An HICP for the United States - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

An HICP for the United States

Description:

John Greenlees for his critical review. Rob Cage, Joshua Klick and Cam Taylor ... Harmonized Index of Consumer Prices' by Walter Lane and Mary Lynn Schmidt at link ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:49
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 46
Provided by: une74
Learn more at: https://unece.org
Category:
Tags: hicp | joshua | states | united | walter

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: An HICP for the United States


1
An HICP for the United States
  • Comparing inflation between United States and
    Europe Using the Methods of the European Unions
    Harmonized Index of Consumer Prices
  • Walter Lane and Mary Lynn Schmidt
  • U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics

2
Acknowledgements
  • The authors wish to thank
  • John Greenlees for his critical review
  • Rob Cage, Joshua Klick and Cam Taylor for
    providing the expenditure weights
  • Lyubov Rozenthal for performing the index
    calculations
  • Susan Fleck, Mary Jablonski, Ronald Johnson,
    John Layng, Wodolar Lysko and Jessica Sincavage
    for editing.
  • The results remain the responsibility of the
    authors and not the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

3
Data
  • US HICP\\CPISRV3\Dcppi\Harmonized_Index_of_Consu
    mer_Prices__Foreign_CPIs
  • EU HICP
  • http//epp.eurostat.cec.eu.int/portal/page?_pageid
    0,1136173,0_45570701_dadportal_schemaPORTAL

4
Experimental BLS series
  • As opposed to official series
  • Produced outside regular production systems
  • Less than full production quality
  • Not produced until after the publication
    of corresponding official statistics
  • For security reasons

5
Why HICP ?
  • International comparability
  • Inflation rates
  • Deflated series
  • National CPIs OK for domestic purposes
  • Indexation of payments
  • Visit to EUROSTAT in 2002
  • John Astin, then head of consumer prices
  • HICP Manual

6
An Experimental Consumer Price Index for the
United States
  • January 1998 forward
  • follows HICP methods to the extent possible
  • includes the rural population
  • expanded the CPIs population coverage to the
    whole population
  • excludes owner-occupied housing
  • narrowed the CPIs item coverage to remove
    owner-occupied housing
  • experimental vs. official BLS Statistics
  • produced outside of its regular production system
  • less than full production quality
  • after the publication of the corresponding
    official statistics
  • available from the authors on request

7
European Union
  • Until April 2004
  • TheEU15
  • Austria
  • Belgium
  • Denmark
  • Germany
  • Greece
  • Finland
  • France
  • Ireland
  • Italy
  • Luxembourg
  • the Netherlands
  • Portugal
  • Spain
  • Sweden
  • the United Kingdom.
  • On May 1, 2004ten additional countries
  • The EU25
  • Cyprus
  • the Czech Republic
  • Estonia
  • Hungary
  • Latvia
  • Lithuania
  • Malta
  • Poland
  • Slovakia
  • Slovenia

8
European Monetary Union (EMU)
  • The Euro-zone,
  • EU15 except
  • Denmark
  • Sweden
  • the United Kingdom
  • Between 2006 and 2010The 10 countries that
    joined in 2004 will
  • join the EMU
  • adopt the Euro
  • The European Central Bank (ECB)
  • Manages the Euro
  • Uses the HICP

9
CPI-U
  • Official U.S. CPI
  • CPI for All Urban Consumers
  • 87 of the US population
  • Metropolitan areas
  • Small urban places (Micropolitan areas)
  • Excludes
  • Rural 11 of U.S. population
  • Institutional population 2
  • Prisoners
  • Nursing home residents
  • Military living on bases

10
CPI-XR
  • Experimental index for the (non-institutional) ru
    ral population
  • Jan 02 onward
  • 13 of the US pop
  • 11 of spending
  • Weights
  • from Consumer Expenditure Surveys
  • for rural population
  • Price movement
  • from small urban areas

11
CPI-XT
  • Experimental index for (non-institutional)
    total population
  • Jan 02 onward
  • 98 of the US population
  • CPI-XT CPI-U CPI-XR

12
U vs. XR vs. XT Dec 01 to Dec 05
13
US HICP
  • Removed weights for
  • Owners equivalent rent of primary residence
  • Owners equivalent rent of secondary
    residences(part of the Lodging while out of town
    stratum)
  • Restored the weights of
  • Home maintenance and repairs
  • appliance purchases and repairs

14
Biennial Weights (Relative Importances) for
CPI-U, CPI-XR, CPI-XT and HICP 2001-2002
15
Other Differences Between European and US
Methods
  • geometric formula for most US elementary
    aggregates
  • tends to rise more slowly than Dutot(HICP allows
    either Dutot or Jevons formula)
  • quality adjustments for changes in consumer
    products
  • introduce new products
  • differences in the public/private divide
  • Medical care
  • Education
  • Have much larger importance in the US indexes
  • Household and vehicle insurance
  • Europe premiums-net-of-reimbursements
  • US gross premiums (net reimbursements from
    expenditures)

16
CPI-U vs. HICP Dec 97 to Dec 05
17
  • Harmonized index of consumer prices for
    selected countries and areas,
  • percent
    change from same period of previous year,
    2003-2006
  • -----------------------------
    --------------------------------------------------
    ------------------------------
  • United
    European European
    United
  • Period States
    Japan Union-25 Union-15 France Germany
    Italy Kingdom

  • (1) (2) (3)
  • -----------------------------
    --------------------------------------------------
    ------------------------------
  • 2003 2.3
    -0.3 1.9 2.0 2.2
    1.0 2.8 1.4
  • 2004 2.8
    0.0 2.1 2.0 2.3
    1.8 2.2 1.3
  • I 1.7
    -0.1 1.7 1.7
    2.0 1.0 2.3 1.3
  • II 3.0
    -0.4 2.3 2.3 2.6
    1.9 2.3 1.4
  • III 2.8
    -0.1 2.3 2.3 2.4
    2.0 2.3 1.3
  • IV 3.7
    0.6 2.3 2.3 2.3
    2.2 2.2 1.4
  • 2005 3.9
    -0.4 2.2 2.1 1.9
    1.9 2.2 2.0
  • I 3.2
    -0.1 2.1 2.1
    1.9 1.7 2.0 1.7
  • II 3.3
    -0.1 2.0 2.0
    1.8 1.6 2.2 1.9
  • III 4.6
    -0.4 2.3 2.3
    2.1 2.1 2.2 2.4
  • IV 4.3
    -0.8 2.3 2.3
    1.8 2.2 2.4 2.1

18
(No Transcript)
19
(No Transcript)
20
Two-Digit Classification of Individual
Consumption by Purpose
  • 01 Food and non-alcoholic beverages
  • 02 Alcoholic beverages, tobacco and narcotics
  • 03 Clothing and footwear
  • 04 Housing, water, electricity, gas and other
    fuels
  • 05 Furnishings, household equipment and routine
    maintenance of the house
  • 06 Health
  • 07 Transportation
  • 08 Communication
  • 09 Recreation
  • 10 Education
  • 11 Hotels, cafes and restaurants
  • 12 Miscellaneous goods and services

20
21
Whats in USH12?
  • Legal services
  • Funeral expenses
  • Financial services
  • Motor vehicle insurance
  • Jewelry and watches
  • Personal care products
  • Personal care services
  • Household paper products

21
22
Expenditure weights, selected countries,
two-digit level
22
23
Expenditure weights, selected countries,
two-digit level
23
24
Compare Price Change, EU25 and US HICP sub
indexes, Dec 98 to 2005
  • US
    EU25
  • All Items 19.2 16.6
  • 02 Alcohol and tobacco 38.3 31.6
  • 04 Housing 36.9 27.1
  • 06 Health 32.7 27.3
  • 07 Transportation 21.4 24.1
  • 10 Education 50.9 32.8
  • 12 Miscellaneous goods 23.0 30.0
  • and services

24
25

Comparison all items, selected countries,
Dec 1998-2005
25
26
12-month change selected countries, December
1998-2005
26
27
Selected comparisons of two-digit indexes
RI EU25 USH 02 44.8 19.2
RI EU25 USH 04 145.7 134.2
27
28
Selected comparisons of two-digit indexes
RI EU25 USH 06 38.4 78.5
RI EU25 USH 10 11.1 31.9
28
29
Selected comparisons of two-digit indexes
RI EU25 USH 07 149.9 202.6
RI EU25 USH 12 86.5 92.2
29
30
EU25 selected 2-digit indexes, Dec 1998-2005
Alcohol and tobacco
Alcohol and tobacco
Transport
30
31
US HICP selected 2-digit indexes, Dec 1998-2005
Education
Transportation
31
32
US HICP 2-digit indexes, Dec 1997-2005
32
33
US HICP 2-digit indexes, Dec 1997-2005
Education
Housing
Transportation
33
34
Alcohol and tobacco, selected countries, Dec
1998-2005
France
US
34
35
Education, selected countries, Dec 1998-2005
US
Sweden
35
36
Expenditure weights, selected countries,
two-digit level
36
37
Background highlights
  • Classification Of Individual COnsumption by
    Purpose (COICOP) 2-digit level
  • US HICP, EU25, and selected countries
  • Comparison
  • All items
  • Selected Major Groups/Divisions
  • Expenditure weights /
  • relative importances

37
38
Background highlights
  • Classification Of Individual COnsumption by
    Purpose (COICOP) 2-digit level
  • US HICP, EU25, and selected countries
  • Comparison
  • All items
  • Selected Major Groups/Divisions
  • Expenditure weights /
  • relative importances

38
39
(No Transcript)
40
(No Transcript)
41
Background highlights
  • Classification Of Individual COnsumption by
    Purpose (COICOP) 2-digit level
  • US HICP, EU25, and selected countries
  • Comparison
  • All items
  • Selected Major Groups/Divisions
  • Expenditure weights /
  • relative importances

41
42
Expenditure weights, selected countries,
two-digit level
42
43
(No Transcript)
44
(No Transcript)
45
Dec. 1997 through Dec. 2005percent change
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com