World Bank Iraq Trust Fund External Review Prepared by Development Alternatives, Inc. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

World Bank Iraq Trust Fund External Review Prepared by Development Alternatives, Inc.

Description:

Secretariat function, to be located in Baghdad, and serve as the single focal ... Committee, to meet monthly in Baghdad and review activities of the two trust funds. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:49
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: siteresour4
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: World Bank Iraq Trust Fund External Review Prepared by Development Alternatives, Inc.


1
World Bank Iraq Trust Fund External
ReviewPrepared by Development Alternatives, Inc.
  • March 31, 2006

2
International Reconstruction Fund Facility for
Iraq (IRFFI) Model
  • IRFFI was created in response to donor requests
    for a multi-donor, coordinated approach to
    financing rehabilitation and reconstruction
    projects in Iraq.

3
World Bank Strategy for Iraq
  • The World Banks core objective is to help Iraq
    develop institutional frameworks and systems to
    promote the effective and transparent use of
    resources to promote stability, good
    governance, and economic growth.
  • The ITF allowed the Bank to participate in Iraqs
    reconstruction, combining rehabilitation with
    medium- and long-term institution building, even
    before IDA loans could be provided to Iraq.

4
IRFFIs Multi-Donor Trust Fund Model
  • The IRFFI model was designed to
  • Mobilize resources rapidly
  • Create common governance structures
  • Coordinate rehabilitation activities
  • Reduce transaction costs
  • Promote information-sharing.

5
Rapid Resource Mobilization Response
  • Donors deposited funds promptly into the Iraq
    Trust Fund (ITF)
  • Within the first 6 months, US371 million (93 of
    donor pledges) were deposited into the ITF.
  • Within the first year, US392 million (99 of
    donor pledges) were deposited into the ITF.
  • The speed of resource mobilization exceeded
    typical multi-donor trust fund experiences.

6
Rapid Resource Mobilization Response
  • ITF projects were designated for fast-track
    processing according to Bank procedures for
    emergency operations.
  • Bank projects normally take 15 months to approve.
  • Within 9 months of the trust fund activation, 9
    emergency operations were approved, legally
    obligating about 93 of ITF resources to Iraq.
  • ITF grant funding was provided to Iraq promptly.

7
Rapid Resource Mobilization Response
  • Pace of disbursements payments made for goods,
    services, works delivered has been affected by
  • Banks lack of recent involvement in Iraq
  • Iraqs inexperience with international
    organizations
  • Iraqi-implementation of competitive bidding
    procedures
  • Portfolio characteristics (e.g. the majority of
    ITF grants finance civil works and goods for
    large reconstruction projects)
  • Frequent changes in government and turnover of
    ministry staff
  • Volatile security situation.

8
Rapid Resource Mobilization Response
  • Overall, the pace of project implementation and
    disbursement has been expeditious under difficult
    circumstances.

9
Governance Structure Coordination
  • IRFFI created common governances structure to
    promote a coordinated response, including
  • Secretariat function, to be located in Baghdad,
    and serve as the single focal point for
    information.
  • Donor Committee, to meet every 6 months, to
    endorse overall priorities and provide strategic
    guidance.
  • Facility Coordination Committee, to meet monthly
    in Baghdad and review activities of the two trust
    funds.
  • Iraqi Strategic Review Board (ISRB) is charged
    with reviewing project proposals to ensure
    projects are responsive to Iraqs priorities and
    to avoid duplication of activities.

10
Governance Structure Coordination
  • Due to the continued volatile situation, the
    innovative organizational arrangements have not
    been adequately tested.

11
Governance Structure Coordination
  • Despite missed opportunities of joint governance
    structures,
  • Joint UN/World Bank website provides
    comprehensive source of information
  • Effective coordination exists at the working
    level among project teams of World Bank and UN
  • While several donors may work in same areas,
    projects are complementary, varying in scope,
    geographical coverage, or implementation method.

12
Governance Structure Coordination
  • World Bank methods of operation are distinctly
    different from other donors.
  • The World Bank preference for Iraqi project
    execution
  • Puts Iraqis in the drivers seat and
  • Inherently builds capacity by providing hands-on
    experience managing resources and development
    projects.
  • Thus, even when donors work in same areas,
    different implementation methods have generated
    different results.

13
Governance Structure Coordination
  • Although IRFFI may not have clarified roles of UN
    and WB along lines of comparative advantage
  • Perhaps in situations of vast needs the
    potential of all organizations should be
    exploited (and not constrained by comparative
    advantage).

14
Governance Structure Coordination
  • With political progress and improved security,
    the governance structures created for IRFFI could
    yet promote substantive cooperation and realize
    significant benefits.

15
Transaction Costs
  • The multi-donor trust fund approach
  • Creates one window to access funding provided by
    many donors
  • Allows smaller donors and those without bilateral
    programs to participate in rebuilding efforts in
    Iraq
  • Provides one platform and set of procedures for
    project execution
  • Minimizes security costs, allowing a larger share
    of donor contributions to be directed to Iraq.
  • The ITF reduces transaction costs for Iraq and
    for donors.

16
ITF Due Diligence Measures
  • ITF portfolio is subject to risks, including
  • Frequent staff changes in ministries
  • Difficult security conditions, preventing on-site
    supervision visits
  • Capacity limitations of ministries and
    inexperience with modern project management
    procedures.

17
ITF Due Diligence Measures
  • To mitigate risks, the World Bank
  • Employs local staff to support ministries and
    monitor project implementation
  • Trains PMTs intensely
  • Interacts daily with PMT staff
  • Undertakes full range of Bank project review and
    quality control procedures.
  • The employment of the Fiduciary Monitoring Agent
    is crucial to determine the effectiveness of due
    diligence efforts.

18
Summary of Conclusions
  • Although several aspects of the model could not
    be fully implemented, Iraq has benefited from
    the
  • Rapid mobilization of donor funds
  • Participation of donors unable to mount bilateral
    programs
  • Involvement of the World Bank early in the
    reconstruction program, and the creation of
    ministry platforms for effective resource
    management
  • Comprehensive website to provide information to
    donors, vendors, and the general public
  • Creation of a unified channel for Bank
    interaction with UN agencies.

19
Thank You
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com