Social Security Issues in the 110th Congress - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Social Security Issues in the 110th Congress

Description:

Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-MD) House Minority Leader ... Reduces some public employees' Social Security spousal or survivor benefits by ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:46
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 39
Provided by: CLe8
Learn more at: https://www.ncpers.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Social Security Issues in the 110th Congress


1
Social Security Issues in the 110th Congress
  • NCPERS
  • 2007

2
CONTEXT
3
United States Senate


4
House of Representatives
5
New Congressional Leadership
  • Senate
  • Majority Leader
  • Harry Reid (D-NV)
  • Senate
  • Minority Leader
  • Mitch McConnell (R-KY)

6
  • Speaker of the House
  • Nancy Pelosi (D-CA)

House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-MD)
House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-OH)
7
SENATE FINANCE COMMITTEE
  • Previous Chair Charles Grassley (R-IA)
  • New Chair Max Baucus (D-MT)

8
HOUSE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE
  • Previous Chair Bill Thomas (R-CA)
  • New Chair Charlie Rangel (D-NY)

9
SOCIAL SECURITY OFFSETS
10
What is the Government Pension Offset?
11
  • Reduces some public employees Social Security
    spousal or survivor benefits by two-thirds of
    their public pension.

12
WHOM DOES IT AFFECT?
  • Any public employee who does not pay into Social
    Security but whose spouse does/did.
  • public employee expects survivor benefits based
    on deceased spouses earnings.

13
What is the Windfall Elimination Provision?
14
  • Changes Social Security formula to reduce EARNED
    benefits of persons with a public pension.
  • Some employees lose up to 340 per month (maximum
    reduction for 2007) in Social Security.

15
WHOM DOES IT AFFECT?
  • Public employees receiving pension from job not
    covered by Social Security.
  • Affects benefits from
  • Earnings in prior career
  • Earnings in a non-offset state
  • Earnings from part-time or summer jobs.

16
The SolutionSocial Security Fairness Act
  • NEA worked to get re-introduced in House (H.R.
    82) and Senate (S. 206) in first few days of the
    110th Congress.
  • In last Congress, record numbers of Members of
    Congress cosponsored.
  • Need to rebuild cosponsor lists in the 110th
    Congress!

17
What Would the Bill Do?
  • Completely repeal GPO and WEP.
  • Anyone currently impacted would be helped
    prospectively.
  • Not retroactive to cover benefits already lost.

18
Why is it Taking So Long???
  • Legislation takes on average 7-8 years to move
    through Congress.
  • Opposition from previous congressional leaders
  • Cost (ten year cost of full repeal is over 60
    billion)
  • Philosophical disagreement (double dipping)

19
New Opportunities?
  • New congressional leadership offers new
    opportunities.
  • New committee chairs with jurisdiction
  • House Ways and Means Charlie Rangel (D-NY),
    cosponsored repeal bill last year.
  • Senate Finance Max Baucus (D-MT) not a
    cosponsor in the past.

20
  • Will still have obstacles
  • Cost continues to be an issue
  • Congress may continue to push issue off until
    they address larger Social Security reform

21
Campaign to Repeal the Offsets
22
COALITION TO ASSURE RETIREMENT EQUITY (CARE)
  • NEA is a member, along with other unions,
    firefighters, police, etc.
  • Working together to target Members of Congress,
    activate grassroots, and conduct other activities
    in support of repeal.

23
What Can You Do?
  • Contact all Members of Congress
  • Explain impact of offsets on you, your
    colleagues, your profession.
  • Thank cosponsors of House and Senate bills urge
    all other Members to cosponsor the Social
    Security Fairness Act (H.R. 82/S.206).

24
  • Ask Governor to write Congress and state
    legislature to pass a resolution calling on
    Congress to repeal the GPO and WEP.
  • Organize a call-in day.
  • Deliver postcards to Members of Congress in their
    local offices.
  • Go to NEA website or website of your organization
    and send an e-mail message to Congress ask
    friends, family, and co-workers to do the same.

25
  • Reach out to other impacted groups in your area.
  • Organize a rally.
  • Host a town hall meeting with a wide cross
    section of public employees.
  • Submit a letter to the editor or an op-ed to your
    local newspaper.

26
Talking Points
  • GPO and WEP take away benefits folks have EARNED
    by working for many years.
  • This is a national problem --there are affected
    people in all states.

27
  • Economic Impact
  • Loss of income forces some people into poverty
    and onto expensive government programs like food
    stamps.
  • Impacted people have less to spend -- hurts
    local economies.

28
  • IMPACT ON THE PUBLIC SECTOR
  • GPO and WEP discourage people from
    entering/staying in public sector professions.
  • If Congress wants to encourage people moving from
    private sector into public service, they must
    address the offsets!
  • These issues are important to voters!!

29
Remember
  • The Battle is Not Over!!! We Must Keep Fighting!!

30
PRIVATIZATION
31
A Little History
  • At start of 109th Congress, Social Security was
    on the front-burner.
  • President was pushing privatization and the issue
    appeared on the fast track.

32
Where Are We Now?
  • VICTORY!!! Strong opposition from a broad
    coalition of groups stopped privatization
    proposals from moving. Social Security moved to
    the back-burner.

33
Outlook for 110th Congress
  • Unclear if/when Social Security will be on
    agenda.
  • Democrats in charge oppose privatization.
  • Dems. priorities for 1st 100 hours included
    fighting any attempt to privatize Social
    Security.

34
CONTINUE TO OPPOSE ANY PRIVATIZATION!!
  • Would jeopardize secure retirement of many
    Americans.
  • Cost could reach over 1 trillion in ten years.
  • Would subject financial security to unpredictable
    ups and downs of the market.

35
Mandatory Coverage
36
The Issue
  • Some reform proponents suggest requiring Social
    Security participation for all public employees.
  • This is a bad idea
  • Would weaken state and local plans.
  • Increase state and local financial burdens.
  • Wont solve Social Securitys financial concerns.

37
Mandatory Coverage Status
  • Strong bipartisan coalition in Congress opposed
    to mandatory coverage.
  • Issue off table until Social Security reform
    resurfaces.

38

?
?
QUESTIONS ?
?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com