UPDATED STATISTICAL POSTPROCESSING RESULTS WITH THE NCEP AND MSC GLOBAL ENSEMBLE FORECASTS - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

UPDATED STATISTICAL POSTPROCESSING RESULTS WITH THE NCEP AND MSC GLOBAL ENSEMBLE FORECASTS

Description:

The two systems have big different performances. 16. After CMC January Upgrade ... The two systems now appear to have a similar level of skill over the NH ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:42
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: boc4
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: UPDATED STATISTICAL POSTPROCESSING RESULTS WITH THE NCEP AND MSC GLOBAL ENSEMBLE FORECASTS


1
UPDATED STATISTICAL POST-PROCESSING RESULTS WITH
THE NCEP AND MSC GLOBAL ENSEMBLE FORECASTS
  • Bo Cui1, Zoltan Toth2, Yuejian Zhu2, Dingchen
    Hou1
  • David Unger3, Stéphane Beauregard4
  • 1SAIC at Environmental Modeling Center, NCEP/NWS
  • 2Environmental Modeling Center, NCEP/NWS
  • 3Climate Prediction Center, NCEP/NWS
  • 4Canadian Meteorological Centre, Meteorological
    Service of Canada
  • Acknowledgements
  • Jeff Whitaker, Tom Hamill, Richard Verret,
    Richard Wobus

2
Outline
  • Statistical post-processing results
  • Methods
  • decaying averaging bias estimate
  • climatological mean bias estimate, CDC GFS
    refcst. data set (Hamill Whitaker)
  • bias estimate using 31-day centered running mean
    fcst. error
  • (optimal benchmark )
  • Variables bias corrected, 2004
  • 500 mb height, 850 mb temperature, 2m
    temperature, 10m U and V
  • components
  • Comparison of NCEP CMC ensemble performance
    before and after CMC January upgrade
  • Canadian ens. fcst on Jan.12, 2005, the Optimal
    Interpolation
  • Technique for the analysis cycle was replaced
    with the Ensemble Kalman
  • Filter Technique
  • Current work and future plan
  • Correlation between observed anomalies and ens.
    mean fcst. errors
  • The 2nd moment bias correction

3
Bullet 1
RPSS 500 mb Height, Northern Hemisphere March,
2004 February, 2005

OPR_DAV2 RPSS improved for all
lead time RFC_COR significant
improvement for all lead time vs.
RFC_RAW
4
Bullet 1
RMS 500 mb Height, 2004 Summer Northern
Hemisphere
OPR_DAV2 RMS error reduced for first
week RFC_COR improvement for all lead
times wrt RFC_RAW

5
Bullet 1
PAC 500 mb Height, 2004 Summer Northern
Hemisphere
OPR_DAV2 PAC scores slightly
improved for first few days RFC_COR
very limited improvement over
RFC_RAW

6
Bullet 1
Excessive Outliers 500 mb Height, 2004 Summer
Northern Hemisphere
OPR_DAV2 improved performance
for up to 5-7 days RFC_COR improvement
for all lead time vs. RFC_RAW

7
Bullet 1
RPSS 850 mb Temperature, 2004 Summer Northern
Hemisphere
8
Bullet 1
ROC 850 mb Temperature, 2004 Summer Northern
Hemisphere
9
Bullet 1
RPSS 10m V component, Northern Hemisphere
March, 2004 February, 2005


10
Bullet 1
RPSS 2m Temperature, Northern Hemisphere
March, 2004 February, 2005

11
Bullet 1
Comparison of the Decaying Average Equal Weight
Approaches
RPSS 500 mb Height of Northern Hemisphere,
2004 Autumn
  • Bias is calculated over some previous days with
    equal weight for each day
  • Difficult to distinguish the difference between
    OPR_DAV2 and OPR_EQU curves by eye
  • The decaying average approach and the equal
    weight approach are equivalent.
  • Decaying average approach has the advantage
    the bias updated every day by only considering
    last day data


12
Second Moment Bias-Correction Algorithm RPSS
500 mb Height, 2004 Summer, Northern Hemisphere


OPR_DAV2S no improvement vs. OPR_DAC2
OPR_RFC_DAV2 no improvement for all
lead time vs. OPR_DAC2
13
PRELIMINARY RESULTS
  • 1. Decaying averaging ( 2 weight, 30-day oper.
    training data)
  • Short range Works very well, all measures
    improved (Day 5)
  • Week 2 Limited success
  • Degrades ensemble mean (rms, PAC)
  • Improves probabilistic performance (ie, outlier
    stats, RPSS)
  • 2. Climatological mean error removed (25-yr CDC
    training data)
  • RMS and PAC Very limited improvement
  • Probabilistic measures (RPSS, etc) significant
    gain
  • 3. Operational (raw or bias-corrected) vs. CDC
    bias-corrected ens
  • Ensemble mean Operational much better than CDC
    hindcast
  • CDC has 50 larger initial error
  • Probabilistic scores Operational much better
    for out to day 10
  • For some measures, CDC hindcasts better beyond
    day 10

14
TENTATIVE CONCLUSIONS
Bullet 1
  • 1. Adaptive, regime dependent bias correction
    works well for first few days (almost as good as
    optimal)
  • Frequent updates of DA/NWP modeling system
    possible
  • 2. Climate mean bias correction can add value,
    especially for wk2 prob. fcsts
  • Generation of large hind-cast ensemble is
    expensive but can be helpful

15
Bullet 2
Before CMC January Upgrade RPSS 500 mb Height,
Northern Hemisphere Dec.1, 2004 Jan. 10, 2005


The two systems have big different performances
16
Bullet 2
After CMC January Upgrade RPSS 500 mb Height,
Northern Hemisphere Jan. 15, 2005 Feb. 28,
2005


The two systems now appear to have a similar
level of skill over the NH in terms of
probabilistic scores.
17
Bullet 3
  • Correlation between the Obs. Anomalies Fcst.
    Errors
  • Top 500 mb Height Fcst. Error Observed Anomaly
    at (40 N, 95 W), 2004 ( the anomaly added as
    day 17)
  • Bottom 500 mb Height Residual Error Observed
    Anomaly
  • the fcst. errors increase with fcst. lead time.
    The growth is nearly linear. The fcst. errors are
    a function of lead time, and longer lead times
    are strongly correlated with observed events.
  • the fcst. errors have higher frequency details
    compared the residual errors.

18
Bullet 3

Current Work Future Plans
  • Utilizes the correlation between the obs.
    anomalies ens. perturbation and fcst. errors
  • Preliminary Results
  • The ens. mean fcst. error is a function of lead
    time. The correlation between the
  • observed anomalies and the ens. mean fcst error
    is very high. This suggests that
  • the ens. mean fcst error is dominated by the
    observed verifying anomalies. The
  • time mean errors may not be closely related to
    systematic errors.
  • Purpose
  • remove the observed anomaly from the error fields
    before they are used as
  • estimates of the bias.
  • Method
  • decompose the total error into (a) component
    parallel to obs. anomaly
  • (b) residual error, orthogonal to obs.
    Anomaly (M. Wei).
  • remove error component along obs. anomaly from
    total error and work with residual component for
    bias estimation.
  • The 2nd moment bias correction
  • Current method, no significant improvement, the
    calculation of the 2nd
  • moment ratio needs more consideration (David
    Unger).

19
Questions and Comments?More plots on
http//www.emc.ncep.noaa.gov/gmb/ens/
20
Bullet 1
METHOD / APPLICATION 1
  • Adaptive (Kalman Filter type) Bias-Correction
    Algorithm

Implementation of decaying averaging for 1st
moment bias
decaying averaging mean error (1-w) prior
t.m.e w (f a)
For each lead time separately, tme time mean
error
  • Application to NCEP Operational Ensemble
  • OPR_RAW NCEP T00Z 10 ensemble forecasts
  • OPR_DAV2 w 2 (most recent 30 days used)
  • OPR_OPT 31-day centered running mean forecast
    error is removed, operationally not feasible,
    used as optimal benchmark

21
METHOD / APPLICATION 2
Bullet 1
  • CDC GFS Reforecast Data Set (Hamill Whitaker)
  • Model T62L28 MRF, circa 1998
  • Initial states NCEP Reanalysis
  • Duration 15 days runs at 00Z from 19781101 to
    now
  • Ensemble Breeding, 10 members used from 15
  • Bias correction

Climatological (out of sample) mean forecast
error (25 yrs) removed (1979-2003, 1st moment)
  • Experiments
  • RFC_RAW
  • CDC reforecast ensemble forecasts (no bias
    correction)
  • RFC_COR
  • Calibrated CDC reforecast
  • RFC_OPT
  • 31-day centered running mean forecast error
    is removed, operationally not feasible, used as
    optimal benchmark

22
METHOD / APPLICATION 5
  • Use large hindcast data set for correcting
    operational fcst. by using decaying average
    difference between operational and reforecast

FCSTclibriated FCSTOPR BIAS25yr_clim
BIASOPR-RFC
  • Application to NCEP Operational Ensemble
  • OPR_RFC_DAV2 25-year climatological mean
    fcst. errors and decaying averaging mean error
    (w2) between NCEP operational and CDC refcst.
    removed

23
METHOD / APPLICATION 6
  • Second Moment Bias-Correction Algorithm

ratio r.m.s of ensemble mean / standard
deviation
decaying averaging mean ratio (1-w) prior
time mean ratio w ratio
FCSTclibriated FCSTmean Ratio ( FCSTm-
FCSTmean )
For each lead time separately
  • Application to NCEP Operational Ensemble
  • OPR_DAV2S w 2 (most recent 30 days
    used)

24
Bullet 2
Before CMC January Upgrade RPSS 500 mb Height,
Northern Hemisphere Dec.1, 2004 Jan. 10, 2005


The two systems have big different performances
25
Bullet 2
After CMC January Upgrade RPSS 500 mb Height,
Northern Hemisphere Jan. 15, 2005 Feb. 28,
2005


The two systems now appear to have a similar
level of skill over the NH in terms of
probabilistic scores.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com