Analysis of Primary Biotechnology Literature - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 24
About This Presentation
Title:

Analysis of Primary Biotechnology Literature

Description:

Paragraph 4: Other genes present? Samples asssayed for other transgenes. NOS terminator sequence. A3, B2 and K1. Bt toxin gene (cryIAb) B3. Conclusion: ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:103
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: philmc9
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Analysis of Primary Biotechnology Literature


1
Analysis of Primary Biotechnology Literature
Biotechnology Education Forum NDSU Extension
Inservice Training Bismarck, ND March 1, 2002
Phil McClean Department of Plant Science North
Dakota State University
2
Concerns for Biotech Products Ecological Balance
Will Be Altered
  • Other organisms will be affected
  • Monarch butterfly
  • Maize Bt pollen falls on neighboring milkweed
  • Milkweed a monarch butterfly food source
  • Does the pollen affect the butterfly
  • Losey et al. (1999) Nature 399214
  • Yes!!
  • Sears et al. (2001) PNAS 9811937
  • No!!

3
Concerns for Biotech Products Inadvertent Gene
Transfer
  • Wild relatives receive transgene from biotech
    crops
  • Important genetic diversity will be lost
  • Has it been observed?
  • Quist Chapela (2001) Nature 414541
  • Yes!!
  • Has it been challenged?
  • Christou (2002) Transgenic Research 11iii
  • Yes!!

4
Lets Review the Primary Literature
Transgenic DNA Introgressed Into
Traditional Maize Landraces in Oaxaca, Mexico
David Quist and Ignacio Chapela
Nature 414541-543 November 29, 2001
5
What does the title tell us?
6
What does the title tell us?
Transgenes were found in landraces
7
What does the title tell us?
Transgenes were found in landraces
What does this imply?
8
What does the title tell us?
Transgenes were found in landraces
What does this imply?
Biotech crops have contaminated nature
9
Paragraph 1 What was analyzed?
10
Paragraph 1 What was analyzed?
  • Bulk seed from corn cobs from landraces
  • Fields isolated from roads
  • Six samples (A1-A3 and B1-B3)
  • Store sample (K1)
  • Controls
  • Peruvian sample (P1)
  • Oaxacan sample from 1971 (H1)
  • Monsanto Yieldgard maize (Bt1)
  • Monsanto Roundup-Ready maize (RR1)

11
Paragraph 1 How were samples analyzed?
12
Paragraph 1 How were samples analyzed?
  • DNA isolated from flour
  • Scored for presence of 35S promoter
  • Why???
  • Widely used transgene contruct element
  • Polymerase chain reaction technique
  • Presence of product
  • transgene promoter DNA is in sample

13
Paragraph 2 What are the results?
14
Paragraph 2 What are the results?
  • Amplification observed in 5/7 samples
  • Weak, but present
  • Low copy gave low signal
  • Store sample gave strong signal
  • Bt1 and RR1 gave strong signal
  • Historical and Peruvian samples negative
  • Positive control amplification observed in all
    samples

15
Paragraph 2 Supporting evidence?
16
Paragraph 2 Supporting evidence?
  • Independent confirmation by Mexican govt
  • Oaxaca and one other state
  • Samples near authors site also positive at low
    levels
  • Mexican experiment analyzed individual kernels
  • Strong signal than pooled samples authors used

17
Paragraph 3 Confirming Experiment?
18
Paragraph 3 Confirming Experiment?
  • Weak signal amplified with internal primers
  • New fragment sequenced
  • Sequence equal Monsanto 35S promoter sequence

19
Paragraph 4 Other genes present?
20
Paragraph 4 Other genes present?
  • Samples asssayed for other transgenes
  • NOS terminator sequence
  • A3, B2 and K1
  • Bt toxin gene (cryIAb)
  • B3
  • Conclusion
  • Multiple transgenes found in the Mexican
    landraces

21
Paragraph 5 Clues to transgene origin?
22
Paragraph 5 Clues to transgene origin?
  • Samples assayed for genomic location of transgene
  • Procedure Inverse PCR
  • Scores transgene and neighboring maize DNA
  • Four samples contain known flanking genes
  • A2, A3, B3, K1
  • Transgene located in same position as Novartis
    Bt11
  • Samples A3, K1
  • Conclusion
  • GMOs to landraces introgression occurring
  • Despite GMO planting in Mexico (1998-now)

23
The Challenge to Quist Chapela
  • Chistou (2002)
  • Fundamental flaws (experimental design) in
    research
  • Results can be explained by
  • Contaminated samples
  • Flawed iPCR interpretation
  • Cross pollination not supported by results
  • Better experiment
  • Grow plant samples out and
  • Score phenotype (Bt or Glyphosate tolerant)
  • Score genotype (screening individual plants)

24
Whats Next??
  • Funding becomes available
  • Detailed experiments
  • New results or interpretation
  • Whats at stake?
  • Integrity of biotech approaches to crop
    improvement
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com