Federal Authority and its Opponents: Judicial Federalism, the Bank War, Tariff Controversy, and Stat - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 10
About This Presentation
Title:

Federal Authority and its Opponents: Judicial Federalism, the Bank War, Tariff Controversy, and Stat

Description:

In this proclamation, Andrew Jackson defends his tariffs and declares nullification illegal. ... is the unwarranted tariffs put into place by Andrew Jackson. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:575
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 11
Provided by: amhistIs
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Federal Authority and its Opponents: Judicial Federalism, the Bank War, Tariff Controversy, and Stat


1
Federal Authority and its Opponents Judicial
Federalism, the Bank War, TariffControversy, and
States' Rights Debates
2
King Andrew
  • During his two terms in office Andrew Jackson
    exercised his veto power more than any other
    President before him.
  • His opponents saw this use as excessive and
    unwarranted.
  • In 1832 President Jackson vetoed a bill that
    would have established a second bank of the
    United States.
  • This bill was seen as a political move on the
    part of Jackson's opponents.
  • President Jackson strongly opposed a second bank
    and made his feelings on the situation well
    known.

3
Veto Message Regarding the Bank of the United
States
  • In his veto message to the Senate, Andrew Jackson
    outlines his grievances with the charter of the
    second bank of the United States.
  • Jackson sites the problems that will arise from
    investment in the Bank by only 25 people and
    foreign entities.
  • He is fearful of the political and economic
    ramifications of a second bank.

4
Tarrif of 1828
  • In 1828, Vice President John C. Calhoun began to
    differ with Andrew Jackson over the question of
    states' rights.
  • While Jackson began supporting the federal
    government vis-a-vis the states, Calhoun took the
    oppositie view.
  • When the Tariff of 1828 was imposed, Calhoun was
    opposed to such an act. He drafted a speech to
    air his greviances.
  • "With these views the committee are solemnly of
    the impression, if the present usurpations and
    the professed doctrines of the existing system be
    persevered in, after due forebearance on the part
    of the State, that it will be her sacred duty to
    interposes duty to herself, to the Union, to the
    present, and to future generations, arid to the
    cause of liberty over the world, to arrest the
    progress of a usurpation which, if not arrested,
    must, in its consequences, corrupt the public
    morals and destroy the liberty of the country. "

5
Tariff of 1832
  • In order to keep peace with the South and to
    prevent succession, in particular that of South
    Carolina, Andrew Jackson proposed a new tariff.
  • This tariff was slightly lower than that of 1828,
    but was not low enough to appease the south.
  • South Carolina continued to threaten
    nullification in response to the two tariffs.
  • In this proclamation, Andrew Jackson defends his
    tariffs and declares nullification illegal.

6
The Debates over States' Rights
  • At the height of the Tariff Controversy, debates
    began about the rights of states.
  • In his inaugural address as Governor of South
    Carolina, Robert Y. Hayne (1791-1839) outlines
    the reasons his state has for nullification.
  • One of the main reasons sited is the unwarranted
    tariffs put into place by Andrew Jackson.

7
Antifederalist No. 17
  • In opposition to Federal authority Brutus,
    describes the limitations that the Constitution
    places on state authority.
  • In particular, he sites that articles one and
    eight make it clear that there is no need for
    state governments
  • "It appears from these articles, that there is no
    need of any intervention of the State
    governments, between the Congress and the people,
    to execute any one power vested in the general
    government, and that the Constitution and laws of
    every State are nullified and declared void, so
    far as they are or shall be inconsistent with
    this Constitution, or the laws made in pursuance
    of it, or with treaties made under the authority
    of the United States. The government, then, so
    far as it extends, is a complete one, and not a
    confederation. It is as much one complete
    government as that of New York or Massachusetts
    has as absolute and perfect powers to make and
    execute all laws, to appoint officers, institute
    courts, declare offenses, and annex penalties,
    with respect to every object to which it extends,
    as any other in the world. "

8
Judiciary Act of 1789
  • The Judiciary Act of 1789, the first act of
    Congress, establishes the federal courts system.
  • The Act outlines the jurisdiction and duties of
    the courts.
  • In particular, section 25, describes the courts
    jurisdiction and power of final say over all
    matters, including those of individual states.
  • "the decision is against the title, right,
    privilege, or exemption, specially set up or
    claimed by either party, under such clause of the
    said Constitution, treaty, statute, or
    commission, may be re-examined, and reversed or
    affirmed in the Supreme Court of the United
    States upon a writ of error,"

9
Antifederalist No. 22
  • In the Antifederalist No. 22, Candidus, writes
    about the alternatives to a federal Constitution.
  • This plan outlines seven suggestions for the
    Constitution including judicial power and
    states' rights.
  • "The advocates for the Constitution, have always
    assumed an advantage by saying, that their
    opposers have never offered any plan as a
    substitute the following outlines are therefore
    submitted, not as originating from an individual,
    but as copied from former resolutions of
    Congress, and united with some parts of the
    Constitution proposed by the respectable
    convention."

10
Federalist No. 39
  • James Madison shows his support for the federal
    judiciary in the Federalist No. 39.
  • He describes what constitutes a republican
    government and its components and strengths
    including a federal judiciary or as he refers to
    it a tribunal.
  • "What, then, are the distinctive characters of
    the republican form? Were an answer to this
    question to be sought, not by recurring to
    principles, but in the application of the term by
    political writers, to the constitution of
    different States, no satisfactory one would ever
    be found "
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com