OVERVIEW OF THE PRIVATELY MANAGED PENSION FUNDS SECOND AND THIRD PILLAR IN THE EU MEMBER STATES - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

OVERVIEW OF THE PRIVATELY MANAGED PENSION FUNDS SECOND AND THIRD PILLAR IN THE EU MEMBER STATES

Description:

OVERVIEW OF. THE PRIVATELY MANAGED PENSION FUNDS. SECOND AND THIRD PILLAR ... state and additional pensions determines the degree of solidarity of the system. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:55
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: Recht5
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: OVERVIEW OF THE PRIVATELY MANAGED PENSION FUNDS SECOND AND THIRD PILLAR IN THE EU MEMBER STATES


1
OVERVIEW OF THE PRIVATELY MANAGED PENSION FUNDS
SECOND AND THIRD PILLAR IN THE EU MEMBER STATES
  • Prof. dr. Yves Stevens
  • institute for social law
  • President Belgian occupational pension board

2
Overview
  • Is there no three pillar model?
  • Privately managed pension funds in the EU
  • Conclusions

3
I.IS THERE NO THREE PILLAR MODEL ?
4
Three pillars
  • A model that does not exist
  • Different approaches
  • Anglo saxon and worldbank
  • Continental old Europe
  • A common European vision ?
  • Main advantage

5
The three pillar pension systemThe world bank
vision
1. Social security
2. Madatory funded systems
3. Voluntary supplemental benefits
6
The three pillar pension systemThe continental
old European vision
3. Voluntary supplementary benefits
2. Mandatory industry sector pensions Company
sponsored benefits
1. Social security benefits
7
Example Bulgaria
  • 1st Pillar
  • State social security
  • Flows of finance are controlled by public
    institutions.
  • 2nd Pillar
  • Obligatory
  • Individual accounts
  • Funded
  • 3rd Pillar

WORLDBANK
8
Example Belgium
  • 1st Pillar
  • State social security
  • Flows of finance are controlled by public
    institutions.
  • 2nd Pillar
  • Occupational and work-related character
  • Mainly voluntary character (for employer, not for
    employee)
  • Flows of finance controlled by social partners or
    employers, outsourced to pension funds and/or
    financial institutions.
  • 3rd Pillar
  • Flows of finance controlled by private
    institutions
  • Private individual character - voluntary
    individual choice to take part.

OLD CONTINENTAL EUROPE
9
The three pillar pension systemWhat some critics
say
2. Madatory funded systems
3. Voluntary supplemental benefits
1. Social security
10
The three pillar pension systemWhat some critics
say
3. Voluntary supplementary benefits
2. Mandatory industry sector pensions Company
sponsored benefits
1. The social security benefits
11
How difficult to define ? Europes quilt
affiliation
level
actors
booking
coverage
fiscal
control
prudent man ? strict state supervision
participation
risk/cost
indvidual ? employer ? society
finance
government
12
What exists
  • An integrated pillar coordinated view on every
    pension system
  • Everything is linked to everything

13
II. PRIVATELY MANAGED PENSION FUNDS
14
Privately managed pension funds
  • Facts
  • strong increases in the last 10 years in Europe
  • increasing number of individual accounts
  • increasing number of DC plans with further
    deterioration of DB plans
  • Shift towards the anglo-saxon model ?
  • Directive 2003/41
  • Proposal of directive on portability
  • Does the World bank model prevail in the new
    member states ?

15
Privately managed pension funds
  • Some examples what happens in
  • France
  • Germany
  • Italy
  • Ireland
  • Sweden
  • UK

16
III.CONCLUSIONS
17
Conclusions
  • The proportion between state and additional
    pensions determines the degree of solidarity of
    the system.
  • The bigger the portion of the state pension, the
    higher the income redistribution.
  • The bigger the additional component, the more the
    distribution follows the hierarchy of salaries.
  • The GDP percentage for pensions (state
    additional) is almost the same everywhere in the
    EU, BUT the smaller the role of the state
    pension, the bigger the income inequality is.
  • On macro-economical level, all pillars constitute
    a whole. Save in the 1th pillar and leave the
    additional pensions free, is no solution. All
    pillars should be regarded together (including
    tax benefits to the third pillar).

18
Conclusions
  • Budget and political constraints limit the
    possibilities for the development of the first
    pillar.
  • The role of other pillars becomes more important.
  • Pension policy is part of a global social policy
    including health care for the elderly,
    dependency, poverty exclusion measures, ...
  • Every Euro spent in whatever pillar remains a
    cost that needs to be gained through the economy.
  • Economic prosperity and growth is a prerequisite
    for a sound social system.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com