U.S.-Iran Foreign Policy: Global Energy Independence From Iran is Not the Solution - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

U.S.-Iran Foreign Policy: Global Energy Independence From Iran is Not the Solution

Description:

Capital: Tehran. Population: 70,049,262. GDP: $610.4 billion. Language: ... U.S. Embassy in Tehran seized on 11/4/1979. 63 American citizens taken hostage ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:161
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: forint
Learn more at: http://www.kentlaw.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: U.S.-Iran Foreign Policy: Global Energy Independence From Iran is Not the Solution


1
U.S.-Iran Foreign Policy Global Energy
Independence From Iran is Not the Solution
  • By Adnan Bohri
  • April 25, 2007

2
Agenda
  • Background
  • Iranian Revolution, why sanctions exist
  • The Iran-Libya Sanctions Act of 1996
  • Do sanctions apply to the IPI pipeline?
  • Why sanctions and energy independence from Iran
    are not the solution.

3
Background and Fun Facts
  • Capital Tehran
  • Population 70,049,262
  • GDP 610.4 billion
  • Language Persian (Farsi)

Source http//encarta.msn.com/encyclopedia_761567
300/Iran.html
4
Iran Pre-1979
  • Ruled by the Shah, Mohammad Raza Pahlavi
  • Allies with U.S. during the Cold War
  • Regime fell in the Iranian revolution of 1979

Source http//encarta.msn.com/encyclopedia_761567
300/Iran.html
5
Iranian Revolution
  • After the overthrow of the Shah, Aytollah
    Ruhollah Khomeini came to power
  • Known as the Supreme Leader of Iran
  • Established Islamic Republic of Iran

Source http//encarta.msn.com/encyclopedia_761567
300/Iran.html
6
Iran Hostage Crisis
  • U.S. Embassy in Tehran seized on 11/4/1979
  • 63 American citizens taken hostage
  • 50 hostages held prisoner for 444 days
  • Supported by Khomeini under the slogan America
    cant do a damn thing

Source http//encarta.msn.com/encyclopedia_761567
300/Iran.html
7
Overview of sanctions against Iran
  • Began after 1979 Iran Hostage Crisis
  • Iranian Transactions Regulations - 31 C.F.R.
    560
  • Import embargo on Iranian-origin goods and
    services
  • No direct trade with the U.S. since 1995, when
    the U.S. government banned all commercial and
    financial transactions between U.S. companies and
    Iranian public and private entities
  • Iran-Libya Sanctions Act of 1996
  • Current Nuclear Standoff with Iran
  • Could lead to additional sanctions by U.N.
  • Source http//www.treas.gov/offices/enforcement/
    ofac/programs/iran/iran.pdf

8
How Much Energy Does Iran Have?
  • Possesses worlds 2nd largest natural gas
    reserves
  • 10 of worlds known oil reserves (4th largest)
  • 2nd largest oil producer in OPEC

Source http//www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/cabs/Iran/Back
ground.html
9
Iran-Libya Sanctions Act of 1996 (ILSA)
  • Allows the President to impose sanctions if a
    person has made an investment of more than 20
    million that directly and significantly
    contributes to the enhancement of Irans ability
    to develop petroleum resources of Iran.
  • Controversial because it allows the President to
    impose unilateral sanctions on foreign companies
    or entities

Source Iran-Libya Sanctions Act, 50 U.S.C.
1701 note (1996)
10
ILSA Continued
  • Investment" defined as the entry into a contract
    that includes responsibility for the development
    of petroleum resources in Iran or Libya
  • Statute silent as to whether the construction of
    energy transit routes from Iran might be
    considered an investment
  • However, Clinton Administration position was
    that, under certain conditions, the construction
    of such routes could be a sanctionable investment

Source Kenneth Katzman, The Iran-Libya
Sanctions Act (ILSA), Congressional Research
Service Report for Congress, updated Apr. 26,
2006.
11
ILSAs First Test
  • The French oil company, Total
    SA, struck a 2 billion deal with Iran in
    September 1997, to develop natural gas reserves
    in Irans South Pars field
  • This was the largest single foreign investment in
    Iran since the U.S. Embassy in Tehran was sacked
    in 1979
  • Clinton Adm. found that deal violated ILSA, but
    ultimately decided to waive sanctions

Source Kenneth Katzman, The Iran-Libya
Sanctions Act (ILSA), Congressional Research
Service Report for Congress, updated Apr. 26,
2006.
12
The Iran-Pakistan-India Natural Gas Pipeline
  • 4-7 billion project
  • 2100 km in length from Iran to India
  • Would supply 60 million cubic meters of gas a
    day to India and up to 30 million cubic meters a
    day to Pakistan.
  • Officials of India, Pakistan Iran met in August
    2006 to discuss pricing of gas
  • Tentatively scheduled to
    begin construction in 2007
    and be completed by 2010

Source George Perkovich and Revati Prasad, A
Pipeline to Peace, N.Y. Times, Apr. 18, 2005.
13
The Need for the Pipeline
  • Pakistan would benefit from Iranian natural gas
    exports, and Pakistani territory would be used as
    a transit route to export natural gas to India
  • Would bring in 700 million per year in
    transport fees
  • Indias Energy needs will surpass
    Chinas in the next 50 years
  • Cooperation between Pakistan and India
    would increase stability in South Asia

Source George Perkovich and Revati Prasad, A
Pipeline to Peace, N.Y. Times, Apr. 18, 2005.
14
Would the Pipeline be an investment under ILSA?
  • The Iranian side of the project will be financed
    entirely by Iran and a group of multi-national
    investors Iran will be required to put together
  • Pakistan's investment in the project will start
    only after the pipeline reaches Pakistani
    territory
  • Applying a plain-meaning interpretation of ILSA,
    Pakistans and Indias involvement could be
    interpreted as one that does not directly
    contribute to the enhancement of Irans ability
    to develop petroleum resources of Iran.

15
Comparing Totals case with Pakistans
  • 7-10 billion proposed project
  • Natural gas transit route
  • No direct development by Pakistan
  • Pakistani ownership of the pipeline would begin
    at its border
  • However, deal would provide incentive and funding
    for Iran to develop its gas resources
  • 2 billion investment
  • Direct development of oil fields within Iran

16
Recent Developments
  • ILSA expired on August 5, 2006
  • Iran Freedom and Support Act
  • Bill passed by Congress that tightens the
    sanctions imposed on entities that invest in
    Irans energy sector
  • Includes stricter provisions regarding the
    waiving of sanctions by the president

17
Congresss View
  • Agreement in Congress that ILSA shouldnt be
    allowed to expire
  • U.S. must continue to look at economic sanctions
    as a method for
    keeping Iran in
    check and isolating
    them

Source Hearing of the Senate Banking, Housing,
Urban Affairs Committee on June 22, 2006
18
Bush Administrations View
  • The Bush Adm. sees the value of ILSA, but did not
    support significant changes to the statute
  • Did not support the tightening of the ILSA
    sanctions as contained in the Iran Freedom
    Support Act
  • Restrictions would weaken the Presidents
    flexibility to pursue diplomacy with Allies
  • Source R. Nicholas Burns, Under Secretary of
    State for Political Affairs, Testimony Before the
    Senate Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban
    Affairs, June 22, 2006 and March 21, 2007.

19
Have Sanctions Been Effective and should they
continue to be used?
  • 27 years of sanctions and isolation have not
    dissuaded Iran from pursuing its nuclear program
    or driven the cleric-led government from power.
  • ? instead have convinced Iran that only nuclear
    technology can protect them from American
    hostility
  • Source R. Nicholas Burns, Under Secretary of
    State for Political Affairs, Testimony Before the
    Senate Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban
    Affairs, June 22, 2006 and March 21, 2007.

20
Effects of Sanctions Continued
  • Since the Total waiver, 11.5b in foreign
    investments in Irans energy sector have been
    agreed upon.
  • Irans natural gas sector, non-existent prior to
    the late 1990s, is becoming an increasingly
    important factor in Irans energy future as a
    result of foreign investment.
  • E.U. threatened formal counter-action over ILSA
    in the WTO, and in April 1997, the U.S. and E.U.
    formally agreed to try to avoid a trade
    confrontation.

Source Kenneth Katzman, The Iran-Libya
Sanctions Act (ILSA), Congressional Research
Service Report for Congress, updated Apr. 26,
2006.
21
Why Iranian Sanctions are Detrimental for
American Interests
  • Sanctions on Iran? higher global energy prices ?
    higher U.S. energy prices
  • Energy prices are set by the global market, so
    doesnt matter whether its coming from Texas or
    Tehran
  • Increases in oil prices correspond closely to
    downturns in the economy. The last four
    recessions all correlated with restrictions in
    the oil supply.
  • When energy prices spike, the market slows down
    when prices decrease, the market speeds up.
  • Lower oil and gas prices allow us to invest in
    alternative energies and gives us time and
    breathing room to develop those technologies.

Source Mark Zupan, Dean of Graduate School of
Business Administration at the University of
Rochester, New York. Available at
http//analysisonline.org/energy/zupan.html
22
Continued...
  • Numerous Western oil companies have shied from
    investing in Iran for fear of incurring Americas
    wrath
  • Imposing sanctions on companies that develop
    Irans petroleum resources would isolate America
    from its European allies, as well as China and
    India
  • Best way to engage Iran is to bring them into the
    global community
  • Lifting economic sanctions, or at the very least
    allowing American allies to invest, should be
    seen as real priority.

23
Conclusions
  • U.S. made historic offer in June 06 when Sec.
    Rice first offered to engage in direct
    discussions with Iran provided Iran completely,
    verifiably suspends its enrichment activities.
  • Instead of energy independence, the goal should
    be an effort to improve relations with Irans
    regime and bring them into the global community.
  • U.S. unilateral sanctions on Iran undermine this
    goal.

24
The End
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com