IGOS Geohazards Workshop 27th 29th June 2005 BRGM, Orleans

1
IGOS Geohazards Workshop27th 29th June 2005
BRGM, Orleans

• Infrastructure Working Group
• WG Membership
• Marc Paganini ESA Chairman
• Warner Marzocchi INGV Rapporteur
• Pierre Thierry BRGM
• Remy Bossu EMSC
• Hans Peter Plag University of Nevada
• Ronan Le Roy SolData
• Max Wyss WAPMERR
• Michel Schouppe European Commission

2
Infrastructure WG MEETING AGENDA

• Context for discussions
• Objectives vs Geohazards implementation plan
• How to reach objectives consensus?
• Preliminary list of objectives
• Task setting formalisation
• Examples of Tasks description

3
CONTEXT FOR DISCUSSIONS

• Access to data (observation, ancillary,
  end-products)
• Data policies (observation, ancillary, end
  products)
• Regional / Global Databases
• Archiving systems
• System inter-operability
• Data Harmonisation and Standardisation
  (Meta-data requirements)
• Dissemination
• User Services
• Legal issues level of reliability (quality
  control),
• Intellectual Property Rights

of global interest for the communities
4
OBJECTIVES vs IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
Potential discrepancies Between The objective
settings written in the implementation plan of
the Geohazards Theme Report April 2004 And The
objectives settings proposed for the 2y
(2006-2007) and 5y (2006-2010) time frame by the
Infrastructure Working Group
How to use the IGOS Geohazards Theme Report in
relation to the work required to each Working
Group?
5
OBJECTIVES

• Harmonise IGOS objective settings with the
  GMES/GEOSS targets related to geohazards.
• Produce inventories of existing databases /
  networks / systems and establish priority
  criteria for accessibility improvement /
  enlargement / harmonisation.(What about their
  lifetime? Are they sustainable?)
• Establish a word-wide volcanic unrest database
  (should start from the WOVODAT database)
  supporting the assessment and guidance during
  emergencies.
• Develop regional databases of critical structures
  (vulnerability of our societies) for use by civil
  protection officials in developing countries
  during emergencies.

6
OBJECTIVES

• Establish an effective real time transmission of
  earthquake loss estimates from international
  experts to civil protection officials in
  developing countries.
• Put in place an homogenous access to world-wide
  monitoring seismic networks (starting on EUROMED
  countries).
• Study the various options for an efficient
  distribution of alert /early warning messages
  particularly in developing countries.

7
TASK SETTING

• Objectives
• Beneficiaries / end-users
• Time Frame (for implementation)
• Need (justification for actions)
• Solution (proposed)
• Budget (available / partially / needed)
• Advantages for the communities
• Risk to fail objective

8
Task
9
Task