Informal risk pooling : modelling issues and empirical evidence in Abidjan, Cte dIvoire - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 10
About This Presentation
Title:

Informal risk pooling : modelling issues and empirical evidence in Abidjan, Cte dIvoire

Description:

Some findings on solidarity practices among informal workers in Abidjan, C te d'Ivoire (I) ... Capital : Abidjan. Total population : 3 M. 40% of the population ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:46
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 11
Provided by: yvangui
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Informal risk pooling : modelling issues and empirical evidence in Abidjan, Cte dIvoire


1
Informal risk pooling modelling issues and
empirical evidence in Abidjan, Côte dIvoire
  • Yvan Guichaoua
  • Cepremap
  • yvan.guichaoua_at_cepremap.cnrs.fr

2
Political and empirical grounds of risk-pooling
arrangements literature
  • Political stake
  • fighting one dimension of poverty vulnerability
  • Field surveyed
  •  Agrarian societies ,  village economies 
  • Evidence
  • Various forms of reciprocity gift-giving,
    labour services, collective land tenure...
  • ...leading to consumption smoothing when
    idiosyncratic changes in income occur

3
Papers objectives
  • Present the way informal risk-sharing
    arrangements are modelled, with a particular
    focus on the role granted to extra-economic
    objects to warrant equilibrium attainment
  • Provide some empirical evidence that
    extra-economic-objects (through various forms of
    pre-existing forms of socialisation) affect
    solidarity rules

4
Principles of risk-sharing arrangements modelling
(I)
  • Initial conditions (autarky)
  • A priori un-socialised rational agents exposed to
    risks
  • Absence of legal enforcement mechanism
  • Purpose
  • To make cooperation emerge from the initial
    conditions specified above through self-enforcing
    contract formation (contractsharing rule of
    income differentials)
  • Participation constraint
  •  The difference between each individuals
    expected utility under continued participation
    should always be greater than the gain from
    current defection 

5
Principles of risk-sharing arrangements modelling
(II)
  • Second-best contracts are feasible under
    restrictive conditions
  • Risk aversion of agents should be sufficiently
    large
  • Depreciation of future should not be too large
    ( eternal village  hypothesis)
  • Furthermore
  • Information is supposed to be perfect
  • No convergence process toward equilibrium is
    provided if there are mutiple equilibria

6
Principles of risk-sharing arrangements modelling
(III)
  • Conclusion to be sustained, cooperation needs
  • At least, ad hoc implicit social objects
     eternal village , behavioural norms as focal
    points
  • Explicit social objects sanctions on cheaters
    (not necessary but helpful)
  • ? Social objects are necessary but are strictly
    exogenous
  • ? Why not displace the focus to pre-existing
    social conditions of risk-sharing arrangements
    emergence (Aokis embeddedness hypothesis) ?

7
Some findings on solidarity practices among
informal workers in Abidjan, Côte dIvoire (I)
  • Côte dIvoire (1998)
  • Total population 15,4 M.
  • Urbanisation rate 42,5
  • Capital Abidjan
  • Total population 3 M.
  • 40 of the population living on informal income
  • Survey sample
  • 111 contruction and small-garment industry
    workers (not necessarily poor in absolute terms)

8
Some findings on solidarity practices among
informal workers in Abidjan, Côte dIvoire (II)
  • Family kind of help
  • Non-family kind of help ( help among peers ?)

9
Some findings on solidarity practices among
informal workers in Abidjan, Côte dIvoire (III)
Probability to participate in an association
10
Some findings on solidarity practices among
informal workers in Abidjan, Côte dIvoire (IV)
  • Conclusions and questionings
  • Informal risk-sharing arrangements do exist in
    cities
  • Taking into account the social group(s) to which
    agents belong is relevant for the analysis of the
    kind of help they can receive
  • Plausibility of substitution between family and
    non-family kinds of help (reversion of
    intrafamily transfers ?)
  • Why do non-Ivorians not participate in
    associations ? Which kind of solidarity game do
    they play ?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com