REVIEWING SIGNIFICANT ASSUMPTIONS - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 16
About This Presentation
Title:

REVIEWING SIGNIFICANT ASSUMPTIONS

Description:

All the significant forecasting assumptions and risks underlying the ... Influencing Factors/climate/coastal occupation. Employment/Economic Development ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:31
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: Val
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: REVIEWING SIGNIFICANT ASSUMPTIONS


1
REVIEWING SIGNIFICANT ASSUMPTIONS
  • SOLGM Financial Management Seminar
  • October 2006

2
This Session
  • Review of our statutory obligations
  • Consider our significance policy and our current
    assumptions
  • Potential change factors
  • Review process and response
  • BERL Presentation
  • Table discussion

3
Statutory Obligations
  • An LTCCP must (Section 10) clearly identify
  • All the significant forecasting assumptions and
    risks underlying the financial estimates
  • The assumptions of the Council concerning the
    useful life of significant assets, and the
    sources of funds for future replacement of
    significant assets and
  • Where significant forecasting assumptions involve
    a high level of uncertainty, the fact of that
    uncertainty

4
Significant
  • The Act defines significant as the degree of
    importance on and consequences for
  • The district or regions wellbeing
  • Persons particularly interested in, or affected
    by, the matter and
  • The capacity of the Council to perform its role,
    and the financial and other costs of doing so.
  • The (potential) changes materiality on expenses
    and revenues, assets and liabilities, levels of
    service

5
Annual Plan Requirements
  • Section 95 requirements
  • The Annual Plan will support the LTCCP
  • Identify any variation from the LTCCP, including
    the nature and reasons for that proposed
    variation
  • The impact of the proposed variation on the
    community
  • Extend opportunities for public participation in
    decision making (related to the variation)

6
Significance Policy
  • Review threshold levels in our policy
  • Asset base movement
  • Turnover projections
  • Transfer ownership or control of strategic assets
  • Private sector partnerships
  • Extent that levels of service may change
  • Affected number or groups of people

7
What are our current Assumptions?
  • Growth expectations
  • Influencing Factors/climate/coastal occupation
  • Employment/Economic Development
  • Impact on capital, operations and revenue
  • Inflation/Price changes
  • BERL Indicators
  • Six Categories
  • Transit Funding Levels
  • Interest Rates

8
What are our Significant Assumptions
  • Project cost and priority
  • Required Return on investments
  • Funding Arrangements
  • Development contributions
  • Risks to Assumptions
  • Fuel and energy cost variation
  • Climate change/Planning impacts
  • Political Expectations
  • Legislative Impact

9
Potential Change Factors
  • Inflation Impact on Cost Structure
  • Operational, Capital and Revenue
  • Changes in levels of service
  • Delivery issues or cost issues
  • Growth rate variations
  • Economic factors or geographic impact
  • Revenue stream impact
  • Development contributions
  • Projects that have arisen outside the LTCCP

10
Potential Change Factors
  • Changes to Council Policy
  • Project timing
  • Impact on capital works programme/funding
  • Impact of Natural Disaster
  • Funding requirements/operational impact
  • Significant variations on contract renewal
  • Review of our assessed risk factors

11
Impact of reducing Rates?
  • What level of Political pressure may we be
    subjected to?
  • Detail the impact on current/planned levels of
    service
  • Impact on Projected Balance Sheet
  • Assess the longer term effect of not doing
    something as planned
  • Could we be exposed to a potential amendment?

12
Review Process
  • Process requires us to consider what may trigger
    a change in the use or cost of our resources
  • Refresh the numbers
  • Start with LTCCP Year 2
  • Year 1 (end of year) projections
  • Financial impact of project delays
  • Community Impact
  • Entire district or smaller community impact

13
Review Process
  • Inflation was incorporated to prevent wild swings
    in financial projections
  • Current CPI ahead of BERL figures, but how
    significant
  • Avoid reactionary changes
  • Significance policy section 97
  • Impact on threshold levels
  • Changes in levels of service
  • Have we triggered a review/amendment?

14
Reasonableness Test
  • Are changes common sense and understandable
  • Inflation rate
  • Fuel price based costs
  • Interest rates
  • Reprioritising of capital projects
  • Growth factors
  • Are we looking at permanent affect?
  • Change may be required
  • If not, note potential impact and timing factors

15
Marketing the Plan
  • Consultation requirements and expectations
  • Highlight the changes (and the reasons) rather
    than the standard operational activities
  • Solicit local input to localised issues
  • Levels of service impacts
  • Project priority
  • Benefit to the community
  • Note any longer term impact of any variations

16
Conclusion
  • What was the basis for establishing our policy
    and assumptions 12 months ago
  • What has really changed?
  • How significant is the change?
  • Will the changes potentially lead to an LTCCP
    amendment?
  • Changes must be based on common sense, logic, and
    be marketable!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com