Constitutional Law December 1, 2004 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 15
About This Presentation
Title:

Constitutional Law December 1, 2004

Description:

Invalidated in US v. Eichman. Amendment Efforts Amendment. Kokinda. Post Office Sidewalk. Not PF. Distinguish Traditional PF Sidewalks. Not Expressly Opened ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:60
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: rle
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Constitutional Law December 1, 2004


1
Constitutional Law December 1, 2004
  • Freedom of Expression
  • Content Neutral Regulation
  • Introduction
  • Time, Place and Manner
  • The Public Forum
  • Introduction
  • The Perry Framework
  • Practical Application
  • Prior Restraints
  • Expressive Conduct
  • Introduction
  • OBrien
  • Texas v. Johnson

2
Recap
  • CN as Less Dangerous
  • TPM (Hill)
  • Identifying Neutrality
  • Test/Balancing
  • Level
  • Public Forum
  • Emergence
  • Perry Framework

3
e. Current Framework
4
3. Application
  • Cases
  • Kokinda (P.O. entrance sidewalk)
  • Lee (airport)
  • Forbes (candidate debate)
  • General Points
  • PF Status Hard to Come By
  • Uncertainty of Limited PF
  • Relate to Government Benefits Issues

5
4. Prior Restraints
  • Licensing Prior Restraints
  • Generally Invalid
  • Narrow Exception for Obscenity
  • Neutral Licensing
  • Parades and Events (Thomas)
  • Harmonious Use of Public Space
  • Procedural Requirements Inapplicable
  • Ministerial vs. Discretionary
  • Solicitation

6
C. Expressive Conduct1. Introduction
  • Speech and Conduct
  • Speech involves conduct
  • Conduct conveys messages
  • Spectrum (link)
  • Issues
  • Categorization
  • Treatment of Mixed Speech Conduct

7
2. OBrien
  • Ban on Draft Card Burning
  • Assume Communicative Content
  • Some 1st Amendment Protection
  • Test for Symbolic Speech (link)
  • Application
  • Important Draft Interests Served by Cards
  • Unrelated To Suppression of Expression
  • Rejection of Improper Motive Evidence

8
3. Texas v. Johnson
  • Flag Burning as Protest
  • OBrien Does Not Apply
  • Interest in Preserving Peace not Implicated
  • Preserving Flag is Content Based
  • Fails SS
  • Preserving Flag is Illegitimate Purpose
  • Flag Doesnt Need Preserving This Way

9
d. Aftermath
  • Controversial
  • Broad Political Outcry
  • Push for Constitutional Amendment
  • New Federal Statute
  • Designed to Be Content Neutral
  • Invalidated in US v. Eichman
  • Amendment Efforts Amendment

10
Kokinda
  • Post Office Sidewalk
  • Not PF
  • Distinguish Traditional PF Sidewalks
  • Not Expressly Opened
  • Limited PF
  • Reasonable Reg of Nonpublic Use
  • Compare Concurrence Valid CN Reg.

Back
11
Lee
  • Airport
  • Not a Public Forum
  • Not Traditional B/c Airports New
  • Not Designated
  • Reject Transportation Node Argument
  • Reasonableness Test
  • Uphold Ban on Solicitation
  • Reject Ban on Literature Distribution

Back
12
Forbes
  • Candidate Debate on Public TV
  • Public TV not a PF
  • Debates Different
  • Still Not a PF
  • General Access (to Class) vs.
  • Selective Access
  • Exclusion Meets Test
  • Not Viewpoint
  • Reasonable to Exclude Frivolous Candidates

Back
13
The OBrien Test
  • W/in Power of Govt
  • Important Govt Interest
  • Unrelated to Suppression of Expression
  • Restriction No Greater Than Necessary
  • Compare Test for Content Neutral

14
TPM Conduct
  • TPM
  • Justified w/o Reference to Content
  • Narrowly Tailored to Meet Significant Interest
  • Leaves Open Ample Alternatives
  • OBrien
  • W/in Power
  • Furthers Important Governmental Interest
  • Interest Unrelated to Suppression
  • No Broader Than Necessary

Key Red CN Blue Ends Green Means
Back
15
Speech/Conduct Spectrum
Conduct
Speech
Symbolic Speech
Political Assassination Hate Crimes Criminal
Conspiracy
Armbands Flag Salute Picketing Campaign
Contributions
Draft Card Burning Flag Desecration Live Nude
Dancing
Back
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com