Severe Wernickes Aphasia: Using Augmented Input Strategies to Improve Communication 8 8 8 8

1
Severe Wernickes AphasiaUsing Augmented Input
Strategies to Improve Communication 8 8 8
8

• Kathryn Garrett PhDCCC-SLP
• Duquesne University Pittsburgh PA /
• Private Practice
• Ruth Mason Richman MS CCC-SLP
• Newton-Wellesley Hospital Newton MA

ASHA 2007 -- BOSTON 1 hour Seminar
2
What is Wernickes aphasia

• A fluent aphasia according to Geschwinds
  classification system
• A posterior aphasia syndrome caused by lesions to
  the superior temporal gyrus according to the
  Boston classification system
• A syndrome of aphasia that impacts the phonologic
  and semantic system and results in
• significantly reduced language comprehension
• reduced ability to produce intelligible speech
• Paraphasias and jargon
• NOT apraxia of speech

Courtesy Natl Aphasia Association
3
Traditional neuroanatomic correlates of
Wernickes aphasia syndrome
Gray matter (cortical) frequent white matter
(subcortical) involvement
4
Possible Etiologies

• Middle cerebral artery (posterior branches)
  thrombotic or embolic events
• Internal or common carotid artery occlusions
• Anterior branches of the posterior cerebral
  artery
• Anoxic events leading to infarcts in the
  watershed areas -- ends of the arterial
  distribution zones
• Tumors abscesses
• Focal TBIs

5
Facts about Wernickes aphasia syndrome

• Represent approximately 13 of all patients with
  aphasia (Brust et al. 1976 Wade et al. 1986)
• Older than average - compared with general
  population of stroke patients (Damasio 1988
  Obler 1978)
• physiologic basis for this phenomenon is not
  known
• Perform very poorly on standardized tests if
  willing to participate secondary to
• Linguistic Deficits
• Behavioral Rigidity
• Why are you doing this to me I dont understand
  what you want from me! OR
• Impulsive responding
• Egocentric focus
• Clinician Are the lights on in this room
• Client Well we always turn them on dont
  we

6
Expressive characteristics

• Unintelligible gibberish
• Jargon paraphasias and neologisms -- a random
  soup of sounds
• Perception of another language being spoken
• Grammatic utterances (subjects are identifiable
  actions can be deduced)
• Phonological encoding breakdowns - jargon
• Lexical mapping difficulties - semantic
  paraphasias
• Occurs during generative speech and repetition
• Press of speech/logorrhea/uninhibited output
• Preserved intonation suggests ideation and
  communicative intent exist despite bizarreness of
  speech production

7
Behavioral manifestations

• Limited insight into the cause of expressive
  communication breakdowns
• May demonstrate frustration when others do not
  understand
• May give up when encountering communication
  breakdowns (Marshall 2001)
• And not persist ask for clarification or
  attempt to convey the message through other
  methods
• May retreat and seldom initiate (Marshall 2001)

8
Comprehension difficulties

• Wide range of impairment severity
• Pure word deafness intermittent
  comprehension
• Phonologic decoding problems
• Semantic decoding problems
• Auditory processing (nonlinguisic) problems also
  can interfere with successful comprehension
  (Brookshire 1987)
• Initial attending and focus (slow rise time)
• Information capacity or memory
• Noise buildup / internal perseveration
• Intermittent imperceptions

Video Illustration MM Baseline
9
Auditory information is transient

• Cannot be processed quickly or efficiently enough
  for meaning to be mapped onto the
  acoustic/phonologic signal
• People with Wernickes aphasia often miss
• general ideas and topics
• specific details
• nuances
• lost in a fog of sounds words and references
  that mean nothing

10
Writing mirrors speech output
11
Compounding the problem

• Cognition
• Confused and disoriented
• Externalize the problem (Why are you asking me
  this)
• General lack of awareness regarding extent and
  impact of comprehension impairment
• At times seems to go beyond challenges attributed
  to comprehension deficit alone
• May need to see this speech written down to
  understand that their output is unintelligible to
  others
• Have difficulty thinking strategically to use
  other communication strategies

12
Impairments often lead to

• Frustration
• Dependence on others to direct their daily
  schedule
• No viable means of communicating basic needs
• No means of engaging in social interaction
• Family frustration and sadness
• Misdiagnoses
• Inappropriate discharge plans or shortened
  rehabilitation stays

13
Surprises -- competencies revealed in meaningful
contexts

• Intermittent meaningful verbal output in some
  conversations
• E.g. It was a a furrilous time. The boys ser
  pin to them reference to Steelers football
  victory
• But never on demand
• Say football
• no response or darsimee

14

• Intermittent functional auditory comprehension
• Clinician Here why dont I get you your
  coatit looks like youll need it out there
  today.
• Client No no no problemwalks over to coat
  rack and retrieves jacket
• But never on demand
• Clinician Point to the coat rack
• no response

15
The Clinical Problem

• Therapy is often difficult to implement
• Success is difficult to achieve
• Stimulation/repetition approaches are typically
  unsuccessful at improving speech intelligibility
• No direct methods to effect change
• Poor comprehension and limited awareness result
  in
• Inability to benefit from feedback or
  instructions
• Lack of forward movement within therapeutic
  process

16
A clinical wish list

• Interrupt the cycle of unsuccessful communication
  as quickly as possible
• Find a modality through which the individual can
  receive some meaningful input and make sense out
  of his/her world
• Identify predictable contextual routines within
  which the individual can begin to express and
  comprehend successfully
• Demonstrate success before an untimely discharge
  from therapy occurs

17
SLP treatment for Wernickes aphasia

• Significantly less attention in the medical and
  SLP literature than for anterior or anomic
  aphasia syndromes
• Seminar focus - management of auditory
  comprehension deficits
• Impairment-based approaches to remediate
  auditory comprehension deficits appear to be the
  most commonly employed in adult therapy settings
• Stimulation therapy
• Presentation of increasingly difficulty auditory
  tasks and stimuli (e.g. commands point to
  discrimination tasks) with
• Repeated trials
• Feedback
• Hierarchy of cues
• Marshalls Controlled Auditory Stimulation
  Program (Lexicon Press)

18
Partner-supported strategies

• Kagan 1998 -- Supported Conversation
• Implies that the focus of remediation extends
  beyond the communicator
• Includes partners and environmental contexts
• Strategies implemented by partners in real-life
  contexts aim to minimize or bypass the disability
  versus fix the impairment
• Communication Ramp
• Goal better communication and increased
  participation in relevant life activities

19
Augmented Input

• Developed by Garrett Beukelman (1992 1998) and
  Garrett Lasker (2005) to improve the
  conversational comprehension of adults with
  aphasia
• Definition Any visual-verbal strategy employed
  by the communication partner that increases the
  message comprehension of the communicator with
  aphasia

20
Partner provides

• Written key words
• Gestures
• Referential pointing
• Individual symbolic gestures
• Pantomime
• Referential graphics
• Maps
• Pictures
• Objects

21
Partner presents graphic support in real time

• Writes or draws while communicating key concepts
  to denote
• topics and topic changes
• key ideas
• questions and response choices
• References text (point) to match auditory with
  visual input
• Clinician Did you hear about the new mayor
• Client nonverbally conveys limited
  comprehension
• Clinician So the new mayor point to written
  key word mayor after it is written is that
  youngster Luke point to printed name then
  write 28 y.o.. Right
• Client Yeah
• Clinician Its hard to believe isnt it
• Client Well you know that...right there
  serty-tar points to 28 y.o.
• Clinician Yes thats pretty young to run the
  city isnt it!

22
The partner should also

• Stop periodically to check comprehension
• Are you with me Did you get that
• What do you think Is that right
• Yes or no

23
Bonus - more intelligible spoken language may
occur

• Encourage expression of key word targets but
  dont force them
• May emerge later in the session
• Then bring clients attention to his/her
  intelligible productions
• Clinician You said this word mayor - great! I
  understood it! point to previously written key
  word -- mayor
• Client Thats right I did..layer..mardi..
• Clinician Dont worry about ityoull say
  mayor againwell talk about Mayor Luke next
  time points to written key words
• Client Mayor sukee thats right suke.

24
Implementation - Augmented Input

• Teach partners to
• Observe communicator for receptive breakdowns
• Provide augmented input to resolve breakdowns as
  needed
• Intermittently (e.g. novel topics)
• Continuously (write while talking)
• Collect materials needed
• Notebooks and pens
• Referential items - scrapbooks photos

25
Theoretical Base

• Sevcik et al. (1991) -- partners real-time
  reference to graphic symbols can increase the
  comprehension orientation functional
  understanding and participation of individuals
  with severe intellectual disabilities in
  meaningful daily activities
• Symbols are selected based on the partners
  judgment regarding the communicators current
  referential interest
• Static visual symbols vs. transient auditory
  symbols
• PECS schedule boxes commenting boards story
  boards on-line drawings and gestures
• More fundamental level of meaning is conveyed in
  pictorial symbols than in auditory-verbal words

26
Case Illustration Demographics

• Personal History
• 86 year-old retired mechanical engineer
• 3 years post onset at time of our intervention
• Married with 2 adult children
• Lives with wife at home (condominium)

27
Participation Assessment

• Pre-stroke levels of activity
• World traveler
• Member of multiple social clubs and organizations
• Extensive circle of friends (though diminishing
  in recent years due to deaths of friends)
• Enjoyed conversing storytelling debating
• Frequent phone conversations with friends family
• Life of the party

28
The Stroke

• Medical History
• Ischemic left CVA at age 83 (November 2003)
• Left frontotemporalparietal insula basal
  ganglia CVA with concomitant atrial fibrillation
  
• Respiratory distress and intubation
• Severe dysphagia/G-tube (4 mos)
• Initial diagnosis -- Global aphasia
• Confused and minimally responsive -- 1st month

29
Therapy History

• Acute inpatient rehab
• 1 week then DCs to
• Subacute inpatient rehab
• December 2003 -- February 2004
• Home health therapy for 2 months
• February 2004 -- April 2004
• Outpatient at a Rehab facility
• May 2004 -- July 2004
• Compensatory tx focus to enhance expression
• Gestures drawing pointing picture recognition
• Copying matching names to pictures
• Functional game-playing
• Limited success with regard to reestablishing
  functional communication negative prognosis for
  return of functional speech
• DCd secondary to poor prognosis for return of
  functional speech
• Referred to Duquesne aphasia therapy group

30
Participation Assessment

• Post-stroke / Before Augmented Input
• Had not traveled since his stroke at time of
  intervention
• Limited social interaction despite residence in
  same community and condominium
• Some participation in a social group for men with
  cognitive impairments
• Restaurant and library outings with his wife
• Participated minimally in phone conversations
• Watched a lot of T.V.
• Frequent communication difficulties and arguments
  with his wife (primary caretaker and
  communication partner)
• Also retreated and did not persevere to
  understand or convey a message

31
Results of Formal Assessment

32
Cognitive Task - Trailmaking (CLQT)
33
Spontaneous Speech

• How are you today unintelligible
• What is your name FFirs
• What was your job OK. There unint
  well way back unintell
• Tell mepicnic picture pointed to
  items fence and then this
  part
• PLUS
• Phonemic paraphasiasperseverative jargon

34
Spontaneous Writing Sample
35
Structured Writing/Drawing Sample --Favorite
Vacation
36
Visual Scanning Task

• No field cuts
• Sustained concentration
• Overall fair-good comprehension of task given
  initial model/cues
• 0 omissions (100)
• 5 additions (38 additions)
• http//aac.unl.edu

37
Phase I Intervention -- Outpatient Clinic

• Types of Therapy
• Individual Therapy -- 2 semesters (1X weekly)
• Introduction to augmented input
• Inhibition and conscious control of perseverative
  or jargon (nonfunctional) output
• Helm-Estabrooks Albert stop strategy
• Oral reading approach (Cherney et al)
• Phrase-picture matching
• Yes-no response training (tagged yes-no
  technique Garrett Lasker 2005)
• Group therapy -- Scaffolded Disourse Model
  (Garrett Ellis 1998 Garrett Staltari Moir
  2006)
• Props supported conversation and thematically
  relevant activities

38
Phase I Intervention -- Outpatient
ClinicJanuary 2005

• Therapy Strategies
• Augmented Input
• Continuous written key word input generated by
  partner to supplement spoken output
• Additional partner gestures and use of graphic
  materials
• Referential (pointing - to speaker to referent)
• Symbolic gestures
• Pantomime
• Pocket Talker portable personal amplifier
• Used during group for approximately 3 semesters
• Recently rejected
• appeared to have triggered ongoing engagement and
  attention to spoken output of others
• Photo Album - topic setter
• Introduced 3 years post onset (Summer 2007)
• Currently used during group reminiscing or
  conversational activities only opportunities

39
Examples of augmented input to enhance MMs
comprehension

• Topic -- explaining wifes unexpected heart
  surgery and related events

40
Examples of augmented input to enhance MMs
comprehension

• Topic -- daughter-in-law suggesting a lunch
  location

41
Clinical Outcomes -- Phase I

• Immediate acceptance of augmented input
• Frequent pointing to tablet to request input from
  partner
• General impression of more intelligible on-topic
  verbal speech that corresponded (somewhat) with
  printed key words
• Could also point to written word choices to
  answer specific wh-questions
• Increased attempts to draw some concepts (though
  not a primary strategy)
• Better shifting of attention to speakers in group
• Became a true participant in group activities
• Began to pantomime and gesture to add information
• Limited his perseverative jargon output in
  response to Stop cues
• In general Manny understood that he needed to
• Convey meaning as understandably as possible
• Follow what others have said

42
Home Outcomes -- Phase I

• Encouraged Mannys spouse to implement the
  strategy at home
• Sylvia expressed an interest
• Technique was modeled
• Formal instruction delivered on multiple
  occasions
• Coaching and practice - multiple occasions
• Initial Outcome
• Commented on immediate and beneficial effect on
  participation
• But voiced confusion regarding its purpose
  (wanted him to say the words)
• Intrapersonal barrier (Acceptance)
• Did not buy tablets
• Said she did not use the technique at home
• he understands pretty well
• I had him try to copy some words

43
But

• What good is a clinical partner-dependent
  strategy if real-life partners dont use it
• Therapy has done no lasting good

44
Phase 2 Intervention The End Run 1 year later

• Mannys Spouse -- Medical Emergency
• Family (dau dau-in-law) in town for an extended
  stay
• Frequent observations of group therapy
• Immediate acceptance of strategies
• Made requests to implement strategy at home
• Ganging up
• Bought 5 tablets and pens
• Placed them in all rooms of Mannys residence
  while spouse was in the hospital
• Upon her discharge to home daughters used
  strategy at every opportunity to model it
• Encouraged spouse to implement augmented input
  and gave her feedback

45
3 Video Clips from interview

• 1. KG modeling Augmented Input
• Topic -- resuming their winter visits to Florida
• Swimming suits
• 2. Interview with Daughter
• 3. On with life!

46
Behavioral Changes

• Increased orientation
• Increased on topic verbal and gestural comments
• Increased verbal intelligibility
• Increased ability to shift attention across
  multiple speakers (especially in group)
• Increased ability to indicate comprehension level
  and conceptual focus by referencing (pointing) to
  key words written by partners
• Less frustration about communication
• Sylvia has decreased her attempts to have Manny
  repeat words
• More satisfying and communicative phone calls
• Manny is happier (except for boredom)

47
Conclusions

• Augmented input when implemented habitually and
  strategically by trained conversational partners
  changed Mannys ability to participate
• in daily communication with spouse/family members
• in aphasia therapy/interactions with other peers
  with aphasia

48
Future research

• Identify a means of measuring message
  comprehension in response to augmented input
  before conducting systematic research
• Indirect -- how do we know they understood
• Perceptual ratings
• Quantify nonverbal behaviors
• Compare participation communicative success and
  changes in comprehension with and without
  augmented input
• Across severity levels
• Types of partners
• Types of settings
• Measure factors affecting implementation among
  communication partners
• Training type and intensity
• Attitudinal - Is augmented input a style or a
  technique that can be learned by all

49
Final Thoughts

• Easy to implement (at a technical level)
• Materials Notebooks whiteboards markers
  calendars maps natural gestures
• Can be implemented with acute patients and
  outpatients
• Can be taught quickly to partners (although may
  take longer to habituate)
• Augmented Input complements other contextual
  strategies
• Contextual group or individual therapy
• Picture Symbol strategies (e.g. topic setters)
• Response Elaboration Therapy (Kearns et al)
• Thought-centered Therapy (Wepman)

Assists in meeting Marshalls (2001) challenge of
reestablishing a successful communication
connection as quickly as possible
50
Selected References

• Brust JCM Shafer SQ Richter RW Bruun B
  (1976). Aphasia in acute stroke. Stroke 7
  167-174.
• Damasio H Tranel D Spradling S Alliger R.
  (1988). Aphasia in men and women. in Galaburda A
  (ed) Neurons to Reading. Cambridge Mass MIT
  Press pp 1-20.
• Dronkers N. F. Wilkins D. P. Van Valin R.
  D. Redfern B. B. Jaeger J.J. (2004).
  Lesion analysis of the brain areas involved in
  language comprehension. Cognition 92(1-2)
  145-177.
• Eslinger PJ Damasio AR Age and type of aphasia
  in patients with stroke. (1981). Neurol Neurosurg
  Psychiatry 44 377-381.
• Garrett K. Lasker J. (2005) Adults with
  severe aphasia. In D. Beukelman P. Mirenda
  (Eds.) Augmentative communication Management of
  severe communication disorders in children and
  adults 3rd edition (pp. 467-504). Baltimore
  Brookes Publishing Co.
• Garrett K. Ellis G. (1999) Group
  communication therapy for persons with long-term
  aphasia Scaffolded thematic discourse
  activities. In Elman R. (Ed.) Group treatment
  of neurogenic communication disorders The expert
  clinicians approach (pp. 85-96). Boston
  Butterworth-Heinemann
• Kagan A. (1998). Supported conversation for
  adults with aphasia methods and resources for
  training conversation partners. Aphasiology 12
  816-830.
• Knepper L.E. Biller J. Tranel D. Adams
  H.P. Jr Marsh E.E. (1989). Etiology of stroke
  in patients with Wernickes aphasia. Stroke 20
  1730-1732.
• Lasker J. Garrett K. Fox L. (2007)
  Severe aphasia. In D. Beukelman K. Garrett K.
  Yorkston (Eds). Augmentative Communication
  Strategies for Adults with Acute or Chronic
  Medical Conditions. Baltimore Brookes
  Publishing Company. Pp. 163-206.
• Marshall R. (2001) Management of Wernickes
  aphasia A context-based approach. (Chapter 18)
  In R. Chapey (Ed.) Language Intervention
  Strategies in Aphasia and Related Neurogenic
  Communication Disorders 4th ed. Philadelphia
  Lippincott Williams Wilkins. Pp. 435-456.
• Obler LK Martin AL Goodglass H Benson F.
  (1978). Aphasia types and aging. Brain Lang 6
  318-322.
• Peach R. (1995) Treating the fluent aphasias.
  Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation 21-14.
• Sevcik R. A. Romski M. A. Wilkonson K. M.
  (1991). Roles of graphic symbols in the language
  acquisition process for individuals with severe
  cognitive disabilities. Augmentative and
  Alternative Communication 7 161-170.
• Wade DT Hewer RL David RM Enderby PM (1986).
  Aphasia after stroke Natural history and
  associated deficits. J Neurol Neurosurg
  Psychiatry 49 11-16.
• Wood L. A. Lasker J. Siegel-Causey E
  Beukelman D. R. Ball L. (1998). Input
  framework for augmentative and alternative
  communication. Augmentative and Alternative
  Communication 14 261-267.