Flexibility in reading literary texts: Differences between weak and strong adolescent readers - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 27
About This Presentation
Title:

Flexibility in reading literary texts: Differences between weak and strong adolescent readers

Description:

Who are they with fish and starfish in their hair? Mark's think aloud comments. Story fragment ... EMO emotional resp. EVA evaluating. OTH other activity ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:73
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 28
Provided by: Tan56
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Flexibility in reading literary texts: Differences between weak and strong adolescent readers


1
Flexibility in reading literary texts
Differences between weak and strongadolescent
readers
  • Tanja Janssen, Martine Braaksma,
  • Gert Rijlaarsdam Huub van den Bergh
  • University of Amsterdam
  • EARLI Nicosia, August 23-26, 2005

2
e.g., explaining, predicting, analyzing,
evaluating, emotional responding
  • flexibility
  • the ability of readers to change their reading
    activities
  • in adaptive response to parts of a literary text
  • and/or in response to different literary texts.

flexible
within a single text between texts
3
  • The Three Friends
  • by
  • Jeanette Winterson

4
  • Once upon a time there were two friends who found
    a third. Liking no one better in the whole world,
    they vowed to live in one palace, sail in one
    ship, and fight one fight with equal arms.

5
  • After three months they decided to go on a quest.
  • What shall we seek? they asked each other.
  • The first said, Gold.
  • The second said, Wives.
  • The third said, That which cannot be found.
  • They all agreed that this last was best and so
    they set off in fine array.

6
  • They heard a noise behind them like a scythe
    cutting the water and when they looked they saw a
    ship thin as a blade gaining towards them. The
    figure rowed it standing up, with one oar that
    was not an oar. They saw the curve of the metal
    flashing, first this side and then that. They saw
    the rower throw back his hood. They saw him
    beckon to them and the world tilted. The sea
    poured away.
  • Who are they with fish and starfish in
    their hair?

7
Marks think aloud comments
  • Story fragment
  • 1 I think something strange is going to happen.
  • 2 I dont think it will be fun, because what is
    written here is just nonsense.
  • 3 Perhaps its going to be thrilling. Lets
    see what happens in the next fragment.
  • 4 Its just nonsense. There is nothing
    special to it.
  • 5 It remains the same.
  • 6 It is really not exciting.
  • 7 It's a bit funny, but not exciting.
    I thought it would be thrilling.
  • 8 This part is boring. Its just
    nonsense.
  • 9 I thought that it would be a little
    bit more romantic, not just nonsense.
  • 10 Its just nonsense. I think it has nothing
    to do with novels.

8
Julias think aloud comments
  • Story fragment
  • 1 The three friends. Laughs. The three little
    pigs. Like those comic figures Huey, Dewey,
    and Louie.
  • 2 Laughs. Its really not a nice beginning
    two friends who found a third. They must be
    rich a palace. .
  • 3 So, they were men If it cannot be found,
    why should you go and
  • look for it? Women. Women would be more fun.
    No, drugs! They
  • should go look for that. Yes.

9
Research questions
  • Do adolescents change their reading activities
    over the course of their reading process and in
    response to different stories?
  • Are there differences between weak and strong
    readers (within a story / between stories)?

10
Participants
  • 19 students from 3 schools
  • 10th grade
  • 16 years old
  • boys girls
  • different levels
  • of achievement

11
Think aloud task
  • 5 short stories (500-1000 words)
  • Stories may invite multiple interpretations
  • Presented fragment by fragment
  • From computer screen (self-paced)
  • Online thinking aloud (no hints)
  • About 20 minutes per story

12
First watching a model
13
Thinking aloud
14
Data
  • 92 think aloud protocols
  • About 4000 student statements (as individual
    cases)
  • One coder, 10 coded by two coders Cohens kappa
    .81

15
Coding scheme
  • Retelling
  • Inferencing
  • Detecting problems
  • Associating
  • Analyzing
  • Evaluating
  • Responding emotionally
  • Responding metacognitively
  • Other activity

16
Coding example
17
Analysis
  • Multilevel models
  • Occurrence of each activity as a function of time
  • Hierarchy of data
  • reader
  • story 1 story 2 story 3 story 4 story 5

fragment 1 fragment 2 fragment n
activity 1 activity 2 activity n
18
Results
  • Two examples
  • problem detecting (e.g., self-questioning)
  • responding emotionally (e.g., laughing, sighing)

19
Individual readers (n 19)
20
Mean patterns for weak and strong readers
21
Individual readers stories (n92)
22
Individual readers (n 19)
23
Mean patterns for weak strong readers
24
Individual readers stories (n92)
25
Conclusions
  • Adolescents change the configuration of their
    reading activities over the course of the reading
    process
  • Strong readers change the configuration of their
    reading activities more often than weak readers
  • over the course of the reading process
  • in response to different stories

Strong readers appear to be more flexible in
their literary reading and response than
weak readers.
26
Implication for literature teaching
  • Weak student-readers should learn to
    differentiate
  • their literary responses and strategies,
    depending on
  • the phase in the reading process
  • the particular literary text they are reading

27
  • Thank you for your attention
  • E-mail T.M.Janssen_at_uva.nl
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com