Subjective Quantification of Perceptual Interactions among some 2D Scientific Visualization Methods - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Subjective Quantification of Perceptual Interactions among some 2D Scientific Visualization Methods

Description:

Experiment Details. Results. Discussion. Prompt visual thinking. Discovery and ... Experiment Details. Results. Discussion. Task #2: Spatial Feature Resolution ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:69
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 58
Provided by: daf
Learn more at: http://vis.computer.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Subjective Quantification of Perceptual Interactions among some 2D Scientific Visualization Methods


1
Subjective Quantification ofPerceptual
Interactionsamong some 2DScientific
Visualization Methods
Daniel Acevedo David Laidlaw
Visualization Research Lab Brown
University http//vis.cs.brown.edu
2
Icon Size
Icon Spacing
Icon Brightness
3
Our Goal
  • Model the effectiveness of multi-valued,
    multi-layered, icon-based
  • 2D scientific visualization methods
  • Quantify the perceptual interactions among
    visual dimensions
  • Quantify the expressive power of the
    individual visual dimensions

4
Paper Summary
Quantifying filtering interference among 3
visual dimensions when visualizing a
single-valued continuous scalar dataset in 2D
for exploratory visualization using icon-based
visualization methods.
5
Roadmap of the talk
  • Background
  • Exploratory Visualization
  • Experiment Details
  • Results
  • Discussion

6
  • Background
  • Exploratory Visualization
  • Experiment Details
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Info/Sci. Visualization
  • Bertin, Cleveland, et al., Mackinlay, Card,
  • MacEachren,
  • Perception
  • Callaghan, Landy, Bergen, Carswell and
    Wickens, Ware, Healey,
  • Bair, House, Interrante,
  • Visual Design and Art
  • Wallschlaeger et al., Tufte,

7
  • Background
  • Exploratory Visualization
  • Experiment Details
  • Results
  • Discussion

8
  • Background
  • Exploratory Visualization
  • Experiment Details
  • Results
  • Discussion

Exploratory Visualization
  • Prompt visual thinking
  • Discovery and hypothesis formation
  • Overall understanding
  • Insight
  • Design factors
  • Data characteristics
  • Composition

Spatial resolution Data levels Context and
saliency Data relations Visual clutter Balance
9
  • Background
  • Exploratory Visualization
  • Experiment Details
  • Results
  • Discussion

The Task Exploratory Visualization
10
  • Background
  • Exploratory Visualization
  • Experiment Details
  • Results
  • Discussion

Summary
  • Want to
  • Quantify expressive power of visual dimensions
  • Have
  • Design factors to qualify our exploratory goal
  • Need
  • More indirect experimental techniques

11
  • Background
  • Exploratory Visualization
  • Experiment Details
  • Results
  • Discussion

Logistics
  • 3 Visual Dimensions
  • Icon Brightness
  • Icon Size
  • Icon Spacing

Mapped Icon size (0,1) Non
Mapped Icon brightness (1.00) Icon spacing
(0.66)
Filtering Interference Brightness x Size x
Spacing Size x Spacing Spacing x Size
12
  • Background
  • Exploratory Visualization
  • Experiment Details
  • Results
  • Discussion

Logistics
  • 3 Tasks
  • Data Resolution Identification
  • How many different levels of data can a visual
    dimension represent?
  • Spatial Feature Resolution Identification
  • What is the size of the smallest
    spatial feature a visual dimension can
    represent?
  • Visual Linearity Perception
  • How perceptually linear is a
  • visual dimension?

13
  • Background
  • Exploratory Visualization
  • Experiment Details
  • Results
  • Discussion

Logistics
  • Computer-based. 900x900.
  • 6 Subjects. Within-subjects design.
  • 9 training sections, 9 trial sections.
  • No time limit, with breaks.

14
  • Background
  • Exploratory Visualization
  • Experiment Details
  • Results
  • Discussion

Task 1 Data Resolution
How many different levels of datacan a visual
dimension represent?
D zero-crossing
(a, l)
Da
  • a 0.2, 0.6
  • l 0.625, 1.25, 2.5, 5 ( image width)

15
  • Background
  • Exploratory Visualization
  • Experiment Details
  • Results
  • Discussion

Task 1 Data Resolution
Icon brightness
16
  • Background
  • Exploratory Visualization
  • Experiment Details
  • Results
  • Discussion

Task 1 Data Resolution
Icon brightness
17
  • Background
  • Exploratory Visualization
  • Experiment Details
  • Results
  • Discussion

Task 1 Data Resolution
Icon size
18
  • Background
  • Exploratory Visualization
  • Experiment Details
  • Results
  • Discussion

Task 1 Data Resolution
Icon size
19
  • Background
  • Exploratory Visualization
  • Experiment Details
  • Results
  • Discussion

Task 1 Data Resolution
Icon spacing
20
  • Background
  • Exploratory Visualization
  • Experiment Details
  • Results
  • Discussion

Task 1 Data Resolution
Icon spacing
21
  • Background
  • Exploratory Visualization
  • Experiment Details
  • Results
  • Discussion

Task 2 Spatial Feature Resolution
What is the size of the smallest spatialfeature
a visual dimension can represent?
Dl
22
  • Background
  • Exploratory Visualization
  • Experiment Details
  • Results
  • Discussion

Task 2 Spatial Feature Resolution
Icon brightness
23
  • Background
  • Exploratory Visualization
  • Experiment Details
  • Results
  • Discussion

Task 2 Spatial Feature Resolution
Icon brightness
24
  • Background
  • Exploratory Visualization
  • Experiment Details
  • Results
  • Discussion

Task 2 Spatial Feature Resolution
Icon size
25
  • Background
  • Exploratory Visualization
  • Experiment Details
  • Results
  • Discussion

Task 2 Spatial Feature Resolution
Icon size
26
  • Background
  • Exploratory Visualization
  • Experiment Details
  • Results
  • Discussion

Task 2 Spatial Feature Resolution
Icon spacing
27
  • Background
  • Exploratory Visualization
  • Experiment Details
  • Results
  • Discussion

Task 2 Spatial Feature Resolution
Icon spacing
28
  • Background
  • Exploratory Visualization
  • Experiment Details
  • Results
  • Discussion

Task 3 Visual Linearity
How perceptually linearis a visual dimension?
29
  • Background
  • Exploratory Visualization
  • Experiment Details
  • Results
  • Discussion

Task 3 Visual Linearity
Icon brightness
30
  • Background
  • Exploratory Visualization
  • Experiment Details
  • Results
  • Discussion

Task 3 Visual Linearity
Icon brightness
31
  • Background
  • Exploratory Visualization
  • Experiment Details
  • Results
  • Discussion

Task 3 Visual Linearity
Icon size
32
  • Background
  • Exploratory Visualization
  • Experiment Details
  • Results
  • Discussion

Task 3 Visual Linearity
Icon size
33
  • Background
  • Exploratory Visualization
  • Experiment Details
  • Results
  • Discussion

Task 3 Visual Linearity
Icon spacing
34
  • Background
  • Exploratory Visualization
  • Experiment Details
  • Results
  • Discussion

Task 3 Visual Linearity
Icon spacing
35
  • Background
  • Exploratory Visualization
  • Experiment Details
  • Results
  • Discussion

Summary
  • 3 Visual Dimensions
  • Icon Brightness
  • Icon Size
  • Icon Spacing
  • 3 Tasks
  • Data Resolution Identification
  • Spatial Feature Resolution Identification
  • Visual Linearity Perception

36
  • Background
  • Exploratory Visualization
  • Experiment Details
  • Results
  • Discussion

Task 1 Data Resolution
Just- Noticeable- Differences (jnd) units
37
  • Background
  • Exploratory Visualization
  • Experiment Details
  • Results
  • Discussion

Task 1 Data Resolution
Icon Brightness l5
(0,0.33)
(0,0.66)
(0,1)
(0.33,0.66)
(0.33,1)
(0.66,1)
38
  • Background
  • Exploratory Visualization
  • Experiment Details
  • Results
  • Discussion

Task 1 Data Resolution
l0.625 l2.5 l5
Icon Spacing
(0,0.33)
(0,0.66)
(0,1)
(0.33,0.66)
(0.33,1)
(0.66,1)
39
  • Background
  • Exploratory Visualization
  • Experiment Details
  • Results
  • Discussion

Task 1 Data Resolution
l0.625 l2.5 l5
Icon Size
(0,0.66)
(0,1)
(0,0.33)
(0.33,0.66)
(0.33,1)
(0.66,1)
40
  • Background
  • Exploratory Visualization
  • Experiment Details
  • Results
  • Discussion

Task 2 Spatial Feature Resolution
41
  • Background
  • Exploratory Visualization
  • Experiment Details
  • Results
  • Discussion

Task 2 Spatial Feature Resolution
42
  • Background
  • Exploratory Visualization
  • Experiment Details
  • Results
  • Discussion

Task 2 Spatial Feature Resolution
Icon Brightness
(0,0.33)
(0,0.66)
(0,1)
(0.66,1)
(0.33,0.66)
(0.33,1)
43
  • Background
  • Exploratory Visualization
  • Experiment Details
  • Results
  • Discussion

Task 2 Spatial Feature Resolution
Icon Spacing
(0,0.33)
(0,0.66)
(0,1)
(0.33,0.66)
(0.33,1)
(0.66,1)
44
  • Background
  • Exploratory Visualization
  • Experiment Details
  • Results
  • Discussion

Task 2 Spatial Feature Resolution
Icon Size
(0,0.33)
(0,0.66)
(0,1)
(0.33,0.66)
(0.33,1)
(0.66,1)
45
  • Background
  • Exploratory Visualization
  • Experiment Details
  • Results
  • Discussion

Task 3 Visual Linearity
Icon spacing
46
  • Background
  • Exploratory Visualization
  • Experiment Details
  • Results
  • Discussion

Task 3 Visual Linearity
Icon spacing
47
  • Background
  • Exploratory Visualization
  • Experiment Details
  • Results
  • Discussion

Task 3 Visual Linearity
Icon spacing
48
  • Background
  • Exploratory Visualization
  • Experiment Details
  • Results
  • Discussion

Valid Experimental Methodology?
  • PROS
  • Better than expected results
  • Simple tasks, yet powerful
  • Low variance
  • Good initial experiment
  • CONS
  • Fatigue
  • No control of context variables
  • Visual linearity failed
  • Only single-variable visualizations

49
  • Background
  • Exploratory Visualization
  • Experiment Details
  • Results
  • Discussion

Main conclusion
  • Successful quantification of perceptual
    interaction (filtering interference) among
    three visual dimensions
  • Data resolution (DR)
  • Spatial Feature Resolution (FR)

DR
FR
DR
Spacing(0,1)
Brightness(0,1)
Brightness(0.33,0.66)
50
  • Background
  • Exploratory Visualization
  • Experiment Details
  • Results
  • Discussion

Effective Visualization Methods
  • We can now select an effective visualization
    method

DR6 FR8
DR15 FR4
51
  • Background
  • Exploratory Visualization
  • Experiment Details
  • Results
  • Discussion

DR15 FR4
52
  • Background
  • Exploratory Visualization
  • Experiment Details
  • Results
  • Discussion

DR6 FR8
53
  • Background
  • Exploratory Visualization
  • Experiment Details
  • Results
  • Discussion

54
  • Background
  • Exploratory Visualization
  • Experiment Details
  • Results
  • Discussion

55
  • Background
  • Exploratory Visualization
  • Experiment Details
  • Results
  • Discussion

Whats next?
  • Study saliency
  • Weights on requirements
  • Include other visual dimensions
  • Analyze combinations (two data variables)
    using expert visual designers
  • Apply to real datasets

56
Acknowledgements
  • NSF ITR grant CNS-0427374
  • Experiments subjects
  • Paper reviewers
  • Graduate students and staff from
  • Browns Graphics Group
  • Browns Visualization Research Lab
  • RISD Illustration professors
  • Cullen Jackson, Jason Sobel, and Shiyin Wang

57
Subjective Quantification ofPerceptual
Interactionsamong some 2DScientific
Visualization Methods
Daniel Acevedo daf_at_cs.brown.edu David
Laidlaw dhl_at_cs.brown.edu
http//vis.cs.brown.edu
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com