Title: Trade, the Third World, UNCTAD and the New International Economic Order
1Trade, the Third World, UNCTAD and the New
International Economic Order
EC246 International Trade Institutions and
Policy
- Holger Breinlich
- University of Essex
2Overview of Lecture
- Trade and development
- The key issues
- The Prebisch-Singer hypothesis
- Policy response import substitution
- Development issues in multilateral trade
negotiations - Developing countries in the GATT
- The Nonaligned Movement, UNCTAD and the NIEO
- Export price instability and commodity agreements
- The shift to export-led growth policies NICs and
ASEAN4
3Trade and Development
4Trade Development The Main Issues
- Is trade an engine of growth and development?
- Trade pessimists (protectionists)
- Trade optimists (free-traders)
- Neutralists institutions, geography and other
fundamentals more important than trade - Should LDCs adopt
- An inward-looking policy, i.e. industrialisation
with import substitution - An outward-looking policy, i.e. export promotion
with free(r) trade - Or some combination of both?
5Trade and Development Early Theories
- Late 18th and early 19th century first
intellectual debate between free traders and
protectionists (until then, mercantilism
dominant) - Adam Smith (1776) and David Ricardo (1817)
advance ideas about the benefits of trade and
comparative advantage - Alexander Hamilton (1791) and Friedrich List
(1841) argue for infant industry protection - Smith and Ricardos ideas prevailed in the UK,
Hamilton and Lists in the U.S. and Germany
6Trade and Development Early Theories
- Late 1930s
- D.H. Robertson trade is unlikely to play the
role of an engine of growth in the 20th century
(which it did play in the 19th century) - Jacob Viner, by contrast, pleaded for a liberal
trading system, removal of trade barriers and the
principle of nondiscrimination (this was also the
position of the U.S. government) - Partly revival of the nineteenth century argument
about free trade vs. protectionism, partly part
of the wider debate on capitalism vs. socialism - 1950s Economists (Nurske, Prebisch, Singer,
Myrdal) generally sceptical about the benefits
of trade, favour import substitution strategies
7The Prebisch-Singer Hypothesis
- Independently of one another, Prebisch (in
theoretical work) and Singer (in empirical work)
argued that there was and will continue to be a
secular decline in terms-of-trade of
primary-commodity exporters - Due to low income and price elasticities of
demand (edi, edp ) - Definitions
- edi (-change demand)/(-change income)
- edp (-change demand)/(-change price)
- Estimates
- edi 0.6 (foodstuff), 0.5 (agricultural raw
materials), 1.9 (manufactured goods), 2.4
(petroleum other fuels) - edp usually estimated lt 1 for food (inelastic
demand, i.e. 1 reduction in price ? lt1 increase
in demand) - Illustrations (supply-demand diagram)
8Prebisch-Singer Illustration
pF/pM
pF/pM
D
D
S
S
D
D
P
P
P
Food/Manuf.
Food/Manuf.
High (relative) price elasticity
Low (relative) price elasticity
9The Prebisch-Singer Hypothesis
- This decline results in a long-term transfer of
income from poor to rich countries - Can be combated only by protecting domestic
manufacturing industries through a policy of
import substitution - Note other ways of addressing these problems are
commodity agreements and primary-good cartels
(more on this later)
10Import Substitution The Idea
- Behind the protection of high barriers on
manufacturing imports LDCs should industrialise
by substituting domestic production for
previously imported goods - 1st stage simple consumer goods
- 2nd stage more sophisticated goods
- Thus achieving greater domestic industrial
diversification and less dependence on primary
good exports (balanced growth) - Will also ultimately gain the ability to export
such goods as their prices become more
competitive
11Import Substitution How it Should Work
- First impose high barriers (tariffs, quotas etc.)
on manufacturing imports - Then set up a local industry producing the same
goods (usually in cooperation with foreign firms
which get investment incentives like tax breaks) - In the short run, production costs high ?
implicit transfer from consumers to producers
(figure) - But in the long-run, everyone gains as domestic
industry becomes more competitive due to - Economies of scale
- Positive externalities of learning by doing
- Incentives for human physical capital
accumulation
12Transfers Consumers - Producers
Home Supply
price
PT
PT
B
C
D
PWM
Home Demand
quantity
Z
C
Z
C
13Import Substitution Why it Didnt Work
- Behind protective walls, industries (both
publicly and privately owned) remain inefficient
and never grow up - Constant need for protection and government
intervention fosters corruption - Gains accrue to foreign firms and a few local
industrialists - Balance-of-Payments problems due to large imports
of often government-subsidised capital goods and
intermediate products from abroad - Overvaluation of domestic currencies acts as an
implicit tax on agricultural products and thus
the poor
14Development Issues in Multilateral Trade
Negotiations
15Initial Reaction to ITO/GATT
- Developing countries denounced the pre-Havana
draft for an ITO charter as motivated by a desire
to keep them in dependence - On their insistence, the final charter adopted by
the conference contained a chapter on economic
development - Specified circumstances and conditions under
which developing countries would be freed from
the principle of reciprocity - But no unconditional exceptions ? seen as
insufficient by most LDCs (which were almost all
pursuing import substitution strategies) - GATT adopted passages of this chapter but
generally less emphasis on developing countries
trade issues
16Nonaligned Movement and the Haberler Report
- 1958 GATT panel of exports (Haberler, Meade,
Tinbergen, Campos) appointed to analyse trade and
development problems of LDCs. Main Conclusions - Developed countries trade barriers (tariffs and
others) limit exports from developing countries - Contributes to the foreign exchange gap
- GATT responded by establishing Committee III
which - Reviewed the trade measures restricting LDCs
exports - Recommended a programme for trade expansion by
reducing barriers
17Responses to the Haberler Report
- Positive reaction of developed countries but not
followed up by substantial lowering of trade
barriers - 1963 21 developing countries introduce
resolution in the GATT, calling for action
program on tariff and non-tariff barrier
reductions for their products - In response, GATT Ministerial Meeting in 1963
appointed committee to draft amendments to GATT
rules - Approved in 1964 New Part IV on Trade and
Development included in GATT - Essentially about nonreciprocity and preferential
treatment for developing countries - Little effect in practice and undermining fight
against GATT-inconsistent barriers in developed
countries
18Generalised System of Preferences (GSP)
- Next major achievement of developing countries
the Generalised System of Preferences (GSP) - 1971 Grant of a 10-year waiver from the MFN
clause w.r.t. to tariff and other preferences
became known as the GSP. - Each developed country chooses developing
countries to be favoured, the commodities to be
covered, the extent of tariff preferences and the
period for which privileges were granted (often
linked to non-trade related conditions!) - Negative effects
- Looser discipline in the rule-based MTNs
- Further undermining the case for reduction of
GATT-violating barriers of developed countries
19GATT and Developing Countries Two Views
- Developed countries unwilling to address
developing countries concerns under GATT - Their import barriers towards other developed
countries declined by much more - Products in which developing countries had a
comparative advantage were basically taken out of
GATT altogether (agriculture, textiles and
apparel) - Even GSP heavily qualified and quantitatively
small - But could also argue that
- Developing countries basically opted out of GATT
in their pursuit of import substitution - Should have pursued export-oriented strategies
and participated fully in reciprocal tariff
reductions rather than to demand exemptions
20In the meantime UNCTAD
- 1955 Nonaligned Movement emerges from the
Bandung conference, led by heads of newly
independent states of Africa and Asia (Nasser,
Nehru, Sukarno) and demands - Decolonisation of the remaining dependent
territories - An international role of the Third World,
independent of the First and Second Worlds and
their Cold War - Ideas for an UNCTAD were gaining support among
developing countries, as their number and voting
power grew within UN - 1961 (Belgrade) nonaligned countries conference
Tito voiced an UNCTAD idea - 1962 (Cairo) nonaligned countries conference the
idea got more concrete
21UNCTAD
- In the preparations for UNCTAD, the Group of 77
Third World member countries of UN became an
effective bargaining unit turning the new
organisation into a trade union of LDCs - 1964 Western countries conceded to pressures
from developing countries ? UNCTAD founded (
United Nations Conference on Trade and
Development) - 1964, the 1st meeting of UNCTAD (UNCTAD I) was
held - 75 developing countries, Prebisch as the 1st
Secretary-General - Aim Integration of developing countries into the
world economy
22UNCTAD
- As the best means to close the foreign-exchange
gap, UNCTAD I voted nearly unanimously for - A managed international market
- Trade arrangements that are fair (in fact,
often discriminatory against the developed
countries) - UNCTAD I initiatives
- Were supported strongly by the socialist
countries - Moderately supported by some developed countries,
notably France and EEC - Opposed by other developed countries, the U.S. in
particular
23UNCTAD since 1964
- UNCTADs role and tasks
- Based in Geneva, 400 staff members, budget of 75
million - Focal point within UN for trade development
- Forum for intergovernmental discussion, supported
by discussions with experts and exchanges of
experience - Undertakes research, publishes reports and
analyses (on e.g. trade and environment,
economic development in Africa) - Conducts various technical cooperation programmes
(e.g. help with trade negotiations, technology
transfers ...) - UNCTAD meets every 4 years at its conference
- The conference is UNCTADs highest
decision-making body - Sets priorities and guidelines for the
organization - Provides an opportunity to debate key economic
and development issues
24The New International Economic Order (NIEO)
- October 1973 war between Israel and Egypt
- Successful OPEC cartel action, causing the first
oil shock - Suggested that the Third World was in a position
to actually force industrialised countries to
make concessions - April 1974 6th special session of UNCTAD adopts
Declaration on the Establishment of a New
International Economic Order - Formulation of 20 demands, among which
- Sustained improvement of ToT for primary products
- Favourable conditions for transfer of financial
resources - Promotion of transfer of technology
- Reform of the international monetary system
25The New International Economic Order (NIEO)
- NIEO demands (continued)
- Preferential and nonreciprocal treatment in
economic relations - Full sovereignty over natural resources and right
to nationalisation - Regulation and supervision of the activities of
transnational corporations - Feb 1975 Nonaligned Movement Dakar conference
- The ideological high water-mark of NIEO
- The development of the rich capitalist countries
is intimately related to the colonial and
neocolonial exploitation of the periphery (Anell
and Nygren, 1980)
26Third World losing political cohesion
- A last success agreement to create the UN Common
Fund, the chief plank of the NIEO commodity
programme - Since late 1970s, NIEO campaign looses momentum
- Monopoly power used by OPEC for oil does not
extend to other commodities (and even oil cartel
was breaking down) - Economic performance and interests within the
Third World gradually diverge (e.g. rich Arab
OPEC countries, newly industrialising countries
(NICs) of South-East Asia) - Divergence of interests/performances weakens NIEO
per se but is also evidence for the importance of
national policies - Realisation that NIEO campaign insisted on a
better deal for poor states (and thus
governments), not for poor people foreign aid
too often a transfer from the poor in the rich
countries to the rich in the poor countries
27Export Price Instability and Commodity Agreements
28Export price instability
- An important clue as to why the export
performance of LDCs has been weak relative to
that of developed economies lies in LDCs export
earnings instability - It is the result of two phenomena observed in
trade data low income and price elasticity of
demand of primary products - Such export price instability leads to lower and
less predictable rates of economic growth, hence
attempts for price stabilisation (figure) - Commodity agreements meant to stabilise prices
- Buffer-stock schemes
- Cartels
29Export Price Volatility for Primary Products
pF
pF
D
D
S
S
D
D
P
P
P
Food
Food
High price elasticity
Low price elasticity
30Buffer-Stock Schemes
- Idea buy and stockpile commodity when prices
low, sell when prices high (reduces magnitude of
demand swings) - Problems
- Not clear what the fair long-run price is, can
lead to disagreement between partners - Tendency to fix target price too high and run out
of funds (especially given long-run decline in
ToT for many primary products) - Examples
- Coffee, tin
- The UN Common Fund
31Cartels
- Idea Agree on an above-market price and cut back
production to achieve that price (? monopoly) - Conditions for successful operation
- Must face a price-inelastic demand (no actual or
potential substitutes) - All important producers must join the agreement
- Members must be willing to cut back production
and an enforcement mechanism must be found to
curb incentives to cheat (once price exceeds
their marginal costs) - Buyers must be unable (at least disinclined) to
fight such monopoly rents - Primary-product cartels became first prominent
after WW I but most failed for want of one of the
above conditions. Similar agreements (for tin,
coffee, etc.) after WW II existed only shortly as
well.
32Failure of Cartels OPEC in the 1980s
- OPEC is the best known and successful
international cartel in history - But problems from 1981-1983 recession in the
developed world onwards - Oil-using countries invested in technology to use
alternative fuels (natural gas etc.) (condition
1) - High prices triggered (successful) search for oil
in other parts of the world (condition 12) - Cartel members began to cheat by selling below
the agreed price (condition 3) - Oil prices fell from 34 to 29 in 1983, then
further until 11/barrel in 1998 (though massive
recovery since due to strong demand)
33The Alternative of Export-Led Growth
34The Alternative of Export-Led Growth
- Since the 1970s, switch from import-substituting
industrialisation to export-led growth
strategies. The later gradually became the
dominant strategy in the Third World - A key element in this shift was the success of
the Asian NICs (tigers) (South) Korea, Taiwan,
Hong Kong, Singapore which pursued more
export-led strategies - Following suit Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia,
Philippines (ASEAN4) - Achieved massive increase in standards of living
- Per capita income (1980 USD) NICs, from 974
(1963) to 5162 (1988) ASEAN4 from 606 (1963) to
1546 (1988) - World trade share () NICs, from 1.9 (1963) to
7.7 (1988) ASEAN4 from 1.1 (1963) to 2.1 (1988)
35The Alternative of Export-Led Growth
- Basic idea
- Fully participate in world markets rather than
try to replace manufacturing imports through own
production - Produce simple labour-intensive manufacturing
goods for export markets - Use comparative advantage in these sectors
- Escape low demand in small home markets
- In practice much more complex
- Accompanied by many other reforms (encouraging
education, capital formation etc.) ? see Alwyn
Young (Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1995) - Asian Tigers initially protected their infant
industries (Taiwans average tariff 40-50 until
the 1980s)
36Summary and Learning Outcomes
- Trade and development
- The key issues
- The Prebisch-Singer hypothesis
- Policy response import substitution
- Development issues in multilateral trade
negotiations - Developing countries in the GATT
- The Nonaligned Movement, UNCTAD and the NIEO
- Export price instability and commodity agreements
- The shift to export-led growth policies NICs and
ASEAN4