The Death Penalty - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

The Death Penalty

Description:

Chapter 20 The Death Penalty the entrance to death row San Quentin, California women s death row: Central California Women s Facility capital punishment debate ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:431
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: csusEdui6
Learn more at: https://www.csus.edu
Category:
Tags: death | penalty

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Death Penalty


1
Chapter 20
  • The Death Penalty

2
the entrance to death rowSan Quentin, California
3
womens death rowCentral California Womens
Facility
4
capital punishment debatethe PRO side
  • moral arguments
  • retribution calls for death penalty
  • utilitarian arguments (deterrence)
  • 200 studies most--no evidence of deterrence
  • Peterson Bailey murder rates were higher in
    states with death penalty than in adjacent states
    without it
  • Lempert confirmed no effect
  • Ehrich each execution between 1933 1969
    prevented between 7 8 murders
  • National Academy of Sciences reanalyzed data
    dismissed findings
  • economic arguments
  • death penalty is less expensive than life
    imprisonment
  • ?

5
capital punishment debate the CON side
  • moral arguments
  • capital punishment is not moral
  • state does not have the right to take a life
  • utilitarian arguments (deterrence)
  • no convincing evidence that capital punishment
    deters
  • many capital crimes cannot be deterred
  • drug/alcohol-based, psychological disturbance,
    rage
  • economic arguments
  • death penalty more expensive than life sentence
  • extra 216,000 to prosecute 2.16 million to
    execute
  • other arguments
  • mistakes are unavoidable irreversible
  • death sentence imposed in unfair discriminatory
    way
  • eg, by race, jurisdiction, even politics (see
    Houston)
  • eg, 1,000 murders to 1 execution

6
public opinion death penalty
  • nearly 3/4 Americans support death penalty.
  • majority have supported it since Gallup survey
    first asked about it in 1936
  • only exception was 1960 - 1965
  • support generally risen over last 35 years
  • important note on survey methodology
  • support level depends on how question worded
  • when offered alternative to capital punishment,
    many supporters opt for the alternative
  • life without possibility of parole
  • gt20 shift to opposition, when given this
    option
  • life, in addition to restitution to the victim

7
states with death penalty
NO death penalty
WITH death penalty
8
death penaltyby the numbers
  • 270 death sentences are pronounced yearly
  • compared to 22,000 yearly arrests for murder
    non-negligent manslaughter
  • persons on death row exceeds 3,700
  • 54 women are on death row
  • 722 executions from 1976 - July, 2001
  • yearly executions generally gt 74 since 1976

9
Furman v. Georgia, 1972
  • U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the death penalty,
    as administered, constituted cruel and unusual
    punishment, in violation of the 8th Amendment to
    the U.S. Constitution
  • invalidated death penalty laws of 39 states
    D.C.
  • 35 states re-enacted laws
  • issue returned to Supreme Court...

10
Gregg v. Georgia, 1976
  • U.S. Supreme Court upheld death penalty laws
    which
  • required the sentencing judge or jury to take
    into account specific aggravating and mitigating
    circumstances in deciding which convicted murders
    should be sentenced to death, and which
  • authorized a bifurcated proceeding (trial to
    determine guilt and a separate hearing
    exclusively to determine penalty)

11
McCleskey v. Kemp, 1987
  • U.S. Supreme Court rejected a constitutional
    challenge (to Georgias death penalty law) on the
    grounds of racial discrimination
  • attorney cited rigorous research showing the
    application of the death sentence in Georgia was
    racially biased.
  • Court rejected claim (5-4 vote), ruling
  • in cases alleging racial discrimination,
    defendant has to prove decision makers acted with
    a discriminatory purpose in that specific case.
  • statistical evidence showing discrimination
    throughout the state was not adequate proof.
  • McKleskey executed in 1991

12
legal issues re capital punishment
execution of insane
counsel
execution of juveniles
populations processes
appeals
execution of retarded
13
Ford v. Wainwright, 1986
  • U.S. Supreme Court ruled the 8th Amendment
    prohibited the state from executing the
    incompetent the accused must comprehend both the
    fact that he has been sentenced to death and
    reason for it.
  • accused was delusional, claiming KKK was part of
    a conspiracy to get him to commit suicide
  • Court ruled there is no deterrent or retributive
    value to executing the mentally disturbed
  • idea is offensive to humanity

14
execution of juveniles
  • minimum age for execution varies by state
  • 8 states dont specify
  • in some, age is same as juvenile waiver age
  • 84 males on death row who were lt 18 (at time of
    offense)
  • Thompson v. Oklahoma, 1988
  • decided that William Thompson, 15 when he
    committed murder, could not be executed
  • Sanford v. Kentucky Wilkins v. Missouri, 1989
  • offenders aged 16 and 17 can be executed

15
execution of the retarded
  • 360 offenders on death row are retarded
  • the retarded account for 10 of executions
  • Penry v. Lynaugh, 1989
  • Supreme Court held 8th Amendment does NOT
    prohibit execution of the mentally retarded
  • Penry was a convicted killer with an IQ of 56 and
    mental capacity of a 7-year-old.

16
habeas corpus petition
  • a writ requesting a court to review the
    conditions of incarceration or the basis of
    detention
  • habeas corpus is the only means by which a
    federal court can hear challenges by state
    inmates to their convictions and/or sentences
  • before an inmate may file a complaint in federal
    court, he must exhaust all the administrative
    remedies that the state courts make available to
    him.

17
appeals
  • average time sentence--execution 7- 8 yrs
  • recent moves to limit that interval
  • McCleskey v. Zant, 1991, Supreme Court
  • except in exceptional circumstances, lower
    federal courts must dismiss prisoners second and
    subsequent habeas corpus petitions.
  • 1993 Supreme Court offender who presents belated
    evidence of innocence not necessarily entitled to
    new hearing in federal court evidence must be
    truly persuasive
  • Anti-Terrorism Effective Death Penalty Act,
    1996
  • death row inmates must file habeas corpus
    petition within one year

18
counsel
  • appointed counsel often receive small fees
  • eg, 1,000 per case 20/hr (Alab.) 11.75/hr
    (Miss.)
  • Stickland v. Washington, 1984, Supreme Crt
  • defendant has a right to representation that
    meets an objective standard of reasonableness
  • accused must show that there is a reasonable
    probability that, but for counsels
    unprofessional errors, the result of the
    proceeding would have been different.

19
where death penalty imposed
of all death sentences imposed
20
where executions happen, 1976 - July, 2001
722 executions carried out since 1976
21
inmates on death rowby race
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com