Title: Process Improvement for Drill Bit Blanks For MN Twist Drill
1Process Improvement for Drill Bit BlanksFor MN
Twist Drill
University of Minnesota Duluth
Department of Mechanical and Industrial
Engineering
- The Three Orienteers
- Scott Anderson Project Leader
- Andy Johnson Mechanical Engineer
- Tony Niemczyk Industrial Engineer
Report Number UMDMIE-CD-2006WPDK12
2Problem Statement
- Blanks are coming off of machine without
orientation - Manually sorted to bins
- Blanks manually moved approximately 10 feet to
coning machine - Manually loaded into coning machine
3Problem Statement
4Scope of Project
- Orientate drill bit blanks from cut-off machine
- Directly feed blanks into coning machine
- Increase throughput
- Reduce work in progress
5Functional Requirements
- Require little maintenance, less then 2,000/year
- Reduces manual handling labor
- Simple in design
- Utilizes gravity as much as possible
- Maintains or improves throughput
- Adaptable to varying lengths and diameters
- Efficient
- Implemented with little risk due to offline
testing
6Constraints Limitations
- The speed of the cutting and coning machines
which for the cuttingmachine is 200 parts per
minute - Budget is a 2 year payback on a 20,000 a year
salary based on the reallocation of labor - Material type being cut which includes cobalt and
various types of steel. - Drill bit diameter and length varying from 1/4
to 1/2 and 2 ½ to 6 respectively
7Constraints Limitations
- Set up time as it relates to throughput for the
entire system - Control Systems which include a PLC and relays
- Space available
- Factors that involve the safety of the workers
and the plant. - Type of power supplied (AC/DC, Mechanical, etc)
- Weight of the drill bits
8Project Organization
- Scott Anderson Project Leader
- Andy Johnson Mechanical Engineer
- Tony Niemczyk Industrial Engineer
- Work in parallel whenever possible
- Crucial decisions made as group
- Frequent group meetings
9Design Concepts AlternativesAlternative 1
Vibratory Feeder
- Ability to orientate blanks
- Remove blanks that do not meet specifications
- Can Handle up to 200 parts per minute
- Automatic feed of blanks into coning machine
10Design Concepts AlternativesAlternative 1
Vibratory Feeder
11Design Concepts AlternativesAlternative 2
Vibratory Table
- Slight vibration from a vibratory motor would
break binding - Vibration agitates the drill bits so that gravity
brings them into alignment - Would not allow relocation of labor
12Design Concepts AlternativesAlternative 2
Vibratory Table
13Design Concepts AlternativesAlternative 3
Vibratory Table Rail System
- A vibratory table aligns and feeds blanks into a
movable transport hopper - Transport hopper feeds directly into the coning
machine - Eliminates the handling of blanks
- Many possibilities for automation
14Design Concepts AlternativesAlternative 3
Vibratory Table Rail System
15Design Concepts AlternativesAlternative 4
Conveyor Methods
- Conveyor takes blanks directly off cut-off
machine or from vibratory hopper - Allows for automatic rejection of parts
- Provides blanks sequential order of alignment
- Requires little operator interface
16Design Concepts AlternativesAlternative 4
Conveyor Methods
17Design Concepts AlternativesAlternative 5
Chute Hopper
- Blanks orientate on vibratory hopper and slide
down channels to coning hopper - Coning hopper uses rake mechanism
- Logic senses when blanks are in hopper waiting to
be fed into coning machine
18Design Concepts AlternativesAlternative 5
Roofing Hopper
19Preliminary Design Recommendations
- Preliminary recommendation was the hopper and
rail system - Met all functional requirements and was simple in
concept and design - Reduced labor intensity but did not enable
relocation of personnel - Blanks still needed to be loaded into hoppers and
hoppers removed when emptied
20Design Evaluation
- Previous concepts were broken down into features
- Features were given a quantitative value and
weight - Feature values and weights of each alternative
were summarized and options were compared - Hopper and chute was determined to be the best
option
21Evaluation Scores
22Economics
- Installed Cost 10,297.55
- Annual Benefits of
- System by itself 37,070.00
- System with reduced setup time 747,070.00
- Annual Maintenance (10 of installed cost)
1,029.76 - Payback Period of
- System by itself 108 working days
- System with reduced setup time 5 working days
23Mechanisms
- Vibratory Hopper
- The first step in aligning the blanks from the
existing conveyor - Half cylinder shaped hopper attached to a base
plate that has a vibratory motor attached - The shape of the hopper and the vibrations from
the motor will force the blanks to align - The hopper will align the bits
- Hopper serves as a place for the blanks to build
up if the coning machine stops
24MechanismsVibratory Hopper
25Mechanisms
- Chute
- Provides channels for the blanks to slide down
- Provide further alignment of the blanks
- The optimized angle of the chute was
experimentally determined to be 30
26MechanismsChute
27Mechanisms
- Coning Hopper
- Aligns blanks for feeding to the coning machine
- When blanks enter the hopper they need to be
aligned by pneumatic actuator and rake. - Allows for full range of blanks without any
insert in the hopper - Gates on bottom regulated by the PLC slide open
and shut
28MechanismsConing Hopper
29Procedures
- Setup procedures for when
- Both coner and cut-off are off
- Cut-off machine is running
- Both coner and cut-off are running
- Cut-off machine has completed coil
- Both machines have completed coil
30Procedures
- Programmable Logic Controller Procedure
- Sensors in the system check the system for out of
control circumstances - Ensure that the hoppers never overflow with
material - Determine the operation of the slider plates
31PLC Flowchart
32Testing Procedure
- Build the physical components one at a time
starting with the coning hopper - Test the coning hopper
- Build the chute and the vibratory hopper
- Send blanks through the system
33Testing Procedure
- Attach the system to the coning machine itself
- Test the feeding of the blanks into the coning
machine - Connect the PLC and the sensors to the system
- Check that the correct timings occur
- Check that Out of boundary conditions do not
occur
34Implementation Procedure
- Build all support structures for the system
- Make modifications to the coning machine
- Remove all connections to the coning machine
- Move coning machine to its new location
35Implementation Procedure
- Reestablish all connections to the coning machine
- New system should be attached and powered up for
use - All elements should be tested for proper running
conditions and for proper safety precautions
36Setup Improvements
- A standard process for setup would be very
beneficial to process flow - Identify external operations
- Identify internal operations
37Acknowledgments
- We would like to thank Matt Mattson for
contacting the University of Minnesota Duluth
with a senior design project and for
accommodating all of the needs of the group in a
respectful and timely manner - We would like to thank Scott Allison for giving
Matt Mattson the capabilities to go to the
University and finance the project - Finally we would like to thank our professors
Dave Keranen and Bill Pedersen for all of their
help and advice in the development of the project
and for guiding us to not only get the project to
completion, but also in a manner to help us learn
new skills on our own
38MN Twist Drill