Successful Pre- and Post-Award Collaborations Start with Good Proposals and Agreements - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 28
About This Presentation
Title:

Successful Pre- and Post-Award Collaborations Start with Good Proposals and Agreements

Description:

Successful Pre- and Post-Award Collaborations Start with Good Proposals and Agreements Nancy Daneau, Office of Sponsored Programs Joanne Goldstein and Michael Miller ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:102
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 29
Provided by: nyuEduco
Learn more at: https://www.nyu.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Successful Pre- and Post-Award Collaborations Start with Good Proposals and Agreements


1
Successful Pre- and Post-Award Collaborations
Start with Good Proposals and Agreements
  • Nancy Daneau, Office of Sponsored Programs
  • Joanne Goldstein and Michael Miller, Sponsored
    Programs Accounting

2
What well cover today.
  • Common issues that arise during proposal
    development and award negotiation that impact our
    post-award colleagues
  • Solutions for the pre-award administrator to be
    proactive and pre-empt problems
  • How to coordinate and manage the process to
    facilitate effective project management and
    foster good relationships

Hot potatoes!
3
Budget Developmenthot potatoes
  • Identify Cost Categories Unidentified Costs
  • May cause overruns on the award
  • Institution shares in cost of research effort
  • May require sponsor approval for rebudgeting
  • Holds up post-award invoicing and financial
    reporting
  • Bottom line Not in the budget? Ask.
  • Personnel Costs Proposal vs. Expenditures
  • Reports of time and effort are certified
  • Bottom line Reporting Audits Findings

4
Budget Developmenthot potatoes(contd)
  • Itemize Costs Correctly Follow the Rules
  • Salary vs. Stipend
  • Stipends not allowable on research grants, only
    on training/ fellowship grants
  • Employer/employee relationship salary
  • Trainee/fellow entitled to living allowance
    stipend
  • Consider immigration status in allowability
  • Must be US citizen or permanent resident (green
    card) to receive stipend
  • Materials Supplies vs. Equipment
  • Threshold for capital equipment 3,000 at NYU,
    with a useful life of at least 1 year
  • FA rate applied to materials and supplies, but
    NOT to capital equipment items

5
Budget Developmenthot potatoes(contd)
  • Travel domestic vs. foreign
  • Domestic in-state or out-of-state
  • Foreign allowable with prior approval, certain
    restrictions apply
  • Know basis/rates for reimbursement
  • Use NYU per diems or actuals, not combination of
    both!
  • Understand need for detailed meal receipts, not
    just credit card slips
  • Subawards vs. subcontracts
  • Difference between the big S and the little s
  • Programmatic effort (big S) vs. goods and
    services (little s)
  • Impact on FA/indirect cost recovery on federally
    funded projects
  • FA assessed on only the first 25K of the big
    S
  • FA assessed on full amount of little S
  • Flow-down of prime award terms and conditions
    required for big S, not for little s
  • Subrecipient monitoring required for big S, not
    for little s

6
Budget Developmenthot potatoes(contd)
  • Pieces needed for the big S
  • Subawardee budget, Statement of Work (SOW),
    institutional approvals
  • Impact if not on file or request to issue Sub not
    initiated internally
  • Late issuance
  • Late start of work by collaborator
  • Late invoicing and payment
  • Late reporting
  • Impacts the progress of the overall effort
  • Remember, your institution as prime recipient is
    ultimately responsible for conduct of the work
    and meeting sponsor requirements!

7
Budget Developmenthot potatoes(contd)
  • Are costs allowable, allocable, reasonable,
    consistently treated?
  • Sponsor guidelines
  • OMB Circular A-21
  • Institutional Rules
  • Are costs direct or FA/indirect?
  • Direct costs identifiable to a specific project
  • Indirect costs incurred as part of overall
    operations
  • Ex Direct vs. Administrative (FA) costs
  • Salaries and wages of clerical/administrative
    staff generally unallowable as direct
  • Ex General office supplies, unallowable as
    direct charges
  • Exception meet the test of major project as
    defined in Exhibit C of A-21
  • Application/treatment of costs should be
    consistent

8
Cost Sharinghot potatoes
  • Most institutions policies, written or not
  • No cost sharing unless mandated/required by
    sponsor
  • Voluntary committed cost sharing
  • Faculty/key personnel time and effort stated but
    not fully charged to the sponsored award
  • Must be tracked and reported upon
  • Has negative impact on FA/indirect cost recovery
  • Indirect Cost Waivers
  • Does the difference between NYUs federally
    negotiated rate and the reduced rate you agree to
    accept on the award represent cost sharing?
  • Only if feds approve and only applies to federal
    awards

9
Budget Development Hints and Tips
  • Project the future Look toward reality
  • Ask the question What will it take to do this
    project?
  • Work budget backward starting with total costs
  • Compare reality with proposed budget
  • Plan so that every dollar is utilized to PI and
    institutions best advantage ask every question
    to get the full cost impact from your PI

10
Budget Development Hints and Tips
  • Impacts of poor planning
  • Loss of direct cost funding available to the
    project
  • Loss of FA/indirect cost recovery
  • Disallowances
  • Open communication reduces potential for
  • Excessive, inappropriate, or late cost transfers
  • Manual adjustments
  • Disallowances
  • Revised invoices/financial reports
  • Audit findings
  • Loss of expanded authorities or letter of credit
    drawdown eligibility

11
Award Terms Conditionshot potatoes
  • Period of Performance dates
  • Effective date vs. execution date
  • Funding authorizations
  • Budget periods
  • Incremental funding
  • Supplemental funding
  • Impacts allowability of expenditures
  • Rebudgeting
  • Institutional policy
  • Sponsor policy/prior approval requirements
  • Impacts ability to get reimbursed and project
    planning

12
Award Terms Conditionshot potatoes (contd)
  • Invoicing
  • Format and documentation
  • Standard
  • Sponsor specifies, non-standard with back up
    documentation required (negotiate!)
  • Tied to award type
  • Cost reimbursement (CR) or fixed price (FP)
  • Frequency
  • CR in arrears monthly, quarterly, semi-annually,
    annually
  • FP up-front, per milestones reached, at
    completion
  • Combination tied to progress or deliverables

13
Award Terms Conditionshot potatoes (contd)
  • Payment terms
  • Upon execution/initiation
  • Fixed schedule of installments
  • Milestone payments
  • Upon completion/termination
  • Withholding of percentage or amount
  • Net 30 days standard
  • Non-standard can impact institutions cash flow
  • Remember, revenue is generated based on
    expenditures
  • NOT representative of cash on hand or payments
    made by sponsor
  • Consider institutions cash outlay and
    outstanding A/R

14
Award Terms Conditionshot potatoes (contd)
  • Deliverable/Reporting Requirements
  • Technical
  • Progress
  • Final
  • Financial
  • SF 269, SF 270, and SF 272 for fed grants
  • Sponsor specified forms
  • Timeframe for submission
  • Cost Sharing
  • Sponsor specified format for documentation
  • Letters from 3rd party contributors
  • School/dept to certify that cost share
    requirement met

15
Award Terms Conditionshot potatoes (contd)
  • Property/Equipment
  • Annually and/or
  • At completion
  • Invention
  • Upon internal disclosure
  • At completion
  • Timely report submission impacts A/R,
    relationship between central offices with
    responsibility/oversight and PI/institutions
    reputation with sponsor
  • Delinquent reports potential for sponsors to
    withhold funding on all awards
  • Label your institution as not responsible can
    impact future competitions

16
Award Terms Conditionshot potatoes (contd)
  • Problematic Terms and Conditions/Clauses
  • Publication
  • Restrictions and prior approval requirements
  • Impacts ability to disseminate research results
  • Export controls
  • Acceptance of controlled or proprietary
    technology, items covered by EAR/ITAR
  • Restrictions on hiring foreign students
  • Impact Loss of fundamental research exclusion
  • Intellectual property
  • Internal invention disclosures
  • Disclosure to sponsor
  • Impacts loss of ability to file provisional
    patents, legal battles over inventorship if
    proper disclosures not made

17
Award Terms Conditionshot potatoes (contd)
  • Early Termination/Stop Work Orders
  • Coverage for non-cancellable commitments
  • Notifications
  • Account suspension by SPA changing the end date
  • Reconciliation of account(s)
  • Settlements and repayment to sponsor if necessary
  • Legal terms (indemnification, venue, governing
    law, etc.)
  • Require legal counsel review/approval
  • PI consent?

18
Award Terms Conditionshot potatoes (contd)
  • Compliance
  • Human/animal subjects
  • Conflict of Interest
  • Committee review/approvals
  • Institutional policies cost transfers, business
    expense, purchasing, etc.
  • Impacts level of risk to the PI, dept,
    institution

19
Award Classificationhot potatoes
  • Award instrument
  • Grant, contract, subaward, subcontract
  • Award type
  • Cost reimbursement, fixed price, gifts
    (restricted and unrestricted)
  • Sponsor type
  • Federal, state, city, county, commercial/
    private, non-profit

20
Award Classificationhot potatoes (contd)
  • Proper identification integral to
  • Account set-up (at-risk or upon receipt of
    executed award)
  • Consistency re data warehouse
  • Precedence (gift vs. grant, GRIFTS)
  • Integrity of financials (OMB A-110)
  • Audited financial statements (OMB A-133)
  • Impact on consistency and accuracy
  • Internal reporting
  • External reporting
  • A-133 reporting
  • Cost accounting standards

21
Account Set-Uphot potatoes
  • Single PI
  • Multiple PIs
  • One account shared or separate accounts for each?
  • PIs from different departments/divisions
  • Access?
  • Controls?
  • Budget years vs. cumulative project period
  • Separate accounts?
  • Carry forward
  • Automatic?
  • Prior approval required?

22
Account Set-Uphot potatoes (contd)
  • Interest Earned
  • Return to sponsor?
  • Use toward the project?
  • For use at institutions discretion?
  • Tracking
  • Reporting
  • Interest Income
  • Tracked separately from revenue
  • Program Income
  • Route to SPA deposited to deferred revenue,
  • SPA increases project budget
  • User fees deposit against same cost center where
    expense incurred
  • Reimbursements from 3rd parties
  • deposit against line expense was incurred
  • Cost sharing
  • Need to establish program/project
  • Identify cost share funding
  • Post expenditures accordingly
  • Certify once obligation met

23
Pre-award keys to success
  • Training
  • PIs ask them the same questions for each
    proposal explain your expectations and it will
    become habitual
  • Faculty Assistants understand the relationship
    between the PI and his/her assistant and ally
    yourself with both
  • Share all training opportunities with anyone who
    works in the process
  • Serve the Greater Good
  • Explain the impacts on the institution for a
    poorly planned budget
  • Remind your team that what serves the institution
    helps everyone

24
Pre-award keys to success (contd)
  • Get to know your neighborhood
  • Meet and talk with all members of the community
    in the process during the lull
  • Knowing who does what and who can help during a
    crisis will help
  • Do what works for you
  • If logic doesnt work, resort to emotion even
    guilt
  • If you are a teacher, teach if you are a
    listener, listen use your skills to advance the
    process
  • Patience and planning will go a long way!

25
Building the bridge with post-award
  • Building allies between pre-award and post-award
  • Serve as the primary point of contact/gatekeeper
    between the PI, dept and the post-award team (too
    many cooks in the kitchen.)
  • Learn about and anticipate the needs of your
    post-award counterparts
  • Educate your post-award counterpart on the
    specifics of each project
  • Communicate often, even when you think it
    insignificant or not in their realm
  • Keep people apprised of your expectations
  • Interact regularly, not solely when there are
    fires to be put out
  • Utilize them as the resource they are for your
    PIs or dept
  • Maintain your sense of humor!

26
Building the bridge with post-award (contd)
  • Understand award terms and conditions so you can
    negotiate the best deal for all the players
  • Realize sponsor restrictions and special
    requirements negotiate to standardize when it
    makes sense and is possible
  • Accept differences between the variety of
    sponsors and awards there is no cookie cutter
    solution
  • Job security A day in the life of a research
    administrator is never without a new twist!

27
Resources.Links
  • Business Expenses, Expense Reimbursement policies
  • http//www.nyu.edu/cdv/site20/policies/policies.ht
    ml
  • Cost Transfer Interim Guidelines
  • http//www.nyu.edu/cdv/site20/cservice/spa.html
  • Purchasing Policies, including Purchasing Card
  • http//www.nyu.edu/purchasing.services/restricted/
    policies.html
  • Asset Management Procedures Forms
  • http//www.nyu.edu/asset/procedures.html
  • OSP Policies Procedures including NYU Policy on
    Distinguishing Between Gifts and Sponsored Awards
  • http//www.nyu.edu/osp/policies/

28
  • Questions/Comments?
  • Contact info. for follow-up questions
  • Nancy Daneau, nancy.daneau_at_nyu.edu
  • Joanne Goldstein, joanne.goldstein_at_nyu.edu
  • Michael Miller, michael.miller_at_nyu.edu
  • Thanks for joining us!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com