High School Restructuring Process

1
High School Restructuring Process
2
Budget Picture and Board Parameters
3
Projected Changes in Revenues and Expenditures

• Changes in Revenues 2005-06 2006-07
• State Aid Increase Per Pupil 1,403,500 1,403,500
  ?
• Increased Student Count 528,975 536,850?
• Other Revenue 119,200 119,200
• Total Increase in Revenue 2,051,675 2,059,550

4

• Changes in Expenditures 2005-06 2006-07
• Net Salary Related Increase 3,168,559 2,819,071
  
• State Retirement Cost Increase
  936,391 1,328,663
• Health Insurance Cost Increase 1,109,916 1,331,
  899
• Supply and Purch. Serv. Increase 209,087
  -
• Capital Outlay Increase 81,539 -
• Utility Cost Increase 309,930 340,000
• Total Increase in Expenditures 5,815,422 5,819,
  633
• Deficit Carry Forward 163,953 ?
• Total Resource Requirement 5,979,375 5,819,633
• Projected Deficit w/o BDRP (3,927,700) (3,760,0
  83)
• BDRP 3,013,020 -
• Projected Deficit w/BDRP (914,680) ?

5
Budget Deficit Reduction Plans

• Additional Revenue Expense Reduction Fund
  Equity Use
• 2003-04 - 3,854,786
  647,398
• 2004-05 462,607 3,381,390
  163,953
• 2005-06 155,000 3,013,020
  914,680

6
Budget Deficit Reduction Plans

• Expense Reductions
• Total Instruction
  Support
• 2003-04 3,854,786 2,078,750
  1,776,036
• 2004-05 3,381,390 2,551,500
  829,890
• 2005-06 3,013,020 2,134,448
  878,572

7
(No Transcript)
8
Board of Education Parameters for Addressing the
Budget Deficit 2006 - 2008

• Reduce Costs in All Areas of the District Budget
• Non-Instructional Operations and Services
• Instructional Programs and Services
• Use Fund Equity in Accordance with Board Policy

9
Restructure Non-Instructional Services

• Restructure non-instructional operations and
  services in the district over a two-year period
  in order for costs to fit long-range budget
  projections
• Maintain quality services within a reduced scope
• Look for creative options for providing services
  at a reduced cost

10
Restructure Instructional Programs and Services

• Review and reduce costs in all instructional
  departments and restructure the secondary
  educational program over a two-year period in
  order for costs to fit long-range budget
  projections

11
Restructure Secondary Program

• Reduce costs in the secondary instructional
  program by 2.3 3 million dollars
• Restructure the instructional programs at
  Berkshire, Derby, and BCS for implementation in
  2006-2007 (1 1.3 million dollars)
• Restructure the instructional programs at Groves
  and Seaholm for implementation in 2007-2008 (1.3
  1.5 million dollars)

12
Secondary Restructuring Goals

• Focus on the following goals in restructuring the
  secondary instructional program
• Maintaining high student academic achievement
• Maintaining or lowering class size
• Maintaining a variety of educational and activity
  choice options for students

13
High School Schedule Development
Process and Timeline
14
High School Schedule DevelopmentTimeline

• February - March Form High School Schedule
  Committee and Do Background Research
• 2/13 Notify High School Staff of Restructuring
  Timeline and Process
• 3/6 3/16 Community Forums Regarding High
  School Restructuring
• 3/22 3/23 High School Schedule Committee
  Meeting (w/ Dr. Rettig)
• 4/19 High School Schedule Committee Meeting
• 5/3 High School Schedule Committee Meeting (w/
  Dr. Rettig)
• 5/4 Presentation to Board of Education, High
  School Staff and Community Regarding Possible
  Schedule Options
• 5/8 5/11 Presentation to Students Regarding
  Possible Schedule Options
• 5/15 5/26 Survey High School Students, High
  School Staff, Grades 7 11 Parents Regarding
  Possible Schedule Options
• 5/30 6/9 Oakland Schools Scores and Analyzes
  Survey Results
• 9/27 9/28 Schedule Committee Meets to Develop
  a Schedule Proposal Based on Survey Results and
  Feedback
• 11/13 11/16 Present Survey Results and
  Schedule Recommendation to Students, Staff,
  Parents
• 11/21 Present Schedule Recommendation to Board
  of Education for Discussion
• 12/5 Board Approval of High School Schedule

15
High School Schedule Development Ad Hoc Advisory
Committee

• The Committee Is a Joint Groves/Seaholm Committee
• Committee Make Up
• Teachers (10)
• Building Administrators (10)
• Parents (8)
• Students (6)
• Central Administration (4)

16
High School Graduation Requirements Development
Process and Timeline
17
High School Graduation Requirements Development
Timeline

• May, 2006 Form Committee and Do Background
  Research
• 8/ 7 10/27 Graduation Requirements Committee
  Meetings
• 11/13 11/16 Present Schedule and Graduation
  Requirements Recommendation to Students, Staff,
  Parents
• 11/21 Present Schedule and Graduation
  Requirements Recommendation to Board of
  Education for Discussion
• 12/5 Board Approval of Schedule and Graduation
  Requirements

18
High School Graduation Requirements Development
Ad Hoc Advisory Committee

• The Committee Is a Joint Groves/Seaholm Committee
• Committee Make Up
• Teachers (15)
• Building Administrators (15)
• Parents (10)
• Students (6)
• Central Administration (4)