Title: A Systematic Analysis of Affirmative Action in American Law Schools
1A Systematic Analysis of Affirmative Action in
American Law Schools
- Richard H. Sander
- Presented by Anna Yang
2Main Issue
- Despite the prevalence of affirmative action
policies in higher education scholars are only
beginning to study seriously the relative costs
and benefits of racial preferences in admissions.
- Do racial preferences in American law schools
generate benefits to blacks that exceed the costs
to blacks? - Black law school applicants are the largest
intended group of beneficiaries of affirmative
action - This study focuses solely on black and white law
school applicants - Case for affirmative action most compelling for
blacks - Data on blacks in most extensive
- Law school admissions treat blacks as a uniform
group
3Why is it interesting?
- The costs of affirmative action on blacks have
always been thought of as the stigma or negative
stereotype of lowered admission standards - The study focuses on more tangible and easily
measured principal costs such as lower actual
academic performance that results from
preferential admissions - A student who gains admission to a more elite
school on nonacademic grounds is likely to
struggle more academically - Results in higher attrition rates lower pass
rates on the bar exam problems in the job market - How large are these effects and whether their
consequences outweigh the benefits of greater
prestige
4Key findings
- The levels of racial preferences in American law
schools are very large and remarkably similar - Hard to distinguish/ no control group
- Black students admitted through preference have
significantly lower grades in law school - Median black student starting law school in 1999
received first year grades comparable to a white
student in the 7th or 8th percentile - These low grades substantially handicap black
students and their efforts to graduate and pass
the bar exam - In 1991 only 45 of black law students completed
law school and passed the bar on first attempt
Sander estimates 74 w/o racial preference
5Key Findings cont.
- The job market benefits of attending an elite
school is severely overrated. - Better grades trump college prestige
- Most black lawyers would have higher earnings in
absence of preferential admissions - No indication that racial preference produces
more black lawyers - 86 of current black law students wouldve been
admitted to law school under a raceblind system - Lower attrition rates would possibly increase the
number of black lawyers - Cost of Affirmative Action Benefits
6Law School Admission Practices
- Admissions Curve
- Scenario one an admissions process where race is
only a tiebreaker - Scenario two a multifaceted admissions process
that relies heavily on subjective criteria
extracurriculars etc. and considers race as a
diversity factor - Scenario three an admissions process that relies
primarily on the academic index and awards
substantial points to black applicants - Scenario four an admissions process that relies
primarily on academic index but evaluates each
racial group separately
7- Academic index 0.4 UGPA 0.6 LSAT
8Analyzing Michigan Law School Admission Practices
in 1999
- Admissions system awarded a maximum of 150 points
- Up to 110 pts for academic performance
- 10 pts for Michigan residency
- 4 pts for alumni children
- Up to 3 pts for outstanding essays
- Up to 5 pts for personal achievements
- 20 pts for blacks/hispanic applicants
- On the 1000pt scale of admission curve figures
this translates to a minority boost of over 100
pts - Black and white applicants were not in the same
playing field in admissions - Race trumps all other diversity factor combined
9No Transcript
10No Transcript
11Analyzing Michigan Law School Admission Practices
in 1999
- Logistic Regression
- Evaluates the significance of some yesorno
predictors on admissions decisions - Gauge how much weight is given to particular sets
of factors in admissions decisions - Estimate the importance of the unknown by
weighing the importance of the known - Somers D
- Predicts the proportion of admissions outcomes
that can be successfully predicted by knowing the
academic index and the race of the applicants - Somers D 0.88 for whites 0.90 for blacks at
Michigan Law in 1999 - Controlling academic credentials residency
status and race - Knowing these measurable stats allows us to
reduce the guesswork involved in predicting an
individuals admission by 88 - More mechanical and less driven by nonracial
diversity factors
12No Transcript
13The Cascade Effect
- Racial preference does not only exist at elite
schools - Toptier schools snatch up most qualified
applicants other tiers follow suit - The academic index gap between white and blacks
remain the same up and down the hierarchy of law
schools - LSAC Analysis
- 95 of the nations accredited law schools and
most of the state bar examiners participated - 1991 1997
- The racial gap of academic index does not
disappear at lowertier schools
14No Transcript
15Summary
- Law school admissions offices reply primarily on
academic indices in selecting their students - Since the number of blacks with high academic
scores is small elite law schools achieve
something close to proportional representation
either by maintaining separate black and white
admission tracks or by giving black applicants
large numerical boosts - Cascade effect The use of these preferences by
elite schools gives nearly all other law schools
little choice but the follow suit
16Effects of Affirmative Action on Academic
Performance in Law Schools
- Uses comprehensive LSACBPS data
- Converts each students first year GPA and
graduation GPA into a number standarized for each
school - Findings Low black performance is simply the
direct consequence of the disparity in entering
credentials between blacks and whites at elite
schools
17No Transcript
18Strongest predictors of first yr law school
grades LSAT Score and UGPA
19No Transcript
20Black students academic performance do not
adjust overtime
21Black students are less likely to graduate law
school
22Academic Performance is the most important
indicator of Graduation
23Affirmative Action has a negative effect on black
graduation rates
24Two phenomenons and their effects on attrition
rates
- Boosting of blacks from schools where they would
have average grades to more elite schools where
they would have poor grades - Adds 4 to 5 points to the black attrition rate
- The Cascade Effect lower tier schools admit
black students who would not be admitted to any
schools in absence of racial preferences - Adds 6 to 7 points to the black attrition rate
25Effects of Affirmative Action on Passing the Bar
- Nationally established standards and
administering - While each individual state adds its own portion
of the exam the bar exam itself is produced by
the national professional boards - Only 61.4 of black takers in the national
LSACBPS study passed the bar on their first
attempt - Blacks four times as likely to fail on their
first attempt as whites
26Academic performance is the strongest factor for
bar exam passing
27Blacks have a much higher chance of failing the
bar than whites
28Explanations for the blackwhite gap
- Lower GPAs
- GPA is the strongest determinant of passing the
bar - The Cascade Effect
- A large number of black students enter law school
with very low academic credentials - In 1991 22 of black students matriculating had
an academic index of 500 or less 0.2 of whites
had scores in this range LSACBPS - Among students of all races in this range 60
fail their bar on their first attempt - Both are byproducts of affirmative action
29Theories for the blackwhite gap
- Academic mismatch
- Elite law schools do not mainly focus on passing
the bar - The lonely struggle and the snowball effect
- First semester black law students reported
spending similar time studying as white students
but but found themselves substantially less
prepared for class 1995 National Survey of Law
Student Performance
30The Job Market
- Most powerful predictor of earnings
- Job Location
- First tier New York
- 2nd tier Washington LA Chicago San Francisco
- 3rd tier Atlanta Houston Minneapolis
- Law School GPA
- School Prestige a distant third
- Most powerful predictor of earnings
31No Transcript
32Outside of top 10 law schools there is a large
market penalty for being in or near the bottom of
the class
33No Transcript
34No Transcript
35GPA and earnings for black students in the AJD
Sample
36Flawed system
- Race preference allows black students to attend a
more prestigious school therefore this results
in better jobs based solely on prestige - Analysis shows that employers place more emphasis
on academic performance over prestige - Analysis also shows that employers are more
willing to offer jobs to black applicants - The absence of preference would greatly increase
the supply of blacks with high grades
37Effects of elimination of affirmative action on
black lawyers
- Sanders claim the annual production of new
black lawyers would probably increase if racial
preferences were abolished tomorrow - Current racial preferences boost black applicants
up one to two tiers of prestige
38Raceblind admissions
39No Transcript
40Implications of Results
- Justice OConnor was wrong
- Univ. of Michigans law school just like its
undergraduate college was definitely adding
academic indices for black applicants or using
separate admission decisions - Racial preference is not indispensable and works
against having a reasonable number of blacks in
the legal field - Blacks are actually the victims of law school
programs with affirmative action.
41Suggestions
- Get rid of it
- Minimum percentage
- Prevent black enrollment form falling below 4 of
total enrollment - Since preference is smaller academic gaps would
be smaller between black and white students - Still ensure significant black presence
- The most significant blackwhite gap would be at
elite schools where harmful side effects of aff
action for blacks are minimized and positive
effects are maximized