London Londres - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 58
About This Presentation
Title:

London Londres

Description:

Luciano Gal n Universidad Aut noma de Madrid UNICA U. Complutense, 2005. 5 ... Luciano Gal n Universidad Aut noma de Madrid UNICA U. Complutense, 2005. 23 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:94
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 59
Provided by: ulb3
Category:
Tags: london | londres | madrid

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: London Londres


1
London - Londres
  • 7 -- VII -- 2005

2
International Trade of Higher Education
  • The GATS

3
Three main focuses
  • The globalization of higher education
  • International trade of higher education
  • The GATS

4
Globalization
  • Social phenomena. (Inevitable and unstoppable)
  • Information and communication technologies
  • Global information
  • Global economy
  • Global trade

5
How the Globalization affects universities?
  • Globalization effects on the universities will
    be more drastic than industrialization,
    urbanization and secularization combined. It is
    the biggest challenge the University has faced
    for more than a century and a half. (Castells)

6
What is Higher Education?
  • Merchandise
  • Commodity
  • Public service
  • Public good
  • Service
  • National value

7
Modes of supply and emerging models
Professors Mobility
Transnational University
Branches
Students OCDE (2000) 1.6 M students
Virtual University
Internacional University
Internet E-learning (2002) 2500 MM US
8
What is GATS?
  • The General Agreement on Trade in Services is
    the first ever set of multilateral rules covering
    international trade in services.
  • Agreement (WTO status equivalent UN)
  • General (140 members)
  • Trade
  • Services

9
When the GATS was created and why?
  • At the end of the 2nd. world war and with the
    objective of promoting the international trade
    GATT (General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade) was
    created in 1947. After the famous Uruguay Round
    from 1986 to 1994 it was decided the
    transformation of GATT to WTO (World Trade
    Organization) and an agreement for the
    liberalization of services (GATS) was adopted.
    Negotiations began 5 year later (2000).

10
Main categories of trade in education
  • Cross border supply. Includes any type of course
    provided through distance education or internet,
    testing services or education material which can
    cross national boundaries (does not require the
    physical movement of the consumer)
  • Consumption abroad . Mainly involve the education
    of foreign students (require movement of the
    consumer to the country of the supplier)
  • Commercial presence. Foreign universities,
    institutions or investors in another country
    (provider establishes facilities in another
    country)
  • Presence of natural persons. Ability of people to
    move between countries to provide educational
    services.

11
Where are European Universities today?
  • International relations
  • Trade
  • Internet
  • Trends
  • Students

12
Internationalization of higher education
  • European joint programs
  • Technical and Administrative Staff
  • Professors
  • Students

13
Differences between internationalization and
globalization of HE
  • Economic
  • Geographic
  • Information and Knowledge

14
Key difference
  • Internationalisation
  • Can be shaped and influenced by Higher
    Education Institutions (e.g. mobility, joint
    curricula, consortia)
  • Globalisation
  • An external macro socio-economic process,
    hardly to be influenced by Higher Education
    Institutions

15
Previous references of trade in Higher Education
  • Languages
  • B A Schools
  • Internet Materials

16
Teaching in Internet
  • Graduate and Postgraduate courses
  • Continuous education (Long life learning)
  • Specific training courses

17
USA references
  • Internet Trends
  • Colleges and universties are the most wired
    community on the Web 83 of all higher
    education institutions and 100 of universities
    are online.
  • College students represent the single largest
    nongender-based online demographic, constituting
    24 of the total number of adult Internet users.
  • College students spend approximately 105 billion
    annually, online 1.5 billion, its expected to
    almost triple to 3.9 billion by 2002.

18
Other references
  • African Virtual University
  • 2001, 24.000 students since 1997, from 17
    countries
  • 2003 restructured shared site by 34
    universities
  • RMIT Melbourne latest program provider
  • Tengtu China 12.000 schools connected early
    2003
  • networking 6 million students
  • 2002, 19 of corporate training in US was
    on-line
  • Globally 150 billion industry by 2025

19
Other references
  • Tertiary distance education worlds fastest
    growing sub-sector
  • Canada 500.000 students many on-line
  • Asia has 3.5 million students (2000) China
    Central Radio and TV University has 1.5 million
    enrolls over 100.000 each year
  • 30 of all tertiary courses in Russia are
    distance 26 in Turkey 37 in Thailand
    Europe approx 900.000

20
Trends in HE
  • Use of ICT for domestic and cross border HE
    activities.
  • Rapid increase of for-profit entities providing
    HE domestically and internationally.
  • Increasing cost and tuition fees paid by students
    of public and private institutions.
  • Need of public institutions to seek alternative
    sources of funding.

21
Trends in HE
  • Ability or inability of governments to fund the
    increasing demand for HE
  • The fact that the business of transnational HE
    was alive and active before the GATS.
  • The increasing of private providers is
    questioning the quality of the programs.

22
How will students influence the demand?
  • Dramatically
  • According to the information reported by Merrill
    Lynch (USA investment house) the number of
    students in 2025 will be around 160 millions
    which is the double of students in 2002.

23
Students in USA(2003)
  • Total in HE
    15.756.000
  • Postgraduate students (14) 2.219.400
  • Foreign students (PG) (17) 377.300

24
Percentage of tertiary foreign students
  • Switzerland 17
  • Australia 13
  • Austria/U.K/Belgium 11
  • Germany 9
  • Demark/France/Sweden 6
  • USA 3
  • Spain 1

25
Students in European Union
  • EU (15) 12.563.000
  • EU (15 10) 15.207.000
  • Students mobility (15) 290.000
  • within EU(2.3 ) (1510) 350.000

26
Other references
  • Over 1.6 million international tertiary students
    abroad in OECD countries in 2001
  • Over 580.000 in USA approx 35 of world total
    (6,4 inc from 2000) 6740 in top 20 US business
    schools
  • Other significant share of global market include
    UK (14) Germany (12) Australia (9)
    France (8)
  • UK in 2001, students from China increased by 67
    from previous year 31 increase from India
  • New Zealand 300 growth between 1999 and 2002

27
Is there a relation between globalization and
international trade?
  • Yes
  • How will this affect the higher education?
  • Positive view
  • Negative view

28
Positives values
  • Innovation
  • New providers
  • Greater student access
  • Increased economic gain
  • New hybridization and fusion of cultures through
    mobility of people

29
Negative aspects
  • The threat to the role of government
  • Public service / Public good
  • Quality of education
  • Homogenization of culture

30
Supports to the trade
  • Business of transnational education was alive and
    active before the advent of GATS.
  • Education is in a large extent a government
    function and the agreement do not seek to
    displace the educational system and the right of
    governments to regulate and meet domestic policy
    objectives

31
Critics to the trade
  • GATS is a very new instrument and it is too soon
    to predict ..
  • The whole question of the protection of public
    service is very uncertain and potentially at risk
    by the narrow interpretation of what means..
  • Any subsides given to domestic providers must
    also be given to foreign providers.
  • If a foreign provider establishes a branch in a
    country this must permit to all WTO members the
    same opportunity and treatment.

32
Structure of GATS
  • First part. Framework containing the general
    principles and rules.
  • Second part. National schedules with the list of
    countries specific commitments on access to
    their markets by foreign providers.
  • Third part. Annex that detail specific
    limitations for each sector.

33
Subsectors in Education Services
Primary
pre-school and other primary education services
general secondary, higher secondary, technical
and vocational secondary, and technical and
vocational secondary education services for
handicapped students
Secondary
post-secondary technical and vocational and other
higher education services
Higher
education services for adults who are not in the
regular school and university system and includes
education services through radio or television
broadcasting or by correspondence
Adult
education services at the first and second levels
in specific subject matters not elsewhere
classified and all other education services that
are not definable by level
Other
34
World Bank. Trends in Lending
Primary Secondary Education
Vocational post-secondary education / Tertiary
education
35
Enrollment in Private Higher Education ( of
total)
36
What other services related to higher education
are included?
  • Language testing
  • Student recruitment
  • Quality assessment of programmes.

37
What we think about this related services?
  • Technological services.
  • Quality assessment of programmes.
  • These are areas where international trade may
    grow very quickly under consulting formulas.

38
Typology of Barriers to Trade as identified
by USA, New Zealand, Australia and Japan
Barriers to trade
Examples and modes of supply concerned
Prohibition for foreign providers
  • No possibility for foreign supplier to offer its
    services (all modes of supply)

Administrative burden and lack of transparency
  • Domestic laws and regulations unclear and
    administered in unfair manner (all modes of
    supply)
  • When governmental approval required for foreign
    suppliers, extremely long delays encountered
    when approval denied, no explication given, no
    information about necessary improvements to
    obtain it in the future (all modes of supply)
  • Denial of permission for private sector suppliers
    to enter into and exit from joint ventures with
    local or non-local partners on a voluntary basis
    (modes 1 and 3)

39
Typology of Barriers to Trade as identified
by USA, New Zealand, Australia and Japan
Barriers to trade
Examples and modes of supply concerned
  • Subsidies for education are not made known in a
    clear and transparent manner (all modes of
    supply)
  • Repatriation of earnings is subject to
    excessively costly fees and / or taxes for
    currency conversion (all modes of supply)
  • Excessive fees / taxes imposed on licensing or
    royalty payments (modes 1 and 3)

Fiscal discrimination
Accreditation / recognition discrimination
  • No recognition of titles delivered by foreign
    providers (all modes of supply)
  • No recognition of foreign diplomes (mode 2)
  • No accreditation delivered nationally for foreign
    providers (modes 1 and 3)

Technical discrimination
  • Restrictive use of national satellites or
    receiving platforms
  • Restrictive use of satellites dishes

40
How the GATS affects the Bologna process?
  • If we want a European HE area that is
    characterised by the fluid mobility of students
    in terms of geographical, economic and social
    equity it looks very difficult to follow the
    GATS model
  • The debate between competitiveness and
    cooperation is crucial in the EU area.
  • Employers should be deeply involved in the HE
    space construction according to the Bologna
    process.

41
What universities and universities associations
said?
  • The 2002 Porto Alegre Declaration, which was
    signed by Iberian and Latin American associations
    and public universities is radically opposed to
    international trade in education.
  • The Joint Declaration on Higher Education and the
    GATS, signed by four associations representing
    5.500 American, Canadian and European
    universities, rather than coming out against
    international trade, call for a freeze on WTO
    negotiations on educational services.

42
How much money are we talking about?
  • Global expenditures on education services exceed
    2.3 trillion .
  • The OCDE in 2001 estimate the value of the
    international trade in HE in 1999 en 34 billions
    in 1995 was estimated in 30 billion . USA
    with 33 was clearly the first supplier followed
    by Australia and UK. In 1995 HE was on fifth
    place of most exported services in USA.

43
How much money are we talking about?
  • Public expenditure on education continues to grow
    faster than total government spending, but not as
    fast as GDP. OECD countries spent an average of
    5,5 of their GDP. (Source Education at a Glance
    2002)
  • Investment house like Merrill Lynch predict that
    public education will be globally privatized over
    the next decade and say there is an untold amount
    of profit to be made when this happens.

44
Five Mayor Exporters ESUS million 2000
Prevalence of English speaking countries
45
What countries have shown interest?
  • USA.
  • Education to a large extent is a
    government function, but most countries permit
    private education. The proposal envisions that
    private education will continue to supplement,
    not to displace, public education
  • New Zeeland
  • HE sector is vitally important to all
    countries. Reduction of barriers to trade in HE
    does not equate to erosion of core public
    education systems and standards.
  • Australia
  • Governments must retain their sovereign
    right to determine their own domestic founding.
  • Japan
  • It has become extremely important for each
    country to improve the quality of education and
    research. Primary interest should be improving
    quality

46
Where are we?
  • The last negotiation round was open in Doha in
    December 2001
  • Participants shall submit initial requests for
    specific commitments by 30 June 2002
  • Participants shall submit initial offers by 31
    May 2003
  • March 2003. Possible trading partners meetings
    and discussions
  • Improved offers before spring of 2004
  • 2005. GATS negotiations conclude

47
Experiences in other countries
  • Malaysia (Invitation to foreign universities to
    establish under a clear regulatory framework)
  • South Africa (Branch of Australian Universities)
  • Canada (42 of the universities are actively
    involved in the export of HE services)
  • Belgium (HE must be out of GATS)
  • Rumania (In 10 years, 1/3 of the students are in
    private universities)
  • Cameroon (1/3 of the students from secondary have
    no place at state universities)

48
Quality and Accreditation
  • Free trade is not trade in the absence of quality
    standards
  • Increasing transnational education and new legal
    trade rules require more attention to quality
    assurance and accreditation of cross border
    education programs and providers.
  • Authority for QA, regulation and accreditation
    for cross border education must be guided by
    stakeholders of education and not left to trade
    officials or market.

49
Quality and Accreditation
  • Recognition of academic titles and certificates
    across countries is directly related to the
    issues of quality and accreditation
  • Accreditation and quality services labelled as
    Other in GATS may be the key of the
    international trade

50
Some key features
  • a. Students mobility
  • b. Freedom for mobility and recruitment of
    professors.
  • c. Capitals mobility. Investments and benefits
    expatriation.
  • d. Technological compatibility for transmission
    and reception through the satellites and national
    informatics networks.
  • e. Difficulties in translating degrees into
    national equivalents and corresponding legal
    consequences
  • f. Quality assurance

51
Potencial Donors
Public Funds
Public University
Others
Private Funds
Investment in Companies
DOMESTIC MARKET
Tuition Research
Non Profit Institutions
Research?
52
Conclusions
  • At present, the idea that there is a global
    concept of education in the world, is something
    that in a way or another everybody accepts with
    nuances or sustantial discrepancies but at the
    same time with the recognition of the fact.
  • It would be a mistake to expect that the Doha
    negotiation Round would either stop the trend
    towards internationalisation, nor would an
    agreement dramatically accelerate the trend.

53
Conclusions
  • The Bologna's process could be affected by the
    evolution of the international trade in HE that
    is taking place at these moments and by the
    interpretation and development of GATS.

54
Conclusions
  • Some universities and governments have the idea
    that the rules of international trade are not
    applicable to the sector of education. The low
    cost of tuition fees for HE is incompatible whit
    the principles of commercial services.
  • Education is a multi-faceted undertaking
    characterised by a multitude of convergent and
    divergent interest of multiple stakeholders. It
    cannot be limited only to consideration of free
    choice and price efficiency criteria.

55
Conclusions
  • The higher educations world market will affect
    and increase the mobility of the main agents that
    would have the opportunity to establish and
    develop their activities in different countries
    in a more easy way than until now

56
Conclusions
  • The advantages of a free HE market may fall in an
    unbalance way on the side of globalizators.
  • Even if there are some positive effects for
    less developed countries, the benefits will
    mainly go to the agent that provides the service.
  • A balance has to be achieved between legitimate
    requests for consumer protection and sovereignty
    rights by governments.

57
Conclusions
  • The national authorities for Trade and Economy
    are the only official representatives at the GATS
    negotiations. Sectors concerns (as HE) are not
    directly represented.
  • It is of the utmost importance that Ministers of
    Education have full information about the
    process analyze the specific national needs and
    agree with the official representatives the
    proposals and political actions for HE within the
    GATS.

58
Conclusions
  • Quality must be among the main objectives for
    future trade in HE.
  • Higher Education authorities, agencies,
    students, professors and the university community
    as a global, should demand the quality
    improvement of the overall system. Not just from
    the point of view of the mobility and the fees
    but mainly the quality of teaching and research.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com