Recognizing Different Perspectives on Quality Slide 1 of 3 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 54
About This Presentation
Title:

Recognizing Different Perspectives on Quality Slide 1 of 3

Description:

Recognizing Different Perspectives on Quality Slide 1 of 3 Different Perspectives on Quality There are many different definitions and dimensions of quality. – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:247
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 55
Provided by: juliangoh
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Recognizing Different Perspectives on Quality Slide 1 of 3


1
INTRODUCTION
2
Recognizing Different Perspectives on
QualitySlide 1 of 3
  • Different Perspectives on Quality
  • There are many different definitions and
    dimensions of quality.
  • For the present, you should view quality as a
    measure of goodness that is inherent to a product
    or service.
  • Employees working for the same firm often view
    quality differently as illustrated in the next
    slide.

3
Recognizing Different Perspectives on
QualitySlide 2 of 3
Different View of Quality that can Exist in the
Same Firm
Engineering
Marketing
Accounting
A product engineer might associate quality with
product design
A marketing executive might associate quality
with quick design time
An accountant might associate quality with low
product cost
4
Recognizing Different Perspectives on
QualitySlide 3 of 3
  • As Illustrated in the Preceeding Slide,
    Perceptions on Quality Can Vary
  • In order to communicate effectively about
    quality, managers need to recognize that
    differences in perceptions of quality exist.

5
DEFINITION OF QUALITY
  • It is difficult to define quality. Everything we
    do has some quality elements in it. An example,
    choosing the clothes we wear, colour, features,
    comfort, affordability, suitability, the design
    is associated to some quality aspect. We know it
    when we see it, feel it, touch it, wear it and
    buy it. How do we define quality, is where we
    associate it with our criterion or perception of
    quality that we have set in our mind or heart. As
    long as it suits or fall on or between the
    criterion or perception we set, met all or part
    of it, we grade it as a product that met our
    quality expectation.

6
DEFINITION OF QUALITY
  • Various definition can be found. Among them
  • Conformance to requirements. (Crosby)
  • Fitness for use or satisfies customers needs. (
    J.M. Juran)
  • A predictable degree of uniformity and
    dependability at low cost and suited to the
    market. ( W. Edwards Deming)
  • The totality features and characteristics of a
    product or service that bear upon its ability to
    satisfy stated or implied needs. (ISO 8402)
  • Totality of features and characteristics of a
    product or service that bears on its ability to
    satisfy given needs. (ANSI ASQ)

7
What Is Quality?
  • Garvins Definitions of Quality
  • David Garvin of the Harvard Business School found
    that most definitions of quality were either
    transcendent, product-based, user-based,
    manufacturing-based, or value-based.
  • Garvins Dimensions of Product Quality
  • Using the five definitions of quality, Garvin
    developed a list of eight quality dimensions.
  • Service Quality Dimensions
  • Parasuraman, Zeithamel, and Berry of Texas AM
    University published a widely recognized set of
    service quality dimensions.

8
Garvins Definitions of Quality?Slide 1 of 2
  • Transcendent Definition
  • Quality is something that is intuitively
    understood but nearly impossible to communicate
    such as beauty or love.
  • Product-Based Definition
  • Quality is found in the components and attributes
    of a product.
  • User-Based Definition
  • If the customer is satisfied, the product has
    good quality.

9
Garvins Definitions of Quality?Slide 2 of 2
  • Manufacturing Based Definition
  • If the product conforms to design specifications,
    it has good quality.
  • Value-Based Definition
  • If the product is perceived as providing good
    value for the price, it has good quality.

10
Garvins Product Quality DimensionsSlide 1 of 4
Performance
Features
Durability
Reliability
Serviceability
Conformance
Aesthetics
Perceived Quality
11
Garvins Product Quality DimensionsSlide 2 of 4
  • Performance
  • Refers to the efficiency with which a product
    achieves its intended purpose.
  • Features
  • Attributes of a product that supplement a
    products basic performance.
  • Reliability
  • The propensity for a product to perform
    consistently over its useful design life.

12
Garvins Product Quality DimensionsSlide 3 of 4
  • Conformance
  • Numerical dimensions for a products performance,
    such as capacity, speed, size, durability, color,
    or the like.
  • Durability
  • The degree to which a product tolerates stress or
    trauma without failing.
  • Serviceability
  • Ease of repair.

13
Garvins Product Quality DimensionsSlide 4 of 4
  • Aesthetics
  • Subjective sensory characteristics such as taste,
    feel, sound, look, and smell.
  • Perceived Quality
  • Quality is as the customer perceives it.
    Customers imbue products and services with their
    understanding of their goodness. This is
    perceived quality.

14
Service Quality DimensionsSlide 1 of 3
Parasuraman, Zeithamel, and Berrys Service
Quality Dimensions
Tangibles
Responsiveness
Service Reliability
Assurance
Empathy
15
Service Quality DimensionsSlide 2 of 3
  • Tangibles
  • Include the physical appearance of the service
    facility, the equipment, the personnel, and the
    communication material.
  • Service Reliability
  • Differs from product reliability in that it
    relates to the ability of the service provider to
    perform the promised service dependably and
    accurately.

16
Service Quality DimensionsSlide 3 of 3
  • Responsiveness
  • The willingness of the service provider to be
    helpful and prompt in providing service.
  • Assurance
  • The knowledge and courtesy of employees and their
    ability to inspire trust and confidence.
  • Empathy
  • Caring, individual attention paid to customers by
    the service firm.

17
Why Does It Matter That Difference Definitions
of Quality Exist?
Understanding that definitions and dimensions of
quality exist allows measures to be taken to
provide a better basis for communication and
planning in a firm.
18
Differing Functional Perspectives on Quality
  • Engineering Perspective
  • Operations Perspective
  • Strategic Management Perspective
  • Marketing Perspective
  • Financial Perspective
  • Human Resources Perspective

19
Engineering Perspective on QualitySlide 1 of 4
  • Nature of Engineering Perspective
  • Engineers are interested in applying mathematical
    problem solving skills and models to the problems
    of business and industry.
  • Two of the major emphases in engineering
  • Product design
  • Process design

20
Engineering Perspective on QualitySlide 2 of 4
  • Product Design Engineering
  • Involves all of those activities associated with
    developing a product from concept development to
    final design and implementation.
  • Product design life cycle
  • Key to quality as quality is assured at the
    design stage.
  • Concurrent engineering
  • The simultaneous performance of product and
    process design activities.
  • Has resulted in improved quality and faster speed
    to market for new products.

21
Engineering Perspective on QualitySlide 3 of 4
Product Design Life Cycle
Figure 1.1
Idea Generation
Prototype Iterations
Preliminary Design
Prototype Development
Final Definition
Product Design Evaluation
Implemen- tation
22
Engineering Perspective on QualitySlide 4 of 4
  • Related Concepts
  • Life Testing
  • Is a facet of reliability engineering that
    concerns itself with determining whether a
    product will fail under controlled conditions
    during a specified life.
  • Redundancy
  • Is applied so that a back up system can take over
    for the failed primary system.
  • Statistical Process Control
  • Is concerned with monitoring process capability
    and process stability.

23
Operations Perspective on QualitySlide 1 of 6
  • Nature of Operations Perspective
  • The operations management view of quality is
    rooted in the engineering approach.
  • Like engineers, operations managers are very
    concerned about product and process design.
  • However, rather than focusing on only the
    technical aspects of these activities, operations
    concentrates of the management of these
    activities.
  • Operations management has developed into an
    integrative field, combining concepts from
    engineering, operations research, organizational
    theory, organizational behavior, and strategic
    management.

24
Operations Perspective on QualitySlide 2 of 6
  • Systems View
  • Operations management utilizes the systems view
    that underlies modern quality management
    thinking.
  • The systems view involves the understanding that
    product quality is the result of the interactions
    of several variables such as machines, labor,
    procedures, planning, and management.

25
Operations Perspective on QualitySlide 3 of 6
The Systems View of Operation Management
Figure 1.3
Planning
Organizing
Inputs
Conversion Process
Outputs
Customers
Feedback
Controlling
26
Operations Perspective on QualitySlide 4 of 6
  • Operations/Marketing Interface
  • In recent years, a major advance in operations
    management has been the improved understanding of
    the operations/marketing interface.
  • The interface has resulted in an increased focus
    on the customer.
  • This externalized view is important as operations
    managers in firms still tend to be focused
    heavily on meeting production schedules,
    sometimes at the expense of good quality.

27
Operations Perspective on QualitySlide 5 of 6
  • Strategic View of Operations Management
  • Among the recent advances in operations
    management has been a migration towards a more
    strategic view.
  • Ferdows and Demeyer linked this strategic view of
    operations management to quality management by
    proposing the Sand Cone Model in which quality
    was identified as the base on which lasting
    improvement in other competitive dimensions were
    established.

28
Operations Perspective on QualitySlide 6 of 6
An Operations Management Competence Model The
Sand Cone Model
Figure 1.4
Cost Efficiency
Speed
Dependability
Quality
29
Strategic Management Perspective on
QualitySlide 1 of 3
  • Nature of the Strategic Management Perspective
  • Strategy refers to the planning processes used by
    an organization to achieve a set of long term
    goals.
  • The planned course of action must be cohesive and
    coherent in terms of goals, policies, plans, and
    sequencing to achieve quality improvement.
  • Initially, quality-related strategic planning was
    treated as if it were a separate exercise from
    firm-level strategic planning.
  • However, quality management, to become pervasive
    in a firm, needed to be included in all of the
    firms business practices, including strategic
    planning.

30
Strategic Management Perspective on
QualitySlide 2 of 3
A Generic Strategic Planning Process
Figure 1.5
Firm Mission and Goals
Internal Analysis
External Analysis
Strategic Options
Business Level Strategy
Corporate Level Strategy
Operational Subplans
Org. Reward Systems
Organizational Design
Conflict Politics and Change
Strategic Alignment Between Structure and Goals
31
Strategic Management Perspective on
QualitySlide 3 of 3
  • Goal of Strategic Quality Planning
  • The ultimate goal of strategic quality planning
    is to aid an organization to achieve sustainable
    competitive advantage.
  • Research shows that quality is still the major
    concern of CEOs.

32
Marketing Perspective on QualitySlide 1 of 3
  • Nature of Marketing Perspective
  • Marketing efforts are often focused on managing
    perceptions of quality.
  • Relationship Management
  • Directing attention toward satisfying and
    delivering value to the customer.
  • Tools for Influencing Customer Perceptions of
    Quality
  • Price and advertising are the primary tools for
    influencing customer perceptions of quality, but
    are imperfect mechanisms.

33
Marketing Perspective on QualitySlide 2 of 3
A Marketing System
Figure 1.7
Organization
Offering
Payment
Intermediary
Payment
Offering
Offering
Payment
Customer
34
Marketing Perspective on QualitySlide 3 of 3
  • Focus on Service
  • Another important contribution of the marketing
    perspective has been the focus on service.
  • Customer service surveys are important tools for
    assessing the multiple dimensions of quality.

35
Financial Perspective on QualitySlide 1 of 4
  • Nature of the Financial Perspective
  • One of the most commonly asked questions about
    quality management is will it pay us financial
    benefits?
  • The financial perspective relies more on
    quantified, measurable, results-oriented
    thinking.
  • W. Edwards Deming made the first theoretical
    attempt to link quality improvements to financial
    results through the Deming Value Chain.

36
Financial Perspective on QualitySlide 2 of 4
The Deming Value Chain
Figure 1.8
Improve Quality
Productivity Improves
Cost decrease because of less rework, fewer
mistakes, fewer delays, snags better use
of machine-time and materials
Capture the Market
Provide Jobs and More Jobs
Stay in Business
37
Financial Perspective on QualitySlide 3 of 4
  • Law of Diminishing Marginal Returns
  • According to this law, there is a point at which
    investments in quality improvement will become
    uneconomical.
  • According to the quadratic economic quality level
    model, higher levels of quality will result in
    higher expenditures.
  • This view is at odds with the ethic of continual
    improvement.

38
Financial Perspective on QualitySlide 4 of 4
Basic Economic Quality Level Model
Figure 1.9
Cost
Total Quality Costs Sum of Losses and Gains
Costs of Improving Quality
MinimumCost
Losses due to poor quality
Optimum Quality Level
Quality
39
Human Resources Perspective on QualitySlide 1
of 3
  • Nature of Human Resources Perspective
  • Understanding the human resources perspective on
    quality is essential as it is impossible to
    implement quality without the commitment and
    action of employees.
  • Related Concepts
  • Employee Empowerment
  • Organizational Design
  • Job Analysis
  • 360-degree evaluation
  • Total Quality Human Resources Management

40
Human Resource Perspective on QualitySlide 2 of
3
  • Employee Empowerment
  • Empowering employees involves moving decision
    making to the lowest level in the organization.
  • Organizational Design
  • Human resources managers are involved in many
    aspects of organizational design, such as the
    design of reward systems, pay systems,
    organizational structure, compensation, training
    mechanisms, and employee grievance arbitration.
  • Job Analysis
  • Involves collecting detailed information about a
    particular job.

41
Human Resource Perspective on QualitySlide 3 of
3
  • 360-Degree Evaluation
  • A performance measurement system in which an
    employees peers, supervisors, and subordinates
    are involved in evaluating the workers
    performance.
  • Total Quality Human Resources Management (TQHRM)
  • TQHRM involves many of the concepts of quality
    management to provide a more supportive and
    empowered environment.

42
WHY QUALITY?
  • Nakane(1986) introduce cumulative
    model.(Nakane-Hall Model) which stresses that
    quality is the base of all improvement.

Speed/Flexibility
Cost/Efficiency
Dependability
Quality
43
The Three Spheres of QualitySlide 1 of 4
Figure 1.10
Quality Management
Quality Assurance
Quality Control
44
The Three Spheres of QualitySlide 2 of 4
  • Quality Control
  • Includes phases of analysis, relation, and
    generalization.
  • Activities relating to quality control include
  • Monitoring process capability and stability
  • Measuring process performance
  • Reducing process variability
  • Optimizing processes to nominal measures
  • Performing acceptance sampling
  • Developing and maintaining control charts

45
The Three Spheres of QualitySlide 3 of 4
  • Quality Assurance
  • Refers to activities associated with guaranteeing
    the quality of a product or service.
  • Quality assurance activities include tasks such
    as
  • Failure mode and effects analysis
  • Concurrent engineering
  • Experimental design
  • Process improvements
  • Design team formation and management
  • Off-line experimentation
  • Reliability/durability product testing

46
The Three Spheres of QualitySlide 4 of 4
  • Quality Management
  • The management processes that overarch and tie
    together the control and assurance activities.
  • Quality management activities
  • Planning for quality improvement.
  • Creating a quality organizational culture.
  • Providing leadership and support.
  • Providing training and retraining.
  • Designing an organizational system that
    reinforces quality ideals.
  • Providing employee recognition.
  • Facilitating organizational communication.

47
Other Perspectives on QualitySlide 1 of 2
  • The Value-Added Perspective on Quality
  • A customer-based perspective on quality that is
    utilized by services, manufacturing, and public
    sector organizations.
  • Involves a subjective assessment of the efficacy
    of every step of the process for the customer.

48
Other Perspectives on QualitySlide 2 of 2
  • Cultural Perspectives on Quality
  • International marketers have long noted that
    there are differences in tastes and preferences
    between cultures and nations.
  • It is not so obvious that approaches to quality
    improvement may differ according to culture.

49
Contingency Approach to Quality
  • Contingency Theory
  • Contingency theory presupposes that there is no
    theory or method for operating a business that
    can be applied in all situations.
  • As a result, a coherent quality strategy will
    need to address key environmental variables.
  • Contingency Approach
  • Definitions and dimensions of quality applied
    within an organization will, and should vary.
  • Dimensions of quality will depend on the
    environment in which a company operates.
  • Provides flexibility to managers in pursuing
    quality.

50
Total Quality Management
  • TQM can be define as "continuous improvement
    activities involving everyone in the organisation
    - managers and workers - in a totally integrated
    effort toward improving performance at every
    level. This is directed towards satisfying
    cross-functional goals such as quality, cost,
    schedule, mission, needs, suitability and etc.
  • TQM ultimately focused on increased customer/user
    satisfaction.

51
Total Quality Management
  • There are many ways to achieve customer
    satisfaction. Among them are
  • Strategically Based
  • Decision making and problem solving using
    scientific approach
  • Focusing on Internal and External Customer
  • Training and Education
  • Employee Improvement and Empowerment
  • Commitment
  • Teamworking
  • Continuous Improvement (Kaizen)
  • All these lead to improvement in at least one of
    the quality dimensions.

52
Total Quality Management
  • There are many approaches to Total Quality but
    the most basic elements are focusing on
  • Customer
  • Strategic Planning and Leadership
  • Continuously Improving and Learning
  • Employees Empowerment and Team-working

53
Benefits of Total Quality Management
  • According to Deming' Chain Reaction, by
    emphasising on quality, organisation can
    benefited in terms of

54
References
  • Garvin, D.A. Managing Quality The Strategic and
    Competitive Edge. New York Free Press, 1988
  • Garvin, D.A." What Does 'Product Quality' Really
    Mean?" Sloan Management Review, Vol. 26, No.1,
    1984, pp.25-43, and Greg Bounds, Lyle Yorks, Mel
    Adams, Gipsie Ranney, Total Quality Management,
    Towards the Emerging Paradigm, 1994, McGraw
    Hill. p.p 41-51
  • Ross Johnson and William O.Winchell, Production
    and Quality (Milwaukee, WI American Society for
    Quality, 1989), p.2.
  • Nakane, J. Manufacturing Futures Survey in
    Japan, A Comparative Survey 1983-1986. Tokyo
    Systems Science Institute, Weseda University, May
    1986
  • David L. Goetsch and Stanley B. Davis,
    Introduction to Total Quality, Quality Management
    for Production, Processing and Services, Second
    Edition, 1997, Prentice Hall. p.p 4
  • W. Edward Deming, Out of Crisis, Cambridge,
    Mass. MIT Center for Advanced Engineering Study,
    1986 and James R. Evans and James W. Dean. Jr,
    Total Quality, Management, Organization and
    Strategy, Second Edition, 2000, South-Western
    Thomson Learning, p 45
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com