Title: UPDATED STATISTICAL POSTPROCESSING RESULTS WITH THE NCEP AND MSC GLOBAL ENSEMBLE FORECASTS
1UPDATED STATISTICAL POST-PROCESSING RESULTS WITH
THE NCEP AND MSC GLOBAL ENSEMBLE FORECASTS
- Bo Cui1, Zoltan Toth2, Yuejian Zhu2, Dingchen
Hou1 - David Unger3, Stéphane Beauregard4
- 1SAIC at Environmental Modeling Center, NCEP/NWS
- 2Environmental Modeling Center, NCEP/NWS
- 3Climate Prediction Center, NCEP/NWS
- 4Canadian Meteorological Centre, Meteorological
Service of Canada - Acknowledgements
- Jeff Whitaker, Tom Hamill, Richard Verret,
Richard Wobus
2 Outline
- Statistical post-processing results
- Methods
- decaying averaging bias estimate
- climatological mean bias estimate, CDC GFS
refcst. data set (Hamill Whitaker) - bias estimate using 31-day centered running mean
fcst. error - (optimal benchmark )
- Variables bias corrected, 2004
- 500 mb height, 850 mb temperature, 2m
temperature, 10m U and V - components
- Comparison of NCEP CMC ensemble performance
before and after CMC January upgrade - Canadian ens. fcst on Jan.12, 2005, the Optimal
Interpolation - Technique for the analysis cycle was replaced
with the Ensemble Kalman - Filter Technique
- Current work and future plan
- Correlation between observed anomalies and ens.
mean fcst. errors - The 2nd moment bias correction
3Bullet 1
RPSS 500 mb Height, Northern Hemisphere March,
2004 February, 2005
OPR_DAV2 RPSS improved for all
lead time RFC_COR significant
improvement for all lead time vs.
RFC_RAW
4Bullet 1
RMS 500 mb Height, 2004 Summer Northern
Hemisphere
OPR_DAV2 RMS error reduced for first
week RFC_COR improvement for all lead
times wrt RFC_RAW
5Bullet 1
PAC 500 mb Height, 2004 Summer Northern
Hemisphere
OPR_DAV2 PAC scores slightly
improved for first few days RFC_COR
very limited improvement over
RFC_RAW
6Bullet 1
Excessive Outliers 500 mb Height, 2004 Summer
Northern Hemisphere
OPR_DAV2 improved performance
for up to 5-7 days RFC_COR improvement
for all lead time vs. RFC_RAW
7Bullet 1
RPSS 850 mb Temperature, 2004 Summer Northern
Hemisphere
8Bullet 1
ROC 850 mb Temperature, 2004 Summer Northern
Hemisphere
9Bullet 1
RPSS 10m V component, Northern Hemisphere
March, 2004 February, 2005
10Bullet 1
RPSS 2m Temperature, Northern Hemisphere
March, 2004 February, 2005
11Bullet 1
Comparison of the Decaying Average Equal Weight
Approaches
RPSS 500 mb Height of Northern Hemisphere,
2004 Autumn
- Bias is calculated over some previous days with
equal weight for each day - Difficult to distinguish the difference between
OPR_DAV2 and OPR_EQU curves by eye -
- The decaying average approach and the equal
weight approach are equivalent. - Decaying average approach has the advantage
the bias updated every day by only considering
last day data
12Second Moment Bias-Correction Algorithm RPSS
500 mb Height, 2004 Summer, Northern Hemisphere
OPR_DAV2S no improvement vs. OPR_DAC2
OPR_RFC_DAV2 no improvement for all
lead time vs. OPR_DAC2
13PRELIMINARY RESULTS
- 1. Decaying averaging ( 2 weight, 30-day oper.
training data) - Short range Works very well, all measures
improved (Day 5) - Week 2 Limited success
- Degrades ensemble mean (rms, PAC)
- Improves probabilistic performance (ie, outlier
stats, RPSS) -
- 2. Climatological mean error removed (25-yr CDC
training data) - RMS and PAC Very limited improvement
- Probabilistic measures (RPSS, etc) significant
gain - 3. Operational (raw or bias-corrected) vs. CDC
bias-corrected ens - Ensemble mean Operational much better than CDC
hindcast - CDC has 50 larger initial error
- Probabilistic scores Operational much better
for out to day 10 - For some measures, CDC hindcasts better beyond
day 10
14TENTATIVE CONCLUSIONS
Bullet 1
- 1. Adaptive, regime dependent bias correction
works well for first few days (almost as good as
optimal) - Frequent updates of DA/NWP modeling system
possible - 2. Climate mean bias correction can add value,
especially for wk2 prob. fcsts - Generation of large hind-cast ensemble is
expensive but can be helpful
15Bullet 2
Before CMC January Upgrade RPSS 500 mb Height,
Northern Hemisphere Dec.1, 2004 Jan. 10, 2005
The two systems have big different performances
16Bullet 2
After CMC January Upgrade RPSS 500 mb Height,
Northern Hemisphere Jan. 15, 2005 Feb. 28,
2005
The two systems now appear to have a similar
level of skill over the NH in terms of
probabilistic scores.
17Bullet 3
- Correlation between the Obs. Anomalies Fcst.
Errors - Top 500 mb Height Fcst. Error Observed Anomaly
at (40 N, 95 W), 2004 ( the anomaly added as
day 17) - Bottom 500 mb Height Residual Error Observed
Anomaly - the fcst. errors increase with fcst. lead time.
The growth is nearly linear. The fcst. errors are
a function of lead time, and longer lead times
are strongly correlated with observed events. - the fcst. errors have higher frequency details
compared the residual errors.
18Bullet 3
Current Work Future Plans
- Utilizes the correlation between the obs.
anomalies ens. perturbation and fcst. errors - Preliminary Results
- The ens. mean fcst. error is a function of lead
time. The correlation between the - observed anomalies and the ens. mean fcst error
is very high. This suggests that - the ens. mean fcst error is dominated by the
observed verifying anomalies. The - time mean errors may not be closely related to
systematic errors. - Purpose
- remove the observed anomaly from the error fields
before they are used as - estimates of the bias.
- Method
- decompose the total error into (a) component
parallel to obs. anomaly - (b) residual error, orthogonal to obs.
Anomaly (M. Wei). - remove error component along obs. anomaly from
total error and work with residual component for
bias estimation. - The 2nd moment bias correction
- Current method, no significant improvement, the
calculation of the 2nd - moment ratio needs more consideration (David
Unger).
19Questions and Comments?More plots on
http//www.emc.ncep.noaa.gov/gmb/ens/
20Bullet 1
METHOD / APPLICATION 1
- Adaptive (Kalman Filter type) Bias-Correction
Algorithm
Implementation of decaying averaging for 1st
moment bias
decaying averaging mean error (1-w) prior
t.m.e w (f a)
For each lead time separately, tme time mean
error
- Application to NCEP Operational Ensemble
- OPR_RAW NCEP T00Z 10 ensemble forecasts
- OPR_DAV2 w 2 (most recent 30 days used)
- OPR_OPT 31-day centered running mean forecast
error is removed, operationally not feasible,
used as optimal benchmark
21METHOD / APPLICATION 2
Bullet 1
- CDC GFS Reforecast Data Set (Hamill Whitaker)
- Model T62L28 MRF, circa 1998
- Initial states NCEP Reanalysis
- Duration 15 days runs at 00Z from 19781101 to
now - Ensemble Breeding, 10 members used from 15
Climatological (out of sample) mean forecast
error (25 yrs) removed (1979-2003, 1st moment)
- RFC_RAW
- CDC reforecast ensemble forecasts (no bias
correction) - RFC_COR
- Calibrated CDC reforecast
- RFC_OPT
- 31-day centered running mean forecast error
is removed, operationally not feasible, used as
optimal benchmark
22METHOD / APPLICATION 5
- Use large hindcast data set for correcting
operational fcst. by using decaying average
difference between operational and reforecast -
-
FCSTclibriated FCSTOPR BIAS25yr_clim
BIASOPR-RFC
- Application to NCEP Operational Ensemble
- OPR_RFC_DAV2 25-year climatological mean
fcst. errors and decaying averaging mean error
(w2) between NCEP operational and CDC refcst.
removed
23METHOD / APPLICATION 6
- Second Moment Bias-Correction Algorithm
ratio r.m.s of ensemble mean / standard
deviation
decaying averaging mean ratio (1-w) prior
time mean ratio w ratio
FCSTclibriated FCSTmean Ratio ( FCSTm-
FCSTmean )
For each lead time separately
- Application to NCEP Operational Ensemble
-
- OPR_DAV2S w 2 (most recent 30 days
used) -
24Bullet 2
Before CMC January Upgrade RPSS 500 mb Height,
Northern Hemisphere Dec.1, 2004 Jan. 10, 2005
The two systems have big different performances
25Bullet 2
After CMC January Upgrade RPSS 500 mb Height,
Northern Hemisphere Jan. 15, 2005 Feb. 28,
2005
The two systems now appear to have a similar
level of skill over the NH in terms of
probabilistic scores.