Implementing KPI Reporting in the College of LSA - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 27
About This Presentation
Title:

Implementing KPI Reporting in the College of LSA

Description:

Implementing KPI Reporting in the College of LSA Rob Wilke Nick Hadwick Our Data Environment LSA in Context KPI Development Process System Demo How used Technical ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:98
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 28
Provided by: biUmichE
Learn more at: http://www.bi.umich.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Implementing KPI Reporting in the College of LSA


1
Implementing KPI Reporting in the College of LSA
  • Rob Wilke
  • Nick Hadwick

2
  • Our Data Environment
  • LSA in Context
  • KPI Development Process
  • System Demo
  • How used
  • Technical Infrastructure
  • Challenges encountered
  • Future Directions

3
BI Data -gt Information -gtKnowledge -gt Action
4
UM Data EnvironmentThousands of tables in
PeopleSoftLarge datasetsPersonal data table
2.3 million rowsAdmissions Program table 2.3
million rows Student Enroll table 6.7 million
rowsJob table 1.4 million rowsPay Check table
8.5 million rowsDept table 20,000 rows/3700
distinct DeptIDs
5
LSAUMDistinct DeptIDs - 1443700Student
Enrollments 3.8 million6.7 million
6
College of LSA
  • 40 Academic Depts/Programs (3 Divisions
    Humanities, Social Sciences, Natural Sciences)
  • Museums
  • Michigan Learning Communities
  • Student Support Advising, Language Resource
    Center, Science Learning Center, Study Abroad
  • Deans Office
  • 80 of Budget is Salary/Benefits

7
Heterogeneous Organization
  • What to measure?
  • Can you compare the Exhibit Museum with the
    English Department?
  • Why did we develop the KPI measures?

8
LSA KPI History
  • New Dean and Associate Deans
  • Provost Indicators
  • Student Headcount, Diversity
  • Faculty Appointments

9
Charge
  • Work within the realm of information were
    already producing to make information useful for
    planning at the Associate Dean and Executive
    Committee level that will show changes in the
    College over time and project to the future.

10
Goals
  • Clear, Consistent and shared measures
  • Benchmarks to help think about resource
    distribution in the College
  • Not be reliant on self-reported data by
    departments

11
Principal Data Areas
  • Faculty/Staff Counts and Characteristics
  • Graduate Student Characteristics
  • Funding
  • Space and Energy Utilization
  • Student Credit Hours
  • Degrees
  • Relationships between Inputs and Outputs

12
Development Process
  • Top down mandate from upper management
  • Modeled after Provost Indicators
  • Push detail down to departmental level
  • Team of Finance, Budget and IS personnel
  • 2 year trial period with departments
  • Incremental changes to add/subtract measures
  • Initial system was a Spreadsheet and PDF File

13
System Demonstration
  • http//www-a1.lsa.umich.edu/AdminData/KPIDeptCompa
    re.aspx

14

Visualize Trends
15
Visualize Trends
16
Decision Making
  • Student Credit Hours/TTFTE
  • Computed Course Releases/TTFTE
  • Small Sections
  • Over or Under Target
  • Faculty lines (Resource Commitment)
  • Position requests
  • GSI, grader and fellowship funding
  • Lecturer positions

17
Technical Environment
  • SQL Server 2000 database 3 tables
  • IIS Web Server
  • ASP.Net 2.0 Development Environment
  • Originally Excel with Macros

18
Tables
  • Header
  • Key, Description, URL, DisplayOrder, Page,
    Classification (Profile, Indicator, Outline
    Separator)
  • Data
  • Key, DeptID, Year, Data value
  • Notes
  • Key, Title, Note content
  • (Notes and Header tables include HTML stored with
    data)

19
Sample data
45,000 rows
20
Data must be pivoted
21
(No Transcript)
22
Challenges
  • Inconsistent Source Data
  • Lack of Understanding of Source Data
  • Source Data Not Reflecting Reality
  • Numeric Values only
  • Making Assumptions Transparent
  • Conflicting Indicators
  • Minimizing of Indicators
  • Communicating Context to Depts

23
Future Direction
  • Create Charts on the fly
  • Drill down to see detail
  • Top 10 lists of key values
  • Additional Research Indicator

24
Terminology Check
  • Key result indicators (KRIs) tell you how you
    have done in a perspective.
  • Performance indicators (PIs) tell you what to do.
  • KPIs tell you what to do to increase performance
    dramatically
  • David Parmenter, Key Performance Indicators

25
Key Performance Indicators
  • "KPIs represent a set of measures focusing on
    those aspects of organizational performance that
    are the most critical for the current and future
    success of the organization."

26
Key Result Indicators
  • KRIs typically cover a longer period of time
    than KPIs they are reviewed on monthly/quarterly
    cycles, not on a daily/weekly basis as KPIs are.

27
Ask the Right Questions
  • Rarely is the question asked, is our children
    learning?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com