borrowed from Logic)
  • M(It is eight oclock) P
  • w1 ? True,
  • w2 ? False,
  • w3 ? True,
  • w4 ? True,
  • w5 ? True,
  • ...
  • Statement P(w_now) true

7
Semantics
  • What time is it Eccles?
  • Just a minute. Ive got it written down on a
    piece of paper. A nice man wrote the time down
    for me this morning.
  • Then why do you carry it around with you
    Eccles?
  • Well, if anybody asks me the time, I can show
    it to them.
  • Wait a minute, Eccles my good man.
  • What is it, fellow?
  • It is written on this piece of paper that its
    eight oclock
  • ...
  • (From the Goon Show by Spike Milligan and Peter
    Sellers)

8
Semantics
  • Semanticists have looked predominantly at how the
    meanings of the parts of a sentence contribute to
    the whole. Rather than trying to specify the
    semantics of red and ball they suggest how
    the meaning of red ball is composed of the
    meanings of red and ball.
  • They have done the same thing on the sentence
    level. What is the meaning s1 or s2 given the
    meanings of s1P and s2Q? or(P,Q)
  • P(w) Q(w) or(P,Q)(w) (For all w)
  • T T T
  • T F T
  • F T T
  • F F F

9
Semantics
  • P(w) not(P)(w) (For all w)
  • T F
  • F T
  • Tautologies a statement that is necessarily true
  • John is at home or John is not at home
  • P(w) not(P)(w) or(not(P),P)(w) (For all w)
  • T F T
  • F T T

10
Semantics
  • Catch-22 (Contradictions)
  • Yossarian looked at him soberly and tried another
    approach. Is Orr Crazy?
  • He sure is, Doc Daneeka said.
  • Can you ground him?
  • I sure can. But first he has to ask me to.
    Thats part of the rule.
  • ...
  • He has to be crazy to keep flying combat
    missions after all the close calls hes had.
  • ...
  • Then why doesnt he ask you to?
  • ...
  • Anyone who wants to get out of combat duty
    isnt really crazy

11
Semantics
  • a ask to be grounded
  • f flying (currently)
  • g will be grounded
  • c crazy
  • If c and a then g.
  • If a then not c.
  • If f then c.

P(w) Q(w) if(P,Q)(w) T T T T F F F T T F F T
12
(No Transcript)
13
Syntax and Semantics
  • Rule-based.
  • Distinguish grammatical from ungrammatical
    sentences.
  • Distinguish semantically sensible (sets of)
    sentences from problematic ones (tautologies and
    contradictions).
  • Pragmatics how do people use sentences in
    communication
  • Characterize acceptable/unacceptable use
  • It is no longer possible to consider sentences in
    isolation we need to take the context into
    account
  • We look beyond truth-conditional meanings

14
Context
  • You make great coffee.
  • This sentence expresses a proposition, but which
    proposition it expresses depends on the context
  • The deictic pronoun You
  • The verb make. Douwe Egberts makes great
  • coffee, but in different sense from the
  • everyday coffee user.

15
Context
  • Context helps to determine the truth-conditional
    meaning of a sentence, i.e., the proposition it
    expresses.
  • But there is more to the meaning of a sentence
    when we consider the sentence in relation to its
    situation of use

16
Context
  • A Do I make good coffee?
  • B You make great coffee.
  • A Do you think Im a good cook.
  • B You make great coffee.
  • A Its your turn to make the coffee.
  • B You make great coffee.

17
Context
  • We convey more than the literal, propositional
    meaning. But what is the meaning of an utterance
    in this wider sense?
  • Surely it doesnt include all the information
    conveyed by the performance of an utterance (from
    voice age, sex, nationality, e.g., Dutchman
    speaking English).
  • Grice Natural versus Non-natural meaning.
  • Natural smoke means fire
  • Non-natural meaning S meant-nn z by uttering U
    if and only if
  • S intended U to cause some effect z in recipient
    H
  • S intended 1. to be achieved by H recognizing
    intention 1.

18
Context
  • Deixis direct utterance context as a resource
    for constructing meaning.
  • Meaning additional to proposition Conversational
    Implicature.
  • Note that for 2. it is essential to think about
    utterances as acts, i.e., Speech Acts, and its
    relation to the context.
  • Presupposition The King of France is bald. John
    has stopped beating his wife/John didnt stop
    beating his wife.
  • Conversational Structure

19
Conversational Structure
  • A Do you have some time on Monday.
  • B Yes.
  • A We want to move and need a hand.
  • B No problem, what time shall I see you?

20
Conversational Structure
  • A Do you have some time on Monday.
  • B Yes.
  • A We want to move and need a hand.
  • B No problem, what time shall I see you?
  • A Sorry to trouble you.
  • B Not at all.
  • A Thank you very much. Good day
  • (Morecambe and Wise)

21
The social dimension
  • Wednesday Judith Butler. What is the relation
    between representation and conduct in language
    use.
  • She examines the notion of injurious speech (hate
    speech).
  • Christopher Columbus discovered America in 1492.
  • discover b be the first to find or find out
    (who discovered America?). Oxford Encyclopedic
    English Dictionary

22
The social dimension
  • Bush on the two Koreas
  • "People on both sides of this border want to
    live in freedom and dignity, without the threat
    of violence and famine and war. I hope that one
    day soon this hope will be realized. And when the
    day comes, all the people of Korea will find in
    America a strong and willing friend," he said.
    (Bush in SEOUL, South Korea. CNN 20-02-02 )

23
The social dimension (Pinters The Dumb Waiter)
  • GUS How many times have you read that paper?
  • (BEN slams down the paper and rises)
  • BEN (angrily) What do you mean?
  • GUS I was just wondering how many times youd
  • BEN What are you doing, criticising me?
  • GUS No, I was just
  • BEN Youll get a swipe round your earhole if you
    dont watch your step.
  • GUS Now look here Ben
  • BEN Im not looking anywhere! (he addresses the
    room)
  • How many times have I! A bloody liberty!
  • GUS I didnt mean that.
  • BEN You just get on with it mate. Get on with it
    thats all.

24
What is Pragmatics? History
  • Rudolph Carnap (Analytical Philosopher). A study
    is within the scope of pragmatics if explicit
    reference is made to the speaker/user of the
    language.
  • Wide interpretation includes studies such as
    those of Jung into Freudian slips of the tongue.
  • Bar-Hillel/Kalish/Montague Narrowly interpreted
    this boils down to the study of languages that
    contain indexical/deictic terms.

25
What is Pragmatics? Field
  • Pragmatics is not to be confused with Pragmatism,
    and the Pragmatist Maxim which was conceived of
    by C.S. Peirce (1878). Roughly speaking, Peirce
    contends that the meaning of a word is not
    something in the mind of the speaker when he
    utters or accepts it, but rather what he is
    prepared to do when he utters or accepts it.
  • Pragmatics the study of language use taking into
    account the context.

26
What is Pragmatics? Field
  • Most influential contributors have been
    philosophers John Austin, John Searle and Paul
    Grice
  • There is wide range of introductory text books.
    The most used one probably being Levinson
    (1983). Others Green (1989), Leech (1983), Mey
    (1993), Yule (1996), etc.
  • Reader Davis (1991)
  • Journals Journal of Pragmatics, Pragmatics, and
    Pragmatics and Cognition

27
Summary
  • Pragmatics
  • Syntax study of grammatical sentences
  • Semantics study of truth-conditions of sentences
    and specifically sentences with special
    truth-conditions (tautologies, contradictions)
  • Pragmatics Language users, Context
  • Constructing meanings (deixis, presupposition)
  • Speech Acts
  • Implicated meaning (Conversational Implicatures)
  • Conversational Structure
  • Social Dimension some examples (political/power
    relations/creating spaces for discourse)
  • History and Field

28
Plan
  • Day 2
  • Discussion of 2001
  • Preparation and Presentations
  • Clark (indirect Speech Acts)
  • Pratt (Conv. Impl. in Lit. Disc.)
  • Meyerson (Habermas).
  • Schank/Lenat (on 2001)
  • Remainder Day 1
  • Speech Acts (Austin/Searle)
  • Wittgenstein/Habermas
  • Conversational Implicatures (Grice)
  • Film 2001 extract.
  • Day 3
  • Butler Hate speech/Speech injury
  • Conclusions/Evaluation
  • Further Essay Application to Text/Discourse
    Project Application to Computer artefact web
    pages, dialogue systems, ...
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com