Criterion referencing and rubrics and moderation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 12
About This Presentation
Title:

Criterion referencing and rubrics and moderation

Description:

Quality store-bought taste Medium fat content. 2 - Needs Improvement: ... One of the plot parts is fully developed and the less developed part is at least ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:56
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: 56867
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Criterion referencing and rubrics and moderation


1
Criterion referencing and rubrics and moderation
2
Norm referencing
3
Norm referencing
  • The essential characteristic of norm-referencing
    is that students are awarded their grades on the
    basis of their ranking within a particular
    cohort.
  • From http//www.cshe.unimelb.edu.au/assessinglear
    ning/05/normvcrit.html

4
Criterion referencing
5
Criterion referencing
  • In contrast, criterion-referencing, as the name
    implies, involves determining a students grade
    by comparing his or her achievements with clearly
    stated criteria for learning outcomes and clearly
    stated standards for particular levels of
    performance.
  • From http//www.cshe.unimelb.edu.au/assessinglear
    ning/05/normvcrit.html

6
Criterion referencing
  • Criterion-referencing requires
  • giving thought to expected learning outcomes
  • it is transparent for students,
  • the grades derived should be defensible in
    reasonably objective terms
  • students should be able to trace their grades to
    the specifics of their performance on set tasks.
  • From http//www.cshe.unimelb.edu.au/assessinglear
    ning/05/normvcrit.html

7
Moderation
  • It is also worthwhile to monitor grade
    distributions in other words, to use a modest
    process of norm-referencing to watch the outcomes
    of a predominantly criterion-referenced grading
    model.
  • In doing so, if it is believed too many students
    are receiving low grades, or too many students
    are receiving high grades, or the distribution is
    in some way oddly spread, then this might suggest
    something is amiss and the assessment process
    needs looking at.
  • Is it too easy, to difficult or there might also
    be inconsistencies in the way different assessors
    are judging student work.
  • From http//www.cshe.unimelb.edu.au/assessinglear
    ning/05/normvcrit.html

8
Rubrics
9
Rubrics exercise 1
  • Chocolate chip cookie rubric
  • The cookie elements to be judge are
  • Number of chocolate chips
  • Texture
  • Colour
  • Taste
  • Richness (flavour)

10
Rubrics exercise 2
  • 4 - Delicious
  • Chocolate chip in every biteChewy Golden brown
    Home-baked tasteRich, creamy, high-fat flavour
  • 3 - Good
  • Chocolate chips in about 75 percent of the bites
    taken Chewy in the middle, but crispy on the
    edges Either brown from overcooking, or light
    from being 25 percent raw Quality store-bought
    taste Medium fat content
  • 2 - Needs Improvement
  • Chocolate chips in 50 percent of the bites taken
    Texture is either crispy/crunchy from
    overcooking or doesn't hold together because it
    is at least 50 percent uncooked Either dark
    brown from overcooking or light from undercooking
    Tasteless Low-fat content
  • 1 - Poor
  • Too few or too many chocolate chipsTexture
    resembles a dog biscuit BurnedStore-bought
    flavour with a preservative aftertaste stale,
    hard, chalky Non-fat contents

11
Rubrics exercise 3
12
Rubrics
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com