Oregon Ag Carbon Work Group - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

Oregon Ag Carbon Work Group

Description:

Ag likely won't be regulated under a greenhouse gas reduction program ... in other words, payments for each type of service provided by the producer ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:53
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: Informatio181
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Oregon Ag Carbon Work Group


1
Oregon Ag Carbon Work Group
2
Introduction
  • Agriculture represents a small percentage of
    greenhouse gas emissions
  • Ag likely wont be regulated under a greenhouse
    gas reduction program
  • Voluntary agricultural practices can help reduce
    greenhouse gas emissions and sequester carbon

3
Ag Carbon Work Group
  • Evaluated opportunities for agricultural offsets
  • Focused on voluntary sequestration/GHG reduction
    projects
  • Ag groups, environmental groups, agencies, offset
    experts participated

4
Offsets Overview
  • Reduction, removal or avoidance of emissions that
    compensates for emissions elsewhere
  • Available for non-regulated sectors
  • Used by regulated sectors to help comply with
    caps in cap-and-trade program

5
Key offset criteria
  • Additional - what will be eligibility date?
  • Real
  • Quantifiable - baseline vs. project reductions
  • Outside of capped sectors
  • Permanent

6
Key questions
  • What types of practices will be eligible for
    offsets?
  • How to reward early adopters
  • What potential do various practices in Oregon
    have to reduce emissions?
  • What prices are necessary to encourage these
    practices?

7
GHGs evaluated
  • Carbon dioxide
  • Methane
  • Nitrous oxide

8
GHG Mitigation
  • Soil sequestration practices
  • Nutrient management
  • Irrigation water management
  • Manure management
  • Livestock diet management

9
Soil Sequestration
  • Reduced tillage
  • Crop rotation
  • Pasture/range management
  • Some data for east side
  • Less data for west side
  • Per-ton incentives will probably be fairly low
    for E Oregon (although lots of other benefits
    from sequestered C)

10
Nitrous oxide reductions
  • Application rates/timing
  • Precision application
  • Controlled-release products
  • Irrigation water management
  • Several research needs identified

11
Livestock diet management
  • Animal selection/breeding
  • Improve feed digestibility
  • Additives to reduce methane production
  • Little to no net economic benefit from practices
    so incentives would help encourage them
  • Need more research to be able to quantify benefits

12
Manure management
  • Minimize anaerobic conditions - aerate manure in
    lagoons
  • Avoid long storage periods
  • Avoid application to saturated soils
  • Anaerobic digesters

13
Energy projects
  • Most energy efficiency and renewable energy
    projects will not be eligible for offsets in the
    long-term.
  • Benefits of these projects will be claimed at the
    utility level.
  • However, there are other incentives available for
    these types of projects.

14
Some conclusions of group
  • Good practices for offsets in Oregon
  • Digesters - benefits are really easy to quantify
  • Soil sequestration practices are eligible for
    some programs already
  • Problems with offsets for other practices
  • Need to reward early adopters
  • Not enough data to quantify the benefits of many
    practices in Oregon at this time
  • Payment amounts for some practices wont be
    enough to encourage them

15
Conclusions
  • We know there are GHG reduction and carbon
    sequestration benefits from many practices, but
    just arent able to quantify them
  • It makes sense to offer incentives for these
    practices - just not necessarily offsets
  • Farm Bill seems to be an appropriate mechanism
  • Many FOTG practices already providing benefits

16
Conclusions
  • Reward ecosystem services that producers are
    providing, including erosion control, water
    quality protection, wildlife habitat, GHG
    reduction, and carbon sequestration
  • Allow stackable incentives - in other words,
    payments for each type of service provided by the
    producer

17
Conclusions
  • Need more research to help quantify benefits of a
    variety of practices
  • Also need technical assistance resources to
    assist producers with GHG reduction and carbon
    sequestration practices
  • Many GHG benefits described in FOTG - describe
    benefits for all practices that reduce GHGs and
    sequester carbon

18
Conclusions
  • Marketing can be another important benefit of
    documenting GHG reductions and carbon
    sequestration - both developing new markets and
    keeping existing markets

19
Next steps
  • Add a column about magnitude of effects to the
    Climate Friendly FOTG practice list
  • Identify systems of practices and compare
    benefits to other systems
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com