Taking Collaboration to the Next Level: Assessing and Enhancing Your Partnerships - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

Taking Collaboration to the Next Level: Assessing and Enhancing Your Partnerships

Description:

Cooperation. One definition: ... Structure: Information sharing, communication, ... re-scored each item based on their new perceptions and group interactions ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:52
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: maryba4
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Taking Collaboration to the Next Level: Assessing and Enhancing Your Partnerships


1
Taking Collaboration to the Next Level
Assessing and Enhancing Your Partnerships
  • Dr. Christopher Smith, University of Kansas
  • Linda Broyles, SEK-CAP Head Start
  • Mary Baskett, Kansas Head Start Association
  • Carrie Hastings, Kansas HS State Collaboration
    Office

2
Presentation Outline
  • Setting the Context Kansas Early Childhood
    Block Grants
  • Defining and Describing Collaboration What does
    it really mean?
  • Developing a new assessment tool
  • Using the tool in the field
  • Applying what weve learned to your needs
  • Q A

3
Setting the Context
  • Kansas Early Childhood Block Grants
  • 11 million fund approved by legislature in 2008
  • Part of the Childrens Initiatives Fund created
    through the tobacco settlement
  • Administered by the Childrens Cabinet
  • 30 set aside for infant/toddler services
  • Grants focused on at-risk children in unserved
    and underserved areas
  • Evidence-based practices
  • Strong accountability measures

4
Setting the Context
  • Two grants involving HS and EHS
  • Kansas Early Learning Collaborative
  • 6 statewide early learning organizations
  • State agencies could partner but not be the lead
  • 6 million to expand and enhance services within
    local collaboratives (EHS, PAT, infant/toddler
    child care, Healthy Families)
  • Initial focus on 12 counties identified through
    an assessment of risk factors, readiness and
    level of interest/commitment

5
Setting the Context
  • Two grants involving HS and EHS
  • Demonstration Projects for the Kansas Preschool
    Program (KPP)
  • Collaborative model based on successful pre-K
    pilots
  • 3 diverse communities, where Head Start is not
    part of the school district
  • Facilitator works with local teams, including
    school district, special needs administration,
    Head Start and child care, to plan integrated
    classrooms
  • Classrooms will begin serving children in August.
  • Process is documented into a learning model for
    other communities.

6
CollaborationWhat Does It Really Mean?
Collaboration
Coalition
Coordination
Cooperation
Networking
7
CollaborationWhat Does It Really Mean?
  • One definition
  • A successful collaborative process enables a
    group of people and organizations to combine
    their complementary knowledge, skills and
    resources so they can accomplish more together
    than they can on their own.
  • Collaboration isnt necessarily the end point
    on the spectrum.
  • What we wanted is for each team to define success
    for itself and move toward that goal.

8
CollaborationWhat Does It Really Mean?
  • We defined a collaborative process or a
    partnership as three-dimensional
  • Structure Information sharing, communication,
    roles and decision-making (Levels of
    Collaboration Scale)
  • Culture Beliefs, values, sense of commitment,
    level of trust (Partnership Assessment Scale)
  • Service Integration Environments, workforce,
    support to children and families (Focus of
    Services Scale)

9
Collaboration What Does It Really Mean?
  • We needed a tool that could serve many functions
  • Assess the current status of the partnership
    across all dimensions (needs assessment)
  • Inform the dialogue among partners in a
    constructive, non-threatening way (facilitation)
  • Guide planning for positive change (strategic
    planning)
  • Provide periodic feedback through repeat
    assessments (continuous improvement)

10
An Example of Scale Use
  • Three versions of the form are used two
    individual scoring forms and a consensus form
  • Individuals in the group scored the items without
    discussion (individual scores are collected
    separately)
  • The group discussed each item and scored them
    with only a consensus score
  • Individuals re-scored each item based on their
    new perceptions and group interactions
    (individual scores are collected separately)

11
  • Levels of Collaboration Scale

12
  • Partnership Assessment Scale

13
  • Focus of Services Scale

14
Sois this tool effective?
  • The tool can be used effectively in large and
    small groupsit is versatile
  • The tool opens the lines of communication
  • The tool equalizes all partners
  • The tool collects valuable baseline data to
    measure where your group stands in regards to
    working in a collaborative process.
  • Use of a tool to measure collaboration can affect
    practice

15
How do you prepare to use the tool?
  • Gather all partnersit is critical not to leave
    anyone out because it is hard to catch up later
  • Meet in a neutral place where all partners feel
    comfortable
  • Set ground rules for collaborative sessions
  • Gain agreement from partners to work to consensus
  • Thoroughly discuss the desired outcomes of the
    activity

16
How will all partners benefit from using
a tool to measure collaboration?
  • The data will shows the groups strengths and
    areas needing improvement
  • Using the tool saves timethe group knows what
    they know and discovers what they dont know!
  • The tool is a relationship builder
  • Results are shared with everyone in the group and
    other partners you may want to attract
  • Results are used for future planning and
    continuous improvement

17
References for Assessment Tool
  • Levels of Collaboration (Structure)Frey, B.B.,
    Lohmeier, J.H., Lee, S.W., and Tollefson, N.
    (2006). Measuring collaboration among grant
    partners. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(3),
    383-392). 
  • Partnership Assessment (Culture)Hardy, B.,
    Hudson, B. and Waddington E. (2000). What makes
    a Good Partnership? A Partnership Assessment
    Tool. Leeds Nuffield Institute for Health.
  • Focus of Services (Service Integration)Adapted
    from the Pyramid Model of Partnership from the
    Center on the Social and Emotional Foundations
    for Early Learning (CSEFEL), Office of Head Start
    and the Child Care Bureau, Administration for
    Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health
    and Human Services.
  •  

18
Contact Information
  • Mary Baskettmbaskett_at_ksheadstart.org
  • Linda Broyleslindab_at_sek-cap.com
  • Carrie Hastingscarrie.hastings_at_srs.ks.gov
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com