Alliance for Regional Collaboration to Heighten Educational Success ARCHES - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 25
About This Presentation
Title:

Alliance for Regional Collaboration to Heighten Educational Success ARCHES

Description:

Chu, Dorothy. Clifton-Bacon, Sandy. Couch, John. D'Amico, Judy. Davis, Shelley. Drummond, Mark Fischer, Herb. Gordon, Jack. Graf, Jody ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:312
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: brunell1
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Alliance for Regional Collaboration to Heighten Educational Success ARCHES


1
Alliance for Regional Collaboration to Heighten
Educational Success (ARCHES)
  • A Vision Whose Time Is Now.

2
California Alliance of Pre K-18 Partnerships
  • CAPP funded a two-year study of seven
    partnerships conducted through the College of
    Education at California State University, Long
    Beach, and the guidance of an Advisory Board
    composed of a statewide group of experts.

3
This study concluded that partnerships
  • Provide an effective strategy for enhancing
    student achievement and,
  • Promote efficient and effective use of resources
    around shared institutional goals.
  • Improve Alignment Across Educational Segments
  • Increase Incentives and Resources for
    School-University Collaboration
  • Encourage Cross-Institutional Exchange of
    Faculty, Staff, and Students
  • Effectively Use Student Achievement Data
  • Strengthen Accountability for Student Preparation
    for Higher Education

4
Simply
  • The bottom line for partnership efforts is the
    same as the bottom line for all of California
    education
  • to prepare all students for success in college
    and careers, and
  • to close the achievement gaps between racial and
    socioeconomic groups.
  • The ICC began promoting regional partnerships in
    2000.
  • The Alliance Project validates that partnerships
    are an effective strategy for attaining these
    goals.
  • UCs strategic review panel report Forging
    Californias Future Through Educational
    Partnerships adds further weight to the growing
    consensus supporting partnerships.
  • On December 22, 2004, Superintendent Jack
    OConnell announces his intention to establish a
    new statewide P-16 Council to better coordinate
    and integrate education in California -- from
    preschool through college.

5
Superintendent Jack OConnells P-16 Council
Membership Ackerman, Arlene Richard
Alonzo Andreason, Dave Allen, Carrie Atkin,
Catherine Barbara, Manny Canter, Marlene Chu,
Dorothy Clifton-Bacon, Sandy Couch, John
D'Amico, Judy Davis, Shelley
Drummond, Mark Fischer, Herb Gordon, Jack Graf,
Jody Greenwood , M.R.C. Guardino, Carl Hart,
Gary Hasson, Dian Jackson, Bill Lansing,
Sherry Levine, Harold Loss, Jo
Marantal, Manny Martel, Patty Meno, Lionel
Murphy, Stanley Murray, Linda Nguyen-Lam, Kim
Núñez, Fabian Penry, Martha Perata, Don
Plotkin, Scott Rava-Treat, Carol Rios-Kravitz,
Rhonda
Rodriguez, Luis Seigel, Alan Siri, Diane
Stanton, Anne Stevens, Carroll Stewart, Jack
Tacheny, Suzanne Tomlinson-Keasey, Carol Thorp,
Peter Vaught, Kendall Ann Washington, Curtis
Whitebook, Marcy Wright, Joyce
6
Superintendent Jack OConnells P-16 Council
  • Goals
  • Improve student achievement at all levels and
    eliminate the achievement gap
  • Link all education levels -- from preschool,
    elementary, middle, high school, and through
    higher education -- to create a comprehensive
    seamless system of student learning
  • Ensure all students have access to caring and
    qualified teachers
  • Increase public awareness of the link between an
    educated citizenry and a healthy economy.
  • Meeting Dates
  • May 17th Sacramento
  • July 20th Palo Alto
  • September 20th Los Angeles

7
ARCHESThe Assessment Phase
  • In the summer and fall of 2004, approximately 70
    Californians who have been involved at either
    policy or programmatic levels in education were
    interviewed.

8
The Assessment Phase
  • The individuals interviewed included
  • Leaders of all education segments
  • Public Schools
  • Community Colleges
  • California State University
  • University of California
  • Independent Colleges and Universities
  • Business executives
  • Participants in existing educational partnerships
  • Elected officials and policy leaders
  • Community-based organization executives and
    advocacy organizations.

9
The Assessment Phase
  • These interviews yielded a wealth of information
    including
  • Support for the recommendations of the California
    Alliance of Pre K-18 Partnerships report
  • Support for a statewide network of partnerships
  • Support for the inclusion of the business
    community, private sector, community alliances,
    and faith-based organizations
  • Support for incentives -- rather than mandates
    as the mechanism for expanding existing
    partnerships and developing new ones

10
The Assessment Phase
  • Support for connecting measurable goals
    identified by partnerships including
  • recruitment and retention of qualified teachers
  • professional development
  • preparation for college of all students
  • improving student achievement and,
  • high school reform.
  • Having access to, and using, data to inform the
    direction and assess the effectiveness of
    partnerships was regarded as critical and,
  • Opportunities for partnerships to share their
    best practices are needed.

11
Alliance
Harnessing the knowledge, experience, and
strength that characterizes each partnership into
a statewide network offers the potential to
increase substantially the base of expertise and
to develop significant synergy in the state.
12
Regional
  • The prevailing wisdom is that the state is
    naturally divided into approximately 30-40
    regions that have their own unique set of
    educational issues that would benefit from a
    regional approach based upon
  • unique student populations
  • geographic characteristics
  • cultural richness and,
  • leadership relationships.

13
Collaboration
  • Involving all stakeholders and joining forces
    involves
  • the commitment of human and fiscal resources
  • the willingness to set aside institutional or
    organizational imperatives
  • the patience to learn the culture, language, and
    idiosyncrasies reflected in all the
    collaborators and,
  • the trust to be candid in sharing and using data
    to identify issues and assess effectiveness for
    the benefit of all students.

14
Heighten Educational Success
  • The effectiveness of each regional collaborative
    and ARCHES will be measured in terms of
  • the extent to which student achievement is
    enhanced and,
  • the opportunity and resources gaps that lead to
    persistent achievement differentials are closed.
  • ARCHES will encourage regional collaboratives to
    disaggregate data in developing their action
    plans in order to focus on the unique needs of
    their different populations of students.

15
ARCHES
ARCHES, then, is envisioned as a voluntary
confederation of collaboratives whose sole
purpose is to improve student success and close
the achievement gap among groups of students. To
be clear, the collaborative is a means to an end
the end, or goal, both individually and
collectively of ARCHES and its members, is
greater student academic achievement,
opportunity, and equity in California.
16
ARCHES Regional CollaborationValue Added

Pre-K K-8 High School College/Training
measures
measures
measures
CAREER
  • Shared Measures
  • Shared Outcomes
  • Continuous Improvement
  • Student Results

17
P-16 Partnerships Connect Measurable Goals Across
Programs from Childhood to College and Careers
College2,4-yr, grad Adult work and family roles
Preschool and Kindergarten
Elementary School
Middle School
High School
Head Start First 5 California
Puente Center for Adaptive Optics
CSMP KATU Kids Around the University
GEAR UP COSMOS
DEEP ASSIST
EAOP MESA Upward Bound AVID CAL-SOAP
P16/ P-20 Regional Partnerships and Alliances
(Slide courtesy
of Catherine Cooper)
18
Californias Regional Partnerships Work in State
and National Alliances
  • Examples of Regional Partnerships in California
  • North State College OPTIONS
  • Central Valley Higher Education Consortium
  • Monterey Bay Educational Consortium (MBEC)
  • Santa Barbara and Santa Ana ENLACE
  • San Diego-Imperial County College Going
    Initiative
  • San Bernardino and Riverside K-16 Councils
  • Long Beach Educational Council
  • Examples of State and National Alliances
  • ARCHES, Ed Trust K-16 Councils, ENLACE P-20
    Councils, GEAR UP, Pathways to College Network,
    CCSESA, BMWA
  •  Superintendents key role we have a thirst
    for data

(Slide courtesy of Catherine Cooper)
19
Californias P-16 Regional Partnerships are
Aligning Science, Policy, and Practice

(Draft of Collaborative Work in Progress
Slide courtesy of Catherine Cooper)
20
Regional Partnerships Forge a Learning Community
  • Bringing educators, researchers, and funders
    together
  • Effective, efficient data management systems for
    state and local use
  • Asking common questions about P-16 pathways with
    long-term data
  • Engaging diverse families and communities as full
    partners
  • Common tools help students, families, schools,
    and programs build pathways to careers and
    college

(Slide courtesy of Catherine Cooper)
21
The proposed activities of ARCHES are to
  • Develop a plan to provide each school with the
    opportunity to participate in a regional
    collaborative. To meet this objective, ARCHES
    must support the partnership strategies of
    existing educational organizations, support
    current regional partnerships, emerging
    collaboratives, and, when appropriate, the
    fostering of new arrangements
  • Create a web-based clearinghouse to share best
    practices that includes a website, research
    library, materials and resources, and information
    on funding opportunities

22
The proposed activities of ARCHES are to
  • Convene statewide and regional conferences to
    facilitate the sharing of information, expertise,
    and best practices
  • Assemble a group of facilitators who have the
    experience to assist entities to develop and
    sustain regional collaboratives
  • Seek financial resources to develop and sustain
    regional collaboratives

23
The proposed activities of ARCHES are to
  • Connect prospective collaborators from various
    sectors of society and,
  • Advocate for state and federal policies that
    promote regional collaboration.

24
ARCHESThe Next Phase
  • Between now and December, the following
    activities are planned
  • ARCHES is launched at this conference.
  • Convene Advisory Board.
  • Seek relevant advice from constituencies,
    including members of the Round Table and
    participants at this conference.
  • Garnering information from potential participants
    statewide.
  • Solicit financial support from educational
    sectors, private foundations, and corporations.
  • Develop a Request for Proposals to provide funds
    to approximately five new regional
    collaboratives.
  • Support the goals and activities of
    Superintendent OConnells P-16 Council.
  • Collaborate with California Teach initiative to
    improve math and science education by encouraging
    more college math and science majors to become
    teachers.

25
We invite your ideas,celebrate your
participation, and encourage your accomplishments.
Dennis Galligani and Diane Siri Executive
Directors ARCHES A Joint Initiative of
the California Academic Partnership Program
(CAPP) and the California Education Round
Table Intersegmental Coordinating Committee (ICC)
  • Dave Jolly
  • Statewide CAPP Director
  • Office of the Chancellor
  • California State University
  • 916-966-6533
  • djolly_at_calstate.edu

Penny Edgert ICC Coordinator California Education
Round Table Intersegmental Coordinating
Committee 916-327-1821 pedgert_at_cde.ca.gov
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com