Title: Ethanol as Fuel for Recreational Boats
1Ethanol as Fuel for Recreational Boats
www.mercurymarine.com
- ENGS 190/ENGG 290 Final Report
- Sponsor Professor Charles Wyman
- Group Members
- Erik Dambach, Adam Han, Brian Henthorn
- www.dartmouth.edu/ethanolboat
2Presentation Outline
- Need Statement and Background
- Engine Choice and Modifications
- Specifications and Testing
- Marketability
- Conclusions
- Acknowledgements
3Need Statement
-
- Due to the potential for environmental
contamination by gasoline in recreational
boating, fuel ethanol is a potential solution to
reduce pollution associated with recreational
boating.
4Why Ethanol?
- Recreational boating with gasoline as a fuel is a
major source of pollution for both water and air - Ethanol, unlike gasoline, is biodegradable and
low in toxicity - Ethanol is comprised of much fewer chemicals than
gasoline - As an additive, the use of ethanol as a fuel has
the ability to allow for cleaner combustion and
to lower air emissions - Ethanol is a renewable source of energy
5State of the Art
- The use of ethanol as a fuel has mainly been
focused on the automotive industry - There are limited studies of alternative fuels
in boating applications - Fuel ethanol has never been researched for
recreational boating - Ethanol was investigated along with other
alternatives in use to strengthen fuel choice
6Alternative Fuels for Gasoline Marine Engines
7California Case Study
- US fuel prices and regulations vary by region
- Toughest emission regulations in country
- High price of gasoline
- Supportive of alternative fuel technology
- Phase-out of MTBE ? replaced with EtOH
- 2nd most registered number of boats in US
- Discourages the use of carbureted two-strokes
8California Case StudyProjected Price Range for
Ethanol Sale in California at Marinas
Price per gallon of ethanol
9Engine Overview
- 2000 Mercury 5 hp Four-Stroke Outboard
- Four-stroke for smaller needs (
- Necessary Modifications
- Materials Compatibility
- A/F ratio
- Cold-start
10Materials Compatibility
- Rubber Tubing, O-Rings
- Soaked in EtOH
- Tubing replaced with
- Viton B
- O-rings replace with Butyl
Dupont Dow Elastomers Chemical Resistance Guide
11Replacement of Rubberin Fuel System
Tubing
Fuel pump o-ring
Intake manifold o-ring
Drainage screw o-ring
12Materials Compatibility
- Rubber Tubing, O-Rings
- Soaked in EtOH
- Tubing replaced with
- Viton B
- O-rings replace with Butyl
- Fuel Filter
- Soak in EtOH
- Not needed to be replaced
- Metal Corrosion
- Determine primary metal in Fuel System using EDS
on SEM
Dupont Dow Elastomers Chemical Resistance Guide
13Energy-dispersive X-Ray Spectroscopy (EDS)
Main Jet - Brass
Fuel Pump Aluminum
14Carburetor
Source Mercury Service Manual, 4/5/6HP 4-Stroke
15Carburetor Modifications
- Enlarge Main Jet inner diameter by 20-40
- (.033, .036,.039)
Main Nozzle
Main Jet
16Cold-start Solutions
17Other Important Modifications
- Ignition Timing
- Advance ignition timing for EtOH
- Unfortunately, not possible with Mercury outboard
engine - Compression Ratio
- Increase (8.51?111)
- Extremely expensive
- Can only be drastically altered at production
stage
18Target Specifications
19Testing Methodology
20Testing Methodology
21Testing Setup
- Preparation for testing
- Construct test stand
- Break in engine
- Fuel Used
- Gasoline Shell 87 Octane Unleaded
- Ethanol Ethanol with Natural Gasoline Denaturant
(2-5) - Testing Facilities
- Emissions testing at Vermont Technical College
- Thayer School Ice Lab
- Thayer School Loading Dock
22Emissions Testing
- Snap-on MT3505 Emissions Analyzer
- Emissions Analyzed
- Hydrocarbons
- NOx
- CO
- CO2
- Tested at each throttle range (idle, mid, full)
- Tested at each jet size (.028, .033, .036,
.039)
23Emissions Testing Results
- Full and Mid-throttle testing
- Idle is independent of main jet size
- EtOH had dramatic reductions in emissions at
.033 jet size
24Emissions Testing Results
- CO emissions
- Increase using EtOH
- Engine not optimized for EtOH combustion
- Lower CO2 values
- .033 jet similar to gas emissions
25Power Testing
- Power Calculated using
- Torque 4.22ft-lb at full throttle running on
gasoline - 5 horsepower
- .033 jet
- .036 jet
26Fuel efficiency testing
- Put in known amount of fuel (500 mL)
- Run until the engine stopped
- Record run duration time
- Measure amount of remaining fuel
27Fuel Efficiency with Power
- Divide fuel efficiency by power output
- .036 jet size
- closest to gasoline efficiency
- .028 jet size (original optimized for gasoline)
- Did not sustain combustion of EtOH
28Cold-start Testing
- Gasoline Benchmark
- Location Cold room in ice lab,
- Engine temperature monitored with Fluke IR
Thermometer - Cold room initially at 20F
- Warm cold room and engine gradually
- Results
- Below 30F, engine did not start
- At 30F, engine started with much difficulty,
requiring 15 pulls of recoil starter rope
- EtOH Testing
- Location Loading dock
- Minimized difference between
- Results
- Engine would not start at 30F without cold-start
assist - Ether-assist achieved ignition in four
applications (pull of starter rope couple with
ether spray into carburetor) - EtOH engine with cold-start achieved ignition
quicker than gasoline-powered engine
29Determination of Optimal Jet Size
- .033 and .036 jet sizes determined optimal
air-fuel ratio - .033 preferred due to reduced emissions,
slightly reduced efficiency
30Engine Economic Analysis
- Actual modification cost relatively minor
- Rubber replacements relatively inexpensive
- Labor costs significant, but within specification
- EtOH fuel costs for 60gal/yr increase from 101
to 141 compared to gasoline
31Target vs. Actual Specifications
32Engine Marketability
- The buying public always looks towards
mainstream success for their purchasing decision.
If a product has had success and proven to
perform at or near that of a gasoline powered
engine, they will most certainly consider it.
- -Randy Stratton, The Stratton Group
- Although there are a lot of environmentally-consci
ous people, they are often unwilling to pay
anything extra. - -Chris Virgo, mechanic at North Tahoe Marina
33Timeline for ENGS 190
34Timeline for ENGG 290
35Project Conclusions
- Ethanol was found to out-perform gasoline
environmentally for water and air pollution in
recreational boating applications - Ethanol as a fuel has high potential given the
infrastructure, fuel cost, and environmental
policy trends - A four-stroke outboard engine was successfully
modified to run on ethanol fuel - Testing of the engine running on ethanol showed
similar performance in terms of power, varied for
emissions, and decreased fuel efficiency - Website www.dartmouth.edu/ethanolboat
36Recommendations
- Obtain dynamometer for engines of low hp to
strengthen existing data - Determine optimal jet size between 20 and 30
- Alter compression ratio/timing to further
optimize the engine at manufacturer level - Research effects of ethanol materials and
potential long-term replacements to increase
longevity of engine - Use findings to further ethanol-fueled engine
research
37Acknowledgements
- Outside sources
- Fairlee Marine
- Betsy Dorries and Steve Belitsos at Vermont
Technical College - Roberta Nichols
- Terry Jaffoni and Jackie Fee of Cargill
- Michael O'Keefe and Professor Phil Malte at
University of Washington - Don Mathey at Donlee Pump Company
- California Air Resources Board
- Environmental Protection Agency (especially Stout
Alan) - Edward Nelson at Wisconsin Department of Natural
Resources - Tom Durbin at University of California Riverside
- Warren H. Hunt of the Aluminum Association
- Garland Lewis at Tohatsu
- John Cruger-Hansen
- Jeff Schloss at University of New Hampshire
- Jack Hull at Rainbow Rubber Extrusions
- Jay Kidwell at The Carburetor Shop, Inc. and Mile
High Performance - Bones Gate Fraternity
- Zeta Psi Fraternity
- At Thayer School
- Prof. Charles Wyman
- Prof. John Collier
- Prof. Robert Graves
- Doug Fraser
- Gary Durkee
- Thayer School Instrument Rm
- Thayer School Machine Shop
- Paula Berg
- Prof. Benoit Cushman-Roisin
- Prof. Horst Richter
- Joan Levy
- Cathy Follensbee
- William Cote
- Bin Yang
- Daniel Iliescu
- Daniel Cullen