The Influence of Integrating Kinesthetic Learning Experiences in Elementary Classrooms - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 21
About This Presentation
Title:

The Influence of Integrating Kinesthetic Learning Experiences in Elementary Classrooms

Description:

The Influence of Integrating Kinesthetic Learning Experiences in Elementary Classrooms – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:183
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: Heat78
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Influence of Integrating Kinesthetic Learning Experiences in Elementary Classrooms


1
The Influence of Integrating Kinesthetic Learning
Experiences in Elementary Classrooms
  • Heather E. Erwin, Aaron Beighle, Mark Abel,
    Angela Miller
  • University of Kentucky
  • College of Education

2
Purpose of the Study
  • Examine the impact of a classroom-based physical
    activity (CBPA) intervention on elementary
    students physical activity levels during
    mathematics lessons and the entire school day
  • Investigate the extent to which students retained
    academic content taught during CBPA

3
Introduction
  • Many American youth are not meeting the
    recommendations of 60 minutes of MVPA per day
    (Vincent et al., 2003)
  • By age 8, overweight children are 80 more at
    risk of being overweight or obese as adults
    (NASPE American Heart Association, 2006)
  • Important to provide multiple physical activity
    opportunities to individuals at a young age

4
Introduction
  • School-based interventions advocated (Pate et
    al., 2006 Sallis McKenzie, 1991)
  • Child Nutrition and WIC Reauthorization Act of
    2004 (Public Law 108-265, 2004)
  • National trend towards reducing PA opportunities
    in schools due to legislative pressure requiring
    schools to hold students to high academic
    standards (House of Representatives 1804, 103rd
    Congress, 1994)

5
Literature Review
  • Mixed results found with literature on physical
    activity and academic performance
  • Physical activity has been linked to increased
    educational achievement (Coe et al., 2006 Field,
    Diego, Sanders, 2001 Sallis et al., 1999)
  • No significant academic differences between youth
    receiving varying levels of physical activity
    (Daley Ryan, 2000 Fisher, Juszczak,
    Friedman, 1996 Sanders et al., 2000)

6
Literature Review
  • Despite inconsistencies, positive relationships
    exist between physical activity and specific
    facilitators of learning
  • Physical activity (Oliver, Schofield, McEvoy,
    2006 Stewart et al., 2004)
  • On-task behavior (Mahar et al., 2006)
  • Attentiveness (Azrin, Elhe, Beaumont, 2006
    Pellegrini, Huberty, Jones, 1995)
  • Concentration (Caterino Polak, 1999)

7
Literature Review
  • Limited research on physical activity and
    retention of information
  • Disability research suggests an exercise program
    affected working memory of children with dyslexia
    (Reynolds Nicolson, 2007)
  • Positive association between healthy childrens
    fitness and their working memory (Hillman,
    Castelli, Buck, 2005)

8
Participants
  • 76 children (43 boys, 33 girls), aged 8 to 12 (M
    10.08, SD .86)
  • 4 teachers (all females)
  • Recruited from one elementary school in Fayette
    County, KY

9
Instruments
  • Physical activity
  • Walk4Life MLS-2505 pedometers (Plainfield, IL)
  • Model GT1M Actigraph LLC. Accelerometers
    (Pensacola, FL)
  • Student knowledge
  • Teacher-developed learning checks

10
Procedures
  • Teacher in-service to develop integration
    activities and learning checks
  • Example
  • Write each fraction as a decimal and a
    percent.
  • 7 8
  • 10 25
  • Example
  • 149 7

11
Procedures
  • Physical activity
  • 5 days baseline
  • 13 days intervention
  • Learning checks
  • Pre-, post-, and 9 weeks post-

12
Data Analysis
  • Physical activity
  • Step counts/outputs averaged during baseline and
    intervention
  • Multiple paired-sample t-tests

13
Data Analysis
  • Learning checks
  • Scores averaged during baseline,
    post-intervention, and 9 weeks post-intervention
  • Multiple paired-sample t-tests

14
Pedometer Results
15
Accelerometer Results
16
Learning Check Results
17
Discussion
  • Participants accumulated significantly more steps
    during math lessons and overall school day in
    CBPA.
  • Accelerometer data suggest, that in a limited
    subsample of participants, there was a modest,
    yet significant increase in physical activity
    intensity during the intervention math classes.

18
Discussion
  • Students learned math content via CBPA.
  • Students retained math content presented via CBPA
    nine weeks later.
  • CBPA may occur without jeopardizing student
    learning (Ahamed et al, 2007).
  • Results may provide additional support for
    integrating physical activity into
    academic lessons.

19
Implications
  • With low physical activity among children, CBPA
    may help individuals reach recommended levels.
  • Due to the importance of test scores in schools,
    results of this study may encourage teachers to
    use CBPA to teach core content, or at the very
    least, prevent them from opposing its
    implementation.

20
Limitations
  • Small sample size from one school, two grade
    levels
  • Limited to integration of physical activity with
    one subject area
  • Short intervention
  • Cross-sectional data
  • Learning check threats to validity

21
Future Studies
  • More participants, grade levels, subject areas
  • Control group comparison
  • Teacher perceptions in relation to student
    physical activity
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com