UNFCCC, COP 16 and Pakistan- Saadullah Ayaz - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

UNFCCC, COP 16 and Pakistan- Saadullah Ayaz

Description:

UNFCCC, COP 16 and Pakistan- Saadullah Ayaz – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:276
Slides: 12
Provided by: saadayaz
Category: Environment

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: UNFCCC, COP 16 and Pakistan- Saadullah Ayaz


1
IUCNs Views on UNFCCC- COP 16, Cancún Mexico
(2010)
Saadullah Ayaz IUCN Pakistan
2
INTRODUCTION
  • COP 15 (Copenhagen, 2009) produced un-expected
    results, resulting in a deadlock among
    negotiating partners
  • Outcome of COP15 was Copenhagen Accord .
    Majority of Parties believe that
  • - Copenhagen Accord is not an ideal deal
    (neither Fair nor Ambitious or Binding)
  • - Was decided outside the negotiating panel
  • - Many pertinent issues have been left out
  • - There is no clarity on how the various
    decisions in the Accord are to be taken
    forward
  • - The Accord is considered homeless and is not
    part of the UNFCCCs acquis.

3
COPENHAGEN ACCORD- IUCN VIEWS
  • IUCN Pakistan believes that the following have
    been left out in Copenhagen Accord must be
    stressed upon by Pakistan during COP16
    negotiations
  • The Copenhagen Accord does not apparently
    strengthens the Kyoto Protocol and is neither
    regarded to be a fair, nor an ambitions or
    binding deal
  • Copenhagen Accord does not set out any medium
    term emission goals and does not describe the
    practical pathway to achieve the 2C target
  • No particular commitment s have been made to
    halving global emissions by 2050, which are
    necessary for achieving 2C target
  • The Accord does not agree on any specific
    emission reduction commitments by Annex-I
    countries

4
  • No specific deadline has been agreed to complete
    a legally binding instrument under the Kyoto
    Protocol
  • It is believed that the Accord does not provide
    any basis to review the agreement in the light of
    the latest science and in particular. The
    scientifically described impacts for developing
    countries
  • The Accord does not provide commitments for a
    compliance mechanism
  • No financial commitment have been made for Post
    Kyoto Period (particularly between 2015-2020)
  • It does not commit on long-term (post 2020)
    public finance for developing countries, that
    will be additional to existing development
    assistance

5
ISSUES ARE CONTRIBUTING TO THIS SITUATION
  • The continuing absence of national legislation in
    Annex I countries and the US (in particular) are
    not sufficiently committed t o reducing their
    emissions
  • Annex I countries (with the exception of the EU
    and Norway) had not expressed clear openness to a
    second commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol
  • The developing countries (nearly as a whole) seem
    un-willing to firm up on the Copenhagen Accord by
    translating their pledges into legally binding
    commitments for Nationally Appropriate Mitigation
    Action (NAMAs) and to accept that the measuring,
    reporting and verification provisions in the
    Accord be enshrined in a legally binding post
    2012 agreement
  • Fast track finance (for 2010-2012) has been slow
    to be materialised. Long-term (post 2020) finance
    has not been secured either

6
CONFIDENCE BUILDING MEASURES URGENTLY NEEDED IN
CANCÚN
  • Hopes are high- COP 16 expected to be a milestone
    for strengthened international action
  • Progress towards establishing a global post-2012
    climate change regime has proven painfully slow.
    There appears to be broad expectation that the
    adoption of a legally binding agreement may be
    postponed beyond December 2010
  • Challenge posed to humanity by climate change is
    greater and more urgent than it has as it ever
    been Reducing greenhouse gas emissions is the
    only, long-term answer to restoring the global
    climate to stability
  • Parties seem to have come closer to agreement on
    a number of crucial issues including adaptation
    reducing emissions form deforestation and forest
    degradation in developing countries (the REDD
    mechanism) technology transfer and capacity
    building.

7
  • It is important that the Decisions taken by the
    COP16 at Cancun restore and boost confidence in
    the UNFCC process and the eventual outcome of the
    negotiations. The COP16 should therefore finalise
    the issues on which progress has been made and
    adopt a balanced package of Decisions. Action on
    each of them should follow immediately.

8
IUCNS CALL FOR ACTION AT COP16
  • IUCN calls for rapid and robust action by States,
    communities and individuals to take all possible
    steps to cut their emissions of all greenhouse
    gases immediately to ensure that the target
    agreed at Copenhagen, i. e., to limit the rise in
    global average temperature to 2ºC above
    pre-industrial levels can be achieved
  • COP16 takes confidence building measures in
    the form of a balanced package of Decisions on
    REDD-plus, adaptation, technology transfer and
    capacity building
  • IUCN also calls for a rapid advance in the
    development, testing and application of
    ecosystem-based approaches for mitigation in
    forests and for adaptation in vulnerable
    ecosystems and dependent communities
  • New and additional fast-track funding needs to
    be made available immediately, for both
    adaptation and mitigation

9
  • IUCN calls for the establishment of a strong and
    implementation oriented Adaptation Framework as
    part of a post-2012 regime
  •  
  • IUCN calls for the recognition of sustainable
    management of natural resources in building
    resilience of socio-economic and ecological
    systems
  • IUCN also calls for the immediate disbursement
    of new and additional financial means to enable
    adaptation actions to be implemented on the
    ground.
  • IUCN also calls for all people, communities and
    Parties to take such adaptation actions as they
    can towards the goals of the envisioned
    Framework, and towards reducing the vulnerability
    and increasing the resilience of developing
    countries in particular.
  •  

10
  • IUCN calls on the Parties to ensure that national
    REDD-plus frameworks reflect the progress at
    Copenhagen
  • IUCN calls for gender considerations to be taken
    into account in the negotiation process and in
    the future climate regime wherever appropriate
  • IUCN emphasises the importance of building
    capacity for action at national and local level,
    both on adaptation and mitigation.

11
  • Thanks

Saadullah Ayaz Coordinator Climate Change/ Clean
Air Initiative for Asian Cities IUCN
Pakistan Email saad.ayaz_at_iucn.org
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com