Title: OVERVIEW OF THE PRIVATELY MANAGED PENSION FUNDS SECOND AND THIRD PILLAR IN THE EU MEMBER STATES
1OVERVIEW OF THE PRIVATELY MANAGED PENSION FUNDS
SECOND AND THIRD PILLAR IN THE EU MEMBER STATES
- Prof. dr. Yves Stevens
- institute for social law
- President Belgian occupational pension board
2Overview
- Is there no three pillar model?
- Privately managed pension funds in the EU
- Conclusions
3I.IS THERE NO THREE PILLAR MODEL ?
4 Three pillars
- A model that does not exist
- Different approaches
- Anglo saxon and worldbank
- Continental old Europe
- A common European vision ?
- Main advantage
5The three pillar pension systemThe world bank
vision
1. Social security
2. Madatory funded systems
3. Voluntary supplemental benefits
6The three pillar pension systemThe continental
old European vision
3. Voluntary supplementary benefits
2. Mandatory industry sector pensions Company
sponsored benefits
1. Social security benefits
7 Example Bulgaria
- 1st Pillar
- State social security
- Flows of finance are controlled by public
institutions. - 2nd Pillar
- Obligatory
- Individual accounts
- Funded
- 3rd Pillar
WORLDBANK
8 Example Belgium
- 1st Pillar
- State social security
- Flows of finance are controlled by public
institutions. - 2nd Pillar
- Occupational and work-related character
- Mainly voluntary character (for employer, not for
employee) - Flows of finance controlled by social partners or
employers, outsourced to pension funds and/or
financial institutions. - 3rd Pillar
- Flows of finance controlled by private
institutions - Private individual character - voluntary
individual choice to take part.
OLD CONTINENTAL EUROPE
9The three pillar pension systemWhat some critics
say
2. Madatory funded systems
3. Voluntary supplemental benefits
1. Social security
10The three pillar pension systemWhat some critics
say
3. Voluntary supplementary benefits
2. Mandatory industry sector pensions Company
sponsored benefits
1. The social security benefits
11How difficult to define ? Europes quilt
affiliation
level
actors
booking
coverage
fiscal
control
prudent man ? strict state supervision
participation
risk/cost
indvidual ? employer ? society
finance
government
12 What exists
- An integrated pillar coordinated view on every
pension system - Everything is linked to everything
13II. PRIVATELY MANAGED PENSION FUNDS
14 Privately managed pension funds
- Facts
- strong increases in the last 10 years in Europe
- increasing number of individual accounts
- increasing number of DC plans with further
deterioration of DB plans - Shift towards the anglo-saxon model ?
- Directive 2003/41
- Proposal of directive on portability
- Does the World bank model prevail in the new
member states ?
15 Privately managed pension funds
- Some examples what happens in
- France
- Germany
- Italy
- Ireland
- Sweden
- UK
-
16III.CONCLUSIONS
17Conclusions
- The proportion between state and additional
pensions determines the degree of solidarity of
the system. - The bigger the portion of the state pension, the
higher the income redistribution. - The bigger the additional component, the more the
distribution follows the hierarchy of salaries. - The GDP percentage for pensions (state
additional) is almost the same everywhere in the
EU, BUT the smaller the role of the state
pension, the bigger the income inequality is. - On macro-economical level, all pillars constitute
a whole. Save in the 1th pillar and leave the
additional pensions free, is no solution. All
pillars should be regarded together (including
tax benefits to the third pillar).
18Conclusions
- Budget and political constraints limit the
possibilities for the development of the first
pillar. - The role of other pillars becomes more important.
- Pension policy is part of a global social policy
including health care for the elderly,
dependency, poverty exclusion measures, ... - Every Euro spent in whatever pillar remains a
cost that needs to be gained through the economy. - Economic prosperity and growth is a prerequisite
for a sound social system.